December 2024 - openstack-discuss

OpenStack metrics and logs
by Timothé Bauge 11 Dec '24

11 Dec '24

Hello Stackers, I would like to know what are you all using to monitor and supervise your Openstack clusters ? We are in the process of setting up our own private cloud based on RedHat OpenStack Platform 17.1, we choose not to go with the RedHat Service Telemetry Platform, and were strongly advise against Ceilometer and aodh. At the moment, we built our own stack based on Prometheus (with the plenty of exporters) for the metrics, Graylog + OpenSearch for the logs, and Grafana for the visualisation. For now, we are only looking to retrieve basic information in order to know if a dysfunction occurs, but the end goal might be to go as far as to be able to count the cpu/mem/disk usage per hour per vm per project, etc. So, what are you all using and how did you implement it ? Best regards, [cid:659cb34d-63ad-4c5a-94e4-734ef252c20b] Timothé BAUGÉ timothe.bauge(a)covage.com<mailto:pr%C3%A9nom.nom@covage.com> COVAGE I Wholesale B2B du Groupe Altitude

3 3

Re: [openstack-helm] [Cinder] Cinder-Scheduler oslo_privsep.daemon.FailedToDropPrivileges: Privsep daemon failed to start
by daniel890723＠gmail.com 11 Dec '24

11 Dec '24

Hello Daniel here I have been test and trying to solve the oslo_privsep.daemon.FailedToDropPrivileges: Privsep daemon failed to start Error on openstack-helm deployed Cinder After the test with kolla-ansible i can confirm the problem is from kubernetes So i perform the test with all Cinder Service with Priviliged true setting in Value.yaml: pod: security_context: volume_usage_audit: pod: runAsUser: 42424 container: cinder_volume_usage_audit: readOnlyRootFilesystem: true privileged: true allowPrivilegeEscalation: true cinder_api: pod: runAsUser: 42424 container: ceph_coordination_volume_perms: runAsUser: 0 readOnlyRootFilesystem: true cinder_api: readOnlyRootFilesystem: true allowPrivilegeEscalation: true privileged: true cinder_scheduler: pod: runAsUser: 42424 container: ceph_coordination_volume_perms: runAsUser: 0 readOnlyRootFilesystem: true cinder_scheduler: capabilities: add: - SYS_ADMIN privileged: true readOnlyRootFilesystem: true allowPrivilegeEscalation: true Also Glance-api container too: pod: security_context: glance: pod: runAsUser: 42424 container: glance_perms: readOnlyRootFilesystem: true runAsUser: 0 ceph_keyring_placement: readOnlyRootFilesystem: true runAsUser: 0 glance_api: privileged: true readOnlyRootFilesystem: true allowPrivilegeEscalation: true nginx: readOnlyRootFilesystem: false runAsUser: 0 With Cinder and Glance container set as priviliged container the problem is gone and i can create volume with image normally So it is confirmed that the ERROR is because the pod permission Also my System Setup: | OS | Ubuntu:22.04 | | Kubernetes | 1.30.4 | | Openstack-helm | 2024.1 | P.S. i haven't test with a complete clean enviroment with only Ceph and Openstack component installed Daniel Lu

3 3

[nova] Specs review day is TODAY and Spec soft freeze is TOMORROW
by Sylvain Bauza 11 Dec '24

11 Dec '24

Hi folks, As we discussed on yesterday's nova meeting, today is our second specs review day and tomorrow (Dec 12th) will be the last day for providing a new spec to be reviewed. Please see our schedule here: https://releases.openstack.org/epoxy/schedule.html Thanks, -Sylvain

1 0

Open Stack APIs
by foram.thakkar＠crestdata.ai 10 Dec '24

10 Dec '24

Hello, We want to fetch all the servers present in all the projects a user has access to. Currently we have to provide any one project name in the body of the authentication call. Is there a way we can fetch all the projects without providing any project name?

3 3

[tc][all] OpenStack Technical Committee Weekly Summary and Meeting Agenda (2025.1/R-16)
by Goutham Pacha Ravi 10 Dec '24

10 Dec '24

Hello Stackers, We're 16 weeks away from the 2025.1 ("Epoxy") release date (2024-04-02) [1]. OpenStack project teams are planning bug squashes and review jams in the next couple of weeks before contribution activity slows due to end-of-the-year holidays around the world. The OpenStack Technical Committee did not merge any new governance changes this week; however, a few proposals are iterating with community and TC review. === Weekly Meeting === The OpenStack Technical Committee held its monthly video conference last week, which was simultaneously recorded via text on IRC [2][3]. The discussion tracked several TC initiatives for this release cycle [4]. Most notably, the recent migration of base integration jobs to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS and Python 3.12 has caused CI jobs to break for several code repos [5]. I’d like to reiterate that project teams must resolve these issues or temporarily pin the nodeset of their test jobs to "ubuntu-jammy" to buy some time for fixes. We then checked on the status of "unmaintained" branches. The release team wanted the TC to solidify processes for two specific issues: nominating "unmaintained" liaisons and establishing guidelines for retiring these branches. The lack of such processes has resulted in the proliferation of "unmaintained" code branches across the community and failure to implement the TC resolution that created these branches [6]. The oldest unmaintained branch is "unmaintained/victoria", and it’s unclear if anyone benefits from keeping it around. Discussion on cleanup has been delayed due to uncertainty about what to do [7]. Meanwhile, branches like Yoga may still have high usage and active contributors, emphasizing the need for a clear process to decide their fate. The technical committee may consider advising the release team to eliminate branches with low usage, but this doesn’t solve the problem of finding volunteers to maintain high-usage branches. The idea is that projects can opt to maintain more branches if there is sufficient user interest and support, but there is currently no process for this, nor is it clear how to recruit volunteers. We agreed to continue this discussion at the next meeting. However, in the meantime, there were no objections to EOL-ing the Victoria, Wallaby, and Xena branches. Clark Boylan (clarkb) noted an issue with building CentOS Stream 10 images using Disk Image Builder, as they cannot boot on several clouds due to the x86_64 v3 CPU instruction set requirement. Only a few provider clouds, including OpenMetal and Rackspace Flex, meet the CPU requirements to boot CentOS 10. This limitation may affect options for regular test nodes, and project teams are advised to take notice. Until all Zuul/Nodepool cloud providers meet the CPU requirements, teams may need to adjust their testing strategies. Jeremy Stanley (fungi) reminded us that nominations for individual member representatives for the OpenInfra Foundation Board of Directors are still open [8]. Ten nominations from members are required to make it onto the ballot. The OpenStack TC's next weekly meeting is today, 2024-12-10. This will be an IRC meeting hosted on #openstack-tc at 1800 UTC. Please find the agenda on the meeting wiki [9]. I look forward to seeing you there. === Governance Proposals === ==== Open for Review ==== Add ansible-role-httpd repo to OSA-owned projects | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/935694 Retire Murano/Senlin/Sahara OpenStack-Ansible roles | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/935677 Rework the initial goal proposal as suggested by people | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/931254 Resolve to adhere to non-biased language | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/934907 Propose to select the eventlet-removal community goal | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/934936 Thank you very much for reading! On behalf of the OpenStack TC, Goutham Pacha Ravi (gouthamr) OpenStack TC Chair [1] 2025.1 "Epoxy" Release Schedule: https://releases.openstack.org/epoxy/schedule.html [2] TC Meeting Video Recording, 2024-12-03: https://youtu.be/KlYbFxjhACs [3] TC Meeting IRC Log 2024-12-03: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2024/tc.2024-12-03-18.00.log.html [4] TC Tracker for 2025.1: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-2025.1-tracker [5] Runtime update to Ubuntu 24.04/Python3.12: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/migrate-to-noble [6] TC Resolution to create "unmaintained" code branches: https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20230724-unmaintained-branc… [7] Transition "victoria" code branch to EOL: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/935373 [8] Nominations for OpenInfra Individual Board Member Elections: https://lists.openinfra.dev/archives/list/foundation@lists.openinfra.dev/th… [9] TC Meeting Agenda, 2024-12-10: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee

1 0

Kolla-Ansible: Why is handling kolla_*_fqdn in /etc/hosts out of scope?
by Matthias Tinnemeier 10 Dec '24

10 Dec '24

Dear Community, According to the documentation (https://docs.openstack.org/kolla-ansible/2024.2/admin/advanced-configuratio…) the provisioning of kolla_*_fqdn Name Resolution via /etc/hosts must be managed outside of the scope of Kolla. The question, therefore, is why :-) Given the existence of "customize_etc_hosts", there should be at least some logic to implement this behaviour in an automatic way. Is there a particular reason why this is not being implemented via Kolla? Alternatively, would it be worth proposing a patch for this? With kind regards Matthias

1 0

a suggestion: use LDAP to manage all openstack components configuration
by Shi Wei 10 Dec '24

10 Dec '24

Hi, everyone, I have a suggestion. we can use LDAP service to mange all openstak components and nodes(including physical nodes and vm nodes).  Because ldap is easy to read and ldap can support DNS and DHCP service. if a node get ip address by DHCP server with ldap. You and get the Mac address information from the LDAP server. and if all components are communicated by domain name. all records are on the LDAP server. if the one node will change IP address, you can just modify on the ldap server.  The ldap server can easy to backup and extend. use ldap command to export as a ldf file.   you can easy to backup before update configuration. if a new component will join, you can extend the schema by .sch file.  

2 1

[ops][largescale-sig] Join the Large Scale OpenStack virtual meetup with Rackspace !
by Thierry Carrez 09 Dec '24

09 Dec '24

Hi everyone, This cycle the Large Scale SIG is organizing virtual meetups, where operators of large-scale OpenStack deployments come to discuss their experiences, challenges and solutions with fellow operators. On Thursday, December 5, at 16 UTC (10am CT, 5pm Paris), we'll have our first one. The special guest for this meetup will be Kevin Carter, operator of the Rackspace Cloud. It will last one hour and will happen through a video meeting. To join us, please fill this form and we'll send you the link for the event the day before! https://forms.gle/92o1DTavHwivN8tn6 Hoping to see you there. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)

4 6

OpenStack API Ports
by darsh.mehta＠crestdata.ai 09 Dec '24

09 Dec '24

I’m working with OpenStack APIs and noticed that the following endpoints use specific ports: Port 5000: - /auth/tokens?nocatalog - /auth/projects Port 8774: - /servers/detail - /flavors/detail - /images/detail - /os-hypervisors/detail I would like to know: Are these default port assignments (5000 for authentication and 8774 for compute services) configurable? Under what circumstances might these ports change? For example, would they differ in custom deployments or under certain OpenStack configurations?

3 2

[upgrades][openstack-ansible][upgrade from Wallaby to Antelope or Caracal]
by mmunther＠creativeadvtech.com 09 Dec '24

09 Dec '24

Hi Everyone, Kindly we would like to upgrade from Wallaby to something more recent such as Antelope or Caracal. We also have Ubuntu 20.04 and would like to upgrade the OS to Ubuntu 22.04. What would be the correct upgrade path for such a scenario using openstack ansible. Thanks Best Regards Monis

3 2

[neutron] Bug deputy report for week of December 2nd
by Miguel Lavalle 09 Dec '24

09 Dec '24

I was the Neutron bug deputy last week. Following is a brief summary of the reported bugs: Critical bugs ----------------- https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2091021 Fullstack ha failover tests from neutron.tests.fullstack.test_l3_agent.TestHAL3Agent failing due to "destination ip 42.0.0.15 is replying to ping from namespace test-3dc5c664-ddba-4c2e-a9a9-48bbda478506, but it shouldn't". Assignee Slawek Kaplonski. Proposed fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/937097 High bugs -------------- https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2091071 ovn-agent: exception when deleing agent. Assignee Kien Nguyen. Proposed fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/936988 Medium bugs ------------------ https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2090825 AAP arp entry has incorrect mac address. Assignee Vasyl Saienko. Proposed fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/936807 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2090913 [ovn]Allow multiple IPv6 ports on router from same network on ovn_l3. Assigned to Liu Xie. Proposed fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/936931 Low bugs ------------- https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2091106 OVN information in networking-ovn, Assignee: Brian Haley. Proposed fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/937296 Under investigation -------------------------- https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2090921 The OVN database is missing 6 ACL for security group default after each redeployment. Assignee Brian Haley https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2091211 network leakage for flat network. Marked as incomplete for now pending more information from submitter

1 0

about accelerating database initialization
by Jiatong Shen 08 Dec '24

08 Dec '24

Hello all, I am trying to find out if there are ways to accelerate the database initialization process. We are using openstack-helm for deployment victoria OpenStack cluster and internally openstack-helm uses nova-manage db sync command to bootstrap the database. It works but a little bit slower than expected. Right now, I am measuring this bootstrap command could took around 2 minutes to complete. I'd like to get some advices on accelerating the process as well as what is the reasonable time to have. Thank you very much for your insights. -- Best Regards, Jiatong Shen

2 1

[HORIZON] configure for multiple labs at once
by Ishan Shanware (ishanwar) 08 Dec '24

08 Dec '24

Hey Stackers, I wanted to know if it’s possible to view the horizon dashboard for multiple openstack labs at once from the same UI ? thanks Ishan

3 2

[Kolla] Transition Yoga and Zed to EOL
by Jakub Darmach 05 Dec '24

05 Dec '24

Hello, As agreed during the latest IRC meeting, Kolla Yoga and Zed deliverables (Kolla, Kolla-Ansible, Kayobe) are going EOL. [1] Antelope remains as unmaintained, while Bobcat, Caracal and Dalmatian are our current stable releases. Yoga and Zed branches were unmaintained for a while, Kolla community does not have resources to support those branches actively. All changes to those branches have been abandoned. [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/937101 Best regards, *Jakub Darmach*

1 0

Open Stack APIs
by darsh.mehta＠crestdata.ai 05 Dec '24

05 Dec '24

Hello, We want to create an integration with OpenStack for which we require the REST APIs to connect to OpenStack. However, OpenStack provides 2 offerings i.e. Cloud and On-Prem. We are referring to the OpenStack API documentation available over here https://docs.openstack.org/api-quick-start/api-quick-start.html#. But it does not specify anywhere whether the APIs are for cloud or on-prem. Are the APIs same for both or do we have separate documentation for each of these? Thanks in advance!

4 3

[Neutron] WSGI migration issues and eventlet requirements bump
by Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez 05 Dec '24

05 Dec '24

Hello Neutrinos: There is a patch [1] that is trying to bump the eventlet upper version. However, the tempest job is failing because of Neutron. There is a series of patches [2][3][4][5] that are trying to address the problems we are having with the migration to WSGI. I would ask you to review them soon in order to unblock the requirements patch. On top of this series there is a testing patch with several tempest jobs running. We still have some problems but they are limited. Thanks! [1]https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/933257 [2]https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/936428 [3]https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/936813 [4]https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/936838 [5]https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/934409

1 0

OpenStack is Now on Bluesky
by Helena Spease 05 Dec '24

05 Dec '24

Hello Everyone, We’re thrilled to announce that OpenStack and the OpenInfra Foundation now have a presence on Bluesky! This is part of our continued effort to connect with our community and share updates in new and engaging ways. Here’s where you can now find us: - OpenStack on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/openstack.org - OpenInfra Foundation on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/openinfra.org Don’t forget, that OpenStack is already active on these platforms: - Mastodon: https://social.openinfra.dev/@OpenStack - Twitter: https://x.com/OpenStack - LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/openstack/ And, the OpenInfra Foundation is already active on these platforms: - Mastodon: https://social.openinfra.dev/@OpenInfra - Twitter: https://x.com/openinfradev - Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openinfradev - LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/openinfra-foundation Join the conversation and engage with the OpenInfra community wherever you are most active! Cheers, Helena helena(a)openinfra.dev Community Programs Coordinator The OpenInfra Foundation <https://openinfra.dev/>

1 0

OSA adding compute without deploy host
by Derek O keeffe 05 Dec '24

05 Dec '24

Hi all, I have a controller and 2 compute setup that was deployed some time ago with OSA. It's been running fine since it was deployed but we now have the need for more compute and I was looking at the deploy host to add a compute host to the cluster. Unfortunately it seems the deploy host was repurposed and I have lost all the config. So two questions, 1) Is it possible to manually add a compute to the cluster (I fairly confident this is a yes) and 2) if so is there any documentation or how to that someone could point me to/share? any help would be greatly appreciated. Regards,Derek

2 2

[kolla-ansible][neutron][openvswitch]
by Adam Tomas 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

Hi everyone. I have strange problem with neutron ml2 plugin. I have a little strange setup: controllers in networkA/subnetA computesA in networkA/subnetA computesB in networkB/subnetB (separate L2, controllers can be connected via routing) Because computesB are on different LAN I had to put on two computes in that lan neutron-dhcp-agents and add them to networks served for instances in locationB. In addition aggregates are created so, that if an instance has network from locationB then it has to start on computes in locationB. computes and controllers have one flat network (vlan 21) ans three vlan networks (221, 51 and 251),, vlans 21 and 221 are in locationA, 51 and 251 in locationB, the ml2_plugin is configured like below: [ml2_type_vlan] network_vlan_ranges = physnet1:221:221,physnet2:51:51,physnet3:251:251 bond0 is the neutron_external_interface and has vlan 21 as native and 221,51 and 251 as tagged vlans. Openstack networks are mapped to corresponding physnets. dhcp_agents in location A are working without any problems, vm's are started without any problem in vlans 21 and 221 with addresses from all subnets from networks in these vlans. In location B when I add dhcp_agent the port is doen (namespaces qdhcpxxxxxxxxx are created on computesB and are replying to their own address, but not the gateway or any other address), port status of dhcp_agent is DOWN, and in logs I have: Device Port(admin_state_up=True,allowed_address_pairs=[],binding_levels=[],bindings=[PortBinding],created_at=2024-12-01T17:52:25Z,data_plane_status=None,description='',device_id='dhcpfd2f8da2-397b-5456-a75c-f9c5bbccb8b1-81b9ac42-6267-48e2-8352-0ae5c09d85fa',device_owner='network:dhcp',device_profile=<?>,dhcp_options=[],distributed_bindings=[],dns=None,fixed_ips=[IPAllocation,IPAllocation],hints=None,id=08c60b9d-ea8f-4a2d-a3b7-5f787d15f45d,mac_address=fa:16:3e:37:27:0c,name='',network_id=81b9ac42-6267-48e2-8352-0ae5c09d85fa,numa_affinity_policy=<?>,project_id='c0e2f3d69c064ae5b5596fd150d550d7',qos_network_policy_id=None,qos_policy_id=None,revision_number=2,security=PortSecurity(08c60b9d-ea8f-4a2d-a3b7-5f787d15f45d),security_group_ids=set([]),status='DOWN',updated_at=2024-12-01T17:52:25Z) is not bound. Device 08c60b9d\-ea8f\-4a2d\-a3b7\-5f787d15f45d not defined on plugin or binding failed Port 08c60b9d-ea8f-4a2d-a3b7-5f787d15f45d cannot update to ACTIVE because it failed. _port_provisioned /var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/neutron/plugins/ml2/plugin.py:357 Why the same configuration works in LocationA? In location B the same situation is with all ports - even if I create a port "by hand". The error message (in debug mode!) says not much - Device 08c60b9d\-ea8f\-4a2d\-a3b7\-5f787d15f45d not defined on plugin or binding failed, how can I find what is wrong? I would appreciate any help. Best regards, Adam Tomas

1 1

[kolla-ansible][nova] Refresh cell cache in nova scheduler
by Satish Patel 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

Folks, What is wrong here, I do have the following hostname resolvable from all the nodes even if they are in the /etc/hosts file, Why is the following task saying UNREACHABLE and from where its trying to reach ? PLAY [Refresh nova scheduler cell cache] ***************************************************************************************************************************************************** TASK [nova : Refresh cell cache in nova scheduler] ******************************************************************************************************************************************* fatal: [os2-bos-ctrl01]: UNREACHABLE! => {"changed": false, "msg": "Data could not be sent to remote host \"os2-bos-ctrl01\". Make sure this host can be reached over ssh: ", "unreachable": true} fatal: [os2-bos-ctrl02]: UNREACHABLE! => {"changed": false, "msg": "Data could not be sent to remote host \"os2-bos-ctrl02\". Make sure this host can be reached over ssh: ", "unreachable": true} fatal: [os2-bos-ctrl03]: UNREACHABLE! => {"changed": false, "msg": "Data could not be sent to remote host \"os2-bos-ctrl03\". Make sure this host can be reached over ssh: ", "unreachable": true}

4 5

[octavia] [lbaas] [ovs] Is octavia sr-iov supporting tunnels?
by yardalgedal＠gmail.com 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

Hi, Openstack Team, Is new octavia sr-iov feature supporting vxlan tunnels like in ovs or it can work only with provider networks (vlan)?

3 2

[kayobe] Running seed on ansible control host
by Olaf Trygve Berglihn 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

Dear list, Can someone explain how to configure kayobe to set up the seed hypervisor and seed vm on the ansible control host (where you run 'kayobe seed hypervisor host configure' and 'kayobe seed vm provision')? Thanks! -Olaf

2 5

[masakari] failures with new version of Eventlet
by Herve Beraud 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

Hey Masakari maintainers, Masakari is failing with new the version of Eventlet https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/933257 This job failure indicates that Masakari will surely stop working correctly once this version bump will be merged, and we need that requirements bump to support newer versions of Python in OpenStack, so... Masakari is a non-voting job, so even if this job is failing, the requirement bump will proceed, but that would be better if every project is compatible and ready to go. If you need help do not hesitate to: - join us on #openstack-eventlet-removal; - join us at our next meeting (Dec 17) https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Eventlet-removal#Recurring_Events. Thanks for your hard work. -- Hervé Beraud Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat irc: hberaud https://github.com/4383/

1 0

[horizon] Upstream weekly meeting cancelled Dec 4
by Tatiana Ovchinnikova 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

Hi team, Since half of our team is on PTO tomorrow, I am cancelling the meeting. See you all on December 11! With kind regards, Tatiana

1 0

[OSSA-2024-005] Neutron: Authorization bypassed when setting tags on Neutron networks (CVE-2024-53916)
by Jay Faulkner 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

=========================================================================== OSSA-2024-005: Authorization bypassed when setting tags on Neutron networks =========================================================================== :Date: December 03, 2024 :CVE: CVE-2024-53916 Affects ~~~~~~~ - Neutron: >=23.0.0 <23.2.1, >=24.0.0 <24.0.2, >=25.0.0 <25.0.1 Description ~~~~~~~~~~~ Tore Anderson of Redpill Linpro AS discovered that Neutron does not apply the proper policy check for changing network tags. An unprivileged tenant is able to change (add and clear) tags on network objects which do not belong to the tenant, and this action is not being subjected to the proper policy authorization check. Patches ~~~~~~~ -https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/936849 (2023.2/bobcat) -https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/936846 (2024.1/caracal) -https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/936843 (2024.2/dalmatian) -https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/935883 (2025.1/epoxy) Credits ~~~~~~~ - Tore Anderson from Redpill Linpro AS (C, V, E, -, 2, 0, 2, 4, -, 5, 3, 9, 1, 6) References ~~~~~~~~~~ -https://launchpad.net/bugs/2088986 -http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-53916 -- Jay Faulkner OpenStack VMT

1 0