April 2022 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[all][tc] What's happening in Technical Committee: summary April 29th, 22: Reading: 5 min
by Ghanshyam Mann 29 Apr '22

29 Apr '22

Hello Everyone, Here is this week's summary of the Technical Committee activities. 1. TC Meetings: ============ * We had this week's meeting on April 28. Most of the meeting discussions are summarized in this email. Meeting full logs are available @https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2022/tc.2022-04-21-15.00.html * Next TC weekly meeting will be on May 5 Thursday at 15:00 UTC, feel free to add the topic on the agenda[1] by May 4. We will cover CFN and tick-tock release notes topic there and if time permits then cover any othe topic. 2. What we completed this week: ========================= * Resolution to drop the lower constraints maintenance[2] * Remove TC Liaisons framework[3] * Retired openstack-helm-docs[4] 3. Activities In progress: ================== TC Tracker for Zed cycle ------------------------------ * Zed tracker etherpad includes the TC working items[5], we have started the many items. Open Reviews ----------------- * Seven open reviews for ongoing activities[6]. Change OpenStack release naming policy proposal ----------------------------------------------------------- We discussed it it PTG, TC decided to drop the name from release name process and keping the numbers. Slaweq proposed it on gerrit[7] and on ML[8]. Discussion is in progress as there are some objection from foundation marketting team. Migration from old ELK service to new Dashboard ----------------------------------------------------------- You might have seen that Daniel email about the new dashboard[9] and login information, we encourage community members to use it and provide feedback if any. Dainel also investigation about the e-r instance. Consistent and Secure Default RBAC ------------------------------------------- We discussed about the heat mostly in Tuesday call but could not get any consensus. Notes are in etherpad[10] and will continue the discussion on Tuesday 3rd May 14:00 UTC [11], FIPs community-wide goal ------------------------------- Ade has proposed the new milestone for this goal work, please review those and give feedback if any[12]. 2021 User Survey TC Question Analysis ----------------------------------------------- No update on this. The survey summary is up for review[13]. Feel free to check and provide feedback. Zed cycle Leaderless projects ---------------------------------- No updates on this. Only Adjutant project is leaderless/maintainer-less. We will check Adjutant's situation again on ML and hope Braden will be ready with their company side permission[14]. Fixing Zuul config error ---------------------------- Requesting projects with zuul config error to look into those and fix them which should not take much time[15]. Project updates ------------------- * Add the cinder-three-par charm to Openstack charms[16] 4. How to contact the TC: ==================== If you would like to discuss or give feedback to TC, you can reach out to us in multiple ways: 1. Email: you can send the email with tag [tc] on openstack-discuss ML[17]. 2. Weekly meeting: The Technical Committee conduct a weekly meeting every Thursday 15 UTC [18] 3. Ping us using 'tc-members' nickname on #openstack-tc IRC channel. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/838004 [3] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/837891 [4] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/839100 [5] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-zed-tracker [6] https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+status:open [7] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/839897 [8] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-April/028354.ht… [9] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-April/028346.ht… [10] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/rbac-zed-ptg#L103 [11] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Consistent_and_Secure_Default_Policies_Popu… [12] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/838601 [13] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/836888 [14] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-March/027626.ht… [15] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/zuul-config-error-openstack [16] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/837781 [17] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss [18] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Technical_Committee_Meeting -gmann

1 0

[dev][infra][tact-sig] Retiring the status.openstack.org server
by Jeremy Stanley 29 Apr '22

29 Apr '22

With the recent retirement of the Elastic-Recheck and OpenStack-Health services, as well as Zuul long ago growing its own status dashboard, the only other thing still being served from the status.openstack.org site is a very broken and empty ReviewDay interface. I'm planning to take status.openstack.org offline at the end of this month (late next week), so wanted to give everyone a heads up that anything still served from that site right now (basically just a link to the Zuul status page for our openstack tenant) will be going away. If you want the Zuul status page for openstack, the proper URL is https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/status or you can just go to the root of the site and click the "status" link in the openstack tenant row. (There's also a white-label zuul.openstack.org site but that's primarily maintained in order to avoid breaking old tools people may have hard-coded to use it.) -- Jeremy Stanley

1 1

Need information
by Gk Gk 29 Apr '22

29 Apr '22

Hi All, I need information about availability zones in nova. I tried googling but cant find enough information. My questions are , 1. Why is it that we have two concepts of aggregates and AZs ? Is one not enough ? Like exposing aggregates and creating flavors with extra specs to match ? Why do we need AZs also ? 2. Why is it that one node should only be a part of one AZ but not two ? whereas in the case of aggregates, it can overlap ? 3. Also why cant we expose only aggregates like AZs but block the compute member list to the users ? Doing this way will serve the purpose of AZ as well ? Why we dont want to expose aggregates as AZs ? Thanks Kumar

2 1

regarding custom role creation
by Adivya Singh 29 Apr '22

29 Apr '22

Hi Team, i want to create a custom role in openstack, with privilege being 1> to allow them to make image public 2> to modify/change the flavor how can i do this, I have openstack installed with XENA regards Adivya Singh

2 1

ERROR trust id
by Firas Dehech 29 Apr '22

29 Apr '22

Hi all, I am working on a project Openstack in linux ubuntu 20.04. I want to create a cluster hadoop with one master-node and three worker-nodes and i have a problem with a cluster that doesn't work. Status ERROR: Creating cluster failed for the following reason(s): Failed to create trust Error ID: ef5e8b0a-8e6d-4878-bebb-f37f4fa50a88, Failed to create trust Error ID: 43157255-86af-4773-96c1-a07ca7ac66ed. links: https://docs.openstack.org/devstack/latest/ File local.conf : [[local|localrc]] ADMIN_PASSWORD=secret DATABASE_PASSWORD=secret RABBIT_PASSWORD=secret SERVICE_PASSWORD=$ADMIN_PASSWORD HOST_IP=10.0.2.15 LOGFILE=$DEST/logs/stack.sh.log SWIFT_REPLICAS=1SWIFT_HASH=66a3d6b56c1f479c8b4e70ab5c2000f5 SWIFT_DATA_DIR=$DEST/data enable_plugin sahara https://opendev.org/openstack/sahara enable_plugin sahara-dashboard https://opendev.org/openstack/sahara-dashboard Can you guys advise me about these errors. Is there anything to worry about? Regards.

1 0

[neutron] Drivers meeting - Friday 29.4.2022 - cancelled
by Lajos Katona 28 Apr '22

28 Apr '22

Hi Neutron Drivers! Due to the lack of agenda, let's cancel tomorrow's drivers meeting. See You on the meeting next week. Lajos Katona (lajoskatona)

1 0

撤回: [all] New CFN(Computing Force Network) SIG Proposal
by niujie 28 Apr '22

28 Apr '22

niujie 将撤回邮件“[all] New CFN(Computing Force Network) SIG Proposal ”。

5 12

[Openstack Triple0 Wallaby] Deployment error
by Lokendra Rathour 28 Apr '22

28 Apr '22

Hi Team, we tried OpenStack deployment using *Triple0 Wallaby.* while we were trying to deploy the setup Undercloud was deployed successfully. For the Overcloud Deployment: we generated the templates: Command: ./usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/tools/process-templates.py -o ~/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates-rendered_at_wallaby -n /home/stack/templates/network_data.yaml -r /home/stack/templates/roles_data.yaml and using the below command to deploy overcloud: openstack overcloud deploy --templates \ -n /home/stack/templates/network_data.yaml \ -r /home/stack/templates/roles_data.yaml \ -e /home/stack/templates/environment.yaml \ -e /home/stack/templates/environments/network-isolation.yaml \ -e /home/stack/templates/environments/network-environment.yaml \ -e /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/services/ironic-conductor.yaml \ -e /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/services/ironic-inspector.yaml \ -e /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/services/ironic-overcloud.yaml \ -e /home/stack/templates/ironic-config.yaml \ -e /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/docker-ha.yaml \ -e /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/podman.yaml \ -e /home/stack/containers-prepare-parameter.yaml after which it fails with error: 2022-04-27 12:34:00.801 607453 ERROR tripleoclient.v1.overcloud_deploy.DeployOvercloud [-] Exception occured while running the command: ValueError: Failed to deploy: ERROR: HEAT-E99001 Service neutron is not available for* resource type OS::TripleO::Network::Ports::ControlPlaneVipPort, reason: neutron network endpoint is not in service catalog.* Traceback (most recent call last): we were able to deploy Triple0 Victoria/ Train /ussuri using the same approach. Please suggest any further changes needed to include in our setup. -Lokendra

1 1

ELK services moving to OpenSearch
by Daniel Pawlik 28 Apr '22

28 Apr '22

Hello, We would like to announce the new Elasticsearch service based on Opensearch. As it was earlier mentioned [1], the old service logstash.openstack.org is deprecated and will be decommissioned in the near future. Same as earlier, each Zuul CI job results will be sent to the Elasticsearch service. With the new CI log processing system [2], we decided to add more logs to be proceeded [3]. If some important files are missing, please let me know. To use this new service, please check out the documentation [4][5] or use the following credentials: url: https://opensearch.logs.openstack.org/_dashboards/app/discover?security_ten… username: openstack password: openstack tenant: global I would also like to take this opportunity to ask for help with the OpenStack ci-log-processing project [6] which is providing configuration of the Opensearch service as well as tools required to process CI logs and push them into the Opensearch service. Cheers, Dan [1] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022359.html [2] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-February/02736… [3] https://opendev.org/openstack/ci-log-processing/src/branch/master/logscrape… [4] https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#checking-status-… [5] https://governance.openstack.org/sigs/tact-sig.html#opensearch [6] https://opendev.org/openstack/ci-log-processing

1 0

Nova support for multiple vGPUs?
by Sigurd Kristian Brinch 28 Apr '22

28 Apr '22

Hi, As far as I can tell, libvirt/KVM supports multiple vGPUs per VM (https://docs.nvidia.com/grid/14.0/grid-vgpu-release-notes-generic-linux-kvm…) but in OpenStack/Nova it is limited to one vGPU per VM (https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/admin/virtual-gpu.html#configure-a-f…) Is there a reason for this limit? What would be needed to enable multiple vGPUs in Nova? BR Sigurd

3 4