March 2022 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

rabbitmq config changes not applied in newer format
by Eugen Block 30 Mar '22

30 Mar '22

Hi *, this might not be the right place to ask but I'm curious how others configure their rabbitmq. RabbitMQ version: 3.8.3 OpenStack version: Ussuri/Victoria (two different clusters) We have a highly available cloud controlled by pacemaker. The deployment is based on our own Salt states. We noticed that our config is not applied (e. g. after power outage), we need to import those manually with 'rabbitmqctl import /path/to/definitions.json'. Comparing it to an older cloud version (Rocky, Rabbit version 3.6.16) I noticed that the config format is different between those versions, the older version uses a json format (?): ---snip--- # old format cat /etc/rabbitmq/rabbitmq.config [ {mnesia, [ {dump_log_write_threshold, 300}, {dump_log_time_threshold, 180000} ] }, {rabbit, [ {collect_statistics_interval, 5000}, {tcp_listen_options, [ {backlog, 128},{nodelay, true},{keepalive, false} ] }, {tcp_listeners, [ {"x.x.x.x", 5672} ]}, {cluster_partition_handling, pause_minority}, {queue_master_locator, <<"min-masters">>}, {disk_free_limit, 50000000} ]}, {rabbitmq_management, [ {listener, [{ip, "x.x.x.x"}, {port, 15673}]}, {load_definitions, "/etc/rabbitmq/definitions.json"} ] } ]. # new format [...] listeners.tcp.default = 5672 listeners.tcp.other_port = 5673 listeners.tcp.other_ip = x.x.x.x:5672 [...] ---snip--- If I switch to the old format and restart rabbitmq on that node, the changes are applied successfully. Is this a known issue? Should I just stick to the old format? Any comments are appreciated! Regards, Eugen

1 2

[magnum][murano][release][sahara][tc][trove][zaqar] Emergency bypass reviewer/PTL/liaison approval for Yoga release fixes
by Jeremy Stanley 29 Mar '22

29 Mar '22

A number of teams seem not to have noticed that their tests (and possibly the services themselves) were broken by the removal[*] of the "tenant" argument from RequestContext objects in oslo.context 4.0.0 released on February 3, 2022. As we're at a little over a day left before we need to finalize the Yoga release, I'm seeking permission from the TC on behalf of the OpenStack Release Managers to bypass normal core reviewer, PTL and release liaison approval processes in order to approve any remaining changes for official OpenStack projects necessary for this transition, and to produce new release candidates with those fixes included as necessary. [*] https://review.opendev.org/815938 -- Jeremy Stanley

8 16

[ironic] No weekly meeting in April 4th
by Iury Gregory 29 Mar '22

29 Mar '22

Hello Ironicers, Since next week is the PTG we won't have our weekly meeting, we will resume our weekly meeting on April 11. Thank you! -- *Att[]'sIury Gregory Melo Ferreira * *MSc in Computer Science at UFCG* *Part of the ironic-core and puppet-manager-core team in OpenStack* *Software Engineer at Red Hat Czech* *Social*: https://www.linkedin.com/in/iurygregory *E-mail: iurygregory(a)gmail.com <iurygregory(a)gmail.com>*

1 0

[qa] Cancelling office hour on April 5th
by Martin Kopec 29 Mar '22

29 Mar '22

Hi everyone, we are cancelling the QA office hour on April 5th due to PTG. We are looking forward to seeing you on PTG. Just as a reminder, QA time slots: - Monday (April 4th) 13-14 UTC (1 hour) @ Liberty room - Tuesday (April 5th) 15-17 UTC (2 hours) @ Liberty room - Thursday (April 7th) 13-14 UTC (1 hour) @ Liberty room The topics we are going to cover are gathered in this etherpad [1]. If you have anything you would like to discuss with us, please, feel free to write it to [1]. [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-zed-ptg Thank you, -- Martin Kopec Senior Software Quality Engineer Red Hat EMEA IM: kopecmartin

1 0

Juju bootstrap issues on ubuntu 20.04 LTS
by Wada Akor 29 Mar '22

29 Mar '22

Good Day every one, Please i need a respond from these who have deployed openstack charms on ubuntu . i ran the command below # juju bootstrap --bootstrap-series=focal --constraints tags=juju mymaas maas-controller here is my out put below # Creating Juju controller "maas-controller" on mymaas/default Looking for packaged Juju agent version 2.9.27 for amd64 Located Juju agent version 2.9.27-ubuntu-amd64 at https://streams.canonical.com/juju/tools/agent/2.9.27/juju-2.9.27-ubuntu-am… Launching controller instance(s) on mymaas/default... - a3r8rm (arch=amd64 mem=3.5G cores=2) Installing Juju agent on bootstrap instance Fetching Juju Dashboard 0.8.1 Waiting for address Attempting to connect to 10.0.0.2:22 Connected to 10.0.0.2 Running machine configuration script... I was unable to bootstrap the juju-controller on the maa-controller I need support thanks Wada Akoh Kenneth Jos,Plateau State , Nigeria

1 0

[nova][placement] We want you for the PTG !
by Sylvain Bauza 29 Mar '22

29 Mar '22

Hi folks, As a reminder, PTG will start next week and we'll have Nova meetings on Tues up to Friday everyday between 2pm UTC and 5pm UTC. I'm asking here loudly folks to provide their topics they want to discuss for the PTG *before Thursday this week* so I can start to plan the agenda for next week. All of the PTG logistics and topics are within https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-zed-ptg Add the topics you want ! Don't be afraid to join the hopefully last virtual PTG and see our community :-) Last note, remember you need to register for free for the PTG https://openinfra-ptg.eventbrite.com/ See you next week, -Sylvain

1 0

[TripleO] Propositing Jiri Podivin as TripleO (Validation Framework) core
by Mathieu Bultel 29 Mar '22

29 Mar '22

Hi folks, I would like to propose Jiri Podivin as TripleO Validation Framework core. Jirka has been part of the TripleO organization for some significant time now and his contribution has grown a lot during the last few months. He is submitting highly valuable reviews and has now a strong knowledge around the TripleO Validations Framework areas, the Python framework but also in the CI (TripleO and upstream generic) and more general projects. I think getting him as a core reviewer for the Validations repositories will be very good for us. Feel free to send your feedback, if there is no objection until next week, I propose to add him to the list with limited core votes to the VF repo [1]. Thank you, KR, Mathieu (matbu) [1] openstack/validations-libs openstack/validations-common openstack/tripleo-validations and eventually the Validation related code in openstack/python-tripleoclient.

6 5

Cinder - easy to hit RecursionError with complex config formulas
by bartosz.rabiega＠ovhcloud.com 29 Mar '22

29 Mar '22

Hello, I wanted to share something I've recently discovered - there is a strange issue with cinder evaluating complex configuration formulas. For example when using complex goodness_function it's quite easy to hit: ERROR cinder.scheduler.weights.goodness maximum recursion depth exceeded: RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded I did some tests to find the root cause. It seems that pyparsing module does deep recursive parsing quite a lot (default recursion limit is 1000). Not sure how to solve it but it would be nice to at least have a warning in the docs. Results and methodology below. Tests were done using following code snippet ------------------------------------------- from cinder.scheduler.evaluator.evaluator import evaluate import sys formulas = [ "1", "1 + 1", "max(1, 2, 3)", "max(1 + (10 / 20), 2, 3)", "(1 + max(1 + (10 / 20), 2, 3)) / 100", "((1 + max(1 + (10 / 20), 2, 3)) / 100) + stats.total_capacity_gb", "(((1 + max(1 + (10 / 20), 2, 3)) / 100) + stats.total_capacity_gb) / 100", ] stats = { 'allocated_capacity_gb': 50000, 'total_capacity_gb': 60000, 'free_capacity_gb': 10000, } for f in formulas: for i in range(10, 2000, 10): sys.setrecursionlimit(i) try: res = evaluate(f, stats=stats) print(f"{i}: {f}") break except RecursionError: pass Test results -------------------------------- Cinder 14.3.1, pyparsing<3.0 210: 1 210: 1 + 1 450: max(1, 2, 3) 600: max(1 + (10 / 20), 2, 3) 790: (1 + max(1 + (10 / 20), 2, 3)) / 100 980: ((1 + max(1 + (10 / 20), 2, 3)) / 100) + stats.total_capacity_gb 1160: (((1 + max(1 + (10 / 20), 2, 3)) / 100) + stats.total_capacity_gb) / 100 Cinder 16.4.2, pyparsing<3.0 220: 1 220: 1 + 1 450: max(1, 2, 3) 610: max(1 + (10 / 20), 2, 3) 790: (1 + max(1 + (10 / 20), 2, 3)) / 100 980: ((1 + max(1 + (10 / 20), 2, 3)) / 100) + stats.total_capacity_gb 1170: (((1 + max(1 + (10 / 20), 2, 3)) / 100) + stats.total_capacity_gb) / 100 Cinder 19.1.0, pyparsing<3.0 220: 1 220: 1 + 1 450: max(1, 2, 3) 610: max(1 + (10 / 20), 2, 3) 790: (1 + max(1 + (10 / 20), 2, 3)) / 100 980: ((1 + max(1 + (10 / 20), 2, 3)) / 100) + stats.total_capacity_gb 1170: (((1 + max(1 + (10 / 20), 2, 3)) / 100) + stats.total_capacity_gb) / 100 BR

2 1

[tacker] Zed PTG schedule
by Yasufumi Ogawa 29 Mar '22

29 Mar '22

Hi everyone, The next vPTG will be held on 4-8 April and I've reserved rooms 6-8 UTC from 5th to 8th Apr. If you have any suggestion, add your topic on the etherpad[1]. Please don't forget to register youself before joining[2]. [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tacker-zed-ptg [2] https://openinfra-ptg.eventbrite.com/ Cheers, Yasufumi

1 0

[keystone] get project info with username and password only?
by Tony Liu 29 Mar '22

29 Mar '22

Hi, Is there any way to know which project(s) a non-admin user is assigned to by username and password only? Or it can only be found out by admin user? The intention is to get the project-scoped token by username and password. Another thing interesting, when tried unscoped auth with Train and Xena, no project info or catalog returned. This is expected. But when tried the same unscoped auth with Ussuri, project info and catalog are returned. This is not expected. Any clues how this could happen? Or how I can look into it? Thanks! Tony

1 0