March 2023 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[all][tc] Technical Committee next weekly meeting on 2023 Mar 8 at 1600 UTC
by Nikolla, Kristi 07 Mar '23

07 Mar '23

Hi all, This is a reminder that the next weekly Technical Committee meeting is to be held tomorrow (March 8) at 1600 UTC on #openstack-tc on OFTC IRC A copy of the preliminary agenda can be found below. Items can be proposed by editing the wiki page at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting * Roll call * Follow up on past action items * Deciding on meeting time * Gate health check * TC 2023.1 tracker status checks ** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-2023.1-tracker * Deprecation process for TripleO ** https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-February/03208… * Cleanup of PyPI maintainer list for OpenStack Projects ** Etherpad for audit and cleanup of additional PyPi maintainers *** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-pypi-maintainers-cleanup ** ML discussion *** https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-January/031848… * Recurring tasks check ** Bare 'recheck' state *** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary * Virtual PTG Planning ** March 27-31, 2023, there's the Virtual PTG. * Check in on the voting for version names ** https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/874484 ** https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/875942 * Open Reviews ** https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+is:open Thank you, Kristi Nikolla

1 0

[TripleO][Wallaby][openStack] - Creating Alma based Baremetal Instance
by Lokendra Rathour 07 Mar '23

07 Mar '23

Hi Team, we have a PoC where we wish to try Creating OpenStack Baremetal Instance using Alma Linux. Please help in case that is possible, any reference where we can use the Alma Images to instantiate the Baremetal Instance. -- ~ Lokendra skype: lokendrarathour

3 2

[qa][stable][gate] Tempest master failing on stable/yoga|xena, fix is in gate
by Ghanshyam Mann 07 Mar '23

07 Mar '23

Hi All, In case any of you are seeing failure on stable/yoga and stable/xena with the below error, please hold the recheck until the fix (revert) in Tempest is merged "AttributeError: type object 'Draft4Validator' has no attribute 'FORMAT_CHECKER'" - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/876218 -gmann

1 1

[osprofiler][rally][openstack] Using osprofiler/rally directly on production Openstack system
by hai wu 07 Mar '23

07 Mar '23

Is there any concern with using osprofiler/rally directly on the production Openstack system?

2 3

Re: [manila] share server with multiple tenant networks
by Goutham Pacha Ravi 07 Mar '23

07 Mar '23

On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 12:12 PM garcetto <garcetto(a)gmail.com> wrote: > thank you, so how can i have multiple shares on different tenant networks, > creating more share servers right? > Yes; map these tenant networks into share networks in manila, and create your shares with the share networks. Each share network will trigger the creation of a share server if one already doesn't exist. > > > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 7:56 PM Goutham Pacha Ravi <gouthampravi(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Garcetto, >> >> On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 9:07 AM garcetto <garcetto(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> good afternoon, >>> i am trying to add a second share server or share to existing share >>> server on different network inside same tenant, actually i have: >>> >> >>> tenant-net-01 (with the share server), ok working. >>> tenant-net-02 (tried to add a share network, but the error says >>> " >>> create: Could not find an existing share server or allocate one on the >>> share network provided. You may use a different share network, or verify >>> the network details in the share network and retry your request. If this >>> doesn't work, contact your administrator to troubleshoot issues with your >>> network. >>> " >>> >> >> As the message suggests, manila was unable to obtain network allocations >> to create a share server for you on the second network. Are you a user, or >> an administrator of this cloud? If you are an administrator, you >> should look at the logs from manila's share-manager service to check what >> failed. >> >> You cannot expect to attach multiple tenant networks to the same share >> server unfortunately - that isn't supported today. >> >> >> >>> any clue or doc i can read? >>> thank you >>> >>

1 0

[manila] ha for share server
by garcetto 07 Mar '23

07 Mar '23

good afternoon, is it possible to have HA for share server vm in openstack? i mean, the vm that is created on every tenant and used as nfs server. thank you

2 1

[manila] share server with multiple tenant networks
by garcetto 07 Mar '23

07 Mar '23

good afternoon, i am trying to add a second share server or share to existing share server on different network inside same tenant, actually i have: tenant-net-01 (with the share server), ok working. tenant-net-02 (tried to add a share network, but the error says " create: Could not find an existing share server or allocate one on the share network provided. You may use a different share network, or verify the network details in the share network and retry your request. If this doesn't work, contact your administrator to troubleshoot issues with your network. " any clue or doc i can read? thank you

2 1

[ironic] PTL Availability
by Jay Faulkner 07 Mar '23

07 Mar '23

Hi all, Just a heads up -- I'll be out of town and mostly out of IRC from Wednesday, 3/8 to Monday 3/13. If there are emergent issues that need to be addressed urgently, please send an email directly to me and I can have a look. Alternatively, I have a large amount of trust in our delegated release managers and former Ironic PTLs and support them if they need to take action in my stead. - Jay Faulkenr

1 0

[openstack-helm] Get rid of cephfs and rbd provisioners
by Vladimir Kozhukalov 07 Mar '23

07 Mar '23

Hi everyone, I would like to suggest getting rid of cephfs and rbd provisioners. They have been retired and have not been maintained for about 2.5 years now [1]. I believe the CSI approach is what all users rely on nowadays and we can safely remove them. The trigger for this suggestion is that we are currently experiencing issues while trying to switch cephfs provisioner to Ubuntu Focal and fixing this is just wasting time. [2] Stephen spent some time debugging the issues and can give more details if needed. What do you think? [1] https://github.com/kubernetes-retired/external-storage/tree/master/ceph [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-helm-infra/+/872976 -- Best regards, Kozhukalov Vladimir

3 3

Paying for Openstack support
by Albert Braden 07 Mar '23

07 Mar '23

I have a question for the operators here. Is anyone paying for Openstack support and getting good value for your money? Can you contact someone for help with an issue, and get a useful response in a reasonable time? If you have an emergency, can you get help quickly? If so, I would like to hear about your experience. Who are you getting good support from? Do they support your operating system too? If not, where do you get your OS support, and how good is it? If you work for a company that provides openstack and/or Linux support, you are welcome to send me a sales pitch, but my goal is to hear from operators.

5 5