August 2022 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

Re: container and instances are not working on my dashboard
by test 28 Aug '22

28 Aug '22

1 0

containers ad instances are not working
by Lee, Vincent Z 28 Aug '22

28 Aug '22

[https://res.cdn.office.net/assets/mail/file-icon/png/txt_16x16.png]nova-com… 1.log<https://iowastate-my.sharepoint.com/:u:/g/personal/vincet_iastate_edu/EWerz…> Hi all, I am quite new to Openstack and faced some issues with creating instances and displaying created containers on my Openstack dashboard. I am currently working on multinode Openstack. I am hoping to get some helps and feedbacks about this. I will briefly go through the problems I encountered. When I created an instances on my dashboard, it directly went into error state. I have attached a screenshot as shown below. [cid:6d3cb41a-9176-4209-8e12-d669e05ecf5b] This is my list of hosts. [cid:11a45ab0-b7f8-4c79-a619-131d01121687] When I created a container using both cli and dashboard, two containers were running. However, when I tried to look into my dashboard, those containers were not shown. These are the created containers. [cid:1b05b862-8e1d-4833-a3e0-57b921fd6351] However, when i try to open my dashboard and look for them, they just don't appear on it. So I am not sure what is causing this. [cid:0eff5e44-5690-4590-9682-43410e2d52f1] The version of my Openstack deployment is 21.2.4. I deployed my Openstack using the master branch (latest). I have followed the guidelines provided online (https://docs.openstack.org/kolla-ansible/latest/user/quickstart.html) which uses kolla-ansible. In my /var/log/kolla/zun/ directory, I have only a total of six different log files. [cid:4b28ae60-c42a-4cd4-a063-49431d8b5334] I have attached a sample of my globals.yml, multinode, zun-api and compute-api log file in this email. The below image is a sample of how I setup my openstack as shown below. [cid:8cc989cd-b334-4647-8084-048b499e229e] The below image is the reference of my local network. My controller [cid:6e322de9-216e-48c6-b0a2-7cd3f2465ba1] [cid:4695cd8c-a01c-45b5-9523-e9b9f95a9ebc] [cid:0426c49b-701d-4a9b-aadc-ea9353840f66] [cid:f1e89ed4-fc88-4679-bcb5-0150bef1fd7a] [cid:51c37875-f354-4f18-8a83-619ddb2c19d5] My compute host [cid:aad2498a-52f7-4f81-9c57-cdb49f52de4c] [cid:83c1a81e-342a-4ec0-9d94-c73753152087] Hope to hear from everyone soon. Best regards, Vincent

2 1

[nova] Could I boot instance from volume snapshot in cmd?
by 韩光宇 28 Aug '22

28 Aug '22

Hello, I want boot instance from volume snapshot in cmd, but I never found it in `openstack server create --help` and https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/launch-instances.html. Could I do it in cmd? I saw that this can be done on horizon Thanks, Han Guangyu

2 1

[heat] ERROR: You are not authorized to use stacks:global_index.
by Boxiang Zhu 28 Aug '22

28 Aug '22

Hi, I deployed the openstack with kolla-ansible. And the openstack_release of globals.yml is master. The version of openstackclient and heatclient is 5.8.0 and 3.0.0. I run command "source /etc/kolla/admin-openrc.sh" to export env of openstack. OS_PROJECT_DOMAIN_NAME=Default OS_USER_DOMAIN_NAME=Default OS_PROJECT_NAME=admin OS_TENANT_NAME=admin OS_USERNAME=admin OS_PASSWORD=xxxxxxxxx OS_AUTH_URL=http://192.168.100.10:5000 OS_INTERFACE=internal OS_ENDPOINT_TYPE=internalURL OS_MANILA_ENDPOINT_TYPE=internalURL OS_IDENTITY_API_VERSION=3 OS_REGION_NAME=RegionOne OS_AUTH_PLUGIN=password Then I try to list all stacks with command "openstack stack list --all-projects". But I got the error messages as followed: ERROR: You are not authorized to use stacks:global_index. I see the policy is "role:reader and system_scope:all". I think the user admin has role reader and also with system_scope:all. ❯ openstack role assignment list +----------------------------------+----------------------------------+-------+----------------------------------+----------------------------------+--------+-----------+ | Role | User | Group | Project | Domain | System | Inherited | +----------------------------------+----------------------------------+-------+----------------------------------+----------------------------------+--------+-----------+ | cd572da356fb4f7ca53c280802299eb0 | fccbdf34d33a407db1b53bed048d1187 | | 840500fb441a442fbcbca30d3a773b2c | | | False | | cd572da356fb4f7ca53c280802299eb0 | 70d3715e7e2246c08c901d0e96038443 | | | 0a6274ff7f994e8cb6f40e13b0d39ca2 | | False | | cd572da356fb4f7ca53c280802299eb0 | 5c100e870cbd4744af6e546fc9215a37 | | | | all | False | +----------------------------------+----------------------------------+-------+----------------------------------+----------------------------------+--------+-----------+ ❯ openstack user show admin +---------------------+----------------------------------+ | Field | Value | +---------------------+----------------------------------+ | domain_id | default | | enabled | True | | id | 5c100e870cbd4744af6e546fc9215a37 | | name | admin | | options | {} | | password_expires_at | None | +---------------------+----------------------------------+ How can I get all the stacks for all projects? Thanks, Best Regards, Boxiang Zhu

2 1

What is the Traffic Flow between Horizon and Swift?
by John van Ommen 27 Aug '22

27 Aug '22

When a user is using Horizon, and they're examining the contents of their containers in Swift, what does the traffic flow look like? I am unable to browse the contents of my Swift containers from Horizon. When I click on the contents of the container I get: "Unable to get the objects in the container" And when I click on the "Services" tab in Horizon, I get: "Unable to get Nova services list" and "Unable to get Cinder services list" John van Ommen

1 0

[Wallaby] Deployment getting failed Randomly
by Lokendra Rathour 27 Aug '22

27 Aug '22

Hi Team, we were trying to deploy OpenStack wallaby, and we see that 4 out of 5 runs deployment is getting failed for mentioned below reasons: *Error:* 2022-08-25 17:34:29.036371 | 5254004d-021e-d4db-067d-000000007b1a | TASK | Create identity internal endpoint 2022-08-25 17:34:31.176105 | 5254004d-021e-d4db-067d-000000007b1a | FATAL | Create identity internal endpoint | undercloud | error={"changed": false, "extra_data": {"data": null, "details": "The request you have made requires authentication.", "response": "{\"error\":{\"code\":401,\"message\":\"The request you have made requires authentication.\",\"title\":\"Unauthorized\"} }\n"}, "msg": "Failed to list services: Client Error for url: overcloud-public.myhsc.com <https://overcloud-public.myhsc.com:13000/v3/services> :13000/v3/services <https://overcloud-public.myhsc.com:13000/v3/services>, The request you have made requires authentication."} Debug logs: pending results.... The full traceback is: File "/tmp/ansible_openstack.cloud.endpoint_payload_qhlqb_qw/ansible_openstack.cloud.endpoint_payload.zip/ansible_collections/open stack/cloud/plugins/module_utils/openstack.py", line 407, in __call__ results = self.run() File "/tmp/ansible_openstack.cloud.endpoint_payload_qhlqb_qw/ansible_openstack.cloud.endpoint_payload.zip/ansible_collections/open stack/cloud/plugins/modules/endpoint.py", line 150, in run File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/openstack/cloud/_identity.py", line 537, in get_service return _utils._get_entity(self, 'service', name_or_id, filters) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/openstack/cloud/_utils.py", line 197, in _get_entity entities = search(name_or_id, filters, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/openstack/cloud/_identity.py", line 517, in search_services services = self.list_services() File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/openstack/cloud/_identity.py", line 501, in list_services error_message="Failed to list services") File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/keystoneauth1/adapter.py", line 395, in get return self.request(url, 'GET', **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/openstack/proxy.py", line 668, in request return _json_response(response, error_message=error_message) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/openstack/proxy.py", line 646, in _json_response exceptions.raise_from_response(response, error_message=error_message) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/openstack/exceptions.py", line 238, in raise_from_response http_status=http_status, request_id=request_id 2022-08-25 19:38:03.201899 | 5254004d-021e-7578-cd65-000000007ad6 | FATAL | Create identity internal endpoint | undercloud | er ror={ "changed": false, "extra_data": { "data": null, "details": "The request you have made requires authentication.", "response": "{\"error\":{\"code\":401,\"message\":\"The request you have made requires authentication.\",\"title\":\"Unautho rized\"}}\n" }, "invocation": { "module_args": { "api_timeout": null, "auth": null, "auth_type": null, "availability_zone": null, "ca_cert": null, "client_cert": null, "client_key": null, "enabled": true, "endpoint_interface": "internal", "interface": "public", "region": "regionOne", "region_name": null, "service": "keystone", "state": "present", "timeout": 180, "url": "http://[fd00:fd00:fd00:2000::368]:5000", "validate_certs": null, "wait": true } }, "msg": "Failed to list services: Client Error for url: https://overcloud-public.myhsc.com:13000/v3/services, The request you have made requires authentication." } DeployCommand that was used: openstack overcloud deploy --templates \ -r /home/stack/templates/roles_data.yaml \ -n /home/stack/templates/custom_network_data.yaml \ -e /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/services/ironic-conductor.yaml \ -e /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/services/ironic-inspector.yaml \ -e /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/services/ironic-overcloud.yaml \ -e /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/services/ptp.yaml \ -e /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/ssl/tls-endpoints-public-dns.yaml \ -e /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/ssl/inject-trust-anchor-hiera.yaml \ -e /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/external-ceph.yaml \ -e /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/docker-ha.yaml \ -e /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/podman.yaml \ -e /home/stack/templates/overcloud-baremetal-deployed.yaml \ -e /home/stack/templates/networks-deployed-environment.yaml \ -e /home/stack/templates/vip-deployed-environment.yaml \ -e /home/stack/templates/environment.yaml \ -e /home/stack/templates/ironic-config.yaml \ -e /home/stack/templates/enable-tls.yaml \ -e /home/stack/templates/cloudname.yaml \ -e /home/stack/templates/my-additional-ceph-settings.yaml \ -e /home/stack/containers-prepare-parameter.yaml [Issue] we are seeing the deployment is working perfectly once and the same setting is not working perfectly in the second run. the failure rate is high. what can be the reasons behind this? *Note:* Before this, we were deploying with DNS and SSL and it was perfectly working fine in multiple reruns. But after SSL we have seen this random failure. -- ~ Lokendra skype: lokendrarathour

1 1

question about skyline apiserver and console
by mahdi n 26 Aug '22

26 Aug '22

Hello, I want to install ui skyline but I don't know how to install Does the first install the skyline api server next console? or only install skyline console ui? where must I set the keystone url ? skyline have not docs fir develop please help

3 3

[all][tc] What's happening in Technical Committee: summary 2022 Aug 26: Reading: 5 min
by Ghanshyam Mann 26 Aug '22

26 Aug '22

Hello Everyone, Here is this week's summary of the Technical Committee activities. 1. TC Meetings: ============ * We had this week's meeting on Aug 25. Most of the meeting discussions are summarized in this email. Meeting full logs are available @https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2022/tc.2022-08-25-15.00.log.html * Next TC weekly meeting will be on Sept 1 Thursday at 15:00 UTC, feel free to add the topic on the agenda[1] by Aug 31. 2. What we completed this week: ========================= * Retired openstack-helm-addons[2] 3. Activities In progress: ================== TC Tracker for Zed cycle ------------------------------ * Zed tracker etherpad includes the TC working items[3], Two are completed and others items are in-progress. Open Reviews ----------------- * Six open reviews for ongoing activities[4]. 2023.1 cycle Technical Election (TC + PTL) planning ------------------------------------------------------------- Nomination for the technical election (PTL and Technical Committee) are open now[5]. We are 1 week delay in election so as per TC charter we are adding this delay as exception[6]. Request you to add your nomination before Aug 31 and also ping anyone you know is interested in the PTL or TC position. Define 2023.1 cycle testing runtime ------------------------------------------- I have proposed the testing runtime for the 2023.1 cycle[7], please review and feedback if any. 2023.1 cycle TC PTG planning ------------------------------------ I have started the PTG planning for the TC sessions. * Similar to last coupe of PTG, we are planning "TC + Leader interaction" sessions[8], please vote your available day/time in poll[8]. * I have created the etherpad[10] to collect the TC slots topics and poll to select the TC slot timing[11]. * As you know, we are planning 'Operator Hours' in this PTG where developer and operator and meet for an hour to discuss/feedback. There is a poll to know if operator want to join developer PTG slot of interested to have their own space and let developer jump in there for discussion[12] 2021 User Survey TC Question Analysis ----------------------------------------------- No update on this. The survey summary is up for review[13]. Feel free to check and provide feedback. Zed cycle Leaderless projects ---------------------------------- Dale Smith volunteer to be PTL for Adjutant project [14] Fixing Zuul config error ---------------------------- Requesting projects with zuul config error to look into those and fix them which should not take much time[15]16]. Project updates ------------------- * Switch requirements to distributed leadership[17] 4. How to contact the TC: ==================== If you would like to discuss or give feedback to TC, you can reach out to us in multiple ways: 1. Email: you can send the email with tag [tc] on openstack-discuss ML[18]. 2. Weekly meeting: The Technical Committee conduct a weekly meeting every Thursday 15 UTC [19] 3. Ping us using 'tc-members' nickname on #openstack-tc IRC channel. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/851859 [3] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-zed-tracker [4] https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+status:open [5] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-August/030094.… [6] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/854624 [7] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/854375 [8] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-August/030108.… [9] https://framadate.org/zsOqRxfVcmtjaPBC [10] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-2023-1-ptg [11] https://framadate.org/yi8LNQaph5wrirks [12] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-August/030114.… [13] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/836888 [14] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/849606 [15] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/zuul-config-error-openstack [16] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-May/028603.html [17] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/854685 [18] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss [19] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Technical_Committee_Meeting -gmann

1 0

[release] Release countdown for week R-5, Aug 29 - Sep 02
by Előd Illés 26 Aug '22

26 Aug '22

Development Focus ----------------- We are getting close to the end of the Zed cycle! Next week on September 1st, 2022 is the Zed-3 milestone, also known as feature freeze. It's time to wrap up feature work in the services and their client libraries, and defer features that won't make it to the 2023.1 Antelope cycle. General Information ------------------- This coming week is the deadline for client libraries: their last feature release needs to happen before "Client library freeze" on September 1st, 2022. Only bugfix releases will be allowed beyond this point. When requesting those library releases, you can also include the stable/zed branching request with the review. As an example, see the "branches" section here: https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/deliverables/pike/… September 1st, 2022 is also the deadline for feature work in all OpenStack deliverables following the cycle-with-rc model. To help those projects produce a first release candidate in time, only bugfixes should be allowed in the master branch beyond this point. Any feature work past that deadline has to be raised as a Feature Freeze Exception (FFE) and approved by the team PTL. Finally, feature freeze is also the deadline for submitting a first version of your cycle-highlights. Cycle highlights are the raw data that helps shape what is communicated in press releases and other release activity at the end of the cycle, avoiding direct contacts from marketing folks. See https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/release-management.html#cycle… for more details. Upcoming Deadlines & Dates -------------------------- Zed-3 milestone (feature freeze): September 1st, 2022 (R-5 week) RC1 deadline: September 15th, 2022 (R-3 week) Final RC deadline: September 29th, 2022 (R-1 week) Final Zed release: October 5th, 2022 Next PTG: October 17-21, 2022 (virtual PTG!!!) Előd Illés irc: elodilles

1 0

[Nova] Can't Attach An Encrypted NFS (luksv1) Volume
by Sofia Enriquez 26 Aug '22

26 Aug '22

Hello Nova Team, eharney and I are working on NFS encrypted volume support [1] and [2]. I'm trying to attach an encrypted volume to a nova instance. However, this fails with "libvirt.libvirtError: internal error: unable to execute QEMU command 'blockdev-add': Image is not in qcow2 format" error. I'm using a Devstack environment (nova/cinder master branch). Last week I opened a bug report [3] and I'd like to raise some attention to it. I've proposed a WIP patch [4] with a possible solution that I'd like to get some feedback on or know if should follow a different approach. The problem is that is_luks() returns false for the NFS case, because NFS is using LUKS inside of qcow2 and not regular LUKS. Let me know what you think Thank you Sofia [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/597148 [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/749155 [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1987311 [4] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854030 -- Sofía Enriquez she/her Software Engineer Red Hat PnT <https://www.redhat.com> IRC: @enriquetaso @RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat> Red Hat <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc> <https://www.redhat.com>

1 0

[charms][elections] PTL candidacy for Antelope cycle
by Alex Kavanagh 26 Aug '22

26 Aug '22

Hi All I would like to put myself forward for another cycle for the Charms PTL for the Antelope cycle. I've been a contributor to OpenStack and Charms since 2016 and a core member since mid 2016. I've also been the PTL for the last 2 cycles. Why do I want to be PTL again? The team has again achieved a huge amount, testing and supporting the charms and packages across multiple Ubuntu LTS releases (bionic, focal and now, jammy) with Charms and OpenStack support back to queens. We've (almost) transitioned to the new Charmhub ( charmhub.io) and will continue to support Queens through to the upcoming Zed release, and onto Antelope. I'd like to continue to support the team as we march forward with the responsibilities of the PTL to smooth the processes. Thanks Alex (tinwood) -- Alex Kavanagh - Software Engineer OpenStack Engineering - Data Centre Development - Canonical Ltd

1 0

[Glance] PTL non-candidacy
by Abhishek Kekane 26 Aug '22

26 Aug '22

Hi all, I'm writing this email to let you know that I'm not going to run for Glance PTL for the Antelope dev cycle, I think it's time for some new ideas and new approaches so it's a good idea to hand over the hat of PTL to a new member of the team. I've been serving Glance PTL since Ussuri, tried my best to keep Glance stable, lots of changes have been made since then, my initial focus was to improve glance-tempest coverage which we managed to do in past cycles. I would like to thank all the members of the Glance team and others for supporting me during this period. My plan is to stick around, attend to my duties as a glance core contributor, and support my successor in whatever way I can to make for a smooth transition. Thank you once again! Cheers, Abhishek Kekane

4 3

[kuryr][elections] PTL candidacy for Antelope cycle
by Roman Dobosz 26 Aug '22

26 Aug '22

Hello, I would like to announce my candidacy to be the Kuryr PTL for the next Antelope cycle. I've been Kuryr contributor since the Ussuri release and became core reviewers member at the end of Victoria cycle. In the upcoming Antelope cycle, I'd like to focus on Kuryr stability and compatibility with upcoming Kubernetes release. Another thing which I'd like to move forward is to eliminate Kuryr services restarts. Thanks, Roman Dobosz (gryf)

1 0

[election][heat][ptl] PTL non-candidacy
by Rico Lin 25 Aug '22

25 Aug '22

Hi all, As the PTL election will soon start, I would like to share my statement on not planning to run another term of Heat PTL. And instead, I encourage anyone (core reviewer or not) who is interested to put their name on. I will definitely still stay around and help with reviews and patches. *Rico Lin*

2 1

Regarding Designate Installation in ansible Playbook
by Adivya Singh 25 Aug '22

25 Aug '22

hi Team, I have made under conf.d a designate. yml file, and rerunning the setup of Openstack-setuphost but still it is not installing a Designate Container in OpenStack. Is there any Reason for this, Something i am doing right Regards Adivya Singh

2 1

[OPS] Participation Poll for OPS Meetup at the PTG
by Amy Marrich 25 Aug '22

25 Aug '22

Hey all, Just putting this on the list for more visibility. On Monday we posted a poll from the OPS Meetup Twitter account for how Operators would prefer to interact with the Developers[0]. The poll closes on Monday but if you don't have twitter please reply here with your preference. We also have a poll for preferred times[1] Thanks, Amy 0 - https://twitter.com/osopsmeetup/status/1561708280455593984 1 - https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/bD9kR2yd

1 0

[neutron] Drivers meeting agenda - 26.08.2022.
by Lajos Katona 25 Aug '22

25 Aug '22

Hi Neutron Drivers, The agenda for tomorrow's drivers meeting is at [1]. We have the following RFEs to discuss tomorrow: * [RFE] Add a port extension to set/define the switchdev capabilities (#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1987093 ) * [RFE] Add DSCP mark 44 (#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1987378 ) And we have a topic for the On Demand agenda: * (amorin): Add new novaplug mechanism driver ** https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1986969 ** https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/854553 [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NeutronDrivers#Agenda See you at the meeting tomorrow. Lajos Katona (lajoskatona)

1 0

DCN and DVR in Openstack wallaby | tripleo
by Swogat Pradhan 25 Aug '22

25 Aug '22

Hi, I have a site1 and a site2. Site1 contains the controller nodes with some compute and storage and in site2 i have compute nodes maybe hci solution for it. site1 has a different network pool and site2 has a different network pool and these cannot be extended to one another. What I want to know is how I am going to configure network to be used by the compute nodes in site2. If i use DVR then i can just create a normal external network which will only be used for site2 and then the traffic doesn't have to go through the network node. Is it the right solution? And is DVR enabled by default or do I have to use the neutron-ovn-dvr.yaml template? And if i use DVR do i have to set the following parameter?: ComputeParameters: NeutronBridgeMappings: "" Is DCN with DVR the correct approach? With regards, Swogat Pradhan

1 0

[all][tc] Technical Committee next weekly meeting on 2022 Aug 25 at 1500 UTC
by Ghanshyam Mann 25 Aug '22

25 Aug '22

Hello Everyone, Below is the agenda for Tomorrow's TC meeting schedule at 1500 UTC. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting * Roll call * Follow up on past action items * Gate health check ** Bare 'recheck' state *** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary * 2023.1 cycle PTG Planning ** Schedule 'operator hours' as a separate slot in PTG(avoiding conflicts among other projects 'operator hours') * 2023.1 cycle Technical Election * Open Reviews ** https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+is:open -gmann

1 0

container and instances are not working on my dashboard
by Lee, Vincent Z 25 Aug '22

25 Aug '22

Hi all, I am quite new to Openstack and faced some issues with creating instances and displaying created containers on my Openstack dashboard. I am currently working on multinode Openstack. I am hoping to get some helps and feedbacks about this. I will briefly go through the problems I encountered. When I created an instances on my dashboard, it directly went into error state. I have attached a screenshot as shown below. [cid:c1615736-e4b3-4100-99c0-dfb970ff365f] This is my list of hosts. [cid:8d2f9138-27fd-4cf5-95ca-0cd9038f723c] When I created a container using both cli and dashboard, two containers were running. However, when I tried to look into my dashboard, those containers were not shown. These are the created containers. [cid:61d517f2-c60a-4892-bf88-1a9e0d763b7f] However, when i try to open my dashboard and look for them, they just don't appear on it. So I am not sure what is causing this. [cid:fb9d0f7e-1afa-48c1-bc92-9c8054382b55] Hope to hear from everyone soon. Best regards, Vincent

3 2

[all][elections][ptl][tc] Combined PTL/TC Antelope cycle Election Nominations Kickoff
by Amy Marrich 24 Aug '22

24 Aug '22

Apologies all for the lack of notice to the start of the PTL/TC election season. Unfortunately we are starting late and we are attempting to get back on schedule. We will make sure we send out a reminder notice (or two) for nominations closing. Remember we can't do this without your nominations and folks being willing to lead the projects and the community ======================================================================== Nominations for OpenStack PTLs (Project Team Leads) and TC (Technical Committee) positions (4 positions) are now open and will remain open until Aug 31, 2022 23:45 UTC. All nominations must be submitted as a text file to the openstack/election repository as explained at https://governance.openstack.org/election/#how-to-submit-a-candidacy Please make sure to follow the candidacy file naming convention: candidates/antelope/<Project_Name or "TC">/<email_address> (for example, "candidates/antelope/TC/stacker(a)example.org"). The name of the file should match an email address for your current OpenStack Foundation Individual Membership. Take this opportunity to ensure that your OSF member profile contains current information: https://www.openstack.org/profile/ Any OpenStack Foundation Individual Member can propose their candidacy for an available, directly-elected seat on the Technical Committee. In order to be an eligible candidate for PTL you must be an OpenStack Foundation Individual Member. PTL candidates must also have contributed to the corresponding team during the Zed to Antelope timeframe, Sep 17, 2021 00:00 UTC - Aug 31, 2022 00:00 UTC. Your Gerrit account must also have a verified email address matching the one used in your candidacy filename. Both PTL and TC elections will be held from Sep 07, 2022 23:45 UTC through to Sep 14, 2022 23:45 UTC. The electorate for the TC election are the OpenStack Foundation Individual Members who have a code contribution to one of the official teams over the Zed to Antelope timeframe, Sep 17, 2021 00:00 UTC - Aug 31, 2022 00:00 UTC, as well as any Extra ATCs who are acknowledged by the TC. The electorate for a PTL election are the OpenStack Foundation Individual Members who have a code contribution over the Zed to Antelope timeframe, Sep 17, 2021 00:00 UTC - Aug 31, 2022 00:00 UTC, in a deliverable repository maintained by the team which the PTL would lead, as well as the Extra ATCs who are acknowledged by the TC for that specific team. The list of project teams can be found at https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/projects/ and their individual team pages include lists of corresponding Extra ATCs. Please find below the timeline: PTL + TC nomination starts @ Aug 24, 2022 23:45 UTC PTL + TC nomination ends @ Aug 31, 2022 23:45 UTC TC campaigning starts @ Aug 31, 2022 23:45 UTC TC campaigning ends @ Sep 07, 2022 23:45 UTC PTL + TC elections start @ Sep 07, 2022 23:45 UTC PTL + TC elections end @ Sep 14, 2022 23:45 UTC Shortly after election officials approve candidates, they will be listed on the https://governance.openstack.org/election/ page. The electorate is requested to confirm their email addresses in Gerrit prior to 2022-08-31 00:00:00+00:00, so that the emailed ballots are sent to the correct email address. This email address should match one which was provided in your foundation member profile as well. Gerrit account information and OSF member profiles can be updated at https://review.openstack.org/#/settings/contact and https://www.openstack.org/profile/ accordingly. If you have any questions please be sure to either ask them on the mailing list or to the elections officials: https://governance.openstack.org/election/#election-officials

1 0

[TripleO] Derived Parameters going away
by John Fulton 24 Aug '22

24 Aug '22

It seems this feature was not widely adopted so the current maintainers would like to remove it. We have a proposed patch [1] to remove it from the main branch so it won't be in the TripleO release which accompanies Zed. It's presently in the release which accompanies Wallaby. Note that TripleO is using the independent release model [2]. What is the "Derived Parameters" feature? NFV and HCI overclouds require system tuning. There are formulas which output tuning parameters based on hardware. These parameters may then be provided as input to TripleO to deploy a tuned overcloud. There is an additional method of system tuning called “derived parameters” where TripleO uses inspected hardware data as input and automatically sets tuning parameters [3]. Removing this feature shouldn't block anyone since they can still deploy a tuned overcloud by providing standard parameters. There's also a docs patch [4] explaining how to migrate away from derived to standard parameters. John [1] https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:derive-parameters-cleanup [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-specs/+/801512 [3] https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/specs/pike/tripleo-deri… [4] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-docs/+/854443

1 0

OpenInfra Live - August 25 at 1400 UTC
by Allison Price 24 Aug '22

24 Aug '22

Hi everyone, This week’s OpenInfra Live episode is brought to you by members of the OpenStack community. Episode: Making VDI a first-class citizen in the OpenStack world Learn the importance of having a Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) with OpenStack. Get to know the VDI use cases. Discover which relevant features are already integrated and which are still missing. You’ll also have the opportunity to meet Bumblebee and enjoy the cute flying insect during a demo! Date and time: Thursday, August 25 at 1400 UTC (9am CT) You can watch us live on: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juczRNlfg6c <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juczRNlfg6c> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/video/event/urn:li:ugcPost:6966050226767884289/ <https://www.linkedin.com/video/event/urn:li:ugcPost:6966050226767884289/> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/104139126308032/posts/5359387687449790/ <https://www.facebook.com/104139126308032/posts/5359387687449790/> WeChat: recording will be posted on OpenStack WeChat after the live stream Speakers: Manuel Bentele Andy Botting Radosław Piliszek Have an idea for a future episode? Share it now at ideas.openinfra.live <https://openinfrafoundation.formstack.com/forms/openinfralive>. See you there! Allison

1 0

[neutron][ovn] Gauging community interest in supporting a masquerading forwarding DNS resolver for isolated tenant networks
by Miguel Lavalle 24 Aug '22

24 Aug '22

Hi, As described in this Launchpad bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1902950, in contrast with ML2 / OVS, with ML2 / OVN there is not a masquerading forwarding DNS resolver available to instances on isolated tenant networks. The purpose of this message is to gather feedback from the community as to how much interest there is in providing this functionality under ML2 / OVN. If your organization has interest, please respond to this thread. Even better, register your interest on the topic in the etherpad for the upcoming Antelope PTG (https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/neutron-antelope-ptg) under the "Check of interest on closing ML2/OVN DNS gaps" topic. And of course, attend the conversation in October Best regards Miguel Lavalle

1 0

(no subject)
by ralonsoh＠redhat.com 24 Aug '22

24 Aug '22

The original message was received at Wed, 24 Aug 2022 22:48:10 +0900 from redhat.com [7.150.121.148] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org>

1 0