April 2022 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

ERROR openstack [-] Resource OS::TripleO::Network::Ports::ControlPlaneVipPort maps to type OS::Neutron::Port and the Neutron service is not available when using ephemeral Heat.| Openstack tripleo wallaby version
by Swogat Pradhan 24 Dec '24

24 Dec '24

Hi, I am currently trying to deploy openstack wallaby using tripleo arch. I created the network jinja templates, ran the following commands also: #openstack overcloud network provision --stack overcloud --output networks-deployed-environment.yaml custom_network_data.yaml # openstack overcloud network vip provision --stack overcloud --output vip-deployed-environment.yaml custom_vip_data.yaml # openstack overcloud node provision --stack overcloud --overcloud-ssh-key /home/stack/sshkey/id_rsa overcloud-baremetal-deploy.yaml and used the environment files in the openstack overcloud deploy command: (undercloud) [stack@hkg2director ~]$ cat deploy.sh #!/bin/bash THT=/usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/ CNF=/home/stack/ openstack overcloud deploy --templates $THT \ -r $CNF/templates/roles_data.yaml \ -n $CNF/workplace/custom_network_data.yaml \ -e ~/containers-prepare-parameter.yaml \ -e $CNF/templates/node-info.yaml \ -e $CNF/templates/scheduler-hints.yaml \ -e $CNF/workplace/networks-deployed-environment.yaml \ -e $CNF/workplace/vip-deployed-environment.yaml \ -e $CNF/workplace/overcloud-baremetal-deployed.yaml \ -e $CNF/workplace/custom-net-bond-with-vlans.yaml Now when i run the ./deploy.sh script i encounter an error stating: ERROR openstack [-] Resource OS::TripleO::Network::Ports::ControlPlaneVipPort maps to type OS::Neutron::Port and the Neutron service is not available when using ephemeral Heat. The generated environments from 'openstack overcloud baremetal provision' and 'openstack overcloud network provision' must be included with the deployment command.: tripleoclient.exceptions.InvalidConfiguration: Resource OS::TripleO::Network::Ports::ControlPlaneVipPort maps to type OS::Neutron::Port and the Neutron service is not available when using ephemeral Heat. The generated environments from 'openstack overcloud baremetal provision' and 'openstack overcloud network provision' must be included with the deployment command. 2022-04-19 13:47:16.582 735924 INFO osc_lib.shell [-] END return value: 1 Can someone tell me where the mistake is? With regards, Swogat Pradhan

4 4

Live migration fails
by Szabo, Istvan (Agoda) 06 Aug '24

06 Aug '24

Hi, I have couple of compute nodes where the live migration fails with existing vms. When I quickly spawn a vm and try live migration it works so I assume shouldn't be a big problem with the compute node. However I have many existing vms where it fails with a servername not found. /var/log/nova/nova-conductor.log:2021-04-21 14:47:12.605 227612 ERROR nova.conductor.tasks.migrate [req-f4067a26-a233-4673-8c07-9a8a290980b0 dce35e6eceea4312bb0baa0510cef363 ca7e35079f4440c78bd9870724b9638b - default default] [instance: 1517a2ac-3b51-4d8d-80b3-89a5614d1ae0] Unable to find record for source node servername on servername: ComputeHostNotFound: Compute host servername could not be found. /var/log/nova/nova-conductor.log:2021-04-21 14:47:12.605 227612 WARNING nova.scheduler.utils [req-f4067a26-a233-4673-8c07-9a8a290980b0 dce35e6eceea4312bb0baa0510cef363 ca7e35079f4440c78bd9870724b9638b - default default] Failed to compute_task_migrate_server: Compute host servername could not be found.: ComputeHostNotFound: Compute host servername could not be found. /var/log/nova/nova-conductor.log:2021-04-21 14:47:12.605 227612 WARNING nova.scheduler.utils [req-f4067a26-a233-4673-8c07-9a8a290980b0 dce35e6eceea4312bb0baa0510cef363 ca7e35079f4440c78bd9870724b9638b - default default] [instance: 1517a2ac-3b51-4d8d-80b3-89a5614d1ae0] Setting instance to ACTIVE state.: ComputeHostNotFound: Compute host servername could not be found. /var/log/nova/nova-conductor.log:2021-04-21 14:47:12.672 227612 ERROR oslo_messaging.rpc.server [req-f4067a26-a233-4673-8c07-9a8a290980b0 dce35e6eceea4312bb0baa0510cef363 ca7e35079f4440c78bd9870724b9638b - default default] Exception during message handling: ComputeHostNotFound: Compute host am-osfecn-4025 Tried with this command: nova live-migration --block-migrate id. Any idea? Thank you. ________________________________ This message is confidential and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). It may also be privileged or otherwise protected by copyright or other legal rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know by reply email and delete it from your system. It is prohibited to copy this message or disclose its content to anyone. Any confidentiality or privilege is not waived or lost by any mistaken delivery or unauthorized disclosure of the message. All messages sent to and from Agoda may be monitored to ensure compliance with company policies, to protect the company's interests and to remove potential malware. Electronic messages may be intercepted, amended, lost or deleted, or contain viruses.

5 16

[puppet] Proposing core team clean up
by Takashi Kajinami 23 Aug '23

23 Aug '23

Hello, I went through the current core reviewers and found out that the current list includes some people no longer working in the OpenStack community. I'd like to propose removing the following persons from the core reviewer team as we haven't seen these people making any activity in the community recently. * Pradeep Kilambi - puppet-aodh, puppet-ceilometer, puppet-gnocchi, puppet-panko * Richard Megginson - puppet-keystone * Denis Egorenko - puppet-murano * Serg Melikyan - puppet-murano * Sergey Kolekonov - puppet-neutron * David Moreau Simard - puppet-openstack-integration * Yu xingchao - all modules Also, I confirmed that Wes Hayutin is no longer working for OpenStack and he agreed to retire from the core reviewer position. Thus I'll remove him as well. I'll be open for any feedback for one week to hear any thoughts/feedback about this removal. I'd like to take this moment to thank all people for their past work. We always welcome them back if they resume their work in this project. Thank you, Takashi KAJINAMI

3 4

[all] Dynamic Zuul results table in Gerrit 3
by Radosław Piliszek 04 Aug '22

04 Aug '22

Hello Fellow OpenStack and OpenDev Folks! TL;DR click on [3] and enjoy. I am starting this thread to not hijack the discussion happening on [1]. First of all, I would like to thank gibi (Balazs Gibizer) for hacking a way to get the place to render the table in the first place (pun intended). I have been a long-time-now user of [2]. I have improved and customised it for myself but never really got to share back the changes I made. The new Gerrit obviously broke the whole script so it was of no use to share at that particular state. However, inspired by gibi's work, I decided to finally sit down and fix it to work with Gerrit 3 and here it comes: [3]. Works well on Chrome with Tampermonkey. Not tested others. I hope you will enjoy this little helper (I do). I know the script looks super fugly but it generally boils down to a mix of styles of 3 people and Gerrit having funky UI rendering. Finally, I'd also like to thank hrw (Marcin Juszkiewicz) for linking me to the original Michel's script in 2019. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-November/019051… [2] https://opendev.org/x/coats/src/commit/444c95738677593dcfed0cfd9667d4c4f0d5… [3] https://gist.github.com/yoctozepto/7ea1271c299d143388b7c1b1802ee75e Kind regards, -yoctozepto

5 7

[adjutant][tc][all] Call for volunteers to be a PTL and maintainers
by Slawek Kaplonski 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

Hi, After last PTL elections [1] Adjutant project don't have any PTL. It also didn't had PTL in the Yoga cycle already. So this is call for maintainters for Adjutant. If You are using it or interested in it, and if You are willing to help maintaining this project, please contact TC members through this mailing list or directly on the #openstack-tc channel @OFTC. We can talk possibilities to make someone a PTL of the project or going with this project to the Distributed Project Leadership [2] model. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-February/027411… [2] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20200803-distributed-projec… -- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat

4 8

[all] PyCharm Licenses Renewed till July 2021
by Swapnil Kulkarni 13 Jul '22

13 Jul '22

Hello, Happy to inform you the open source developer license for Pycharm has been renewed for 1 additional year till July 2021. Best Regards, Swapnil Kulkarni coolsvap at gmail dot com

8 13

Nova not updating to new size of an extended in-use / attached cinder volume (Ceph RBD) to guest
by Christian Rohmann 28 Jun '22

28 Jun '22

Hello Openstack-Discuss, after some digging I found out that cinder learned to resize attached (in-use) volumes quite a while ago with the introduction of the initial "extend 'in-use' volume" feature: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/454287/ The support was then extended to also cover Ceph RBD backed volumes with: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/613039/ Since this is only about the cinder part, I was wondering if nova would ever find out and would actively rescan the device / volume and quintessentially present an increased new size to the guest. Apparently this is where a certain volume-extended event comes into play: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/454322/ that is to be emitted by cinder when a volume had been extened. I then went head and tried this with the openstack cli (as Horizon does not seem to support / offer to resize in-use volumes. I run Openstack Train with Ceph RBD as storage. First I ran into an issue with the openstack cli (https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1871759/comments/2 <https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1871759/comments/2>) but using cinder extend $volumeid $newsize I was able to resize in-use volumes just fine. The only thing missing was the propagation to the guest. I played around with SCSI rescans, but that did not work, reboots also failed to do anyting in this regards. Stopping and starting the VM did work, but why having the capability to online-resize an attached volume when not being able to resize the guest volume as well? Apparently there seems to be an old and somewhat similar observation / bug with https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1369465 So I was simply wondering if this is expected to be working? Are there any special settings / options I need to set to enable this feature? Thanks and with kind regards Christian

4 9

[Ceph Rados Gateway] 403 when using S3 client
by Taltavull Jean-François 27 Jun '22

27 Jun '22

Hi All, I get an http 403 error code when I try to get the bucket list with Ubuntu (Focal) S3 client (awscli). S3 api has been activated in radosgw config file and EC2 credentials have been created and put in S3 client config file. Otherwise, everything is working fine with OpenStack client. My deployment: - OSA 23.2.0 - OpenStack Wallaby - Ceph and Rados GW Octopus Has any of you already experienced this kind of behaviour ? Many thanks, Jean-Francois

3 6

[oslo] Propose to EOL stable/queens, stable/rocky on all the oslo scope
by Herve Beraud 24 Jun '22

24 Jun '22

Hi, On our last meeting of the oslo team we discussed the problem with broken stable branches (rocky and older) in oslo's projects [1]. Indeed, almost all these branches are broken. Előd Illés kindly generated a list of periodic-stable errors on Oslo's stable branches [2]. Given the lack of active maintainers on Oslo and given the current status of the CI in those branches, I propose to make them End Of Life. I will wait until the end of month for anyone who would like to maybe step up as maintainer of those branches and who would at least try to fix CI of them. If no one will volunteer for that, I'll EOLing those branches for all the projects under the oslo umbrella. Let us know your thoughts. Thank you for your attention. [1] https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/oslo/2021/oslo.2021-10-04-15.00.log.t… [2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-July/023939.html -- Hervé Beraud Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat irc: hberaud https://github.com/4383/ https://twitter.com/4383hberaud

5 5

R: R: R: [Devstack][Gnocchi][Ceilometer] Not able to retrieve metrics using ceilometer and gnocchi
by Molka Gharbaoui 22 Jun '22

22 Jun '22

3 4

[all][tc] Change OpenStack release naming policy proposal
by Slawek Kaplonski 03 Jun '22

03 Jun '22

Hi, During the last PTG in April 2022 in the TC meeting we were discussing our release naming policy [1]. It seems that choosing appropriate name for every releases is very hard and time consuming. There is many factors which needs to be taken into consideration there like legal but also meaning of the chosen name in many different languages. Finally we decided that now, after Zed release, when we will go all round through alphabet it is very good time to change this policy and use only numeric version with "year"."release in the year". It is proposed in [2]. This is also good timing for such change because in the same release we are going to start our "Tick Tock" release cadence which means that every Tick release will be release with .1 (like 2023.1, 2024.1, etc.) and every Tock release will be one with .2 (2023.2, 2024.2, etc.). [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-zed-ptg#L265[1] [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/839897[2] -- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat -------- [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-zed-ptg#L265 [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/839897

16 42

[Neutron][neutron-vpnaas] proposing Mohammed Naser for neutron-vpnaas core reviewer
by Lajos Katona 12 May '22

12 May '22

Hi, I would like to propose Mohammed Naser (mnaser) as a core reviewer to neutron-vpnaas. He and his company uses neutron-vpnaas in production and volunteered to help in the maintenance of it. You can vote/feedback in this email thread. If there is no objection by 6th of May, we will add Mohammed to the core list. Thanks Lajos

6 6

[all][tc][policy][heat][cinder] Continuing the RBAC PTG discussion + policy pop-up meeting new time
by Ghanshyam Mann 10 May '22

10 May '22

Hello Everyone, As we said in PTG about continuing the RBAC discussion on open questions (currently from Heat and Cinder), we are scheduling the call on April 26 Tuesday from 14:30-15:00 UTC. And we will use the same time for the policy-popup team meeting every alternate Tuesday to answer RBAC queries from any projects. Meeting Details: - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Consistent_and_Secure_Default_Policies_Popu… Agenda (you can add for this or coming meetings) - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/rbac-zed-ptg#L97 -gmann

1 2

[TripleO] Tear down of Train centOS 7 check jobs and integration line
by Ronelle Landy 09 May '22

09 May '22

Hello All, We have been running check/gate testing and integration lines for the Train release on both CentOS7 and CentOS 8. Following the work on CentOS 9 and the longevity of the Train release, we proposed removing the CentOS 7 Train jobs and building/testing changes to this release on CentOS 8 only. We floated this proposal with some interested parties and received no objections so we are beginning work on this tear down. We anticipate that removing the CentOS 7 jobs will allow patches to merge quicker and will free up resources for future work. Please respond if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks, Ronelle (for the TripleO CI team)

2 2

[manila] Zed cycle bug squash
by Carlos Silva 06 May '22

06 May '22

Greetings Zorillas and interested stackers! As mentioned in the previous weekly meetings, we will soon be meeting for the first bugsquash of the Zed release! The event will be held from May 2nd to May 6th, providing an extended contribution window. May 2nd 15:00 - 16:00 UTC - Kick off May 5th 15:00 - 16:00 UTC - Mid term checkpoint (we won't have our regular Manila meeting on this day) May 6th 15:00 - 15:30 UTC - Wrap Up We will use a meetpad for these meetings [1]. The main idea of this event is to go over the list of stale bugs and act on them, either seeing if they are incomplete or invalid at this point or working on them. The stale bugs list will be available on [2]. [1] https://meetpad.opendev.org/ManilaZed1Bugsquash [2] https://ethercalc.openstack.org/1nesczgjufb9 See you next week! Thank you, carloss

1 1

[all][tc][Release Management] Improvements in project governance
by Slawek Kaplonski 05 May '22

05 May '22

Hi, During the Zed PTG sessions in the TC room we were discussing some ideas how we can improve project governance. One of the topics was related to the projects which don't really have any changes in the cycle. Currently we are forcing to do new release of basically the same code when it comes to the end of the cycle. Can/Should we maybe change that and e.g. instead of forcing new release use last released version of the of the repo for new release too? If yes, should we then automatically propose change of the release model to the "independent" maybe? What would be the best way how Release Management team can maybe notify TC about such less active projects which don't needs any new release in the cycle? That could be one of the potential conditions to check project's health by the TC team. Another question is related to the projects which aren't really active and are broken during the final release time. We had such problem in the last cycle, see [1] for details. Should we still force pushing fixes for them to be able to release or maybe should we consider deprecation of such projects and not to release it at all? [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-March/027864.ht… -- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat -------- [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-March/027864.ht…

4 4

[api=sig][i18n][infra][tc] Cleaning up more defunct mailing lists
by Jeremy Stanley 04 May '22

04 May '22

A quick audit of the mailing lists we host at lists.openstack.org turned up the following 11 which have had no new posts for at least three years now: * openstack-api-consumers * openstack-de * openstack-el * openstack-i18n-fr * openstack-ir * openstack-personas * openstack-ru * openstack-sos * openstack-tw * openstack-vi * third-party-announce I'd like to clean them up by removing their list configurations, but leaving any public archives intact. Are there any objections? Should any of the above have future messages redirected to a different list (though since they haven't had any for years, that's probably unnecessary)? -- Jeremy Stanley

5 8

question -dashboard horizon
by mahdi n 03 May '22

03 May '22

I login-ed in horizon but in page project http://ip:8000/project show error that : You are not authorized to access this page please login screenshot how to solve this?

4 4

[all][tc] What's happening in Technical Committee: summary April 29th, 22: Reading: 5 min
by Ghanshyam Mann 29 Apr '22

29 Apr '22

Hello Everyone, Here is this week's summary of the Technical Committee activities. 1. TC Meetings: ============ * We had this week's meeting on April 28. Most of the meeting discussions are summarized in this email. Meeting full logs are available @https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2022/tc.2022-04-21-15.00.html * Next TC weekly meeting will be on May 5 Thursday at 15:00 UTC, feel free to add the topic on the agenda[1] by May 4. We will cover CFN and tick-tock release notes topic there and if time permits then cover any othe topic. 2. What we completed this week: ========================= * Resolution to drop the lower constraints maintenance[2] * Remove TC Liaisons framework[3] * Retired openstack-helm-docs[4] 3. Activities In progress: ================== TC Tracker for Zed cycle ------------------------------ * Zed tracker etherpad includes the TC working items[5], we have started the many items. Open Reviews ----------------- * Seven open reviews for ongoing activities[6]. Change OpenStack release naming policy proposal ----------------------------------------------------------- We discussed it it PTG, TC decided to drop the name from release name process and keping the numbers. Slaweq proposed it on gerrit[7] and on ML[8]. Discussion is in progress as there are some objection from foundation marketting team. Migration from old ELK service to new Dashboard ----------------------------------------------------------- You might have seen that Daniel email about the new dashboard[9] and login information, we encourage community members to use it and provide feedback if any. Dainel also investigation about the e-r instance. Consistent and Secure Default RBAC ------------------------------------------- We discussed about the heat mostly in Tuesday call but could not get any consensus. Notes are in etherpad[10] and will continue the discussion on Tuesday 3rd May 14:00 UTC [11], FIPs community-wide goal ------------------------------- Ade has proposed the new milestone for this goal work, please review those and give feedback if any[12]. 2021 User Survey TC Question Analysis ----------------------------------------------- No update on this. The survey summary is up for review[13]. Feel free to check and provide feedback. Zed cycle Leaderless projects ---------------------------------- No updates on this. Only Adjutant project is leaderless/maintainer-less. We will check Adjutant's situation again on ML and hope Braden will be ready with their company side permission[14]. Fixing Zuul config error ---------------------------- Requesting projects with zuul config error to look into those and fix them which should not take much time[15]. Project updates ------------------- * Add the cinder-three-par charm to Openstack charms[16] 4. How to contact the TC: ==================== If you would like to discuss or give feedback to TC, you can reach out to us in multiple ways: 1. Email: you can send the email with tag [tc] on openstack-discuss ML[17]. 2. Weekly meeting: The Technical Committee conduct a weekly meeting every Thursday 15 UTC [18] 3. Ping us using 'tc-members' nickname on #openstack-tc IRC channel. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/838004 [3] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/837891 [4] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/839100 [5] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-zed-tracker [6] https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+status:open [7] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/839897 [8] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-April/028354.ht… [9] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-April/028346.ht… [10] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/rbac-zed-ptg#L103 [11] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Consistent_and_Secure_Default_Policies_Popu… [12] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/838601 [13] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/836888 [14] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-March/027626.ht… [15] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/zuul-config-error-openstack [16] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/837781 [17] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss [18] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Technical_Committee_Meeting -gmann

1 0

[dev][infra][tact-sig] Retiring the status.openstack.org server
by Jeremy Stanley 29 Apr '22

29 Apr '22

With the recent retirement of the Elastic-Recheck and OpenStack-Health services, as well as Zuul long ago growing its own status dashboard, the only other thing still being served from the status.openstack.org site is a very broken and empty ReviewDay interface. I'm planning to take status.openstack.org offline at the end of this month (late next week), so wanted to give everyone a heads up that anything still served from that site right now (basically just a link to the Zuul status page for our openstack tenant) will be going away. If you want the Zuul status page for openstack, the proper URL is https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/status or you can just go to the root of the site and click the "status" link in the openstack tenant row. (There's also a white-label zuul.openstack.org site but that's primarily maintained in order to avoid breaking old tools people may have hard-coded to use it.) -- Jeremy Stanley

1 1

Need information
by Gk Gk 29 Apr '22

29 Apr '22

Hi All, I need information about availability zones in nova. I tried googling but cant find enough information. My questions are , 1. Why is it that we have two concepts of aggregates and AZs ? Is one not enough ? Like exposing aggregates and creating flavors with extra specs to match ? Why do we need AZs also ? 2. Why is it that one node should only be a part of one AZ but not two ? whereas in the case of aggregates, it can overlap ? 3. Also why cant we expose only aggregates like AZs but block the compute member list to the users ? Doing this way will serve the purpose of AZ as well ? Why we dont want to expose aggregates as AZs ? Thanks Kumar

2 1

regarding custom role creation
by Adivya Singh 29 Apr '22

29 Apr '22

Hi Team, i want to create a custom role in openstack, with privilege being 1> to allow them to make image public 2> to modify/change the flavor how can i do this, I have openstack installed with XENA regards Adivya Singh

2 1

ERROR trust id
by Firas Dehech 29 Apr '22

29 Apr '22

Hi all, I am working on a project Openstack in linux ubuntu 20.04. I want to create a cluster hadoop with one master-node and three worker-nodes and i have a problem with a cluster that doesn't work. Status ERROR: Creating cluster failed for the following reason(s): Failed to create trust Error ID: ef5e8b0a-8e6d-4878-bebb-f37f4fa50a88, Failed to create trust Error ID: 43157255-86af-4773-96c1-a07ca7ac66ed. links: https://docs.openstack.org/devstack/latest/ File local.conf : [[local|localrc]] ADMIN_PASSWORD=secret DATABASE_PASSWORD=secret RABBIT_PASSWORD=secret SERVICE_PASSWORD=$ADMIN_PASSWORD HOST_IP=10.0.2.15 LOGFILE=$DEST/logs/stack.sh.log SWIFT_REPLICAS=1SWIFT_HASH=66a3d6b56c1f479c8b4e70ab5c2000f5 SWIFT_DATA_DIR=$DEST/data enable_plugin sahara https://opendev.org/openstack/sahara enable_plugin sahara-dashboard https://opendev.org/openstack/sahara-dashboard Can you guys advise me about these errors. Is there anything to worry about? Regards.

1 0

[neutron] Drivers meeting - Friday 29.4.2022 - cancelled
by Lajos Katona 28 Apr '22

28 Apr '22

Hi Neutron Drivers! Due to the lack of agenda, let's cancel tomorrow's drivers meeting. See You on the meeting next week. Lajos Katona (lajoskatona)

1 0

撤回: [all] New CFN(Computing Force Network) SIG Proposal
by niujie 28 Apr '22

28 Apr '22

niujie 将撤回邮件“[all] New CFN(Computing Force Network) SIG Proposal ”。

5 12