October 2022 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[neutron] Drivers meeting
by Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez 14 Oct '22

14 Oct '22

Hello Neutrinos: Due to the lack of agenda, today's meeting is cancelled. Next meeting will be in two weeks, October 28th. Next week, as you know, is the PTG and we will cancel all regular scheduled meetings. See you next week!

1 0

[baremetal-sig][ptg] Baremetal SIG Operator Hour
by Jay Faulkner 14 Oct '22

14 Oct '22

Hey all, Just a friendly reminder that the Baremetal SIG will be holding an Operator hour Wednesday 1300-1400 UTC in the grizzly room. Please see https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/oct2022-ptg-operator-hour-baremetal-sig to review questions and add more if there's information you'd like to know from our baremetal operators. As always, https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html is more up to date than this email, which just serves as a guide. I'll see you there next week! - Jay Faulkner

1 0

[ironic][ptg] Antelope PTG Schedule
by Jay Faulkner 14 Oct '22

14 Oct '22

Hey all, Just a reminder, Ironic will be meeting at the PTG during the following times: Monday 1400-1500 UTC, in bexar room (shared session with nova about Ironic driver) Tuesday 1400-1700 UTC in grizzly room Wednesday 1400-1600 UTC in grizzly room Wednesday 2200-2300 UTC in grizzly room Also, baremetal SIG will be holding an operator hour for Ironic and other baremetal users on Wednesday, 1300-1400 UTC in the grizzly room. As always, https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html is more accurate and up to date than this email which only serves as a guide. Please also review https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ironic-antelope-ptg -- I've documented a schedule guideline mapping out our PTG topics across these times. If you have any conflicts, please let me know ASAP and we'll try to accommodate. Thanks, Jay Faulkner

1 0

[sdk][ptg] Operator hours - SDK/Cli
by Artem Goncharov 13 Oct '22

13 Oct '22

Hi all, This is no an official operator hour for sdk/cli, but all operators interested to hear/ask/share are welcome to join us during PTG on Friday 21.10 starting from 14:00 UTC (open end) Feel free to add topics of interest under Operator Hour item on https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/oct2022-ptg-sdk-cli <https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/oct2022-ptg-sdk-cli> Would be glad to get you there and talk about issues you face Artem

1 0

[interop][ptg] Virtual PTG Planning
by Martin Kopec 13 Oct '22

13 Oct '22

Hello everyone, here is [1] our etherpad for Antelope PTG with the topics we're planning to discuss. If there is anything you would like to bring up with the interop team, feel free to let us know. We've booked 3 one hour slots: * Monday (October 17th) 13 - 14 UTC @ kilo * Tuesday (October 18th) 15 - 16 UTC @ kilo * Thursday (October 20th) 15 - 16 UTC @ liberty In case we'll see a need for more, we can always book something else later. [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/antelope-ptg-interop Thanks, -- Martin Kopec Senior Software Quality Engineer Red Hat EMEA IM: kopecmartin

2 1

[Glance][PTG] Antelope PTG Schedule
by Pranali Deore 13 Oct '22

13 Oct '22

Hello All, Antelope PTG is going to start next week and we have created our PTG etherpad [1] and also added day wise topics along with timings we are going to discuss. Kindly let me know if you have any concerns with allotted time slots. Friday is reserved for any unplanned discussions. So please feel free to add your topics if you haven't added yet. As a reminder, these are the time slots for our discussion. Tuesday 18 OCT 2022 1400 UTC to 1700 UTC Wednesday 19 OCT 2022 1400 UTC to 1700 UTC Thursday 20 OCT 2022 1400 UTC to 1700 UTC Friday 21 OCT 2022 1400 UTC to 1700 UTC NOTE: We have booked glance operator hours on Thursday at 1600 UTC(we can extend it if required), let us know your availability for the same. At the moment we don't have any sessions scheduled on Friday, if there are any last moment request(s)/topic(s) we will discuss that on Friday else we will conclude our PTG on Thursday 20th OCT. We will be using bluejeans for our discussion, kindly try to use it once before the actual discussion. The meeting URL is mentioned in etherpad [1] and will be the same throughout the PTG. [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/antelope-glance-ptg Hope to see you there!! Thanks & Regards, Pranali Deore

1 0

[tacker][ptg] Announcement about operator hours
by ma-ooyama＠kddi.com 13 Oct '22

13 Oct '22

Hello all: The "operator-hour-tacker" has been reserved on 19-Oct Wednesday from 04UTC to 05UTC. This is the oppotunity to share operator's opinion with developers. Please feel free for adding any topics you'd like to discuss on the etherpad [1]. [1]https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/oct2022-ptg-operator-hour-tacker Thanks, Masaki

1 0

[ussuri] controller has crond PAM errors
by Ruslanas Gžibovskis 13 Oct '22

13 Oct '22

Hi all, First of all, I understand it is old release, but, maybe it is present in newer also? Running centos8Linux and centos repos based OSP installation (not delorean). I am scrolling through logs and found that cron is having some curious log line related to pam. curious if that is normal? /var/log/cron:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770496]: (cinder) PAM ERROR (Cannot make/remove an entry for the specified session) /var/log/cron:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770496]: (cinder) FAILED to open PAM security session (Cannot make/remove an entry for the specified session) /var/log/cron:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770426]: (heat) PAM ERROR (Cannot make/remove an entry for the specified session) /var/log/cron:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770881]: (nova) PAM ERROR (Cannot make/remove an entry for the specified session) /var/log/cron:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770426]: (heat) FAILED to open PAM security session (Cannot make/remove an entry for the specified session) /var/log/cron:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770881]: (nova) FAILED to open PAM security session (Cannot make/remove an entry for the specified session) /var/log/cron:Oct 12 05:00:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[773036]: (nova) PAM ERROR (Cannot make/remove an entry for the specified session) /var/log/cron:Oct 12 05:00:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[773036]: (nova) FAILED to open PAM security session (Cannot make/remove an entry for the specified session) /var/log/secure:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770496]: pam_loginuid(crond:session): Error writing /proc/self/loginuid: Operation not permitted /var/log/secure:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770496]: pam_loginuid(crond:session): set_loginuid failed /var/log/secure:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770881]: pam_loginuid(crond:session): Error writing /proc/self/loginuid: Operation not permitted /var/log/secure:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770426]: pam_loginuid(crond:session): Error writing /proc/self/loginuid: Operation not permitted /var/log/secure:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770881]: pam_loginuid(crond:session): set_loginuid failed /var/log/secure:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770426]: pam_loginuid(crond:session): set_loginuid failed /var/log/secure:Oct 12 05:00:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[773036]: pam_loginuid(crond:session): Error writing /proc/self/loginuid: Operation not permitted /var/log/secure:Oct 12 05:00:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[773036]: pam_loginuid(crond:session): set_loginuid failed -- Ruslanas Gžibovskis +370 6030 7030

1 0

[tripleo] Gate blocker
by Arx Cruz 13 Oct '22

13 Oct '22

Hello, We are facing another gate blocker related to package dependencies https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1992560, please do not recheck your patches. We are working to fix the issue. Kind regards, -- Arx Cruz Software Engineer Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com> arxcruz(a)redhat.com @RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat> Red Hat <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc> <https://www.redhat.com>

2 4

[swift] upgrade newton to train in containers
by Marcel 13 Oct '22

13 Oct '22

I'm planning an upgrade for our newton based swift cluster (OOO vm based) to a (kolla image based containers) train cluster So far I have tested the upgrade for the proxies, account_servers and container servers and it looks promising. I have in a test environment: - switched to the new proxies with the old ring files and it looks like everything works normally - Added the new (train) account and container servers to the rings and it looks like all is fine - Removed the old account and container servers, still fine - tested fall back, also fine My question actually is: Did the account and container database format change between newton and train in such a way that I might run into troubles trying the upgrade as tested above in ways that I did not yet foresee? Thanks Marcel

1 0