September 2021 - openstack-discuss

Re: [all][tc] Minium python version for yoga and centos 9 stream.
by Sean Mooney 08 Sep '21

08 Sep '21

resending to correct list On Tue, 2021-09-07 at 10:51 +0100, Sean Mooney wrote: > hi i was jsut looking at the yoga runtimes an notice that we have not really updated it > with regards to minium python versions. > > currently > > the runtime defintion is as follows https://github.com/openstack/governance/blob/master/reference/runtimes/yoga… > > It is the :doc:`policy <../../resolutions/20181024-python-update-process>` that each OpenStack release cycle will target the latest available version of Python; default Python runtimes on the > distributions listed above; and versions used in integration tests at the start of the cycle, at least until the point when all projects have migrated to a later version. > > Based on the criteria above, all Python-based projects must target and test against, at a minimum: > > Python 3.6 (default in CentOS 8 Stream) > Python 3.8 (latest available; default in Ubuntu 20.04) > > looking at to look at https://repology.org/project/python/versions what python version are shpping by default now in many distro > more and more of them are moving to python 3.9 which is currently not in the test list and wer are starting to fall quite far behind > > debian 11/12/stable are currently using 3.9.2 > centos 8 defaults to 3.6.8 but ships 3.8.6 and 3.9.2 as appstreams > centos 9 stream will default to python3-3.9.6-6.el9.x86_64.rpm https://composes.stream.centos.org/test/latest-CentOS-Stream/compose/BaseOS… > ubuntu 20.04 default to 3.8.2 but also ships 3.9.5 in universe > ubuntu 21.04 default to 3.9.5 so we can expect that when yoga ships on ubuntu 22.04 it will be based on at least python 3.9 and proably 3.10 > fedora well they basically ship everythin but i belive 3.9 is not the default based on complaints some of my fellow contiutors had with > runnign unit and functional tests. > > openSUSE Leap 15.3 main/oss python39 3.9.4 ship 3.9 but default to 3.6 > they aslo nolonger have an openstack product but it would still be nice to keep them in mind. > > > over all i think we shoudl consider raising or min tested/supported python version to python 3.8 for yoga and consider updating from centos 8 to centos 9. > i also think it worth including python 3.9 in the required testing versions for python projects. > > several distros will be releaseing openstack xena/wallaby with python 3.9 and also yoga likely with 3.10 in some cases. > if we only offically test with 3.6 and 3.8 we could have some hard probalems to solve going forward. the optional testing with unit and functional tests > that some project have for python 3.9 certenly helps but actully having an integrated tempest gate job that runs on 3.9 i think is going to be increasingly important. > > readring centos 9 stream, it was orginally planned of release at the end of q2. now that date has obviosly passed but i know that they are still hopeful to have > a release ready in the next month or so. cloud images are avaibel at https://composes.stream.centos.org/production/latest-CentOS-Stream/compose/… although the repos are still only > partly complete https://composes.stream.centos.org/production/latest-CentOS-Stream/compose/… and there are currently no active mirros so its still officaly > not released https://www.centos.org/centos-stream/ and i don not have any ETA beyond soonTM. as such im aware we cant offically declare centos 9 stream as part of the tested > runtimes at this point but it might be at least worht listing it as an experimtal runtime as i suspec there will be a desire to swtich to it during the yoga cycle for some proejct. > ooo/rdo come to mind as they discussed this for xena but obviously that was not possibel since it was not released in time. > > > regards > sean. > > ps removing python 3.6 and replacing it with 3.9 instead of just adding 3.9 as an addtional runtime is more to manage our testing > there isnt nessarly any python feature that i explcitly would like to be able to use that are added in 3.8 that would be enabled > by making that the new min python verion that is motivating this suggestion. there are some nice thingin 3.9/3.10 such as pattern > mataching that are commign but it will be some time (2-4 years)before we can actully use those as our min version so i was just being practial > and suggestion we raise to 3.8 and add 3.9 as required with 3.10 as optional/experimal for those that want it. >

5 7

[cinder] Bug deputy report for week of 2021-08-09
by Sofia Enriquez 08 Sep '21

08 Sep '21

This is a bug report from 2021-01-09 to 2021-08-09. Agenda: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-bug-squad-meeting ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- High - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1942696 "RateLimitingMiddleware still belongs to v2 API code" Medium - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1942953 "Upload volume to image will terminate the vm's volume attachment". Assigned to xuanyandong - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1942342 "Huawei FC driver fails to create a volume from a snapshot with Dorado V6 - Bad or unexpected response from the storage volume backend API: Create luncopy error". Unassigned. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1934036 "Undefined CONF.quota_metadata_items is used in unit tests". Assigned to Takashi Kajinami. Cheers, -- L. Sofía Enriquez she/her Software Engineer Red Hat PnT <https://www.redhat.com> IRC: @enriquetaso @RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat> Red Hat <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc> <https://www.redhat.com>

1 0

Fwd: [ceph-users] Re: Replacing swift with RGW
by Michel Niyoyita 08 Sep '21

08 Sep '21

---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Eugen Block <eblock(a)nde.ag> Date: Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 10:39 AM Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Re: Replacing swift with RGW To: Michel Niyoyita <micou12(a)gmail.com> You should continue this thread on the openstack-discuss mailing list (openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org) since this is not a ceph issue. I'm not familiar with kolla and I don't know the requirements to install openstack-swift, you'll need to ask the openstack community. Zitat von Michel Niyoyita <micou12(a)gmail.com>: > Below are errors I am getting once I try to run swift commands . the second > one is the error I get once try to install python-swiftclient > > (kolla-open) [stack@kolla-open ~]$ swift -v stat > -bash: swift: command not found > (kolla-open) [stack@kolla-open ~]$ sudo yum -y install python-swiftclient > Last metadata expiration check: 0:59:21 ago on Thu 02 Sep 2021 09:21:53 AM > CAT. > No match for argument: python-swiftclient > Error: Unable to find a match: python-swiftclient > (kolla-open) [stack@kolla-open ~]$ > > Waiting for your help > > On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 10:17 AM Eugen Block <eblock(a)nde.ag> wrote: > >> I can't tell for sure, but yes, I believe you need the openstack-swift >> package (with dependencies). What errors do you get? The more >> information you share the better people can help. >> >> >> Zitat von Michel Niyoyita <micou12(a)gmail.com>: >> >> > I tried to install "sudo yum -y install python-swiftclient" on openstack >> > side but fails . are there openastack-shwift packages which are needed? >> > if are there please help me to get . may be also it is the cause I am >> > failing to run swift command on openstack cli side. >> > >> > thank you for your continued support. >> > >> > Micheal >> > >> > On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 9:14 AM Eugen Block <eblock(a)nde.ag> wrote: >> > >> >> I only configured the endpoints for the clients to directly access the >> >> RGWs, but you'll probably need to install the openstack-swift package. >> >> Or have you done that already? >> >> >> >> >> >> Zitat von Michel Niyoyita <micou12(a)gmail.com>: >> >> >> >> > Thank you Eugen for your prompt response. >> >> > >> >> > Now the commands provided work. but I am not finding the object >> storage >> >> on >> >> > the horizon dashboard , but it appears in the system information >> >> services. >> >> > [image: image.png] >> >> > so my question is how to configure it in order that it can appear in >> the >> >> > dashboard . >> >> > >> >> > Michel >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 3:49 PM Eugen Block <eblock(a)nde.ag> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Sorry, one little detail slipped through, the '--region' flag has to >> >> >> be put before the 'service' name. The correct command would be: >> >> >> >> >> >> openstack endpoint create --region RegionOne swift admin >> >> >> http://ceph-osd3:8080/swift/v1 >> >> >> >> >> >> and respectively for the other interfaces. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Zitat von Eugen Block <eblock(a)nde.ag>: >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hi, >> >> >> > >> >> >> > this is not a ceph issue but your openstack cli command as the >> error >> >> >> > message states. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Try one interface at a time: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > openstack endpoint create swift public >> >> >> > http://ceph-osd3:8080/swift/v1 --region RegionOne swift >> >> >> > openstack endpoint create swift admin >> http://ceph-osd3:8080/swift/v1 >> >> >> > --region RegionOne swift >> >> >> > openstack endpoint create swift internal >> >> >> > http://ceph-osd3:8080/swift/v1 --region RegionOne swift >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Zitat von Michel Niyoyita <micou12(a)gmail.com>: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Hello , >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Below are errors I am getting once I am trying to integrate swift >> >> with >> >> >> >> Radosgateway. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From openstack side once i try to endpoint which will point to the >> >> >> >> radosgateway : >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> (kolla-open) [stack@kolla-open kolla]$ openstack endpoint create >> >> >> >> --publicurl http://ceph-osd3:8080/swift/v1 --adminurl >> >> >> >> http://ceph-osd3:8080/swift/v1 --internal >> >> >> http://ceph-osd3:8080/swift/v1 >> >> >> >> --region RegionOne swift >> >> >> >> usage: openstack endpoint create [-h] [-f >> >> {json,shell,table,value,yaml}] >> >> >> >> [-c COLUMN] [--noindent] [--prefix >> >> >> PREFIX] >> >> >> >> [--max-width <integer>] >> [--fit-width] >> >> >> >> [--print-empty] [--region >> >> <region-id>] >> >> >> >> [--enable | --disable] >> >> >> >> <service> <interface> <url> >> >> >> >> openstack endpoint create: error: argument <interface>: invalid >> >> choice: >> >> >> ' >> >> >> >> http://ceph-osd3:8080/swift/v1' (choose from 'admin', 'public', >> >> >> 'internal') >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> (kolla-open) [stack@kolla-open kolla]$ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> below are my /etc/ceph/ceph.conf file : >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> [client.rgw.ceph-osd3] >> >> >> >> rgw_dns_name = ceph-osd3 >> >> >> >> host = ceph-osd3 >> >> >> >> keyring = /var/lib/ceph/radosgw/ceph-rgw.ceph-osd3/keyring >> >> >> >> log file = /var/log/ceph/ceph-rgw-ceph-osd3.log >> >> >> >> rgw frontends = civetweb port=10.10.29.110:8080 num_threads=100 >> >> >> >> rgw_keystone_url=http://10.10.29.150:35357 >> >> >> >> rgw_keystone_admin_user=admin >> >> >> >> rgw_keystone_admin_password=admin >> >> >> >> rgw_keystone_admin_tenant=admin >> >> >> >> rgw_keystone_accepted_role=admin Member swiftoperator >> >> >> >> rgw_keystone_token_cache_size=200 >> >> >> >> rgw_keystone_revocation_interval=300 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> [client.rgw.ceph-osd3.rgw0] >> >> >> >> host = ceph-osd3 >> >> >> >> keyring = /var/lib/ceph/radosgw/ceph-rgw.ceph-osd3.rgw0/keyring >> >> >> >> log file = /var/log/ceph/ceph-rgw-ceph-osd3.rgw0.log >> >> >> >> rgw frontends = beast endpoint=10.10.29.110:8080 >> >> >> >> rgw thread pool size = 512 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> please note that my rgw_dns_name = ceph_osd3 with 10.10.29.110 as >> IP >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> and 10.10.29.150 all-in-one IP >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Please crosscheck where I might make mistake and try to correct. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Best regards >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Michel >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 11:25 AM Etienne Menguy < >> >> >> etienne.menguy(a)croit.io> >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Hi, >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> There are some information on Ceph documentation >> >> >> >>> https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/radosgw/keystone/ < >> >> >> >>> https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/radosgw/keystone/> . >> >> >> >>> - Use keystone as auth for RGW >> >> >> >>> - Create service and register your RGW as swift >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> Étienne >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> On 27 Aug 2021, at 15:47, Michel Niyoyita <micou12(a)gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> Hello , >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> I have configured RGW in my ceph cluster deployed using ceph >> >> ansible >> >> >> and >> >> >> >>>> create sub user to access the created containers and would like >> to >> >> >> >>> replace >> >> >> >>>> swift by RGW in the openstack side. Anyone can help on >> >> configuration >> >> >> to >> >> >> >>> be >> >> >> >>>> done in the OpenStack side in order to integrate those >> services. I >> >> >> have >> >> >> >>>> deployed OpenStack wallaby using Kolla-ansible on ubuntu 20.04. >> and >> >> >> ceph >> >> >> >>>> pacific 16.2.5 was deployed using ansible on ubuntu 20.04 >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> Kindly help for the configuration or documentation. >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> Best Regards >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> Michel >> >> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> >>>> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users(a)ceph.io >> >> >> >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave(a)ceph.io >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> >>> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users(a)ceph.io >> >> >> >>> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave(a)ceph.io >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> >> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users(a)ceph.io >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave(a)ceph.io >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users(a)ceph.io >> >> >> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave(a)ceph.io >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>

4 7

[sdk]: Block storage service update volume status from reserved to available
by dmeng 08 Sep '21

08 Sep '21

Hello there, Hope everything is going well. I would like to know if there is any method that could update the volume status or reset its state. While we creating volumes use the block storage service or creating vms with volumes use the compute service, sometimes we got volumes stuck in creating/deleteing/attaching/reserved state. And we couldn't remove them or reset their state without an admin account even we own the project. The way we create volumes and boot vms is like the following: # create the volume cv = cinder.create_volume(name=bv_name, size=size, image_id=imageobj.id, volume_type=volume_type, is_bootable=True) # format mapping data bdm = [{'uuid': cv.id, 'source_type': 'volume', 'destination_type': 'volume', 'delete_on_termination': True, 'boot_index': 0}] # create the vm nova.create_server(name=hostname, image_id=imageobj.id, flavor_id=flavorl.id, key_name=key_name, block_device_mapping=bdm, user_data=format_userdata, networks=netid, security_groups=sec_groups) In the normal situation, everything works. But in the case of any network issue, the volume might stuck in the process of creating, deleting, or attaching. And if the volume got created successfully, when it tries to create the vm, the volume will be reserved for it, but if anything wrong happen when creating the vm or get timed out, the volume will be in the reserved stage forever. We would like to know if we could update the state or delete them without the admin account? We tried the command line tools 'openstack volume set --state available <volume_id>' and 'cinder reset-state --state available <volume_id>', but both got: Policy doesn't allow volume_extension:volume_admin_actions:reset_status to be performed. (HTTP 403) (Request-ID: req-b50236c3-5662-4cc0-8602-19e79e80219d) ERROR: Unable to reset the state for the specified entity(s). We are using the chameleon openstack cloud but we are not the admin user there, so wondering if there is any method that we could update the volume in our own project? Thanks and have a great day! Catherine

3 2

Error adding a Plain Volume created through GUI to Instance
by KK CHN 08 Sep '21

08 Sep '21

ExecutionError: Unexpected error while running command. Command: rbd map volume-4dcb78d5-e0ce-4bfc-95ae-36a4417c35d8 --pool volumes --id volumes --mon_host 10.236.223.131:6789 --mon_host 10.236.223.132:6789 Exit code: 6 Stdout: 'RBD image feature set mismatch. You can disable features unsupported by the kernel with "rbd feature disable volumes/volume-4dcb78d5-e0ce-4bfc-95ae-36a4417c35d8 journaling".\nIn some cases useful info is found in syslog - try "dmesg | tail".\n' Stderr: 'rbd: sysfs write failed\nrbd: map failed: (6) No such device or address\n' I am trying to add a 20 GB plain volume created through Horizon GUI to an existing Windows 2012 R VM running with VirtIO drivers installed. But this volume adding results in the error as shown above, trace tells to fix it by rbd feature disable .. what is the permanent fix for this issue ? and why it happens ? ( OpenStack Ussuri, Glance, Ceph , qemu-kvm) root@ctrl1:/home/cloud# ceph --version ceph version 14.2.19 (bb796b9b5bab9463106022eef406373182465d11) nautilus (stable) root@ctrl1:/home/cloud#

3 2

Fwd: linux.conf.au 2022 - Call for Sessions now open!
by Joshua Hesketh 08 Sep '21

08 Sep '21

Hello all, Firstly sorry if this isn't the right list for this sort of content. While I've continued to lurk in the OpenStack community I haven't been engaged in a number of years sadly (and missing ya'll!). Nonetheless, linux.conf.au 2022 is coming soon as an online event. This is your unique opportunity to speak at a conference that would otherwise require some 24+ hours of travel for a lot of folk. The Call For Proposals is currently open until Sunday the 12th (it was extended) and it would be great to see some open infrastructure talks (Ansible, OpenStack, Kubernetes, zuul, Airship, etc etc). Read on for more information or let me know if you have any questions. Regardless if you submit a session it is also a great opportunity to attend a world class open source conference remotely! Cheers, Josh -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: linux.conf.au 2022 - Call for Sessions now open! Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:07:01 +1000 From: linux.conf.au Announcements <lca-announce(a)lists.linux.org.au> <lca-announce(a)lists.linux.org.au> Reply-To: lca-announce(a)lists.linux.org.au To: LCA Announce <lca-announce(a)lists.linux.org.au> <lca-announce(a)lists.linux.org.au>, Linux Aus <linux-aus(a)lists.linux.org.au> <linux-aus(a)lists.linux.org.au> The linux.conf.au 2022 Call for Sessions is now open. It will stay open until 11:59pm 5 September 2021 Anywhere on Earth (AoE). The theme for 2022 is 'community'. After the challenges of the past year, our community has explored ways to rebuild the connections we were used to having face-to-face. Many Open Source communities already had their roots online, so how can this be applied to other areas, and how can we keep people interested as they shift to living even more of their lives online? How can we keep in contact with connections in other countries in a virtual way? If you have ideas or developments you'd like to share with the open source community at linux.conf.au, we'd love to hear from you. ## Call for Sessions The main conference runs on Saturday 15 and Sunday 16 January, with multiple streams catering for a wide range of interest areas. We invite you to submit a session proposal on a topic you are familiar with via our proposals portal at https://lca2022.linux.org.au/programme/proposals/. Talks are 45 minute presentations on a single topic presented in lecture format. Each accepted talk will receive one ticket to attend the conference. ## Call for Miniconfs We are pleased to announce we will again have four Miniconfs on the first day, Friday 14 January 2022. These are: * GO GLAM meets Community * Kernel * Open Hardware * System Administration Based on feedback over a few years, we will be introducing two major changes for Miniconfs in 2022: all presentations will be 30 minutes long, and each accepted presentation will receive one ticket to the conference. The Call for Miniconf Sessions is now open on our website, so we encourage you to submit your proposal today. Check out our Miniconfs page at https://lca2022.linux.org.au/programme/miniconfs/ for more information. ## No need to book flights or hotels Don't forget: the conference will be an online, virtual experience. This means our speakers will be beaming in from their own homes or workplaces. The organising team will be able to help speakers with their tech set-up. Each accepted presenter will have a tech check prior to the event to smooth out any difficulties and there will be an option to pre-record presentations. ## Introducing LCA Local We know many of you have missed the experience of a face-to-face conference and in 2022 we are launching LCA Local. While our conference will be online, we are inviting people to join others in their local area and participate in the conference together. More information and an expression of interest form for LCA Local will be released soon. ## Have you got an idea? You can find out how to submit your session proposals at https://lca2022.linux.org.au/programme/proposals/. If you have any other questions, you can contact us via email at contact(a)lca2022.linux.org.au. The session selection committee is looking forward to reading your submissions. We would also like to thank them for coming together and volunteering their time to help put this conference together. linux.conf.au 2022 Organising Team ---- Read this online at https://lca2022.linux.org.au/news/call-for-sessions/ _______________________________________________ lca-announce mailing list lca-announce(a)lists.linux.org.au http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/lca-announce

1 0

Octavia Issue: Failed to build compute instance due to: Failed to retrieve image with amphora tag
by Karera Tony 07 Sep '21

07 Sep '21

Hello Team, I have openstack wallaby running on Ubuntu deployed using kolla-ansible but whenever I create a load balancer I get the error below in the octavia-worker.log octavia.common.exceptions.ComputeBuildException: Failed to build compute instance due to: Failed to retrieve image with amphora tag 2021-09-06 14:14:49.392 20 ERROR oslo_messaging.rpc.server But I have an image with the correct tag as shown below. (kolla-openstack) stack@deployment:~$ openstack image show amphora1 | grep tag | tags | amphora Kindly advise if I am missing anything. Regards Tony Karera

2 1

[keystone] Weekly meetings
by Douglas Mendizabal 07 Sep '21

07 Sep '21

Hi All, I'm helping the Keystone team get the weekly meetings back on track. [1] I'd like to propose a change to the meeting time slot from Tuesday at 1700 UTC to Tuesday at 1500 UTC to make it a little earlier for our contributors in EMEA. I'll be out next week, so I won't be available to chair the meeting, but I should be back the following week for the August 31 meeting. If there are no objections to this time change, I'll go ahead and propose a change to the meetings repo. Thanks, - Douglas Mendizábal (redrobot) [1] https://meetings.opendev.org/#Keystone_Team_Meeting

1 1

Adding another cell(v2)
by Alexander Dibbo - STFC UKRI 07 Sep '21

07 Sep '21

Hi, Could someone point me to the documentation on how to add a new cell to cellsv2? I have found various documentation that says to follow the procedure for Cells V1 but I cant find documentation for that. Below is the link to the doc I have found https://docs.openstack.org/nova/train/user/cells.html I am running train and have found myself needing to use more cells to deal with our latest hardware deployment. We use a home rolled deployment system. Thanks In Advance Regards Alexander Dibbo - Cloud Architect / Cloud Operations Group Leader For STFC Cloud Documentation visit https://stfc-cloud-docs.readthedocs.io<https://stfc-cloud-docs.readthedocs.io/> To raise a support ticket with the cloud team please email cloud-support(a)gridpp.rl.ac.uk<mailto:cloud-support@gridpp.rl.ac.uk> To receive notifications about the service please subscribe to our mailing list at: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=STFC-CLOUD To receive fast notifications or to discuss usage of the cloud please join our Slack: https://stfc-cloud.slack.com/ This email and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the named recipients. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this email or any of its attachments and should notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your system. UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise risk of this email or any attachments containing viruses or malware but the recipient should carry out its own virus and malware checks before opening the attachments. UKRI does not accept any liability for any losses or damages which the recipient may sustain due to presence of any viruses.

2 1

[neutron] Bug deputy report for week of August 30th
by Brian Haley 07 Sep '21

07 Sep '21

Hi, I was Neutron bug deputy last week. Below is a short summary about the reported bugs. -Brian Critical bugs ------------- * None High bugs --------- * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1942190 - [Fullstack] Timeout while waiting for port to be active - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/807134 Medium bugs ----------- * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1942033 - Mechanism driver 'ovn' failed in update_port_postcommit: ovsdbapp.backend.ovs_idl.idlutils.RowNotFound - q-dhcp was also enabled in config causing the issue, removing fixed it * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1942251 - Routes has not added after router restart - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/721799 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1942344 - ovs2ovn migration tool fails using VALIDATE_MIGRATION=False - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/806942 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1942413 - subport status is not updated when trunk or subport notification is received - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/807076 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1942615 - SG shared through RBAC mechanism can't be used to spawn instances - Slawek took ownership * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1942617 - SG rules from SG shared using RBAC aren't visible - Slawek took ownership Low bugs -------- * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1942234 - [OVS] Device "update" information could look the same between two different updates - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/806889 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1942237 - Changed FIP event in Ie4c0f4a63a87c32026c49b03068e5f461deb38b6 - Won't fix - consumers have been fixed * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1942358 - Use "objects_exist" in port forwarding plugin - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/806962 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1942448 - Neutron - “Update bandwidth limit rule” API on SUCCESS responds with 200 instead of Expected 202 - Looks like an api-ref typo - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-lib/+/807390 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1942469 - Network delete notifications no longer contain segment info - Broken with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/786373 - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/807243 Misc bugs --------- * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1942458 - NeutronNetworks.create_and_delete_subnets fails NotFound - Asked for more information, could be container-related - Moved to neutron-charm for more investigation Wishlist bugs ------------- * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1942294 - Is allow_overlapping_ips config option still needed really?

1 0