August 2023 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[all] osprofiler requirements on opentelemetry: is this reasonable?
by Thomas Goirand 01 Sep '23

01 Sep '23

Hi, I just saw that the last version of osprofiler requires opentelemetry-exporter-otlp and opentelemetry-sdk. Since osprofiler is used in almost all projects, and that opentelemetry is really HUGE, I wonder if this is all reasonable. This forces downstream distros to do a lot of packaging only for that. Is this avoidable? I started doing the packaging, and then stopped to write this message, seeing how much work that would represent. Your thoughts? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)

3 3

[Rally]
by Aayushi Gautam 31 Aug '23

31 Aug '23

Hello, I am Aayushi , an intern with Redhat working on ESI ( Elastic secure Infracstructure) group. We were trying to use Rally to test the performance of our codebase. I have created a Plugin and task . And getting an error. The same bug is also asked on the bug page of Rally, but it was not answered. I have attached the code of the plugin and task and the error message. Looking forward to hearing from you.

2 5

Issue with Live Migration
by Chris DiLorenzo 31 Aug '23

31 Aug '23

We are running zed deployed with kolla-ansible. We are running into an issue with Live Migration. These are the steps to reproduce the issue: - Create a VM - Attach a Cinder Volume. This will create a new Storage Controller. - Start writing data to the new disk. We used FIO. Let FIO run until it starts reporting IOPS data. - Live migrate the VM - The VM will migrate and FIO will continue to run. FIO will show 0 or no IOPS - lspci output will show that the new storage device is in error. - The VM will remain in this state until the user issues a hard reset command - Once the VM is rebooted, the issue can not be reproduced until another device is attached This also happens if we attach a new VNIC. Prior to migration, this is what we see: root@test-vm-cd:~# cat before_migration_lspci.txt | grep block 05:00.0 SCSI storage controller: Red Hat, Inc. Virtio block device (rev 01) Subsystem: Red Hat, Inc. Virtio block device 08:00.0 SCSI storage controller: Red Hat, Inc. Virtio block device (rev 01) Subsystem: Red Hat, Inc. Virtio block device Post migration we see this: 08:00.0 SCSI storage controller: Red Hat, Inc. Virtio block device (rev ff) (prog-if ff) !!! Unknown header type 7f Kernel driver in use: virtio-pci The original SCSI controller is fine. Outside of the above error, we don't see any other errors. From Openstack's perspective, the migration went fine. Any suggestions on where to look? Has anyone else seen this? Thanks, Chris

1 0

[elections][sahara] PTL Candidacy for 2024.1
by Jerry Zhou (周鑫勇) 31 Aug '23

31 Aug '23

Hello everyone! I would like to announce my candidacy for the role of Sahara PTL during the 2024.1 cycle. I have been in this role for the last cycle, and I would like to continue serving as PTL. During the past cycles, there was a lot of effort put into promoting contributor collaboration through various activities. We also revised unstable unit/functional tests to improve the quality of development, and created documents for users to demonstrate use cases with practical examples. In the next cycle, I'd like to continue improving unit testing and documentation quality.

1 0

TripleO centos9 wallaby IPA job is failing
by Bhagyashri Shewale 31 Aug '23

31 Aug '23

Hi folks, All the centos9 wallaby IPA jobs are failing due to [1] and blocking gate. We are currently working on it. [1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/2033357 Thanks and regards Bhagyashri Shewale

2 1

Openstack Horizon Login Issues
by Asma Naz Shariq 31 Aug '23

31 Aug '23

Hi Team, Can anyone help me to resolve this issue of openstack dashboard-Yoga release? You do not have permission to access the resource: /horizon/ Login as different user or go back to home page. How to resolve this issue in openstack while accessing web interface. Can anyone guide me how to resolve this issue? when i entered the credentials to access to openstack dashboard, it display mesasge: Something went wrong! An unexpected error has occurred. Try refreshing the page. If that doesn't help, contact your local administrator. Regards, Asma

2 1

migration error
by Karera Tony 31 Aug '23

31 Aug '23

Hello Team, I am migrating an instance from one Cpmpute to another but I am getting this error *Error: *Failed to live migrate instance to host "compute1". Details <http://10.10.13.31/admin/instances/#message_details> Migration pre-check error: Unacceptable CPU info: CPU doesn't have compatibility. 0 Refer to http://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt-host.html#virCPUCompareResult (HTTP 400) (Request-ID: req-6bc103a8-f1f1-489c-a620-ec535b651280) Please advise Regards Tony Karera

1 0

Re: openstack-discuss Digest, Vol 58, Issue 108
by Karera Tony 31 Aug '23

31 Aug '23

My issue was resolved after upgrading kolla-ansible. Regards Tony Karera On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 3:53 PM < openstack-discuss-request(a)lists.openstack.org> wrote: > Send openstack-discuss mailing list submissions to > openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > https://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > openstack-discuss-request(a)lists.openstack.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > openstack-discuss-owner(a)lists.openstack.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of openstack-discuss digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. [keystone][election] Self-nomination for Keystone PTL for > 2024.1 cycle (Dave Wilde) > 2. Re: openstack-discuss Digest, Vol 58, Issue 107 (Karera Tony) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 08:35:00 -0500 > From: Dave Wilde <dwilde(a)redhat.com> > To: OpenStack Discuss <openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org> > Subject: [keystone][election] Self-nomination for Keystone PTL for > 2024.1 cycle > Message-ID: <54d82977-aee0-4df2-a7c3-2be3b8c2788c@Spark> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hey folks, > > It's Dave here, your current OpenStack Keystone PTL. I'd like to submit my > candidacy to again act as the PTL for the 2024.1 cycle.??We're making great > progress with Keystone, and I would like to continue with that excellent > work. > > As PTL in this cycle here are some of the things I'd like to focus on: > > ??- Finish the manager role and ensure that the SRBAC implied roles are > correct > ?? ?for manager and member > ??- Continue the OAuth 2.0 Implementation > ??- Start a known issues section in the Keystone documentation > ??- Start a documentation audit to ensure that our documentation is of the > ?? ?highest quality > > Of course we will continue the weekly meetings and the reviewathons.??I > think > the reviewathons have been very successful and I'm keen on keeping them > going. > > I'm looking forward to another successful cycle and working with everyone > again! > > Thank you! > > /Dave >

1 0

[elections][venus] PTL Candidacy for 2024.1
by Eric Zhang (张连法)-浪潮信息 31 Aug '23

31 Aug '23

Hello everyone! I would like to announce my candidacy for the role of Venus PTL during the Caracal/2024.1 cycle. I have been in this role for the last 2 cycles and I would like to continue serving as PTL. In the upcoming cycle, I would like to focus on the following: * Continuous improvement in documents, unit tests, clients and dashboard. * Enhance log anomaly detection, such as more matching rules, improving performance. Thank you for your consideration! Lianfa Zhang

1 0

[all][elections][tc] TC Election Campaigning Kickoff
by Ian Y. Choi 31 Aug '23

31 Aug '23

Developers, The TC Election Campaigning Period has now started[1]. During the next couple days, you are all encouraged to ask the candidates questions about their platforms[2], opinions on OpenStack, community governance, and anything else that will help you to better determine how you will vote. This is the time to raise any issues you wish the future TC to consider, and to evaluate the opinions of the nominees prior to their election. Candidates, Each of you has posted a platform[2], and announced your nomination to the developers. From this point, you are encouraged to ask each other questions about the posted platforms, and begin discussion of any points that you feel are particularly important during the next cycle. While you are not yet TC members, your voices and opinions about the issues raised in your platforms and questions raised by the wider community will help ensure that the future TC has the widest possible input on the matters of community concern, and the electorate has the best information to determine the ideal TC composition to address these and other issues that may arise. [1] https://governance.openstack.org/election/ [2] https://opendev.org/openstack/election/src/branch/master/candidates/2024.1/…

1 0