March 2021 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

Re: [Release-job-failures] release-post job for openstack/releases for ref refs/heads/master failed
by Thierry Carrez 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

We got two similar release processing failures: > - tag-releases https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/707bb50b4bf645f8903d8ca59b43abbf : FAILURE in 2m 31s This one was an error running the tag-releases post-merge job after https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779217 merged. It failed with: Running: git push --dry-run ssh://release@review.openstack.org:29418/openstack/tripleo-ipsec.git --all ssh://release@review.openstack.org:29418/openstack/tripleo-ipsec.git did not work. Description: Host key verification failed. > - tag-releases https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/655e8980a53c4e829de25f0b8507b5f6 : FAILURE in 2m 57s Similar failure while running the tag-releases post-merge job after https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779218 merged. Since this "host key verification failed" error hit tripleo-ipsec three times in a row, I suspect we have something stuck (or we always hit the same cache/worker). -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)

5 7

[release][OpenstackSDK][masakari] request FFE on OpenstackSDK for python-masakariclient
by Herve Beraud 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Hello folks, As discussed this morning on #openstack-release the masakari team needs OpenstackSDK changes that haven't been released. They have been merged after the final release [1]. Those aren't landed in OpenstackSDK version 0.54.0 [2]. Here is the delta of changes merged between 0.54.0 and 736f3aa1 ( https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/777299) $ git log --no-merges --online 0.54.0..736f3aa16c7ee95eb5a42f28062305c83cfd05e1 736f3aa1 add masakari enabled to segment Only these changes are in the delta. Do you mind if we start releasing a new version 0.55.0 to land these changes and unlock the path of the masakari team? Client library deadline is today. Also this topic opens the door for another discussion. Indeed it's questionable that openstacksdk should follow the early library deadline, for that precise reason. We release python-*client the same time as parent projects so that late features can be taken into account. It seems appropriate that openstacksdk is in the same bucket All those safeguards are a lot less needed now that we move slower and break less things. That could be translated by moving OpenstackSDK from `type: library` [3] to `type: client-library` [4]. Let us know what you think about the FFE. Let's open the discussions about the type shifting. [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/777299 [2] https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/commit/b87ad4371321d5b0dde7ed0b23623… [3] https://releases.openstack.org/reference/deliverable_types.html#library [4] https://releases.openstack.org/reference/deliverable_types.html#client-libr… -- Hervé Beraud Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat irc: hberaud https://github.com/4383/ https://twitter.com/4383hberaud -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsFcBAABCAAQBQJb4AwCCRAHwXRBNkGNegAALSkQAHrotwCiL3VMwDR0vcja10Q+ Kf31yCutl5bAlS7tOKpPQ9XN4oC0ZSThyNNFVrg8ail0SczHXsC4rOrsPblgGRN+ RQLoCm2eO1AkB0ubCYLaq0XqSaO+Uk81QxAPkyPCEGT6SRxXr2lhADK0T86kBnMP F8RvGolu3EFjlqCVgeOZaR51PqwUlEhZXZuuNKrWZXg/oRiY4811GmnvzmUhgK5G 5+f8mUg74hfjDbR2VhjTeaLKp0PhskjOIKY3vqHXofLuaqFDD+WrAy/NgDGvN22g glGfj472T3xyHnUzM8ILgAGSghfzZF5Skj2qEeci9cB6K3Hm3osj+PbvfsXE/7Kw m/xtm+FjnaywZEv54uCmVIzQsRIm1qJscu20Qw6Q0UiPpDFqD7O6tWSRKdX11UTZ hwVQTMh9AKQDBEh2W9nnFi9kzSSNu4OQ1dRMcYHWfd9BEkccezxHwUM4Xyov5Fe0 qnbfzTB1tYkjU78loMWFaLa00ftSxP/DtQ//iYVyfVNfcCwfDszXLOqlkvGmY1/Y F1ON0ONekDZkGJsDoS6QdiUSn8RZ2mHArGEWMV00EV5DCIbCXRvywXV43ckx8Z+3 B8qUJhBqJ8RS2F+vTs3DTaXqcktgJ4UkhYC2c1gImcPRyGrK9VY0sCT+1iA+wp/O v6rDpkeNksZ9fFSyoY2o =ECSj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 3

[all][elections][ptl][tc] Combined PTL/TC Nominations March 2021 End
by Kendall Nelson 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Hello! The PTL and TC Nomination period is now over. The official candidate lists for PTLs [0] and TC seats [1] are available on the election website. -- PTL Election Details -- There are 8 projects without candidates, so according to this resolution[2], the TC will have to decide how the following projects will proceed: Barbican, Cyborg, Keystone, Mistral, Monasca, Senlin, Zaqar, Zun -- TC Election Details -- There are 0 projects that will have elections. Now begins the campaigning period where candidates and electorate may debate their statements. Polling will start Mar 12, 2021 23:45 UTC. Thank you, -Kendall Nelson (diablo_rojo) & the Election Officials [0] https://governance.openstack.org/election/#xena-ptl-candidates [1] https://governance.openstack.org/election/#xena-tc-candidates [2] https://governance.openstack.org/resolutions/20141128-elections-process-for…

3 2

Windows vm is not launching from horizon
by Midhunlal Nb 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Hi all, I successfully installed the openstack rocky version and everything is working properly. ---->Uploaded all images to openstack and I can see all images listed through openstack CLI. +--------------------------------------+---------------------+--------+ | ID | Name | Status | +--------------------------------------+---------------------+--------+ | 1912a80a-1139-4e00-b0d9-e98dc801e54b | CentOS-7-x86_64 active | | 595b928f-8a32-4107-b6e8-fea294d3f7f1 | CentOS-8-x86_64 active| | f531869a-e0ac-4690-8f79-4ff64d284576 | Ubuntu-18.04-x86_64 active| | 7860193b-81bd-4a22-846c-ae3a89117f9d | Ubuntu-20.04-x86_64 active | 1c3a9878-6db3-441e-9a85-73d3bc4a87a7 | cirros active | d321f3a3-08a3-47bf-8f53-6aa46a6a4b52 | windows10 active --->same images I can see through horizon dashboard,but i am not able to launch windows VM from horizon dashboard .Balance all images launching from dashboard. Getting below error; Error: Failed to perform requested operation on instance "windows", the instance has an error status: Please try again later [Error: Build of instance 15a3047d-dfca-4615-9d34-c46764b703ff aborted: Volume 5ca83635-a2fe-458c-9053-cb7a9804156b did not finish being created even after we waited 190 seconds or 61 attempts. And its status is downloading.]. --->I am able to launch windows VM from openstack CLI What is the issue ?why I am not able to launch from dashboard?please help me. Thanks & Regards Midhunlal N B +918921245637

3 2

[neutron] Drivers meeting - agenda for 12.03.2021
by Slawek Kaplonski 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Hi, For tomorrow's drivers meeting we have 2 RFEs related to the integration of Neutron with Designate: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1904559 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1918424 I didn't marked them as triaged yet as I'm not really sure what more data we could need in both cases. I hope that we will get some more questions during the meeting so we can at least together triage them :) Of course, please check those RFEs and ask for anything You need there, even before the meeting :) -- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat

1 0

[cinder] review priorities for the next few days
by Brian Rosmaita 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Here's the list of cinder and driver features that haven't yet merged: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-wallaby-features Please make reviewing these your top priorities. We'll get back to reviewing bug fixes next week. cheers, brian

2 1

[all][tc] Thoughts on Python 3.7 support
by Pierre Riteau 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Hello, There have been many patches submitted to drop the Python 3.7 classifier from setup.cfg: https://review.opendev.org/q/%2522remove+py37%2522 The justification is that Wallaby tested runtimes only include 3.6 and 3.8. Most projects are merging these patches, but I've seen a couple of objections from ironic and horizon: - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-ironicclient/+/769044 - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/horizon/+/769237 What are the thoughts of the TC and of the overall community on this? Should we really drop these classifiers when there are no corresponding CI jobs, even though more Python versions may well be supported? Best wishes, Pierre Riteau (priteau)

9 13

[release][oslo][monasca][keystone] Moving projects to independent
by Herve Beraud 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Hello teams, We are about to move a couple of projects under the independent release models [1]. Those did not have any change merged over the cycle, we think that it is the right time to transition them to independent. Oslo: - futurist - debtcollector - osprofiler Keystone: - pycadf Monasca: - monasca-statsd Before we push the button we want to give ourselves a last chance to raise the hand if you think that it's an issue. Concerning Oslo's projects we already had a related discussion a few months ago and all participants agreed with that [2]. Please let us know ASAP if you disagree with that choice. Thanks for your attention. [1] https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22move-to-independent%22+(status:open%2… [2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-November/018527… -- Hervé Beraud Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat irc: hberaud https://github.com/4383/ https://twitter.com/4383hberaud -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsFcBAABCAAQBQJb4AwCCRAHwXRBNkGNegAALSkQAHrotwCiL3VMwDR0vcja10Q+ Kf31yCutl5bAlS7tOKpPQ9XN4oC0ZSThyNNFVrg8ail0SczHXsC4rOrsPblgGRN+ RQLoCm2eO1AkB0ubCYLaq0XqSaO+Uk81QxAPkyPCEGT6SRxXr2lhADK0T86kBnMP F8RvGolu3EFjlqCVgeOZaR51PqwUlEhZXZuuNKrWZXg/oRiY4811GmnvzmUhgK5G 5+f8mUg74hfjDbR2VhjTeaLKp0PhskjOIKY3vqHXofLuaqFDD+WrAy/NgDGvN22g glGfj472T3xyHnUzM8ILgAGSghfzZF5Skj2qEeci9cB6K3Hm3osj+PbvfsXE/7Kw m/xtm+FjnaywZEv54uCmVIzQsRIm1qJscu20Qw6Q0UiPpDFqD7O6tWSRKdX11UTZ hwVQTMh9AKQDBEh2W9nnFi9kzSSNu4OQ1dRMcYHWfd9BEkccezxHwUM4Xyov5Fe0 qnbfzTB1tYkjU78loMWFaLa00ftSxP/DtQ//iYVyfVNfcCwfDszXLOqlkvGmY1/Y F1ON0ONekDZkGJsDoS6QdiUSn8RZ2mHArGEWMV00EV5DCIbCXRvywXV43ckx8Z+3 B8qUJhBqJ8RS2F+vTs3DTaXqcktgJ4UkhYC2c1gImcPRyGrK9VY0sCT+1iA+wp/O v6rDpkeNksZ9fFSyoY2o =ECSj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

[election][zun] PTL candidacy for Xena
by ZTE 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Hi! I'd like to propose my candidacy and continue serving as Zun PTL in the Xena cycle. Over the Wallaby release, the Zun team continues to keep the Zun stable and reliable, and also some great works have been done. My goals for the Xena cycle are to continue the progress made in the following areas: * zun-conductor: Add a service called zun-conductor * CRI: Use the CRI interface to get inventory when cri driver configed for Capsule. * Affinity&anti-affinity: Add the affinity and anti-affinity policies to zun. Thank you for taking the time to consider me for Xena PTL. Best regards, Shengqin Feng

1 0

[security][security-sig] No meeting tomorrow March 11th
by Gage Hugo 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

The security sig meeting tomorrow has been cancelled. We will meet again at the regular time next week. Thanks

1 0