August 2022 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[manila] LVM shares are unmounted on reboot
by Vaibhav 06 Sep '22

06 Sep '22

Dear All, One of the host running Manila-share service has rebooted. After the reboot the LVMs are not mounted on the Manila mount points. I use LVM Driver with DHSS=False. default_share_type = default_share_type share_name_template = manila-%s rootwrap_config = /etc/manila/rootwrap.conf api_paste_config = /etc/manila/api-paste.ini auth_strategy = keystone my_ip=192.168.82.2 enabled_share_backends = lvm enabled_share_protocols = NFS state_path=/var/lib/manila [lvm] share_backend_name = LVM share_driver = manila.share.drivers.lvm.LVMShareDriver driver_handles_share_servers = False lvm_share_volume_group = VGZunManila lvm_share_export_ips = 192.168.82.2 lvm_share_export_root = $state_path/mnt After the reboot LVMs are there but they are mounted on their respective share location. Any way to solve this and this to be done automatically? Regards, Vaibhav

2 2

[tc][ptl] TC + Community Leaders interaction in 2023.1 Antelope Virtual PTG
by Ghanshyam Mann 02 Sep '22

02 Sep '22

Hello Everyone, We had successful TC+Community leaders interaction sessions in the last couple of PTG, and we will continue the same for 2023.1 cycle PTG also. I have created the poll to select the best suitable time. It will be for two hours (single or two sessions) either on Monday or Tuesday. Please add your preference in the below doodle poll (including TC members): - https://framadate.org/zsOqRxfVcmtjaPBC Also, I have created the below etherpad with the draft agenda, If you as PTL or project representatives or SIG Chair and would like to attend this session, please add your name: - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-leaders-interaction-2023-1 -gmann

1 1

[PTL][release] Zed Cycle Highlights
by Előd Illés 02 Sep '22

02 Sep '22

Hi, This is a reminder, that *this week* is the week for Cycle highlights [1][2]! They need to be added to deliverable yamls so that they can be included in release marketing preparations. (See the details about how to add them at the project team guide [3].) [1]https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html [2]https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html#z-cycle-highlights [3] https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/release-management.html#cycle… Thanks, Előd Illés irc: elodilles

4 6

[heat][elections] PTL Candidacy for Antelope Cycle
by Brendan Shephard 02 Sep '22

02 Sep '22

Hi all, I first wanted to thank Rico for his ongoing commitment to the project over the last cycles. He has provided lots of guidance and help to the Heat project for a long time and his contribution deserves recognition. I am proposing my candidacy for Heat PTL during the Antelope cycle. I have worked with the Heat project for several years both as a user and more recently over the last 2 years as a contributor. I see great potential in the project for our users and look forward to continuing work in order to support features and functionality of the project. Some of my objectives for the next few cycles are: Remove the dependencies on legacy python-*client libraries and instead shift to the openstacksdk client library. While the legacy libraries have served us well, they are starting to show their limitations and the delta in servicibilty will only increase as each project moves towards leveraging the openstacksdk. So this change, while quite extensive will ensure future compatibility with the other OpenStack project teams. Continue ensuring Heat supports the most up-to-date and recent features provided by each project. To ensure Heat is the default and best choice for our users, we need to ensure we are able to leverage the latest available features from the complimentary OpenStack projects. This is an ongoing challenge to stay up-to-date with the changes each cycle and work towards implementing them in Heat. Thank you all for you consideration, and I look forward to the next cycle and continuing to work with you all. Regards, Brendan

3 2

[all] [oslo.messaging] Interest in collaboration on a NATS driver
by Tobias Urdin 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

Hello everyone, Before continuing on, yes this kind of is a massive effort but it doesn’t have to be, it would be very cool to get a replacement for RabbitMQ as I’m probably not the only one not satisfied with it. I've proposed a very bare POC in [1] but it's long way from being finished, but atleast some basic devstack is passing. NATS [2] is a cloud-native scalable messaging system that supports the one-to-many and pub-sub methods that we can use to implement it as a oslo.messaging driver. This would make OpenStack easier to deploy in a highly available fashion, reduce outages related to RabbitMQ, free up memory and CPU usage by RabbitMQ (it’s insane when using clustering) and embrace a more cloud-native approach for our software that runs the cloud, alternatives is also welcome :) The POC has a lot of things that could be improved for example: • Do retries and acknowledgements in the library (since NATS does NOT persist messages like RabbitMQ could) • Handle reconnects or interruptions (for example resubscribe to topics etc) • Timeouts need to be implemented and handled • Investigate maximum message payload size • Find or maintain a NATS python library that doesn't use async like the official one does • Add a lot of testing • Cleanup everything noted as TODO in the POC code Now I couldn’t possibly pull this off myself without some collaboration with all of you, even though I’m very motivated to just dig in and do this for the rest of the year and migrate our test fleet there I unfortunately (like everyone else) is juggeling a lot of balls at the same time. If anybody, or any company, out there would be interested in collaborating in a project to bring this support and maintain it feel free to reach out. I’m hoping somebody will bite but atleast I’ve put it out there for all of you. Best regards Tobias [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.messaging/+/848338 [2] https://nats.io

4 7

[ovn-bgp-agent][neutron] - expose_tenant_networks bug
by Satish Patel 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

Folks, I am setting up ovn-bgp-agent lab in "BGP mode" and i found everything working great except expose tenant network https://ltomasbo.wordpress.com/2021/02/04/ovn-bgp-agent-testing-setup/ Lab Summary: 1 controller node 3 compute node ovn-bgp-agent running on all compute node because i am using "enable_distributed_floating_ip=True" ovn-bgp-agent config: [DEFAULT] debug=False expose_tenant_networks=True driver=ovn_bgp_driver reconcile_interval=120 ovsdb_connection=unix:/var/run/openvswitch/db.sock I am not seeing my vm on tenant ip getting exposed but when i attach FIP which gets exposed in loopback address. here is the full trace of debug logs: https://paste.opendev.org/show/buHiJ90nFgC1JkQxZwVk/

2 9

help: set ironic inspect autodiscovery failed
by 陈薇 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

Hi All, I'm trying the ironic inspect autodiscovery but failed. What I did: Set the inspector.conf 1. [discovery] enroll_node_driver = ipmi [processing] permit_active_introspection = true processing_hooks = $default_processing_hooks,extra_hardware,lldp_basic Configure the python agent: inspection_callback_url: There's no node automatically added. I enter the host and read the log of python agent, no inspect related log. Could anybody give any advice about how to triage or setup correctly? Thanks & Regards, Wei

1 1

[election][openstack-ansible] PTL candidacy for Antelope cycle
by Dmitriy Rabotyagov 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

Hello. I want to self-nominate for the role of OpenStack-Ansible PTL for the Antelope release cycle. As always, my goal will be to constantly improve existing code, make deployments and further operations as reliable as possible. For the previous cycle we have reached some of previously defined goals, like adding a `service` role, finally implementing service_token_roles and support of CentOS 9 Stream, but there is still room for improvement for role testing. With the return of live events I will do my best to ensure project presence on them and get in touch with operators to gain feedback for project future improvement. -- Kind regards, Dmitriy Rabotyagov

2 1

[all][tc] Technical Committee next weekly meeting on 2022 Sept 1 at 1500 UTC
by Ghanshyam Mann 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

Hello Everyone, Below is the agenda for Tomorrow's TC meeting schedule at 1500 UTC. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting * Roll call * Follow up on past action items * Gate health check ** Bare 'recheck' state *** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary * Checks on Zed cycle tracker ** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-zed-tracker * 2023.1 cycle PTG Planning ** TC + Leaders interaction sessions *** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-leaders-interaction-2023-1 ** TC PTG etherpad *** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-2023-1-ptg ** Schedule 'operator hours' as a separate slot in PTG(avoiding conflicts among other projects 'operator hours') *** https://twitter.com/osopsmeetup/status/1561708283492196353 *** https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/bD9kR2yd * 2023.1 cycle Technical Election ** https://governance.openstack.org/election/ * Open Reviews ** https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+is:open -gmann

1 0

[cinder] Extending Feature Freeze Deadline by 1 week
by Rajat Dhasmana 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

Hi All, As discussed in the cinder meeting today, due to the abundance of features proposed[1] and the shortage of review bandwidth, we are planning to extend the feature freeze by one week. Current feature freeze date (for cinder): 01 September 2022 New feature freeze date (for cinder): 08 September 2022 Kindly let me know if there are any objections to the above proposal else all the features proposed are eligible for the feature freeze exception of 1 week. [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-zed-features Thanks and regards Rajat Dhasmana

1 0