December 2021 - openstack-discuss

cpu pinning
by open infra 04 Jan '22

04 Jan '22

3 7

[all][qa][triplo] Help need to maintain OpenStack health dashboard
by Ghanshyam Mann 04 Jan '22

04 Jan '22

Hello Everyone, In the QA meeting[1], we discussed the help needed to maintain the OpenStack health dashboard which is broken currently and the QA team does not have the JS developer and bandwidth to fix it. While discussing it meeting, we found that the TripleO team might be working on a similar dashboard for their CI results. If that is the case, can we collaborate on maintaining the existing dashboard? OpenStack health dashboard: https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-health Repo: http://status.openstack.org/openstack-health/#/ [1] https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2021/qa.2021-11-16-15.00.log.html#… -gmann

5 7

[tempest] Extending tempest for mixed-architecture stacks
by James LaBarre 04 Jan '22

04 Jan '22

Recently I had been running Tempest on my setup testing a mixed-architecture deployment (x86_64 ans ppc64le compute nodes at the same time). It seems that some of the migration and affinity tests will check if there's more than one Compute node before they run. However, it would seem that's as far as they check, without checking if they are in fact compatible or even of the same architecture. (my test cluster is very small, and normally includes two ppc64le Compute nodes, and sometimes one x86_64 Compute node. Currently one ppc64le machine is down for repair). Because the two compute nodes are different architectures, I am getting failures in various migration and affinity tests, maybe more if I tested a larger subset. Now granted my particular setup is a special case, but it does bring to mind some extensions that may be needed for Tempest in the future. I could see it being possible to have x86_64 and ARM mixed together in one stack, maybe even tossing in RISC-v someday. I'm thinking we need to start adding in extra test images, flavors, etc into the Tempest configurations (as in defining multiple options so that each architecture can have test images, etc assigned to it, rather than the current primary and alt image for just one architecture) Additionally, there should be testcases taking into account the architectures involved (such as seeing that an instance on one arch cannot be migrated to the other, as an example). I know this involves a bit of refactoring, I didn't know if it had even been considered yet. -- James LaBarre Software Engineer, OpenStack MultiArch Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com> jlabarre(a)redhat.com <mailto:jlabarre@redhat.com> <https://www.redhat.com>

3 2

[tc][all] Follow up pain point discussion
by Rico Lin 04 Jan '22

04 Jan '22

Dear all The pain point collection etherpad [1] seems to get good attention from teams. We plan to host a one-hour video meeting to keep the discussion going. Please fill in the doodle to select your preferred time if you can join us: https://doodle.com/poll/kur2mfywceerqcvh?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link The discussion will be hosted in video format. Here are some items (but not limited to) I expect we will discuss and hopefully put some actions/efforts on. - General Pain point: RabbitMQ - General Pain point: OpenStackClient support - General project pain point discussion: How to encourage teams to work/reply on pain points. Meanwhile, we encourage all to check the etherpad and provide your feedback. Also if teams can help to answer questions/concerns on etherpad (like Nova team does) will be greatly appreciated. [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination *Rico Lin*

7 11

[octavia] Management Network Issue
by Ammad Syed 03 Jan '22

03 Jan '22

Hi, I am using octavia 9.0. I have created a neutron vlan based management network of octavia. I am creating a loadbalancer with a subnet in the tenant network, its getting created successfully. Then added a listener and created a pool, both created successfully. Now a weird situation is happening. Now when I add a member in the pool, the management network interface get detached automatically from the AMPHORA instance and amphora keeps in PENDING_UPDATE state. I have created a dedicated service-project for octavia and management network and subnet resides there. Any advise how to fix it ? Ammad

2 2

[release] Release countdown for week R-12, Jan 03-07
by Előd Illés 01 Jan '22

01 Jan '22

Development Focus ----------------- Happy new year! The Yoga-2 milestone is next week, on January6th, 2022. Yoga-related specs should now be finalized so that teams can move to implementation ASAP. Some teams observe specific deadlines on the second milestone (mostly spec freezes): please refer to https://releases.openstack.org/ <https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html>yoga <https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html>/schedule.html <https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html>for details. General Information ------------------- Libraries need to be released at least once per milestone period. Next week, the release team will propose releases for any library that has not been otherwise released since milestone 1. PTL's and release liaisons, please watch for these and give a +1 to acknowledge them. If there is some reason to hold off on a release, let us know that as well. A +1 would be appreciated, but if we do not hear anything at all by the end of the week, we will assume things are OK to proceed. Remember that non-library deliverables that follow the cycle-with-intermediary release model should have an intermediary release before milestone-2. Those who haven't will be proposed to switch to the cycle-with-rc model, which is more suited to deliverables that are released only once per cycle. Next week is also the deadline to freeze the contents of the final release. All new 'Yoga' deliverables need to have a deliverable file in https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/deliverables <https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/deliverables> and need to have done a release by milestone-2. Changes proposing missingdeliverables for inclusion in Yogahave been posted, so if you have one in your project team please update them with an actual release request before the milestone-2 deadline if you plan on including that deliverable in Yoga, or -1 if you need one more cycle to be ready. Upcoming Deadlines & Dates -------------------------- Yoga-2 Milestone:January6th, 2022 Előd Illés irc: elodilles

1 0

[cinder] proposing Simon Dodsley for cinder-specs-core
by Brian Rosmaita 01 Jan '22

01 Jan '22

As everyone is painfully aware, we have review bandwidth issues in the Cinder project. I propose to address this issue with respect to cinder specs, at least, by adding a contributor who is not currently a cinder-core as a member of the cinder-specs-core team. (Right now, the only members of cinder-specs-core are the cinder-core team.) Simon Dodsley (simondodsley on IRC) has been a cinder contributor for a long time, and has been especially active in PTGs and midcycle meetings over the past few cycles. He's done quality reviews, especially of specs, this cycle. As a vendor representative, he brings a useful perspective to reviews that affect drivers, as well as general deployment and usability issues. Additionally, given that the current core team has reviewing responsibilities spread over multiple repositories, having a person focused primarily on specs should help us to get more timely feedback for specs proposers. Finally, don't forget that it is thanks to Simon that the Cinder mascot finally has a name ("Argo"), which in turn has given the Cinder team the really cool name "The Argonauts". In the absence of objections, I'll add Simon to the cinder-specs-core team shortly after 1500 UTC on Friday 31 December. Please communicate any concerns to me before that time. cheers, brian

4 4

PTR records in Designate
by Albert Braden 30 Dec '21

30 Dec '21

We have hacked Designate to add PTR records and it is a mess. Every upgrade turns into a bug hunt. I'd like to advocate for going back to vanilla kolla-ansible but then we wouldn't have PTR records. How are other Designate users dealing with the PTR issue?

2 2

[neutron] Do I need to replace NetworkManager with network.service in centos8?
by 韩光宇 30 Dec '21

30 Dec '21

Dear all, I am deploing OpenStack Victoria. I want to ask a question. Do I need to replace NetworkManager with network-scripts in centos8? I saw that "OpenStack Networking does not work on systems that have the Network Manager service enabled" in past redhat documentation and some other places. But I don't see this in latest documentation of OpenStack community（ https://docs.openstack.org/install-guide/environment-packages-rdo.html）. And If NetworkManager is confit will OpenStack network, Do anyone know where I can see the reason of confit. I would appreciate any kind of guidance. Thanks, Han Guangyu. Past redhat documentation: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/11…

2 1

[cinder] Bug deputy report for week of 12-29-2021
by Sofia Enriquez 30 Dec '21

30 Dec '21

No meeting today. This is a bug report from 12-22-2021 to 12-29-2021. Agenda: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-bug-squad-meeting ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Medium - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1955670 "Unable to delete a group volume after transfer". Unassigned. Cheers, -- Sofía Enriquez she/her Software Engineer Red Hat PnT <https://www.redhat.com> IRC: @enriquetaso @RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat> Red Hat <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc> <https://www.redhat.com>

1 0