April 2021 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

PTO Monday April 5
by Herve Beraud 02 Apr '21

02 Apr '21

Hello Monday is a public holiday in France. I'll be back Tuesday. Have a nice weekend! -- Hervé Beraud Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat irc: hberaud https://github.com/4383/ https://twitter.com/4383hberaud -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsFcBAABCAAQBQJb4AwCCRAHwXRBNkGNegAALSkQAHrotwCiL3VMwDR0vcja10Q+ Kf31yCutl5bAlS7tOKpPQ9XN4oC0ZSThyNNFVrg8ail0SczHXsC4rOrsPblgGRN+ RQLoCm2eO1AkB0ubCYLaq0XqSaO+Uk81QxAPkyPCEGT6SRxXr2lhADK0T86kBnMP F8RvGolu3EFjlqCVgeOZaR51PqwUlEhZXZuuNKrWZXg/oRiY4811GmnvzmUhgK5G 5+f8mUg74hfjDbR2VhjTeaLKp0PhskjOIKY3vqHXofLuaqFDD+WrAy/NgDGvN22g glGfj472T3xyHnUzM8ILgAGSghfzZF5Skj2qEeci9cB6K3Hm3osj+PbvfsXE/7Kw m/xtm+FjnaywZEv54uCmVIzQsRIm1qJscu20Qw6Q0UiPpDFqD7O6tWSRKdX11UTZ hwVQTMh9AKQDBEh2W9nnFi9kzSSNu4OQ1dRMcYHWfd9BEkccezxHwUM4Xyov5Fe0 qnbfzTB1tYkjU78loMWFaLa00ftSxP/DtQ//iYVyfVNfcCwfDszXLOqlkvGmY1/Y F1ON0ONekDZkGJsDoS6QdiUSn8RZ2mHArGEWMV00EV5DCIbCXRvywXV43ckx8Z+3 B8qUJhBqJ8RS2F+vTs3DTaXqcktgJ4UkhYC2c1gImcPRyGrK9VY0sCT+1iA+wp/O v6rDpkeNksZ9fFSyoY2o =ECSj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 1

[infra][puppet] No verified score posted by zuul
by Takashi Kajinami 02 Apr '21

02 Apr '21

Hi I have asked for some help in #openstack-infra but didn't get any solution so far Many people might be now on holidays (enjoy holidays!), so let me send this email so that people involved can find this mail after getting back. A few days ago Wallaby release of openstack puppet modules were created, and the release bot submitted release patches. However for some patches zuul doesn't return any CI result(it doesn't put verified score)[1]. I posted +2+A on [2] but it is not merged, because it is not verified by zuul. I tried "recheck" but it didn't solve the problem. [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/puppet-aodh/+/784213/1 [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/puppet-cloudkitty/+/784230 Currently we don't have any job triggered for the change with .gitreview and I guess that is why we don't get verified. Actually I see that the same patch for puppet-oslo got verified +1, because tripleo job was unexpectedly triggered for the change in .gitreview [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/puppet-oslo/+/784302 The easiest solution would be to manually squash these two patches into one. However I remember that we did get verified when we created the last Victoria release, and I suspect some change in infra side which resulted in this situation. So it would be nice if I can ask some insights from infra team about this situation. Thank you, Takashi Kajinami

1 1

[release] Release countdown for week R-1 Apr 05 - Apr 09
by Herve Beraud 02 Apr '21

02 Apr '21

Development Focus ----------------- We are on the final mile of the Wallaby development cycle! Remember that the Wallaby final release will include the latest release candidate (for cycle-with-rc deliverables) or the latest intermediary release (for cycle-with-intermediary deliverables) available. April 8 is the deadline for final Wallaby release candidates as well as any last cycle-with-intermediary deliverables. We will then enter a quiet period until we tag the final release on 14 April, 2021. Teams should be prioritizing fixing release-critical bugs, before that deadline. Otherwise it's time to start planning the Xena development cycle, including discussing Forum and PTG sessions content, in preparation of PTG on the week of April 19. Actions ------- Watch for any translation patches coming through on the stable/wallaby branch and merge them quickly. If you discover a release-critical issue, please make sure to fix it on the master branch first, then backport the bugfix to the stable/wallaby branch before triggering a new release. Please drop by #openstack-release with any questions or concerns about the upcoming release! Upcoming Deadlines & Dates -------------------------- Final Wallaby release: 14 April, 2021 Xena virtual PTG: 19 - 23 April, 2021 Thanks for your attention -- Hervé Beraud Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat irc: hberaud https://github.com/4383/ https://twitter.com/4383hberaud -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsFcBAABCAAQBQJb4AwCCRAHwXRBNkGNegAALSkQAHrotwCiL3VMwDR0vcja10Q+ Kf31yCutl5bAlS7tOKpPQ9XN4oC0ZSThyNNFVrg8ail0SczHXsC4rOrsPblgGRN+ RQLoCm2eO1AkB0ubCYLaq0XqSaO+Uk81QxAPkyPCEGT6SRxXr2lhADK0T86kBnMP F8RvGolu3EFjlqCVgeOZaR51PqwUlEhZXZuuNKrWZXg/oRiY4811GmnvzmUhgK5G 5+f8mUg74hfjDbR2VhjTeaLKp0PhskjOIKY3vqHXofLuaqFDD+WrAy/NgDGvN22g glGfj472T3xyHnUzM8ILgAGSghfzZF5Skj2qEeci9cB6K3Hm3osj+PbvfsXE/7Kw m/xtm+FjnaywZEv54uCmVIzQsRIm1qJscu20Qw6Q0UiPpDFqD7O6tWSRKdX11UTZ hwVQTMh9AKQDBEh2W9nnFi9kzSSNu4OQ1dRMcYHWfd9BEkccezxHwUM4Xyov5Fe0 qnbfzTB1tYkjU78loMWFaLa00ftSxP/DtQ//iYVyfVNfcCwfDszXLOqlkvGmY1/Y F1ON0ONekDZkGJsDoS6QdiUSn8RZ2mHArGEWMV00EV5DCIbCXRvywXV43ckx8Z+3 B8qUJhBqJ8RS2F+vTs3DTaXqcktgJ4UkhYC2c1gImcPRyGrK9VY0sCT+1iA+wp/O v6rDpkeNksZ9fFSyoY2o =ECSj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

[ironic] Review Jams
by Julia Kreger 01 Apr '21

01 Apr '21

In the Ironic team's recent mid-cycle call, we discussed the need to return to occasionally having review jams in order to help streamline the review process. In other words, get eyes on a change in parallel and be able to discuss the change. The goal is to help get people on the same page in terms of what and why. Be on hand to answer questions or back-fill context. This is to hopefully avoid the more iterative back and forth nature of code review, which can draw out a long chain of patches. As always, the goal is not perfection, but forward movement especially for complex changes. We've established two time windows that will hopefully not to be too hard for some contributors to make it to. It doesn't need to be everyone, but it would help for at least some people whom actively review or want to actively participate in reviewing, or whom are even interested in a feature to join us for our meeting. I've added an entry on to our wiki page to cover this, with the current agenda and anticipated review jam topic schedule. The tl;dr is we will use meetpad[1] and meet on Mondays at 2 PM UTC and Tuesdays at 6 PM UTC. The hope is to to enable some overlap of reviewers. If people are interested in other times, please bring this up in the weekly meeting or on the mailing list. I'm not sending out calendar invites for this. Yet. :) See everyone next week! -Julia [0]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic#Review_Jams [1]: https://meetpad.opendev.org/ironic

3 2

[oslo][release] devstack-plugin-(kafka|amqp1) retirement
by Herve Beraud 01 Apr '21

01 Apr '21

Hello Osloers, Our devstack plugins (kafka and amqp1) didn't show a great amount of activity since ussuri, does it still make sense to maintain them? The latest available SHAs for the both projects comes from Victoria (merged in this period). Can we retire them or simply retire them from the coordinated releases? We (the release team) would appreciate some feedback about this point. Let's open the debat. -- Hervé Beraud Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat irc: hberaud https://github.com/4383/ https://twitter.com/4383hberaud -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsFcBAABCAAQBQJb4AwCCRAHwXRBNkGNegAALSkQAHrotwCiL3VMwDR0vcja10Q+ Kf31yCutl5bAlS7tOKpPQ9XN4oC0ZSThyNNFVrg8ail0SczHXsC4rOrsPblgGRN+ RQLoCm2eO1AkB0ubCYLaq0XqSaO+Uk81QxAPkyPCEGT6SRxXr2lhADK0T86kBnMP F8RvGolu3EFjlqCVgeOZaR51PqwUlEhZXZuuNKrWZXg/oRiY4811GmnvzmUhgK5G 5+f8mUg74hfjDbR2VhjTeaLKp0PhskjOIKY3vqHXofLuaqFDD+WrAy/NgDGvN22g glGfj472T3xyHnUzM8ILgAGSghfzZF5Skj2qEeci9cB6K3Hm3osj+PbvfsXE/7Kw m/xtm+FjnaywZEv54uCmVIzQsRIm1qJscu20Qw6Q0UiPpDFqD7O6tWSRKdX11UTZ hwVQTMh9AKQDBEh2W9nnFi9kzSSNu4OQ1dRMcYHWfd9BEkccezxHwUM4Xyov5Fe0 qnbfzTB1tYkjU78loMWFaLa00ftSxP/DtQ//iYVyfVNfcCwfDszXLOqlkvGmY1/Y F1ON0ONekDZkGJsDoS6QdiUSn8RZ2mHArGEWMV00EV5DCIbCXRvywXV43ckx8Z+3 B8qUJhBqJ8RS2F+vTs3DTaXqcktgJ4UkhYC2c1gImcPRyGrK9VY0sCT+1iA+wp/O v6rDpkeNksZ9fFSyoY2o =ECSj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

5 10

[tripleo][ci] jobs in retry_limit or skipped
by Wesley Hayutin 01 Apr '21

01 Apr '21

Greetings, Just FYI.. I believe we hit a bump in the road in upstream infra ( not sure yet ). It appears to be global and not isolated to tripleo or centos based jobs. I have a tripleo bug to track it. https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1922148 See #opendev for details, it looks like infra is very busy working and fixing the issues atm. http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23opendev/%23opendev.2021-03-31.log… http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23opendev/latest.log.html

3 2

[ironic] IPA image does not want to boot with UEFI
by Vuk Gojnic 01 Apr '21

01 Apr '21

Hello everybody, I am using Ironic standalone to provision the HPE Gen10+ node via iLO driver. Ironic version is 16.0.1. Server is configured with UEFI boot mode. Everything on Ironic side works fine. It creates ISO image, powers the server on and configures it to boot from it. Here is the what /var/log/ironic/ironic-conductor.log says: 2021-03-31 17:46:25.541 2618460 INFO ironic.conductor.task_manager [req-b6a19234-5f4b-4852-ab41-4102b9016bb0 - - - - -] Node ed25569f-c107-4fe0-95cd-74fcad9ab3f0 moved to provision state "cleaning" from state "manageable"; target provision state is "available" 2021-03-31 17:46:32.066 2618460 INFO ironic.drivers.modules.ilo.power [req-b6a19234-5f4b-4852-ab41-4102b9016bb0 - - - - -] The node ed25569f-c107-4fe0-95cd-74fcad9ab3f0 operation of 'power off' is completed in 4 seconds. 2021-03-31 17:46:32.088 2618460 INFO ironic.conductor.utils [req-b6a19234-5f4b-4852-ab41-4102b9016bb0 - - - - -] Successfully set node ed25569f-c107-4fe0-95cd-74fcad9ab3f0 power state to power off by power off. 2021-03-31 17:46:34.510 2618460 INFO ironic.drivers.modules.ilo.common [req-b6a19234-5f4b-4852-ab41-4102b9016bb0 - - - - -] Node ed25569f-c107-4fe0-95cd-74fcad9ab3f0 pending boot mode is uefi. 2021-03-31 17:46:37.248 2618460 INFO ironic.drivers.modules.ilo.common [req-b6a19234-5f4b-4852-ab41-4102b9016bb0 - - - - -] Set the node ed25569f-c107-4fe0-95cd-74fcad9ab3f0 to boot from URL https://10.23.137.234/tmp-images/ilo/boot-ed25569f-c107-4fe0-95cd-74fcad9ab… successfully. 2021-03-31 17:46:48.367 2618460 INFO ironic.drivers.modules.ilo.power [req-b6a19234-5f4b-4852-ab41-4102b9016bb0 - - - - -] The node ed25569f-c107-4fe0-95cd-74fcad9ab3f0 operation of 'power on' is completed in 8 seconds. 2021-03-31 17:46:48.388 2618460 INFO ironic.conductor.utils [req-b6a19234-5f4b-4852-ab41-4102b9016bb0 - - - - -] Successfully set node ed25569f-c107-4fe0-95cd-74fcad9ab3f0 power state to power on by rebooting. 2021-03-31 17:46:48.404 2618460 INFO ironic.conductor.task_manager [req-b6a19234-5f4b-4852-ab41-4102b9016bb0 - - - - -] Node ed25569f-c107-4fe0-95cd-74fcad9ab3f0 moved to provision state "clean wait" from state "cleaning"; target provision state is "available" The Grub2 starts and after I select the option “boot_partition", it starts booting and immediately freezes showing just black screen with static red underscore character. I have tried with pre-built IPA images (see below) as well as with custom IPA images made with Ubuntu 18.04 and 20.04 (built using ironic-python-agent-builder) but it is all the same. Does somebody have idea what is the problem with IPA and UEFI in this particular scenario? Output of “openstack baremetal node show” command: allocation_uuid: null automated_clean: null bios_interface: no-bios boot_interface: ilo-uefi-https chassis_uuid: null clean_step: {} conductor: 10.23.137.234 conductor_group: '' console_enabled: false console_interface: no-console created_at: '2021-03-21T13:54:25+00:00' deploy_interface: direct deploy_step: {} description: null driver: ilo5 driver_info: ilo_address: 10.23.137.137 ilo_bootloader: https://ironic-images/Images/esp.img ilo_deploy_kernel: https://ironic-images/Images/ipa-centos8-stable-victoria.kernel ilo_deploy_ramdisk: https://ironic-images/Images/ipa-centos8-stable-victoria.initramfs ilo_password: '******' ilo_username: Administrator snmp_auth_priv_password: '******' snmp_auth_prot_password: '******' snmp_auth_user: iloinspect driver_internal_info: agent_continue_if_ata_erase_failed: false agent_enable_ata_secure_erase: true agent_erase_devices_iterations: 1 agent_erase_devices_zeroize: true agent_erase_skip_read_only: false agent_secret_token: '******' agent_secret_token_pregenerated: true clean_steps: null disk_erasure_concurrency: 1 last_power_state_change: '2021-03-31T17:46:37.894667' extra: {} fault: clean failure inspect_interface: ilo inspection_finished_at: '2021-03-21T13:57:33+00:00' inspection_started_at: null instance_info: deploy_boot_mode: uefi instance_uuid: null last_error: null lessee: null maintenance: true maintenance_reason: management_interface: ilo5 name: null network_data: {} network_interface: noop owner: null power_interface: ilo power_state: power on properties: cpu_arch: x86 cpus: 64 local_gb: 2979 memory_mb: 262144 protected: false protected_reason: null provision_state: clean wait provision_updated_at: '2021-03-31T17:46:48+00:00' raid_config: {} raid_interface: no-raid rescue_interface: no-rescue reservation: null resource_class: null retired: false retired_reason: null storage_interface: noop target_power_state: null target_provision_state: available target_raid_config: {} traits: [] updated_at: '2021-03-31T17:46:48+00:00' uuid: ed25569f-c107-4fe0-95cd-74fcad9ab3f0 vendor_interface: no-vendor Many thanks! Vuk Gojnic Deutsche Telekom Technik GmbH Services & Plattforms (T-SP) Tribe Data Center Infrastructure (T-DCI) Super Squad Cloud Platforms Lifecycle (SSQ-CP) Vuk Gojnic Kubernetes Engine Squad Lead

2 1

How to customize the xml used in libvirt from GUI/opestack command line?
by Evan Zhao 01 Apr '21

01 Apr '21

Hi there, I googled this question and found two major answers: 1. ssh to the compute node and use `virsh dumpxml` and `virsh undefine/define`, etc. 2. edit nova/virt/libvrit/config.py directly. However, it's trivial to ssh to each node and do the modification, and I prefer not to touch the nova source code, is there any better ways to achieve this? I expect to edit the namespace of a certain element and append an additional element <qemu:command> to the xml file. Any information will be appreciated.

2 1

RE: Re: [kolla] Train Centos7 -> Centos8 upgrade fails on 2nd controller
by Braden, Albert 01 Apr '21

01 Apr '21

I did some experimenting and it looks like stopping RMQ during the removal of the first controller is what causes the problem. After deploying the first controller, stopping the RMQ container on any controller including the new centos8 controller will cause the entire cluster to stop. This crash dump appears on the controllers that stopped in sympathy: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/ZDgFgKtQTB/ This appears in the RMQ log: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/5D2Qjv3H8c/ -----Original Message----- From: Braden, Albert Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 8:31 AM To: openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org Subject: RE: Re: [kolla] Train Centos7 -> Centos8 upgrade fails on 2nd controller Centos7: {rabbit,"RabbitMQ","3.7.24"}, "Erlang/OTP 22 [erts-10.7.2.8] [source] [64-bit] [smp:1:1] [ds:1:1:10] [async-threads:128] [hipe]\n"}, Centos8: {rabbit,"RabbitMQ","3.7.28"}, "Erlang/OTP 22 [erts-10.7.2.8] [source] [64-bit] [smp:1:1] [ds:1:1:10] [async-threads:128] [hipe]\n"}, When I deploy the first Centos8 controller, RMQ comes up with all 3 nodes active and seems to be working fine until I shut down the 2nd controller. The only hint of trouble when I replace the 1st node is this error message the first time I run the deployment: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/h9HWdfwmrK/ and the crash dump that appears on control2: crash dump log: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/MpZ8SwTJ2T/ First 1500 lines of the dump: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/xkCyp2B8j8/ If I wait for a few minutes then RMQ recovers on control2 and the 2nd run of the deployment seems to work, and there is no trouble until I shut down control1. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Goddard <mark(a)stackhpc.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 4:14 AM To: Braden, Albert <C-Albert.Braden(a)charter.com> Cc: openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [kolla] Train Centos7 -> Centos8 upgrade fails on 2nd controller CAUTION: The e-mail below is from an external source. Please exercise caution before opening attachments, clicking links, or following guidance. On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 at 13:41, Braden, Albert <C-Albert.Braden(a)charter.com> wrote: > > I’ve created a heat stack and installed Openstack Train to test the Centos7->8 upgrade following the document here: > > > > https://docs.openstack.org/kolla-ansible/train/user/centos8.html#migrating-… > > > > I used the instructions here to successfully remove and replace control0 with a Centos8 box > > > > https://docs.openstack.org/kolla-ansible/train/user/adding-and-removing-hos… > > > > After this my RMQ admin page shows all 3 nodes up, including the new control0. The name of the cluster is rabbit(a)chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-0.dev.chtrse.com > > > > (rabbitmq)[root@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-2 /]# rabbitmqctl cluster_status > > Cluster status of node rabbit@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-2 ... > > [{nodes,[{disc,['rabbit@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-0', > > 'rabbit@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-0-replace', > > 'rabbit@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-1', > > 'rabbit@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-2']}]}, > > {running_nodes,['rabbit@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-0-replace', > > 'rabbit@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-1', > > 'rabbit@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-2']}, > > {cluster_name,<<"rabbit(a)chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-0.dev.chtrse.com">>}, > > {partitions,[]}, > > {alarms,[{'rabbit@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-0-replace',[]}, > > {'rabbit@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-1',[]}, > > {'rabbit@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-2',[]}]}] > > > > After that I create a new VM to verify that the cluster is still working, and then perform the same procedure on control1. When I shut down services on control1, the ansible playbook finishes successfully: > > > > kolla-ansible -i ../multinode stop --yes-i-really-really-mean-it --limit control1 > > … > > control1 : ok=45 changed=22 unreachable=0 failed=0 skipped=105 rescued=0 ignored=0 > > > > After this my RMQ admin page stops responding. When I check RMQ on the new control0 and the existing control2, the container is still up but RMQ is not running: > > > > (rabbitmq)[root@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-0-replace /]# rabbitmqctl cluster_status > > Error: this command requires the 'rabbit' app to be running on the target node. Start it with 'rabbitmqctl start_app'. > > > > If I start it on control0 and control2, then the cluster seems normal and the admin page starts working again, and cluster status looks normal: > > > > (rabbitmq)[root@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-0-replace /]# rabbitmqctl cluster_status > > Cluster status of node rabbit@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-0-replace ... > > [{nodes,[{disc,['rabbit@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-0', > > 'rabbit@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-0-replace', > > 'rabbit@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-1', > > 'rabbit@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-2']}]}, > > {running_nodes,['rabbit@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-2', > > 'rabbit@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-0-replace']}, > > {cluster_name,<<"rabbit(a)chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-0.dev.chtrse.com">>}, > > {partitions,[]}, > > {alarms,[{'rabbit@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-2',[]}, > > {'rabbit@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-0-replace',[]}]}] > > > > But my hypervisors are down: > > > > (openstack) [root@chrnc-void-testupgrade-build kolla-ansible]# ohll > > +----+-------------------------------------------------+-----------------+--------------+-------+------------+-------+----------------+-----------+ > > | ID | Hypervisor Hostname | Hypervisor Type | Host IP | State | vCPUs Used | vCPUs | Memory MB Used | Memory MB | > > +----+-------------------------------------------------+-----------------+--------------+-------+------------+-------+----------------+-----------+ > > | 3 | chrnc-void-testupgrade-compute-2.dev.chtrse.com | QEMU | 172.16.2.106 | down | 5 | 8 | 2560 | 30719 | > > | 6 | chrnc-void-testupgrade-compute-0.dev.chtrse.com | QEMU | 172.16.2.31 | down | 5 | 8 | 2560 | 30719 | > > | 9 | chrnc-void-testupgrade-compute-1.dev.chtrse.com | QEMU | 172.16.0.30 | down | 5 | 8 | 2560 | 30719 | > > +----+-------------------------------------------------+-----------------+--------------+-------+------------+-------+----------------+-----------+ > > > > When I look at the nova-compute.log on a compute node, I see RMQ failures every 10 seconds: > > > > 172.16.2.31 compute0 > > 2021-03-30 03:07:54.893 7 ERROR oslo.messaging._drivers.impl_rabbit [req-70d69b45-c3a7-4fbc-b709-4d7d757e09e7 - - - - -] [aeb317a8-873f-49be-a2a0-c6d6e0891a3e] AMQP server on 172.16.1.132:5672 is unreachable: timed out. Trying again in 1 seconds.: timeout: timed out > > 2021-03-30 03:07:55.905 7 INFO oslo.messaging._drivers.impl_rabbit [req-70d69b45-c3a7-4fbc-b709-4d7d757e09e7 - - - - -] [aeb317a8-873f-49be-a2a0-c6d6e0891a3e] Reconnected to AMQP server on 172.16.1.132:5672 via [amqp] client with port 56422. > > 2021-03-30 03:08:05.915 7 ERROR oslo.messaging._drivers.impl_rabbit [req-70d69b45-c3a7-4fbc-b709-4d7d757e09e7 - - - - -] [aeb317a8-873f-49be-a2a0-c6d6e0891a3e] AMQP server on 172.16.1.132:5672 is unreachable: timed out. Trying again in 1 seconds.: timeout: timed out > > > > In the RMQ logs I see this every 10 seconds: > > > > 172.16.1.132 control2 > > [root@chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-2 ~]# tail -f /var/log/kolla/rabbitmq/rabbit\(a)chrnc-void-testupgrade-control-2.log |grep 172.16.2.31 > > 2021-03-30 03:07:54.895 [warning] <0.13247.35> closing AMQP connection <0.13247.35> (172.16.2.31:56420 -> 172.16.1.132:5672 - nova-compute:7:aeb317a8-873f-49be-a2a0-c6d6e0891a3e, vhost: '/', user: 'openstack'): > > client unexpectedly closed TCP connection > > 2021-03-30 03:07:55.901 [info] <0.15288.35> accepting AMQP connection <0.15288.35> (172.16.2.31:56422 -> 172.16.1.132:5672) > > 2021-03-30 03:07:55.903 [info] <0.15288.35> Connection <0.15288.35> (172.16.2.31:56422 -> 172.16.1.132:5672) has a client-provided name: nova-compute:7:aeb317a8-873f-49be-a2a0-c6d6e0891a3e > > 2021-03-30 03:07:55.904 [info] <0.15288.35> connection <0.15288.35> (172.16.2.31:56422 -> 172.16.1.132:5672 - nova-compute:7:aeb317a8-873f-49be-a2a0-c6d6e0891a3e): user 'openstack' authenticated and granted access to vhost '/' > > 2021-03-30 03:08:05.916 [warning] <0.15288.35> closing AMQP connection <0.15288.35> (172.16.2.31:56422 -> 172.16.1.132:5672 - nova-compute:7:aeb317a8-873f-49be-a2a0-c6d6e0891a3e, vhost: '/', user: 'openstack'): > > > > Why does RMQ fail when I shut down the 2nd controller after successfully replacing the first one? Hi Albert, Could you share the versions of RabbitMQ and erlang in both versions of the container? When initially testing this setup, I think we had 3.7.24 on both sides. Perhaps the CentOS 8 version has moved on sufficiently to become incompatible? Mark > > > > I apologize for the nonsense below. I have not been able to stop it from being attached to my external emails. > > > > The contents of this e-mail message and > any attachments are intended solely for the > addressee(s) and may contain confidential > and/or legally privileged information. If you > are not the intended recipient of this message > or if this message has been addressed to you > in error, please immediately alert the sender > by reply e-mail and then delete this message > and any attachments. If you are not the > intended recipient, you are notified that > any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, > or storage of this message or any attachment > is strictly prohibited. E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited.

1 0

[ironic] IPA does not want boot with UEFI
by Vuk.Gojnic＠telekom.de 01 Apr '21

01 Apr '21

Hello everybody, I am using Ironic standalone to provision the HPE Gen10+ node via iLO driver. Ironic version is 16.0.1. Server is configured with UEFI boot mode. Everything on Ironic side works fine. It creates ISO image, powers the server on and configures it to boot from it. Here is the what /var/log/ironic/ironic-conductor.log says: 2021-03-31 17:46:25.541 2618460 INFO ironic.conductor.task_manager [req-b6a19234-5f4b-4852-ab41-4102b9016bb0 - - - - -] Node ed25569f-c107-4fe0-95cd-74fcad9ab3f0 moved to provision state "cleaning" from state "manageable"; target provision state is "available" 2021-03-31 17:46:32.066 2618460 INFO ironic.drivers.modules.ilo.power [req-b6a19234-5f4b-4852-ab41-4102b9016bb0 - - - - -] The node ed25569f-c107-4fe0-95cd-74fcad9ab3f0 operation of 'power off' is completed in 4 seconds. 2021-03-31 17:46:32.088 2618460 INFO ironic.conductor.utils [req-b6a19234-5f4b-4852-ab41-4102b9016bb0 - - - - -] Successfully set node ed25569f-c107-4fe0-95cd-74fcad9ab3f0 power state to power off by power off. 2021-03-31 17:46:34.510 2618460 INFO ironic.drivers.modules.ilo.common [req-b6a19234-5f4b-4852-ab41-4102b9016bb0 - - - - -] Node ed25569f-c107-4fe0-95cd-74fcad9ab3f0 pending boot mode is uefi. 2021-03-31 17:46:37.248 2618460 INFO ironic.drivers.modules.ilo.common [req-b6a19234-5f4b-4852-ab41-4102b9016bb0 - - - - -] Set the node ed25569f-c107-4fe0-95cd-74fcad9ab3f0 to boot from URL https://10.23.137.234/tmp-images/ilo/boot-ed25569f-c107-4fe0-95cd-74fcad9ab… successfully. 2021-03-31 17:46:48.367 2618460 INFO ironic.drivers.modules.ilo.power [req-b6a19234-5f4b-4852-ab41-4102b9016bb0 - - - - -] The node ed25569f-c107-4fe0-95cd-74fcad9ab3f0 operation of 'power on' is completed in 8 seconds. 2021-03-31 17:46:48.388 2618460 INFO ironic.conductor.utils [req-b6a19234-5f4b-4852-ab41-4102b9016bb0 - - - - -] Successfully set node ed25569f-c107-4fe0-95cd-74fcad9ab3f0 power state to power on by rebooting. 2021-03-31 17:46:48.404 2618460 INFO ironic.conductor.task_manager [req-b6a19234-5f4b-4852-ab41-4102b9016bb0 - - - - -] Node ed25569f-c107-4fe0-95cd-74fcad9ab3f0 moved to provision state "clean wait" from state "cleaning"; target provision state is "available" The Grub2 starts and after I select the option "boot_partition", it starts booting and immediately freezes with following screen (just red static underscore): [cid:image002.jpg@01D726EE.A920A5C0] I have tried with pre-built IPA images (see below) as well as with custom IPA images made with Ubuntu 18.04 and 20.04 (built using ironic-python-agent-builder) but it is all the same. Does somebody have idea what is the problem with IPA and UEFI in this particular scenario? Output of "openstack baremetal node show" command: allocation_uuid: null automated_clean: null bios_interface: no-bios boot_interface: ilo-uefi-https chassis_uuid: null clean_step: {} conductor: 10.23.137.234 conductor_group: '' console_enabled: false console_interface: no-console created_at: '2021-03-21T13:54:25+00:00' deploy_interface: direct deploy_step: {} description: null driver: ilo5 driver_info: ilo_address: 10.23.137.137 ilo_bootloader: https://ironic-images/Images/esp.img ilo_deploy_kernel: https://ironic-images/Images/ipa-centos8-stable-victoria.kernel ilo_deploy_ramdisk: https://ironic-images/Images/ipa-centos8-stable-victoria.initramfs ilo_password: '******' ilo_username: Administrator snmp_auth_priv_password: '******' snmp_auth_prot_password: '******' snmp_auth_user: iloinspect driver_internal_info: agent_continue_if_ata_erase_failed: false agent_enable_ata_secure_erase: true agent_erase_devices_iterations: 1 agent_erase_devices_zeroize: true agent_erase_skip_read_only: false agent_secret_token: '******' agent_secret_token_pregenerated: true clean_steps: null disk_erasure_concurrency: 1 last_power_state_change: '2021-03-31T17:46:37.894667' extra: {} fault: clean failure inspect_interface: ilo inspection_finished_at: '2021-03-21T13:57:33+00:00' inspection_started_at: null instance_info: deploy_boot_mode: uefi instance_uuid: null last_error: null lessee: null maintenance: true maintenance_reason: management_interface: ilo5 name: null network_data: {} network_interface: noop owner: null power_interface: ilo power_state: power on properties: cpu_arch: x86 cpus: 64 local_gb: 2979 memory_mb: 262144 protected: false protected_reason: null provision_state: clean wait provision_updated_at: '2021-03-31T17:46:48+00:00' raid_config: {} raid_interface: no-raid rescue_interface: no-rescue reservation: null resource_class: null retired: false retired_reason: null storage_interface: noop target_power_state: null target_provision_state: available target_raid_config: {} traits: [] updated_at: '2021-03-31T17:46:48+00:00' uuid: ed25569f-c107-4fe0-95cd-74fcad9ab3f0 vendor_interface: no-vendor Many thanks! Vuk Gojnic Deutsche Telekom Technik GmbH Services & Plattforms (T-SP) Tribe Data Center Infrastructure (T-DCI) Super Squad Cloud Platforms Lifecycle (SSQ-CP) Vuk Gojnic Kubernetes Engine Squad Lead

1 0