January 2022 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[swift] Dropping support for py27
by Timothy Burke 26 Jan '22

26 Jan '22

The Swift team plans for the coming Yoga release to be the final Swift release to support Python 2.7. This is long overdue; it is now two years since the official Python 2.7 end-of-life. We were relatively late in adding Python 3 support, however, and wanted to ensure a long-enough period to root out Python 3 bugs and transition existing Python 2 clusters. We've used that time effectively; now it's time to move forward. We'll do what we can to ensure subsequent releases are *not* considered for installation on unsupported versions of Python. Notably, we'll ensure wheels are no longer flagged as universal, and `python_requires` will be set. If you have a continued interest in running latest Swift on Python 2.7, please get in touch with us, either here on the mailing list or in #openstack-swift on OFTC. Tim Burke Swift PTL

1 0

[cinder] Bug deputy report for week of 01-19-2022
by Sofia Enriquez 26 Jan '22

26 Jan '22

This is a bug report from 01-12-2022 to 01-19-2022. Agenda: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-bug-squad-meeting ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Medium - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1957804 "RBD deferred deletion causes undeletable RBD snapshots." In Progress. Assigned to Eric. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1958122 "HPE 3PAR: In multi host env, multi-detach works partially if volume is attached to instances from separate hosts." In Progress. Assigned to Raghavendra Tilay. Low - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1958023 "Solidfire: there are some references to the removed parameters left." In Progress. Assigned to kajinamit. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1958245 "NetApp ONTAP driver shows type error exception when replicating FlexGroups." Unassigned. Cheers, -- Sofía Enriquez she/her Software Engineer Red Hat PnT <https://www.redhat.com> IRC: @enriquetaso @RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat> Red Hat <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc> <https://www.redhat.com>

2 2

[heat][interop] StackBuildErrorException on a master job
by Martin Kopec 26 Jan '22

26 Jan '22

Hi there, our interop master job (jobs for older OpenStack releases are fine) is constantly failing on 2 heat tests: heat_tempest_plugin.tests.functional.test_software_config.ParallelDeploymentsTest.test_deployments_metadata heat_tempest_plugin.tests.functional.test_software_config.ParallelDeploymentsTest.test_deployments_timeout_failed Full log at: https://storage.bhs.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/… Patch where you can see all the jobs - master one failing and the rest passing: https://review.opendev.org/c/openinfra/refstack-client/+/819918 We can't figure out what's going on there. Maybe additional configuration of the deployment is required? New requirements? Any ideas what the job is missing? Thank you, -- Martin Kopec Senior Software Quality Engineer Red Hat EMEA

2 3

2021 OpenInfra Foundation Annual Report Now Available
by Kendall Nelson 26 Jan '22

26 Jan '22

Hello Everyone! The 2021 OpenInfra Annual Report is live! It includes sections on all OpenInfra projects, Foundation updates, open infrastructure growth, SIG and WG updates, and more. You can find the 2021 OpenInfra Annual Report here: https://openinfra.dev/annual-report/2021 Thanks! Kendall (diablo_rojo)

1 0

[release][infra] SSH host key issue - RedFlag stop approving
by Előd Illés 26 Jan '22

26 Jan '22

Hi, tag-release jobs started to fail today and what i see is mostly that ECDSA host key for IP address X not in list of known hosts [1][2][3] Please don't approve release patches until we haven't figure out what is the problem. [1] https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/a490703c83514eb7ba9d0ff6307f7371… [2] https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/00d3f765ea6847a3bf7ea53294cf2a88… [3] https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/d8aaeff52dac442e89fd3e253596e0c2… Thanks, Előd irc:elodilles @ #openstack-release

2 4

[monasca] [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/monasca-agent for ref refs/tags/4.0.1 failed
by Előd Illés 26 Jan '22

26 Jan '22

Hi Monasca team, The forwarded mail contains a release job failure, specifically the publish-monasca-agent-docker-images job failed [1] with a missing package during docker image build. Can you please have a look at the issue? [1] https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/2ebcbfec634c4c068e9f7625473ea726 Thanks in advance, Előd irc:elodilles @ #openstack-release -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/monasca-agent for ref refs/tags/4.0.1 failed Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 11:57:09 +0000 From: zuul(a)openstack.org Reply-To: openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org To: release-job-failures(a)lists.openstack.org Build failed. - openstack-upload-github-mirror https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/bba91d0025a2496087a29803451a314f : SUCCESS in 45s - release-openstack-python https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/a749eb25de1d426e845740cae1876afe : SUCCESS in 3m 50s - announce-release https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/551dd5bd118347908b7113a5e2fa5c5e : SUCCESS in 5m 37s - propose-update-constraints https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/e95a5bee9817491d84c89f89758872d6 : SUCCESS in 4m 18s - publish-monasca-agent-docker-images https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/2ebcbfec634c4c068e9f7625473ea726 : POST_FAILURE in 7m 08s _______________________________________________ Release-job-failures mailing list Release-job-failures(a)lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-job-failures

2 1

Z Release Naming ...
by Jay Bryant 26 Jan '22

26 Jan '22

All, As in the past, I would like the community's input on the 'Z' release name [1] . I have narrowed the list down to my top 4 choices. Please take a few minutes to vote. The poll closes around 14:30 UTC on 1/28/22. Thanks for your input! Jay (jungleboyj) [1] https://twitter.com/jungleboyj/status/1486344910693441541

1 0

[horizon] Cancelling Today's weekly meeting
by vishal manchanda 26 Jan '22

26 Jan '22

Hello Team, Since there are no agenda items [1] to discuss for today's horizon weekly meeting. Also, Today is a holiday for me. So let's cancel today's weekly meeting. The next weekly meeting will be on 2nd February. Thanks & Regards, Vishal Manchanda [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/horizon-release-priorities

1 0

[TripleO] Proposing Juan Badia Payno for TripleO core reviewer.
by Carlos Camacho Gonzalez 26 Jan '22

26 Jan '22

Hi everyone! I'd like to propose Juan Badia Paino [1][2][3] as a core reviewer on the TripleO repositories that are or might be related to the backup and restore efforts (openstack/tripleo-ci, openstack/tripleo-ansible, openstack/python-tripleoclient, openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras, openstack/tripleo-quickstart). Juan has been around since 2016 making useful contributions and code reviews to the community and I believe adding him to our core reviewer group will help us improve the review and coding speed for the backup and restore codebase. As usual, consider this email as an initial +1 from my side, I will keep an eye on this thread for a week, and based on your feedback and if there are no objections I will add him as a core reviewer in two weeks. [1]: https://review.opendev.org/q/owner:jbadiapa%2540redhat.com [2]: https://www.stackalytics.io/?project_type=all&metric=commits&user_id=jbadia… [3]: https://www.stackalytics.io/report/contribution?module=tripleo-group&projec… Cheers, Carlos.

9 9

Re: Re: [ops] [kolla] RabbitMQ High Availability
by Albert Braden 25 Jan '22

25 Jan '22

Replying from my home email because I've been asked to not email the list from my work email anymore, until I get permission from upper management. I'm not sure I follow. I was planning to add 2 lines to etc/kolla/config/global.conf: [oslo_messaging_rabbit] amqp_durable_queues = False Is that not sufficient? What is involved in configuring dedicated control exchanges for each service? What would that look like in the config? From: Herve Beraud <hberaud(a)redhat.com> Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 2:45 AM To: Bogdan Dobrelya <bdobreli(a)redhat.com> Cc: openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ops] [kolla] RabbitMQ High Availability Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Le mer. 8 déc. 2021 à 11:48, Bogdan Dobrelya <bdobreli(a)redhat.com> a écrit : Please see inline >> I read this with great interest because we are seeing this issue. Questions: >> >> 1. We are running kola-ansible Train, and our RMQ version is 3.7.23. Should we be upgrading our Train clusters to use 3.8.x? >> 2. Document [2] recommends policy '^(?!(amq\.)|(.*_fanout_)|(reply_)).*'. I don't see this in our ansible playbooks, nor in any of the config files in the RMQ container. What would this look like in Ansible, and what should the resulting container config look like? >> 3. It appears that we are not setting "amqp_durable_queues = True". What does this setting look like in Ansible, and what file does it go into? > > Note that even having rabbit HA policies adjusted like that and its HA > replication factor [0] decreased (e.g. to a 2), there still might be > high churn caused by a large enough number of replicated durable RPC > topic queues. And that might cripple the cloud down with the incurred > I/O overhead because a durable queue requires all messages in it to be > persisted to a disk (for all the messaging cluster replicas) before they > are ack'ed by the broker. > > Given that said, Oslo messaging would likely require a more granular > control for topic exchanges and the durable queues flag - to tell it to > declare as durable only the most critical paths of a service. A single > config setting and a single control exchange per a service might be not > enough. Also note that therefore, amqp_durable_queue=True requires dedicated control exchanges configured for each service. Those that use 'openstack' as a default cannot turn the feature ON. Changing it to a service specific might also cause upgrade impact, as described in the topic [3]. The same is true for `amqp_auto_delete=True`. That requires dedicated control exchanges else it won't work if each service defines its own policy on a shared control exchange (e.g `openstack`) and if policies differ from each other. [3] https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:scope-config-opts > > There are also race conditions with durable queues enabled, like [1]. A > solution could be where each service declare its own dedicated control > exchange with its own configuration. > > Finally, openstack components should add perhaps a *.next CI job to test > it with durable queues, like [2] > > [0] https://www.rabbitmq.com/ha.html#replication-factor > > [1] > https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/aa514dd788f34cc1be3800e6d7dba0e8… > > [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820523 > >> >> Does anyone have a sample set of RMQ config files that they can share? >> >> It looks like my Outlook has ruined the link; reposting: >> [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Large_Scale_Configuration_Rabbit > > > -- > Best regards, > Bogdan Dobrelya, > Irc #bogdando -- Best regards, Bogdan Dobrelya, Irc #bogdando -- Hervé Beraud Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat irc: hberaud https://github.com/4383/ https://twitter.com/4383hberaud

6 16