August 2022 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

Metering, billing software components for Openstack
by KK CHN 16 Aug '22

16 Aug '22

List, We are running our datacenter using the Ussuri version. Planning to upgrade to higher versions soon. 1. What are the metering, billing and metric solutions for ussuri and other latest openstack versions ? 2. The ceilometer and gnocchi is the way forward or ? People are using any latest tools for the best results pls share your thoughts. Any thoughts most welcome. Krish

3 3

[openstack-helm] No meeting tomorrow
by Gage Hugo 15 Aug '22

15 Aug '22

Hey team, Since there's nothing on the agenda for tomorrow's meeting, it has been cancelled. We will meet as scheduled next week. Thanks!

1 0

[neutron] Bug deputy report (week starting on Aug-8-2022)
by Bernard Cafarelli 15 Aug '22

15 Aug '22

Hello neutrinos, it is time again to start a new bug deputy rotation: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings#Bug_deputy and my turn for last week's bugs A relatively quiet week (it is the holiday season in quite a few parts of the world!) with fixes already merged for most bugs. Two bugs to highlight though (and in need of some neutron eyes): a manila job failing with IPv6 VMs (1940324) and a live-migration issue (1986003) Critical * neutron-tempest-plugin failing on networking-bagpipe tests - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1986534 networking-bagpipe also needed update after neutron-lib constants rehoming, fix merged: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-bagpipe/+/852867 High * [CI][Devstack] Failing to SSH to test VMs with IPv6 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1940324 LVM job for manila fails on IPv6 hosts with socket.timeout: timed out, if CI/IPv6 gurus can take a look and help manila team Medium * neutron-dynamic-routing: Continuous warning because of missing context wrapper - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1984238 Previous fix missed one context wrapper, fix by tkajinam https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-dynamic-routing/+/852775 Low * Replace "click" with "cliff" - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1985049 Several patches in progress to update tools using click, see LP for details Original started as bug to add click to requirements - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1984109 * [OVN] Remove "FIPAddDeleteEvent" event - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1985096 Unassigned cleanup bug, workaround is not needed since OVN v20.03.0 * DeprecationWarning: Using the 'user' argument is deprecated in version '2.18' and will be removed in version '3.0', please use the 'user_id' argument instead - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1986418 Fix merged https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/853050 * DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \u - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1986421 Fix merged https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/853051 * PkgResourcesDeprecationWarning: <MagicMock name='execute().split().__getitem__().__getitem__()' id='140417024565696'> is an invalid version and will not be supported in a future release - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1986428 Fix also merged: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/853053 Thanks Takashi Natsume for this series of deprecation fixes Untriaged * Exception in concurrent port binding activation - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1986003 Live migration issue that I did not have time to dig into - any takers? Have a nice week! -- Bernard Cafarelli

1 0

[Ansible] [Yoga] Infra LXC Cache Failure
by Father Vlasie 15 Aug '22

15 Aug '22

Hello everyone! I am trying to deploy Openstack Ansible with Rocky Linux 8.6. I have 3 infra nodes all running the same software/hardware specifications but the 3rd one keeps giving me the following error. This occurs when running setup-hosts.yml ---------- TASK [lxc_hosts : Ensure that the LXC cache has been prepared] ******************************************************************************* FAILED - RETRYING: [infra3]: Ensure that the LXC cache has been prepared (120 retries left). FAILED - RETRYING: [infra3]: Ensure that the LXC cache has been prepared (119 retries left). fatal: [infra3]: FAILED! => {"ansible_job_id": "205392349782.93369", "attempts": 3, "changed": true, "cmd": "chroot /var/lib/machines/rocky-8-amd64 /opt/cache-prep-commands.sh > /var/log/lxc-cache-prep-commands.log 2>&1", "delta": "0:00:16.353232", "end": "2022-08-15 12:59:42.058169", "finished": 1, "msg": "non-zero return code", "rc": 1, "results_file": "/root/.ansible_async/205392349782.93369", "start": "2022-08-15 12:59:25.704937", "started": 1, "stderr": "", "stderr_lines": [], "stdout": "", "stdout_lines": []} ---------- Thank you very much for any help! Father Vlasie

1 1

[Octavia] Monitor through Listener Prometheus Protocol
by Vu Tuan Dat 15 Aug '22

15 Aug '22

HI, I installed Prometheus on controller nodes. However, My prometheus instance cannot connect to Listener Prometheus endpoint because it's binded to VIP only in network namespace. Anyone can help? Thanks in advanced, Dat

2 1

[Ansible] [Yoga] Set rsyslog not to containerise
by Father Vlasie 15 Aug '22

15 Aug '22

Hello everyone! I am trying to deploy Openstack Ansible with Rocky Linux 8.6. I have a rsyslog host that is somewhat underpowered (RAM and CPU) and I thought it might help to run rsyslog without containerisation. I have searched but I have not been able to find an example of this.My guess is that I need to create a file in /etc/openstack_deploy/env.d What syntax and commands do I need? I have searched but I could not find any examples... Thank you very much! Father Vlasie

2 1

[ironic] Proposing Jacob Anders to sushy-core
by Iury Gregory 14 Aug '22

14 Aug '22

Hello ironic-cores and sushy-cores, I would like to propose Jacob Anders (janders irc) for sushy-core. He made great contributions to improve sushy to cover corner cases from different HW in the last releases, you can find some of his contributions in [1], please vote with +1/-1. [1] https://review.opendev.org/q/owner:janders%2540redhat.com+project:openstack… -- *Att[]'s* *Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira * *MSc in Computer Science at UFCG* *Ironic PTL * *Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat Brazil* *Social*: https://www.linkedin.com/in/iurygregory *E-mail: iurygregory(a)gmail.com <iurygregory(a)gmail.com>*

3 2

[Ansible] [Yoga] Not recognising Rocky Linux as supported
by Father Vlasie 12 Aug '22

12 Aug '22

Hello everyone! I am trying to deploy Openstack Ansible with Rocky Linux 8.6 on my target hosts. The documentation here (https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/openstack-ansible/latest/ta…) says " • Centos 8 Stream 64-bit * Derivitives: Rocky Linux” under the list of supported operation systems. Ansible does not seem to check for the existence of RHEL 8 systems. :( But when I run “openstack-ansible setup-hosts.yml” I get the error: TASK [Check for a supported Operating System] ***************************************************************************************** fatal: [infra1]: FAILED! => { "assertion": "(ansible_facts['distribution'] == 'Debian' and ansible_facts['distribution_release'] == 'bullseye') or (ansible_facts['distribution'] == 'Ubuntu' and ansible_facts['distribution_release'] == 'focal') or (ansible_facts['distribution'] == 'Ubuntu' and ansible_facts['distribution_release'] == 'jammy') or (ansible_facts['os_family'] == 'RedHat' and ansible_facts['distribution_major_version'] == '9')", "changed": false, "evaluated_to": false, "msg": "The only supported platforms for this release are Debian 11 (Bullseye), Ubuntu 20.04 LTS (Focal), Ubuntu 22.04 (Jammy) and CentOS 9 Stream.\n” What should I do? Thank you!

3 2

[all][tc] What's happening in Technical Committee: summary 2022 Aug 12: Reading: 5 min
by Ghanshyam Mann 12 Aug '22

12 Aug '22

Hello Everyone, Here is this week's summary of the Technical Committee activities. 1. TC Meetings: ============ * We had this week's meeting on Aug 11. Most of the meeting discussions are summarized in this email. Meeting full logs are available @https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2022/tc.2022-08-11-15.00.log.html * Next TC weekly meeting will be on Aug 18 Thursday at 15:00 UTC, feel free to add the topic on the agenda[1] by Aug 17. 2. What we completed this week: ========================= * None in this week. 3. Activities In progress: ================== TC Tracker for Zed cycle ------------------------------ * Zed tracker etherpad includes the TC working items[3], Two are completed and others items are in-progress. Open Reviews ----------------- * Two open reviews for ongoing activities[4]. OpenStack TC + Board member meeting ------------------------------------------------ As you might know, OpenStack TC and Board member had a informal meeting on Aug 10[5][6], I am summarizing the discussion here. The Openstack TC has presented the 'OpenStack Updates' to Board meeting in berlin. One of the key part of the updates were 'OpenStack community Challenges' and we could not finish the discussion or brainstorm on these in berlin meeting. We decided to continue the discussion on those (Slide#21)[7]. In this call, we can only cover the first challenge only 'Less Interaction with Operators & Users'. There is no doubt that we are facing this issue at noticeable level (RBAC is good example where we lacked the operator/user feedback). A lot of things including ML, events are discussed on why it is happening and how to improve it. Having ops meetup as a separate event is something many members raised concern about and it will be good to merge these events into other community events like Summit, PTG etc. To try the first step towards that we can invite or welcome operators in Oct virtual PTG and give them a feeling on merging the events with developers event can be beneficial to both the group. On that, Dan suggested the idea of scheduling the 'Operatos Hours' per project in PTG and there we will keep the discussion on operator-centric and the format they want. We continued the discussion on this in TC weekly meeting where we had mixed suggestions on the 'Operator Hours' schedule, either to ask each project to schedule it in their room and operator join or other way around. Before deciding any format, we will be asking operators about their preference. We will continue the discussion on 'OpenStack community Challenges' in the next call which is schedule on 20:00 UTC on Wednesday, November 16[8]. If anyone is interested, feel free to join it. 2023.1 cycle Technical Election (TC + PTL) planning ------------------------------------------------------------- Not much update on this but we will be seeing the election schedule proposed soon. 2023.1 cycle TC PTG planning ------------------------------------ We discussed about how to best encourage/invite operators into the PTG (I wrote in the above section) and based on the operators feedback we will proceed next. We will continue the discussion in the next meeting also. 2021 User Survey TC Question Analysis ----------------------------------------------- No update on this. The survey summary is up for review[9]. Feel free to check and provide feedback. Zed cycle Leaderless projects ---------------------------------- Dale Smith volunteer to be PTL for Adjutant project [10] Fixing Zuul config error ---------------------------- Requesting projects with zuul config error to look into those and fix them which should not take much time[11]12]. Project updates ------------------- * Retire openstack-helm-addons[13] 4. How to contact the TC: ==================== If you would like to discuss or give feedback to TC, you can reach out to us in multiple ways: 1. Email: you can send the email with tag [tc] on openstack-discuss ML[14]. 2. Weekly meeting: The Technical Committee conduct a weekly meeting every Thursday 15 UTC [15] 3. Ping us using 'tc-members' nickname on #openstack-tc IRC channel. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/849997 [3] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-zed-tracker [4] https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+status:open [5] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-August/029886.… [6] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/2022-08-board-openstack-sync [7] https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1yCiZy_9A6hURXD0BRdr33OlK7Ugch5EgSvF… [8] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-August/029968.… [9] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/836888 [10] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/849606 [11] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/zuul-config-error-openstack [12] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-May/028603.html [13] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/849997 [14] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss [15] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Technical_Committee_Meeting -gmann

1 0

Re: [Ansible] [Yoga] Not recognising Rocky Linux as supported
by Father Vlasie 12 Aug '22

12 Aug '22

> On Aug 12, 2022, at 3:13 PM, openstack-discuss-request(a)lists.openstack.org wrote: > > Comparing https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible/src/branch/stable/yoga/play… <https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible/src/branch/stable/yoga/play…> to https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible/src/branch/master/playbooks… <https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible/src/branch/master/playbooks…> it appears that OpenStack Ansible has removed CentOS Stream/RHEL/Rocky 8 support on master, but the assertion allows it under Yoga. Based on the failure above you must be running master OSA? I would try running the Yoga branch instead. > > The master branch documentation likely needs to be updated as well. That worked perfectly, thank you! :)

1 0