March 2023 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[largescale-sig] Next meeting: March 8, 9utc
by Thierry Carrez 08 Mar '23

08 Mar '23

Hi everyone, The Large Scale SIG will be meeting this Wednesday in #openstack-operators on OFTC IRC, at 9UTC, our APAC+EU-friendly time. You can doublecheck how that UTC time translates locally at: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20230308T09 Feel free to add topics to the agenda: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/large-scale-sig-meeting Regards, -- Thierry Carrez

1 1

[horizon] Cancelling Today's Weekly meeting
by vishal manchanda 08 Mar '23

08 Mar '23

Hello Team, As it is a holiday for me, I will not be able to host today's horizon weekly meeting. So let's cancel today's weekly meeting. If anything urgent, please reach out to the horizon core team. Thanks & regards, Vishal Manchanda

1 0

[cinder] Could I use system lvm volume group for cinder-volume
by 韩光宇 08 Mar '23

08 Mar '23

Hello, I have a physical node and the system uses lvm partitions. With the service already running above, is it possible for me to deploy cinder-volume that uses the lvm backend without affecting the existing service? The physical disk space is basically allocated to the /dev/sda4 physical volume, and the pv wad added to the `uniontechos` volume group. All the space of `uniontechos` vg is allocated to the system logical volume (/dev/uniontechos/root), there is 5T space (a lot of free space). I want to try to reduce the system logical volume——/dev/uniontechos/root, and let cinder-volume use the uniontechos volume group at the same time , I don't know if it is feasible. Could I get some advices? Thank for any help! ```shell # pvdisplay ... --- Physical volume --- PV Name /dev/sda4 VG Name uniontechos PV Size <5.43 TiB / not usable 2.00 MiB Allocatable yes (but full) PE Size 4.00 MiB Total PE 1422313 Free PE 0 Allocated PE 1422313 PV UUID 8LF270-LYD1-kuP1-iWZb-BZEQ-LdA8-UwEa58 # lvdisplay --- Logical volume --- LV Path /dev/uniontechos/root LV Name root VG Name uniontechos LV UUID cEypcY-xcbC-JFoO-d3MS-uMPU-ntQa-WEeE1c LV Write Access read/write LV Creation host, time compute2, 2022-04-28 15:21:27 +0800 LV Status available # open 1 LV Size 5.42 TiB Current LE 1421289 Segments 1 Allocation inherit Read ahead sectors auto - currently set to 8192 Block device 253:0 ``` Best wishes, Han

1 0

[magnum] certificate authority key location
by Vivian Rook 07 Mar '23

07 Mar '23

If I want to create a credential for a user to access a magnum cluster I can do so as described in https://docs.openstack.org/magnum/latest/user/#id4 Namely by running: openstack coe ca sign secure-k8s-cluster client.csr > cert.pem I would like to do this without calling the openstack cli. Where does magnum store its ca key file? I could not find it on the control node under /etc/kubernetes/certs (the ca.crt is there, though no ca.key) Thank you! -- *Vivian Rook (They/Them)* Site Reliability Engineer Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>

1 0

[nova][ptg] Strawman proposal for vPTG timeslots
by Sylvain Bauza 07 Mar '23

07 Mar '23

Hi team, We recently discussed this in the Nova meeting [1] but I'd like to reemphasize here and now that I proposed to book 4 timeslots of one hour during 4 days for the next vPTG. https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html As you see, the proposed timeline will be : Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday between 13:00UTC and 17:00UTC. May you have concerns with this proposal, please express them by replying to this thread. As a reminder, please add the topics you'd like to cover during the vPTG in the PTG etherpad : https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bobcat-ptg Thanks, -Sylvain [1] https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-03-07-16.00.log.h…

1 0

[all][tc] Technical Committee next weekly meeting on 2023 Mar 8 at 1600 UTC
by Nikolla, Kristi 07 Mar '23

07 Mar '23

Hi all, This is a reminder that the next weekly Technical Committee meeting is to be held tomorrow (March 8) at 1600 UTC on #openstack-tc on OFTC IRC A copy of the preliminary agenda can be found below. Items can be proposed by editing the wiki page at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting * Roll call * Follow up on past action items * Deciding on meeting time * Gate health check * TC 2023.1 tracker status checks ** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-2023.1-tracker * Deprecation process for TripleO ** https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-February/03208… * Cleanup of PyPI maintainer list for OpenStack Projects ** Etherpad for audit and cleanup of additional PyPi maintainers *** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-pypi-maintainers-cleanup ** ML discussion *** https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-January/031848… * Recurring tasks check ** Bare 'recheck' state *** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary * Virtual PTG Planning ** March 27-31, 2023, there's the Virtual PTG. * Check in on the voting for version names ** https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/874484 ** https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/875942 * Open Reviews ** https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+is:open Thank you, Kristi Nikolla

1 0

[TripleO][Wallaby][openStack] - Creating Alma based Baremetal Instance
by Lokendra Rathour 07 Mar '23

07 Mar '23

Hi Team, we have a PoC where we wish to try Creating OpenStack Baremetal Instance using Alma Linux. Please help in case that is possible, any reference where we can use the Alma Images to instantiate the Baremetal Instance. -- ~ Lokendra skype: lokendrarathour

3 2

[qa][stable][gate] Tempest master failing on stable/yoga|xena, fix is in gate
by Ghanshyam Mann 07 Mar '23

07 Mar '23

Hi All, In case any of you are seeing failure on stable/yoga and stable/xena with the below error, please hold the recheck until the fix (revert) in Tempest is merged "AttributeError: type object 'Draft4Validator' has no attribute 'FORMAT_CHECKER'" - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/876218 -gmann

1 1

[osprofiler][rally][openstack] Using osprofiler/rally directly on production Openstack system
by hai wu 07 Mar '23

07 Mar '23

Is there any concern with using osprofiler/rally directly on the production Openstack system?

2 3

Re: [manila] share server with multiple tenant networks
by Goutham Pacha Ravi 06 Mar '23

06 Mar '23

On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 12:12 PM garcetto <garcetto(a)gmail.com> wrote: > thank you, so how can i have multiple shares on different tenant networks, > creating more share servers right? > Yes; map these tenant networks into share networks in manila, and create your shares with the share networks. Each share network will trigger the creation of a share server if one already doesn't exist. > > > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 7:56 PM Goutham Pacha Ravi <gouthampravi(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Garcetto, >> >> On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 9:07 AM garcetto <garcetto(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> good afternoon, >>> i am trying to add a second share server or share to existing share >>> server on different network inside same tenant, actually i have: >>> >> >>> tenant-net-01 (with the share server), ok working. >>> tenant-net-02 (tried to add a share network, but the error says >>> " >>> create: Could not find an existing share server or allocate one on the >>> share network provided. You may use a different share network, or verify >>> the network details in the share network and retry your request. If this >>> doesn't work, contact your administrator to troubleshoot issues with your >>> network. >>> " >>> >> >> As the message suggests, manila was unable to obtain network allocations >> to create a share server for you on the second network. Are you a user, or >> an administrator of this cloud? If you are an administrator, you >> should look at the logs from manila's share-manager service to check what >> failed. >> >> You cannot expect to attach multiple tenant networks to the same share >> server unfortunately - that isn't supported today. >> >> >> >>> any clue or doc i can read? >>> thank you >>> >>

1 0