January 2024 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[neutron][vpnaas][ovn] Pushing VPNaaS support through OVN
by Mohammed Naser 13 Feb '24

13 Feb '24

Hi all! One of the biggest show stoppers for us for OVN is VPNaaS but I think it’s time that we’d like to be involved in getting it over the line, I want to thank Bodo who has shown a lot of patience in getting the code necessary, and it seems that the code works for them in production as well. I’d like to ask if possible for folks to review these two outstanding changes: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/847007 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/765353 I know Slawek had some concerns, so hoping that raising via the email list if Bodo can address those and over the next bit of time we can get this landed in, since it even has actual proper testing both in CI and with user feedback. Thanks! Mohammed

6 8

about magnum capi for production
by Nguyễn Hữu Khôi 08 Feb '24

08 Feb '24

Hello guys. Could you share with me some experience about using Magnum CAPI in production? https://github.com/vexxhost/magnum-cluster-api Thank you so much. Nguyen Huu Khoi

6 44

Glance image import to AWS S3 fails for files larger than 5GB
by Shrishail K 06 Feb '24

06 Feb '24

Hi Team, I have a use case where I need to replicate images from file store to S3 store. While image creation directly on S3 works fine with large files over 5G. The same fails when attempted via image-import with copy-image method. The failure is due to AWS rejecting a single object upload operation where the object size is over 5GB. What I see from logs is that direct image creation on S3 uses multipart upload when images are large. However, I fail to see the same happening when image import was used to copy an image from file to s3. Is this a known issue? Or Am I missing some configs related to image-import? Openstack version: Antelope Client version: 6.4.0 Thanks, Shrishail

3 14

[puppet] Retiring puppet-qdr
by Takashi Kajinami 06 Feb '24

06 Feb '24

Hello, Let me restore my old proposal[1] about puppet-qdr. # I lost access to my old emails so I'm starting a new thread. In the previous mail I proposed deprecation instead of retirement, because the module has been used by TripleO. However I noticed that TripleO is now under the process of complete retirement[2]. So, I'd like to revise my proposal, and propose retiring the module completely. Please let me know if you have any concern with this module retired. Unless I hear any objections, I'll start the official retirement process. [1] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-August/034742.… [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/905145 Thank you, Takashi Kajinami irc: tkajinam

2 2

[fwaas][devstack] help configuring dashboard
by garcetto 05 Feb '24

05 Feb '24

good morning, is there some tutorial on how to configure fwaas web dashboard on devstack? thank you.

2 1

[nova] Help with support to SGX
by Winicius Allan 05 Feb '24

05 Feb '24

Hello o/ Anyone already work with Nova to provide VMs with SGX support?

6 7

[all] SQLAlchemy 2.x support in Bobcat
by Thomas Goirand 02 Feb '24

02 Feb '24

Hi, As you may know, and to my great frustration, I'm not the maintainer of SQLAlchemy in Debian, even though OpenStack is the biggest consumer of it. The current maintainer insists that he wants to upload SQLA 2.x in Unstable, potentially breaking all of OpenStack. At the present moment, if I understand correctly, we're not there yet, and Bobcat doesn't have such a support. It would be ok for me, *IF* there are patches available on master, that I could backport to Bobcat and maintain in the debian/patches folder of each project. However, the biggest current annoyance, is that I have no idea where we are at. Are we close to such a support? Is there a list of patches to apply on top of Bobcat that is maintained somewhere? Please enlighten me... :) Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)

5 10

RE: [cinder] Inactive 3rd party CIs
by Roquesalane, Jean-Pierre 02 Feb '24

02 Feb '24

Thanks Takashi for driving this. As far as Dell is concerned, those CIs should be marked as unsupported as they are now EOL. * DellEMC SC CI * DellEMC VNX CI * DellEMC XtremIO CI I'll have the CI team to take a look at the Dell PowerMax CI which is supposed to be active. JP Jean-Pierre Roquesalane SW System Sr Principal Engineer - OpenStack Champion Dell Technologies | Security and Ecosystem Software Mobile +33 6 21 86 79 04<tel:1-613-314-8106> Email : jeanpierre.roquesalane(a)dell.com<mailto:jeanpierre.roquesalane@dell.com> [cid:image001.png@01DA545A.5A50B740] Dell SAS, Si?ge Social 1 rond point Benjamin Franklin 34000 Montpellier. Capital 1,946,545.26 Euros, 351 528 229 RCS Montpellier -APE 4651Z -TVA Intracommunautaire FR 20 351 528 229. SIRET 351 528 229 00088 Vat Number : FR 20351528229 (France) / IT00001709997 (Italy) / ESN0012622G (Spain) Internal Use - Confidential

3 7

Re: [kolla-ansible][magnum] question
by Oliver Weinmann 01 Feb '24

01 Feb '24

Hi Franck, glad that I was able to help. Sorry I don't know about this one. But a quick google revealed this: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/sysconfig-configure-swap… Looks as if the FCOS image has this enabled somehow. I have updated my blogpost on CAPI in MAGNUM. It is finally working and its way faster to deploy Kubernetes. This will no longer use FCOS images but Ubuntu or FLATCAR. Maybe you want to give it a try: https://www.roksblog.de/openstack-magnum-cluster-api-driver/ Have a nice weekend. Cheers, Oliver Am 05.01.2024 um 17:07 schrieb Franck VEDEL: > Hi Oliver. > Thanks for you help !! > > I took the time to consult the help concerning > Magnum(https://docs.openstack.org/magnum/2023.1/user/) and this > article > (https://www.roksblog.de/deploy-kubernetes-clusters-in-openstack-within-minu…) > > > > I understood a lot of things, even though I'm not a Kubernetes expert. > Everything works as I wanted, except for one detail. > Do you know why we get this type of message (and quite a few minutes > to wait) when creating a node: > Capture d’écran 2024-01-05 à 15.43.04.png > > zram_generator…………. no configuration found. > > This is the last point that I cannot improve. Maybe there's nothing we > can do. > Thank you once again, that’s really very nice. > > > Franck VEDEL > > > > >> Le 3 janv. 2024 à 12:26, Oliver Weinmann <oliver.weinmann(a)me.com> a >> écrit : >> >> Hi Franck, >> >> Great. Glad it works. That is the k8s version and the url where >> magnum will pull the container from. The official docs are quite >> helpful. In the latest Openstack release bobcat there is already some >> support for CAPI. It is not 100% working out of the Box but it looks >> very promising. I have taken my blog post offline since I didn’t >> manage to get it working. But I will look into it again in the next >> couple of days. >> >> Cheers, >> Oliver >> >> Von meinem iPhone gesendet >> >>> Am 03.01.2024 um 12:21 schrieb Franck VEDEL >>> <franck.vedel(a)univ-grenoble-alpes.fr>: >>> >>> Hi Oliver, >>> and thanks a lot for your help. >>> I followed the instructions on the blog and indeed, with [trust] it >>> works. >>> I'm trying to understand everything. what are the parameters for: >>> >>> |--labels kube_tag=v1.21.11-rancher1,hyperkube_prefix=docker.io/rancher/| >>> >>> Thanks in advance >>> >>> Franck >>> >>> >>> >>>> Le 25 déc. 2023 à 19:26, Franck VEDEL >>>> <franck.vedel(a)univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> a écrit : >>>> >>>> Hi Oliver and thanks you for this help. >>>> >>>> I was wrong in my explications. >>>> I had seen this article (roksblog.de ) and I did what it said: >>>> I first tried: >>>> enable_cluster_user_trust = True in globals.yml >>>> It didn't work. >>>> >>>> I then made the modification in /etc/kolla/config/magnum.conf: >>>> cluster_user_trust = True >>>> >>>> Same problem. >>>> >>>> That's why I asked the question. Is this really the way to do it? >>>> If so, I will have to restart the containers (keystone?) >>>> >>>> Franck >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Le 25 déc. 2023 à 18:40, Oliver Weinmann <oliver.weinmann(a)me.com> >>>>> a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> Hi Frank, >>>>> >>>>> According to the official kolla docs the option needs to be in >>>>> globals.yml >>>>> >>>>> Ensure that you understand the consequences before enabling this >>>>> option. In|globals.yml|: >>>>> >>>>> In case this also doesn’t work, you can try: >>>>> >>>>> yoga) [vagrant@seed ~]$ cat /etc/kolla/config/magnum.conf >>>>> [trust] >>>>> cluster_user_trust = True >>>>> >>>>> *www.roksblog.de >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Oliver >>>>> >>>>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet >>>>> >>>>>> Am 25.12.2023 um 18:10 schrieb Franck VEDEL >>>>>> <franck.vedel(a)univ-grenoble-alpes.fr>: >>>>>> >>>>>> enable_cluster_user_trust = True >>>> >>> >

2 2

Keystone LDAP backend: need to change user_id_attribute from CN to SAMAccountName
by Michel Jouvin 01 Feb '24

01 Feb '24

Hi, For historical (and bad) resons, we decided 10 years ago when we created our cloud that the Keystone LDAP backend will use the CN as the user_id_attribute rather than the usual SAMAccountName. Since then it has been a source of various problems with CN changes, accented characters in CN... We'd like to change it to SAMAccountName but there is clearly no easy/supported way of doing it and we are looking for some information on the best way to do it and the risks if somebody has some clues... It should impact ~30 users so not a huge number... What we have in mind is basically: - Change the backend attribute - Import new accounts - Assign the new accounts to the same projects as the ol accounts, with the same role One of the foreseen problemsis that old and new accounts will share the same user_name_attribute, based on SAMAccountName. It is not allowed by openstack if I'm right so for the scenario to work we need to change the user_name_attribute of old accounts to something different (we don't care that the user cannot use the account during the transition peroid as long as it doesn't impact active resources). Is it enough to update it in the database? We'd prefer to keep the old accounts in OpenStack until the end of the transition... Another minor issue is the reassignment of keypairs to the new account. It is poosble to ask the user to reload its public keys but we were wondering it there was a not too risky way of doing it for him/her by updating the DB (I guess there is no API for this). Thanks in advance if you have any thought/information to share. Best regards. Michel

3 5