March 2022 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[oslo] Propose to EOL stable/queens, stable/rocky on all the oslo scope
by Herve Beraud 25 Jun '22

25 Jun '22

Hi, On our last meeting of the oslo team we discussed the problem with broken stable branches (rocky and older) in oslo's projects [1]. Indeed, almost all these branches are broken. Előd Illés kindly generated a list of periodic-stable errors on Oslo's stable branches [2]. Given the lack of active maintainers on Oslo and given the current status of the CI in those branches, I propose to make them End Of Life. I will wait until the end of month for anyone who would like to maybe step up as maintainer of those branches and who would at least try to fix CI of them. If no one will volunteer for that, I'll EOLing those branches for all the projects under the oslo umbrella. Let us know your thoughts. Thank you for your attention. [1] https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/oslo/2021/oslo.2021-10-04-15.00.log.t… [2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-July/023939.html -- Hervé Beraud Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat irc: hberaud https://github.com/4383/ https://twitter.com/4383hberaud

5 5

R: R: R: [Devstack][Gnocchi][Ceilometer] Not able to retrieve metrics using ceilometer and gnocchi
by Molka Gharbaoui 23 Jun '22

23 Jun '22

3 4

[api=sig][i18n][infra][tc] Cleaning up more defunct mailing lists
by Jeremy Stanley 05 May '22

05 May '22

A quick audit of the mailing lists we host at lists.openstack.org turned up the following 11 which have had no new posts for at least three years now: * openstack-api-consumers * openstack-de * openstack-el * openstack-i18n-fr * openstack-ir * openstack-personas * openstack-ru * openstack-sos * openstack-tw * openstack-vi * third-party-announce I'd like to clean them up by removing their list configurations, but leaving any public archives intact. Are there any objections? Should any of the above have future messages redirected to a different list (though since they haven't had any for years, that's probably unnecessary)? -- Jeremy Stanley

5 8

[neutron] Bug Deputy Report January 03 - 10
by Lucas Alvares Gomes 12 Apr '22

12 Apr '22

Hi, This is the Neutron bug report from January 3rd to 10th. Critical: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956344 - "Functional test test_gateway_chassis_rebalance is failing intermittently" - Assigned to: Rodolfo Alonso High: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956034 - "ovn load balancer health monitor cause mac address conflict" - Unassigned * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956745 - " [ovn-octavia-provider] Load Balancer remained with ACTIVE state even with PENDING_UPDATE listener" - Assigned to: Luis Tomas Bolivar * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956763 - "[OVN] Overlapping configuration for security group logging is not applied correctly" - Assigned to: Elvira Garcia Ruiz Medium: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956035 - "ovn load balancer member failover not working when accessed from floating ip" - Unassigned * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956632 - "DNS integration documentation and scenario tests need update after dns_assignment calculation was changed" - Assigned to: Miguel Lavalle * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956785 - "Duplicate validator TypeError for dict values Edit" - Assigned to: Harald Jensås Low: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956476 - "[OVN] Disallow multiple physnets per bridge" - Assigned to: Rodolfo Alonso * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956770 - " keepalived no_track implemented in >= 2.0.3" - Assigned to: Rodolfo Alonso Needs further triage: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956435 - "OVS: support multiple segments per host" - Unassigned * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956460 - "The VM can't get metadata from dhcp-agent" - Unassigned * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956846 - "ha router duplicated routes" - Unassigned Cheers, Lucas

4 7

Xena and CEPH RBD backend (show_image_direct_url status )
by west, andrew 10 Apr '22

10 Apr '22

Hello experts Currently using openstack Xena and Ceph backend (Pacific 16.2.7) It seems there is a bug (since Wallaby?) where the efficient use of a CEPH Pacific RBD backend (i.e with copy-on-write-cloning) is not working . Show_image_direct_url needs to be False to create volumes (or ephemeral volumes for nova) This can of course be tremendously slow (Nova , ephemeral root disk) without copy-on-write cloning feature of Ceph. As Ceph RBD is THE most favourite backend for block storage in openstack I am wondering how others are coping (or workarounds found ?) Which combinations of Openstack and Ceph are known to work well with copy-on-write-cloning? How is the noted GRAVE Security RISK of enabling Show_image_direct_url mitigated ? (i.e I think , for CEPH RBD, it needs to be True to get cloning to work efficiently) See another report of this issue here: Re: Ceph Pacifif and Openstack Wallaby - ERROR cinder.scheduler.flows.create_volume - CEPH Filesystem Users (spinics.net)<https://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-users/msg66016.html> Thanks for any help or pointers, Andrew West Openstack consulting CGG France ________________________________ "This e-mail and any accompanying attachments are confidential. The information is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the email by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, disclose, copy, distribute or use this e-mail; please delete it from your system and notify the sender immediately."

7 9

[glance] Zed PTG schedule
by Abhishek Kekane 08 Apr '22

08 Apr '22

Hello All, Greetings!!! Zed PTG is going to start next week and if you haven't already registered, please do so as soon as possible [1]. I have created an etherpad [2] and also added day wise topics along with timings we are going to discuss. Kindly let me know if you have any concerns with allotted time slots. We also have one slot open on Wednesday and Friday is kept reserved for any unplanned discussions. So please feel free to add your topics if you still haven't added yet. As a reminder, these are the time slots for our discussion. Tuesday 5 April 2022 1400 UTC to 1700 UTC Wednesday 6 April 2022 1400 UTC to 1700 UTC Thursday 7 April 2022 1400 UTC to 1700 UTC Friday 8 April 2022 1400 UTC to 1700 UTC NOTE: At the moment we don't have any sessions scheduled on Friday, if there are any last moment request(s)/topic(s) we will discuss them on Friday else we will conclude our PTG on Thursday 7th April. We will be using bluejeans for our discussion, kindly try to use it once before the actual discussion. The meeting URL is mentioned in etherpad [2] and will be the same throughout the PTG. [1] https://openinfra-ptg.eventbrite.com/ [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/zed-glance-ptg Thank you, Abhishek

2 2

plain text config parameters encryption feature
by Alexander Yeremko 07 Apr '22

07 Apr '22

Dear OpenStack community, we are developing plain text config secrets encryption feature according to the next specification: https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/openstack-ansible-specs/specs/xena/pr… We started from Glance OS service and submitted two patchsets already: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance/+/814865 Now we have two questions that we need to clarify to proceed our work on that feature and finish our development: 1. Is it correct that we need to develop more patchsets to rework some logic of encryption mechanism according to comment to 'files/encypt_secrets.py' script that arised at the second patchset (PatchSet 2) dated Nov/30/2021 ? Comment is by Dmitry Rabotyagov: "We _really_ should make it as an ansible plugin and re-work logic" 2. We wish to have such feature in previous releases also, not just in upcoming Yoga or Zed. Stein, Train and Victoria - it would be excellent to have plain text secrets encryption with these releases also. So question is how is it possible to use our feature in those releases also? Can we push some backports to those releases openstack-ansible repo? Could someone be so kind and give us answers? Best regards and wishes, Alex Yeremko This E-Mail (including any attachments) may contain privileged or confidential information. It is intended only for the addressee(s) indicated above. The sender does not waive any of its rights, privileges or other protections respecting this information. Any distribution, copying or other use of this E-Mail or the information it contains, by other than an intended recipient, is not sanctioned and is prohibited. If you received this E-Mail in error, please delete it and advise the sender (by return E-Mail or otherwise) immediately. Any calls held by you with Connectria may be recorded by an automated note taking system to ensure prompt follow up and for information collection purposes, and your attendance on any calls with Connectria confirms your consent to this. Any E-mail received by or sent from Connectria is subject to review by Connectria supervisory personnel.

4 6

Metadata service {devices list}
by Ahmed Abdelhamid 06 Apr '22

06 Apr '22

Hi All, I am running into a strange issue with the metadata service. Per metadata-service manual <https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/metadata.html>, the devices attached to a VM should be visible in $ curl http://169.254.169.254/openstack/2018-08-27/meta_data.json However, whenever i execute it from a VM , the devices array is empty and looks like this, any idea why ? Thanks { "random_seed": "yu5ZnkqF2CqnDZVAfZgarG...", "availability_zone": "nova", "keys": [ { "data": "ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1y...== Generated by Nova\n", "type": "ssh", "name": "mykey" } ], "hostname": "test.novalocal", "launch_index": 0, "meta": { "priority": "low", "role": "webserver" }, "devices": [ ], "project_id": "f7ac731cc11f40efbc03a9f9e1d1d21f", "public_keys": { "mykey": "ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1y...== Generated by Nova\n" }, "name": "test"}

3 10

[tripleo][RDO] Tags for Yoga GA version in tripleo projects
by Alfredo Moralejo Alonso 06 Apr '22

06 Apr '22

Hi, As we are doing builds for RDO Yoga release, I'd like to know what we should include in yoga release. In Xena, tags were created with the commits for the most recent promotion at around GA and shipped rpm packages for them. Additionally, we pinned RDO Trunk Xena to those versions. Will we get similar tags for Yoga? Best regards, Alfredo

2 3

[TripleO] Move tripleo repos stable/ussuri to End Of Life OK?
by Marios Andreou 05 Apr '22

05 Apr '22

Hello TripleO o/ The tripleo-ci team proposes that we move the stable/ussuri branch for all tripleo repos [1] to End of Life [2]. The branch was moved to extended maintenance with [3] so we can already no longer make any new releases for ussuri/tripleo repos. Are there any objections or concerns about this? If so please speak up here or directly on the patch. I think that any patches posted to ussuri nowadays are mainly about cherrypicking back to train, rather than merging something to ussuri specifically. I have posted the proposal to move to EOL at [4] and have WF-1 to wait for this discussion. If there are no objections then once we move to EOL the tripleo-ci team will remove all Ussuri related CI, check/gate/promotions. regards, marios [1] https://releases.openstack.org/teams/tripleo.html#ussuri [2] https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#maintena… [3] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/817623 [4] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/834049

2 5