August 2022 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[dev][requirements][tripleo] Return of the revenge of lockfile strikes back part II
by Jeremy Stanley 01 Aug '22

01 Aug '22

It became apparent in a Python community discussion[0] yesterday that lockfile has been designated as a "critical project" by PyPI, even though it was effectively abandoned in 2010. Because our release automation account is listed as one of its maintainers, I looked into whether we still need it for anything... For those who have been around here a while, you may recall that the OpenStack project temporarily assumed maintenance[1] of lockfile in late 2014 and uploaded a few new releases for it, as a stop-gap until we could replace our uses with oslo.concurrency. That work was completed[2] early in the Liberty development cycle. Unfortunately for us, that's not the end of the story. I looked yesterday expecting to see that we've not needed lockfile for 7 years, and was disappointed to discover it's still in our constraints list. Why? After much wailing and gnashing of teeth and manually installing multiple bisections of the requirements list, I narrowed it down to one dependency: ansible-runner. Apparently, ansible-runner currently depends[3] on python-daemon, which still has a dependency on lockfile[4]. Our uses of ansible-runner seem to be pretty much limited to TripleO repositories (hence tagging them in the subject), so it's possible they could find an alternative to it and solve this dilemma. Optionally, we could try to help the ansible-runner or python-daemon maintainers with new implementations of the problem dependencies as a way out. Whatever path we take, we're long overdue. The reasons we moved off lockfile ages ago are still there, and the risk to us has only continued to increase in the meantime. I'm open to suggestions, but we really ought to make sure we have it out of our constraints list by the Zed release. [0] https://discuss.python.org/t/17219 [1] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-June/038387.html [2] https://review.openstack.org/151224 [3] https://github.com/ansible/ansible-runner/issues/379 [4] https://pagure.io/python-daemon/issue/42 -- Jeremy Stanley

4 7

[openstack-ansible][glance][nfs] Requesting Example of Working Config
by Dave Hall 01 Aug '22

01 Aug '22

Hello, Release - yoga. Host OS - Debian 11 I'm looking for an example of how to get NFS working as storage for glance and cinder - both the openstack_user_config.yml stanzas and the NFS server setup (/etc/exports, etc.). So far I've adapted the stanzas from the openstack_user_config.yml examples. The shares are mounted and writable (by root) from the glance/cinder containers, but glance keeps on throwing 410 errors. Thanks. -Dave -- Dave Hall Binghamton University kdhall(a)binghamton.edu

2 2

[baremetal-sig][ironic] No meeting on August
by Iury Gregory 01 Aug '22

01 Aug '22

Dear all, We would like to inform you that this month the Bare Metal SIG meeting will be skipped. Best regards, -- *Att[]'s* *Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira * *MSc in Computer Science at UFCG* *Ironic PTL * *Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat Brazil* *Social*: https://www.linkedin.com/in/iurygregory *E-mail: iurygregory(a)gmail.com <iurygregory(a)gmail.com>*

1 0

[ironic][swift][vitrage][OpenStackSDK] missing releases in Zed
by Előd Illés 01 Aug '22

01 Aug '22

Hi PTLS/release liaisons of teams in $SUBJECT, Here we are at the time in Zed cycle where release team evaluates if every cycle-with-intermediary deliverables had their releases (like we had in yoga [1] for example). The list-deliverables script showed that we miss some of the deliverables [2]. Here we should create a patch that proposes the transition from 'cycle-with-intermediary' to 'cycle-with-rc' for every such deliverables. As these are usually the ones that missing at this time of the cycles and we end up usually abandoning the transition patches and proposing releases: could you please propose release patches for these deliverables [2]? (Let me know if any of the deliverables needs anyway a transition though, and I'll create the patch) [1] https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:not-yet-released-yoga [2] https://paste.opendev.org/show/bXsaCISJzOfOsRnECvE9/ Thanks in advance, Előd Illés irc: elodilles

1 0

Seek help for glance error "Configuration for store failed. Adding images to this store is disabled"
by Hao Jue PX Wang 01 Aug '22

01 Aug '22

Hi folks, I am using a glance config like this to leverage IBM gpfs backend to store image, however, when upload images openstack image create --file rhel-8.5-official.qcow2 test1, I ran into the following error. Any idea or suggestion for fixing the error? Thanks ============================== [glance_store] default_backend = filesystem enabled_backends = filesystem filesystem_store_datadir = /foundation_gpfs2/icic/images/ filesystem_store_file_perm = 0644 ============================== ========================================================================================== 2022-08-01 10:18:43.590 3663156 INFO glance_store.capabilities [req-2c007ca2-a0c4-4a31-a94d-43f0f25cb2cc 0688b01e6439ca32d698d20789d52169126fb41fb1a4ddafcebb97d854e836c9 b334d58126ee4193bc439ea0cb806aaa - default default] haojuedebug req_cap: [<BitMasks.WRITE_ACCESS: 8>] 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data [req-2c007ca2-a0c4-4a31-a94d-43f0f25cb2cc 0688b01e6439ca32d698d20789d52169126fb41fb1a4ddafcebb97d854e836c9 b334d58126ee4193bc439ea0cb806aaa - default default] Error in store configuration. Adding images to store is disabled.: glance_store.exceptions.StoreAddDisabled: Configuration for store failed. Adding images to this store is disabled. 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data Traceback (most recent call last): 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/glance/api/v2/image_data.py", line 182, in upload 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data image.set_data(data, size, backend=backend) 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/glance/domain/proxy.py", line 198, in set_data 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data self.base.set_data(data, size, backend=backend, set_active=set_active) 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/glance/notifier.py", line 501, in set_data 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data _send_notification(notify_error, 'image.upload', msg) 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/oslo_utils/excutils.py", line 220, in __exit__ 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data self.force_reraise() 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/oslo_utils/excutils.py", line 196, in force_reraise 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data six.reraise(self.type_, self.value, self.tb) 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/six.py", line 703, in reraise 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data raise value 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/glance/notifier.py", line 448, in set_data 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data set_active=set_active) 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/glance/api/policy.py", line 204, in set_data 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data return self.image.set_data(*args, **kwargs) 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/glance/quota/__init__.py", line 319, in set_data 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data set_active=set_active) 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/glance/location.py", line 559, in set_data 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data self._upload_to_store(data, verifier, backend, size) 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/glance/location.py", line 486, in _upload_to_store 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data verifier=verifier) 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/glance_store/backend.py", line 491, in add_to_backend_with_multihash 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data image_id, data, size, hashing_algo, store, context, verifier) 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/glance_store/backend.py", line 468, in store_add_to_backend_with_multihash 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data image_id, data, size, hashing_algo, context=context, verifier=verifier) 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/glance_store/driver.py", line 279, in add_adapter 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data metadata_dict) = store_add_fun(*args, **kwargs) 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/glance_store/capabilities.py", line 175, in op_checker 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data raise op_exec_map[op](**kwargs) 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data glance_store.exceptions.StoreAddDisabled: Configuration for store failed. Adding images to this store is disabled. 2022-08-01 10:18:43.593 3663156 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data ==========================================================================================

2 2

[nova] Zed API microversion planning
by Sylvain Bauza 01 Aug '22

01 Aug '22

Hey, tl;dr: if you have an open API change asking for a microversion, add it into the proposal list BEFORE TOMORROW AUG 2ND https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-zed-microversions-plan For those who write API changes, they probably hit merge conflicts everytime we merge a new API microversion. FWIW, we recently merged 2.91 and 2.92, which means you now have to rebase at least with using a 2.93 version. That's why I'm proposing something new this cycle that may help you : IF YOU HAVE AN OPEN API CHANGE THAT'S JUST NEEDS TO BE REVIEWED, PLEASE ADD IT TO https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-zed-microversions-plan BEFORE AUGUST 2ND 1600UTC. During the next Nova meeting, we'll look at all of the provided API changes in the etherpad, and we'll try to organize them by saying "ok, this one will have this API microversion, this other one that other API microversion". After this meeting, you should be able to know which API microversion you would have for Zed so you could then rebase your changes to use this one. That being said, please make sure to be able to rebase your change very quickly, because we don't want to wait for some API change before accepting another one that's important and which is ready to be merged. Thanks, -Sylvain

1 0

[neutron] Bug deputy July 25 to August 1
by Nurmatov Mamatisa 01 Aug '22

01 Aug '22

Hi, I was bug deputy last week. Below is the week summary. Bug #1940425 <https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1940425> was occurred last week due to os-vif 3.0.0 release. One rfe<https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1983053> was proposed. Undecided bug needs further triage. Details: Critical -------- - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1940425 - test_live_migration_with_trunk tempest test fails due to port remains in down state - Confirmed - Assigned to Slawek Kaplonski - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1982818 - Periodic job openstack-tox-py39-with-oslo-master is broken - In progress: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/851433 - Assigned to Rodolfo Alonso - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1982720 - stable/train: neutron-grenade job consistently fails in reqirements repo - In progress: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/851506 - Assigned to Slawek Kaplonski Medium ------ - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1982962 - Quota driver "DbQuotaNoLockDriver" should implement "get_detailed_project_quotas" - In progress: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/851357 - Assigned to Rodolfo Alonso Low --- - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1982951 - [OVN][QoS] Add minimum bandwidth rule support to ML2/OVN - In progress: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/842292 - Assigned to Rodolfo Alonso Undecided --------- - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1982882 - Failed to process compatible router - network is unreachable - New RFEs ---- - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1983053 - [RFE] Add possibility to define default security group rules - New - Assigned Slawek Kaplonski Best regards, Isa Advanced Software Technology Lab / Cloud Technologies Research

1 0

[cinder] midcycle - 2 Planning
by Rajat Dhasmana 01 Aug '22

01 Aug '22

Hello Argonauts, As discussed in our last cinder meeting[1], most of the cinder team (present during the meeting) don't have conflicts on 10th August, 1400-1600 UTC so we are planning to conduct our Cinder midcycle-2 on the proposed date (R-8 week). This will be 3 weeks prior to Milestone-3/Feature Freeze and 2 weeks before non-client library release (os-brick) so will give plenty of time to know we're on track and work on it if we're not. Please add your topics in the etherpad along with your IRC nick (from L#33). Date: 10th August, 2022 Time: 1400-1600 UTC Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-zed-midcycles [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-zed-meetings#L113

1 0