May 2021 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[telemetry] Retire panko
by Matthias Runge 25 May '21

25 May '21

Hi there, over the past couple of cycles, we have seen decreasing interest on panko. Also it has some debts, which were just carried over from the early days. We discussed over at the PTG and didn't really found a reason to keep it alive or included under OpenStack. With that, it also makes sense to retire puppet-panko. I'll wait for 1-2 weeks and propose appropriate patches to get it retired then, if I don't hear anything against it or if there are any takers. Matthias

1 2

[automation-sig][freezer][i18n-sig][powervmstacker-sig][public-cloud-sig] IRC channel cleanup
by Jeremy Stanley 25 May '21

25 May '21

I've proposed a pair of changes removing the OpenDev Collaboratory IRC bots (including logging) from inactive channels. Some of these channels correspond to current groups within the OpenStack community, so it's only fair to give them a heads up and let them know. The following channels have had no human discussion at all (no comments from anything other than our bots) for all of 2021 so far: * #openstack-auto-scaling * #openstack-fr * #openstack-freezer * #openstack-powervm * #openstack-publiccloud * #openstack-self-healing It's fine if these efforts aren't utilizing IRC, but there's probably little point in us logging or reporting information in them if they're unused. The patches for removing our services from those channels are available for review here (they also include cleanup of channels for other known defunct efforts or vestiges of channels which have since move to new names): https://review.opendev.org/792301 https://review.opendev.org/792302 If you're concerned and would like to resume using one or more of these channels, feel free to follow up here on the mailing list or with review comments some time in the next few days. If there are no objections I plan to merge these no later than Monday, May 24. Of course it's quite easy to reinstate services on a channel at any time, so if you don't see this until the changes have already merged, please follow up anyway and we can restore the bots as needed. -- Jeremy Stanley

1 1

[neutron] Bug deputy report (week starting on 2021-05-17)
by Bernard Cafarelli 24 May '21

24 May '21

Hey neutrinos, we are starting a new bug deputy rotation (new dates available as usual at [0]), here are the bugs that were reported last week. Skipping invalid/duplicate bugs, this was relatively quiet, most bugs have fixes or assignees. OVN eyes are welcome on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929197 (unconfirmed section). In details: Critical * Fullstack test TestUninterruptedConnectivityOnL2AgentRestart failing often with LB agent - https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928764 Causing FT failures, lajos looking into it in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/792507 * Devstack "fixup_ubuntu" method removed - https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928805 Fixed with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/791983 * Docs job is broken in neutron - https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928913 pyroute2 issue with newer versions, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/792180 fixes it for older branches, and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/792077 in master (dependency will be added to pyroute2 directly soon) Medium * "test_reserve_provider_segment_without_physical_network" failing randomly - https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929190 Proposed test fix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/792559 Low * Missing packages in openSuse installation steps - https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929012 Small suggested doc fix on packages to install for L3 agent Unconfirmed * [OVN] SB connection unreliable - https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929197 Needs some OVN eyes, error on "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'chassis_exists'" Incomplete * [stein][neutron] l3 agent error - https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928675 After a migration from queens, controllers go OOM with HA routers "Respawning ip_monitor" logs Mentioned env was cleaned, we may get more information on next env update [0] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings#Bug_deputy -- Bernard Cafarelli

1 0

[TripleO] Opting out of global-requirements.txt
by James Slagle 24 May '21

24 May '21

I'd like to propose that TripleO opt out of dependency management by removing tripleo-common from global-requirements.txt. I do not feel that the global dependency management brings any advantages or anything needed for TripleO. I can't think of any reason to enforce the ability to be globally pip installable with the rest of OpenStack. Two of our most critical projects, tripleoclient and tripleo-common do not even put many of their data files in the right place where our code expects them when they are pip installed. So, I feel fairly confident that no one is pip installing TripleO and relying on global requirements enforcement. One potential advantage of not being in global-requirements.txt is that our unit tests and functional tests could actually test the same code. As things stand today, our unit tests in projects that depend on tripleo-common are pinned to the version in global-requirements.txt, while our functional tests currently run with tripleo-common from master (or included depends-on). The changes needed would be (aiui): - Remove tripleo repos from projects.txt - Remove check-requirements jobs from those same repos - Remove tripleo-common from global-requirements.txt I think we should also plan to backport these changes to Wallaby. Let me know any concerns or feedback, or anything I might be overlooking. Thanks. -- -- James Slagle --

9 14

[kolla] Draft release process
by Mark Goddard 24 May '21

24 May '21

Hi, At the Xena PTG [1] we discussed changing the early phases of our release process to provide more stability while developing features for Kolla projects. We also agreed to firm up timing and improve documentation around some of the steps of the release process nearer to the release. I have drafted a new release process/schedule [2] based on these ideas. Please share your comments, thoughts and concerns either here or in the Etherpad. Thanks, Mark [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/kolla-xena-ptg [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/kolla-release-process-draft

1 0

[kolla] master branch open for development
by Mark Goddard 24 May '21

24 May '21

Hi, Apologies, this email should have been sent some time ago. I wanted to notify the community that the master branch of Kolla projects is open for development. Note that review focus will still be on patches relevant to Wallaby until it is released. Thanks, Mark

1 0

[wallaby][trove] Instance Volume Resize
by Ammad Syed 24 May '21

24 May '21

Hi, I am using wallaby / trove on ubuntu 20.04. I am trying to extend volume of database instance. Its having trouble that instance cannot exceed volume size of 10GB. My flavor has 2vcpus 4GB RAM and 10GB disk. I created a database instance with 5GB database size and mysql datastore. The deployment has created 10GB root and 5GB /var/lib/mysql. I have tried to extend volume to 11GB, it failed with error that "Volume 'size' cannot exceed maximum of 10 GB, 11 cannot be accepted". I want to keep root disk size to 10GB and only want to extend /var/lib/mysql keeping the same flavor. Is it possible or should I need to upgrade flavor as well ? -- Regards, Syed Ammad Ali

2 4

[all][tc] What's happening in Technical Committee: summary 21th May, 21: Reading: 5 min
by Ghanshyam Mann 23 May '21

23 May '21

Hello Everyone, Here is last week's summary of the Technical Committee activities. 1. What we completed this week: ========================= Project updates: ------------------- * None for this week. Other updates: ------------------ * None for this week. 2. TC Meetings: ============ * TC held this week meeting on Thursday; you can find the full meeting logs in the below link: - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2021/tc.2021-05-20-15.00.log.html * We will have next week's meeting on May 27th, Thursday 15:00 UTC[1]. 3. Activities In progress: ================== TC Tracker for Xena cycle ------------------------------ TC is using the etherpad[2] for Xena cycle working item. We will be checking and updating the status biweekly in the same etherpad. Open Reviews ----------------- * Four open reviews for ongoing activities[3]. Starting the 'Y' release naming process --------------------------------------------- * Y release naming process is started[4]. Nomination is open until June 10th feel free to propose names in below wiki ** https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Release_Naming/Y_Proposals Replacing ATC terminology with AC (Active Contributors) ------------------------------------------------------------------- * As UC is merged into TC, this is to include the AUC into ATC so that they can be eligible for TC election voting. We are having a good amount of discussion on Gerrit[5], feel free to review the patch if you have any points regarding this. * In the last TC meeting, we will write a TC resolution to map the ATC with the new term AC from Bylaws' perspective. Retiring sushy-cli -------------------- * Ironic project is retiring the sushy-cli[6] Discussion on moving from Freenode -------------------------------------------- * As you know there are changes in Freenode organization/governance strategy and policies, we are having a lot of discussion over ML on this[7][8]. * In TC, we many members think to monitor this situation and not to make any quick decision in hurry. This also needs to decide which platform is better for the long term. Until then we will continue on Freenode. * As Naser mentioned in the ML thread if anyone feels a very strong opinion to be discussed on priority, feel free to add this in next week's TC meeting agenda. 4. How to contact the TC: ==================== If you would like to discuss or give feedback to TC, you can reach out to us in multiple ways: 1. Email: you can send the email with tag [tc] on openstack-discuss ML[9]. 2. Weekly meeting: The Technical Committee conduct a weekly meeting every Thursday 15 UTC [10] 3. Office hours: The Technical Committee offers a weekly office hour every Tuesday at 0100 UTC [11] 4. Ping us using 'tc-members' nickname on #openstack-tc IRC channel. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-xena-tracker [3] https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/governance+status:open [4] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022383.html [5] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/790092 [6] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/792348 [7] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022468.html [8] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022539.html [9] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss [10] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Technical_Committee_Meeting [11] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Technical_Committee_Office_hours -gmann

1 0

[largescale-sig][neutron] What driver are you using?
by Arnaud Morin 22 May '21

22 May '21

Hey large-scalers, We had a discusion in my company (OVH) about neutron drivers. We are using a custom driver based on BGP for public networking, and another custom driver for private networking (based on vlan). Benefits from this are obvious: - we maintain the code - we do what we want, not more, not less - it fits perfectly to the network layer our company is using - we have full control of the networking stack But it also have some downsides: - we have to maintain the code... (rebasing, etc.) - we introduce bugs that are not upstream (more code, more bugs) - a change in code is taking longer, we have few people working on this (compared to a community based) - this is not upstream (so not opensource) - we are not sharing (bad) So, we were wondering which drivers are used upstream in large scale environment (not sure a vlan driver can be used with more than 500 hypervisors / I dont know about vxlan or any other solution). Is there anyone willing to share this info? Thanks in advance!

2 3

[octavia][tripleo][kolla][stable][release] $series-eol delete problem
by Előd Illés 21 May '21

21 May '21

Hi teams in $SUBJECT, during the deletion of $series-eol tagged branches it turned out that the below listed branches / repositories contains merged patches on top of $series-eol tag. The issue is with this that whenever the branch is deleted only the $series-eol (and other) tags can be checked out, so the changes that were merged after the eol tags, will be *lost*. There are two options now: 1. Create another tag (something like: "$series-eol-extra"), so that the extra patches will not be lost completely, because they can be checked out with the newly created tags 2. Delete the branch anyway and don't care about the lost patch(es) Here are the list of such branches, please consider which option is good for the team and reply to this mail: openstack/octavia * stable/stein has patches on top of the stein-eol tag * stable/queens has patches on top of the queens-eol tag openstack/kolla * stable/pike has patches on top of the pike-eol tag * stable/ocata has patches on top of the ocata-eol tag openstack/tripleo-common * stable/rocky has patches on top of the rocky-eol tag openstack/os-apply-config * stable/pike has patches on top of the pike-eol tag * stable/ocata has patches on top of the ocata-eol tag openstack/os-cloud-config stable/ocata has patches on top of the ocata-eol tag Thanks, Előd

5 5

[all][stable] Delete $series-eol tagged branches
by Előd Illés 21 May '21

21 May '21

Hi, As I wrote previously [1] the long-waited deletion of $series-eol tagged branches started with the removal of ocata-eol tagged ones first (for the list of deleted branches, see: [2]) Then I also sent out a warning [3] about the next step, to delete pike-eol tagged branches, which finally happened today (for the list of deleted branches, see: [4]). So now I'm sending out a *warning* again, that as a 3rd step, the deletion of already tagged but still open branches will continue in 1 or 2 weeks time frame. If everything works as expected, then branches with *queens-eol*, *rocky-eol* and *stein-eol* tags can be processed in one batch. Also I would like to ask the teams who have $series-eol tagged branches to abandon all open patches on those branches, otherwise the branch cannot be deleted. Thanks, Előd [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-April/021949.ht… [2] http://paste.openstack.org/show/804953/ [3] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022173.html [4] http://paste.openstack.org/show/805404/

2 2

[Interop] new meetup pointer
by Kanevsky, Arkady 21 May '21

21 May '21

Team, The meetings will be held going forward at https://meetpad.opendev.org/interop at 4pm UTC every Friday Convert time to your timezone: https://mytime.io/16pm/UTC Thanks, Arkady Kanevsky, Ph.D. SP Chief Technologist & DE Dell Technologies office of CTO Dell Inc. One Dell Way, MS PS2-91 Round Rock, TX 78682, USA Phone: 512 7204955

1 0

[Interop] Next 2 meetings on May 28 and June 4 are CANCELLED
by Kanevsky, Arkady 21 May '21

21 May '21

Arkady Kanevsky, Ph.D. SP Chief Technologist & DE Dell Technologies office of CTO Dell Inc. One Dell Way, MS PS2-91 Round Rock, TX 78682, USA Phone: 512 7204955

1 0

[all] OpenDev Collaboratory IRC services
by Jeremy Stanley 21 May '21

21 May '21

I know lots of people are discussing the recent Freenode IRC upheaval and what it means for their projects. On behalf of the OpenDev sysadmins I've started a thread on the service-discuss(a)lists.opendev.org mailing list to get feedback from communities currently utilizing the OpenDev Collaboratory's IRC bot services in their channels on Freenode (meeting minutes/logging, Gerrit change events, OpenDev service status information, channel operator assistance): http://lists.opendev.org/pipermail/service-discuss/2021-May/000236.html Please follow up there with your thoughts, to assist in our decision making, so we can take the needs of your project into account. Thanks! -- Jeremy Stanley

1 0

[release] Release countdown for week R-19, May 24 - May 28
by Herve Beraud 21 May '21

21 May '21

Development Focus ----------------- The Xena-1 milestone is next week, on 27 May, 2021! Project team plans for the Xena cycle should now be solidified. General Information ------------------- Libraries need to be released at least once per milestone period. Next week, the release team will propose releases for any library which had changes but has not been otherwise released since the Wallaby release. PTL's or release liaisons, please watch for these and give a +1 to acknowledge them. If there is some reason to hold off on a release, let us know that as well, by posting a -1. If we do not hear anything at all by the end of the week, we will assume things are OK to proceed. NB: If one of your libraries is still releasing 0.x versions, start thinking about when it will be appropriate to do a 1.0 version. The version number does signal the state, real or perceived, of the library, so we strongly encourage going to a full major version once things are in a good and usable state. Upcoming Deadlines & Dates -------------------------- Xena-1 milestone: 27 May, 2021 -- Hervé Beraud Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat irc: hberaud https://github.com/4383/ https://twitter.com/4383hberaud -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsFcBAABCAAQBQJb4AwCCRAHwXRBNkGNegAALSkQAHrotwCiL3VMwDR0vcja10Q+ Kf31yCutl5bAlS7tOKpPQ9XN4oC0ZSThyNNFVrg8ail0SczHXsC4rOrsPblgGRN+ RQLoCm2eO1AkB0ubCYLaq0XqSaO+Uk81QxAPkyPCEGT6SRxXr2lhADK0T86kBnMP F8RvGolu3EFjlqCVgeOZaR51PqwUlEhZXZuuNKrWZXg/oRiY4811GmnvzmUhgK5G 5+f8mUg74hfjDbR2VhjTeaLKp0PhskjOIKY3vqHXofLuaqFDD+WrAy/NgDGvN22g glGfj472T3xyHnUzM8ILgAGSghfzZF5Skj2qEeci9cB6K3Hm3osj+PbvfsXE/7Kw m/xtm+FjnaywZEv54uCmVIzQsRIm1qJscu20Qw6Q0UiPpDFqD7O6tWSRKdX11UTZ hwVQTMh9AKQDBEh2W9nnFi9kzSSNu4OQ1dRMcYHWfd9BEkccezxHwUM4Xyov5Fe0 qnbfzTB1tYkjU78loMWFaLa00ftSxP/DtQ//iYVyfVNfcCwfDszXLOqlkvGmY1/Y F1ON0ONekDZkGJsDoS6QdiUSn8RZ2mHArGEWMV00EV5DCIbCXRvywXV43ckx8Z+3 B8qUJhBqJ8RS2F+vTs3DTaXqcktgJ4UkhYC2c1gImcPRyGrK9VY0sCT+1iA+wp/O v6rDpkeNksZ9fFSyoY2o =ECSj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

[nova] Weekly meeting moved to Tuesday 16:00 UTC
by Balazs Gibizer 21 May '21

21 May '21

Hi, Based on the poll[1] and the discussion on the weekly meeting[2] we agreed to move the nova weekly IRC meeting to Tuesday 16:00 UTC from now on. Cheers, gibi [1]http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022440.ht… [2]http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-05-20-16.00.l…

1 0

unable to get spice console
by cloud learner 21 May '21

21 May '21

Dear all, Unable to get spice console on victoria single node. Kindly help. Thanks

1 0

[mistral] glance image upload
by Arnaud Morin 21 May '21

21 May '21

Hey team, Is there any way to upload/download an image to/from glance using a mistral workflow? I am seeing the glance.images_upload and glance.images_data, but I cant figure out how it works, I was thinking that we could provide some sort of swift URL to download/upload from. Is there any example available somewhere or maybe it's not yet implemented? Thanks

3 2

[Senlin][Octavia] Health policy - LB_STATUS_POLLING detection mode
by Giacomo Lanciano 21 May '21

21 May '21

Hi folks, I'd like to know what is the status of making the LB_STATUS_POLLING detection mode available for the Senlin Health Policy [1]. According to the docs and this patch [2], the implementation of this feature is blocked by some issue on LBaaS/Octavia side, but I could not find any details on what this issue really is. As the docs state, it would be really useful to have this detection mode available, as it is much more reliable than the others at evaluating the status of an application. If I can be of any help, I would be willing to contribute. Thanks in advance. Kind regards. Giacomo [1] https://docs.openstack.org/senlin/latest/contributor/policies/health_v1.htm… [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/senlin/+/423012 -- Giacomo Lanciano Ph.D. Student in Data Science Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy https://www.linkedin.com/in/giacomolanciano

2 2

[neutron][stadium][stable] Proposal to make stable/ocata and stable/pike branches EOL
by Slawek Kaplonski 21 May '21

21 May '21

Hi, I checked today that stable/ocata and stable/pike branches in both Neutron and neutron stadium projects are pretty inactive since long time. * according to [1], last patch merged patch in Neutron for stable/pike was in July 2020 and in ocata October 2019, * for stadium projects, according to [2] it was September 2020. According to [3] and [4] there are no opened patches for any of those branches for Neutron and any stadium project except neutron-lbaas. So based on that info I want to propose that we will close both those branches are EOL now and before doing that, I would like to know if anyone would like to keep those branches to be open still. [1] https://review.opendev.org/q/project:%255Eopenstack/neutron+(branch:stable/ ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:merged[1] [2] https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:openstack/ovsdbapp+OR+project:opensta… +(branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:merged[2] [3] https://review.opendev.org/q/project:%255Eopenstack/neutron+(branch:stable/ ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:open[3] [4] https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:openstack/ovsdbapp+OR+project:opensta… +(branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:open[4] -- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat -------- [1] https://review.opendev.org/q/project:%255Eopenstack/neutron+(branch:stable/ ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:merged [2] https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:openstack/ovsdbapp+OR+project:opensta… +(branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:merged [3] https://review.opendev.org/q/project:%255Eopenstack/neutron+(branch:stable/ ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:open [4] https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:openstack/ovsdbapp+OR+project:opensta… +(branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:open

6 11

OVN ovsdb clustering question
by Satish Patel 21 May '21

21 May '21

Folks, I have 3 controller nodes and am trying to setup clustering for OVN deployment, but lack enough documentation and have some issues and questions regarding it. I found this document but again its little confusing and very old - https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2018-March/046470.html # controller 1 /usr/share/ovn/scripts/ovn-ctl --db-nb-addr=172.30.40.93 \ --db-nb-create-insecure-remote=yes \ --db-sb-addr=172.30.40.93 \ --db-sb-create-insecure-remote=yes \ --db-nb-cluster-local-addr=172.30.40.93 \ --db-sb-cluster-local-addr=172.30.40.93 \ --ovn-northd-nb-db=tcp:172.30.40.93:6641,tcp:172.30.40.25:6641,tcp:172.30.40.177:6641 \ --ovn-northd-sb-db=tcp:172.30.40.93:6642,tcp:172.30.40.25:6642,tcp:172.30.40.177:6642 \ start_northd # controller 2 /usr/share/ovn/scripts/ovn-ctl --db-nb-addr=172.30.40.25 \ --db-nb-create-insecure-remote=yes \ --db-sb-addr=172.30.40.25 \ --db-sb-create-insecure-remote=yes \ --db-nb-cluster-local-addr=172.30.40.25 \ --db-sb-cluster-local-addr=172.30.40.25 \ --db-nb-cluster-remote-addr=172.30.40.93 \ --db-sb-cluster-remote-addr=172.30.40.93 \ --ovn-northd-nb-db=tcp:172.30.40.93:6641,tcp:172.30.40.25:6641,tcp:172.30.40.177:6641 \ --ovn-northd-sb-db=tcp:172.30.40.93:6642,tcp:172.30.40.25:6642,tcp:172.30.40.177:6642 \ start_northd # controller 3 /usr/share/ovn/scripts/ovn-ctl --db-nb-addr=172.30.40.177 \ --db-nb-create-insecure-remote=yes \ --db-nb-cluster-local-addr=172.30.40.177 \ --db-sb-addr=172.30.40.177 \ --db-sb-create-insecure-remote=yes \ --db-sb-cluster-local-addr=172.30.40.177 \ --db-nb-cluster-remote-addr=172.30.40.93 \ --db-sb-cluster-remote-addr=172.30.40.93 \ --ovn-northd-nb-db=tcp:172.30.40.93:6641,tcp:172.30.40.25:6641,tcp:172.30.40.177:6641 \ --ovn-northd-sb-db=tcp:172.30.40.93:6642,tcp:172.30.40.25:6642,tcp:172.30.40.177:6642 \ start_northd ## Validation steps controller-2# export\ remote="tcp:172.30.40.93:6641,tcp:172.30.40.25:6641,tcp:172.30.40.177:6641" controller-2# ovn-nbctl --db=$remote show controller-2# In the above command i am seeing output only when it hit controller-1 node, but for node-2 and note-3 giving me empty output that means data replication doesn't work. what is the command to verify synchronization working between all 3 nodes? Do I need to restart any other services?

1 0

[sdk] R1.0 preparation work
by Artem Goncharov 20 May '21

20 May '21

Hey all, As we were discussing during the PTG preparation work for the openstacksdk R1.0 has been started. There is now feature branch “feature/r1” and a set of patches already in place ([1]). (While https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/791541 <https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/791541> is not merged there are no functional tests running, but that is not blocking from doing the main work) Things to be done: - get rid of all direct REST calls in the cloud layer. Instead reuse corresponding proxies [must] - generalise tag, metadata, quota(set), limits [must] - clean the code from some deprecated things and py2 remaining (if any) [must] - review resource caching to be implemented on the resource layer [optional] - introduction of read-only resource properties [optional] - restructure documentation to make it more used friendly [optional] Planned R1 interface changes Every cloud layer method (Connection.connection.***, and not i.e. Connection.connection.compute.***) will consistently return Resource objects. At the moment there is a mix of Munch and Resource types depending on the case. Resource class itself fulfil dict, Munch and attribute interface, so there should be no breaking changes for getting info out of it. The only known limitation is that compared to bare dict/Munch it might be not allowed to modify some properties directly on the object. Ansible collection modules [2] would be modified to explicitly convert return of sdk into dict (Resource.to_dict()) to further operate on it. This means that in some cases older Ansible modules (2.7-2.9) will not properly work with newer SDK. Zuul jobs and everybody stuck without possibility to use newer Ansible collection [2] are potential victims here (depends on the real usage pattern). Sadly there is no way around it, since historically ansible modules operate whatever SDK returns and Ansible sometimes decides to alter objects (i.e. no_log case) what we might want to forbid (read-only or virtual properties). Sorry about that. In some rare cases attribute naming (whatever returned by the cloud layer) might be affected (i.e. is_bootable vs bootable). We are going to strictly bring all names to the convention. Due to the big amount of changes touching lot of files here I propose to stop adding new features into the master branch directly and instead put them into feature/r1 branch. I want to keep master during this time more like a stable branch for bugfixes and other important things. Once r1 branch feel ready we will merge it into master and most likely release something like RC to be able to continue integration work with Ansible. Everybody interested in the future of sdk is welcome in doing reviews and code [1] to know what comes and to speed up the work. Any concerns? Suggestions? Regards, Artem [1] https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Fopenstacksdk+branch:feat… <https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%2Fopenstacksdk+branch:featur…> [2] https://opendev.org/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack <https://opendev.org/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack>

3 5

[TripleO] next irc meeting Tuesday 25 May @ 1400 UTC in #tripleo
by Marios Andreou 20 May '21

20 May '21

Reminder that the next TripleO irc meeting is: ** Tuesday 25 May 1400 UTC in freenode irc channel: #tripleo ** ** https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TripleO ** ** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items ** Please add anything you want to highlight at https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items This can be recently completed things, ongoing review requests, blocking issues, or anything else tripleo you want to share. Our last meeting was on May 11 - you can find the logs there http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2021/tripleo.2021-05-11-14.… Hope you can make it on Tuesday, regards, marios

1 0

[neutron] Drivers meeting 21.05.2021 and 28.05.2021 cancelled
by Slawek Kaplonski 20 May '21

20 May '21

Hi, We don't have any new RFEs to discuss [1] so let's cancel tomorrow's drivers meeting. Next week (28.05.2021) we have Recharge Day in Red Hat so we will probably not have quorum on the drivers meeting and I will also be offline so let's cancel it too. See You on the drivers meeting in 2 weeks (4.06.2021). Have a great weekend :) [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NeutronDrivers[1] -- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat -------- [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NeutronDrivers

2 1

[horizon] Cross-domain user/role/project management
by Martin Chlumsky 20 May '21

20 May '21

Hello, We run a cloud service with multiple keystone domains (Default domain and later we added a federated domain (AzureAD)). We are giving "federated domain users" roles on the projects in the Default domain which existed before the integration with AureAD. Is there a way to manage cross-domain role assignments in Horizon? A horizon setting I missed? I tried as admin and only users and projects of one domain at a time ever show up (I tried switching the domain context to Default and the federated domain). Thank you, Martin

1 0