August 2020 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[largescale-sig] Next meeting: August 12, 16utc
by Thierry Carrez 12 Aug '20

12 Aug '20

Hi everyone, In order to accommodate US members, the Large Scale SIG recently decided to rotate between an EU-APAC-friendly time and an US-EU-friendly time. Our next meeting will be the first US-EU meeting, on Wednesday, August 12 at 16 UTC[1] in the #openstack-meeting-3 channel on IRC: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20200812T16 Feel free to add topics to our agenda at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/large-scale-sig-meeting A reminder of the TODOs we had from last meeting, in case you have time to make progress on them: - amorin to add some meat to the wiki page before we push the Nova doc patch further - all to describe briefly how you solved metrics/billing in your deployment in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/large-scale-sig-documentation Talk to you all on Wednesday, -- Thierry Carrez

2 2

[tc] weekly summary
by Mohammed Naser 12 Aug '20

12 Aug '20

Hi everyone, Here’s an update for what happened in the OpenStack TC this week. You can get more information by checking for changes in openstack/governance repository. We've also included a few references to some important mailing list threads that you should check out. # Patches ## Open Reviews - Create starter-kit:kubernetes-in-virt tag https://review.opendev.org/736369 - Move towards dual office hours https://review.opendev.org/745201 - Clean up expired i18n SIG extra-ATCs https://review.opendev.org/745565 - Resolution to define distributed leadership for projects https://review.opendev.org/744995 - Move towards single office hour https://review.opendev.org/745200 - Add legacy repository validation https://review.opendev.org/737559 - Drop all exceptions for legacy validation https://review.opendev.org/745403 - [draft] Add assert:supports-standalone https://review.opendev.org/722399 - Clean up expired i18n SIG extra-ATCs https://review.opendev.org/745565 - Add legacy repository validation https://review.opendev.org/737559 - Pierre Riteau as CloudKitty PTL for Victoria https://review.opendev.org/745653 - Resolution to define distributed leadership for projects https://review.opendev.org/744995 - Create starter-kit:kubernetes-in-virt tag https://review.opendev.org/736369 - Move towards dual office hours https://review.opendev.org/745201 - Move towards single office hour https://review.opendev.org/745200 ## Project Updates - Deprecate os_congress project https://review.opendev.org/742533 - Add Ceph iSCSI charm to OpenStack charms https://review.opendev.org/744480 - Add Keystone Kerberos charm to OpenStack charms https://review.opendev.org/743769 - Add python-dracclient to be owned by Hardware Vendor SIG https://review.opendev.org/745564 ## General Changes - Reverse sort series in selected goals https://review.opendev.org/744897 - Declare supported runtimes for Wallaby release https://review.opendev.org/743847 - Sort SIG names in repo owner list https://review.opendev.org/745563 - Drop neutron-vpnaas from legacy projects https://review.opendev.org/745401 ## Abandoned Changes - Migrate testing to ubuntu focal https://review.opendev.org/740851 # Email Threads - CloudKitty Status: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-July/016171.html - OSC vs python-*clients: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-August/016409.h… - Proposed Wallaby Schedule: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-August/016391.h… - New Office Hour Plans: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-August/016372.h… # Other Reminders - Cycle-Trailing Release Deadline Aug 13 Thanks for reading! Mohammed & Kendall -- Mohammed Naser VEXXHOST, Inc.

1 0

[tc] monthly meeting summary
by Mohammed Naser 12 Aug '20

12 Aug '20

Hi everyone, Here’s a summary of what happened in our TC monthly meeting last Thursday, August 6. # ATTENDEES (LINES SAID) - mnaser (100) - gmann (43) - diablo_rojo (20) - jungleboyj (16) - belmoreira (10) - evrardjp (8) - fungi (6) - zaneb (4) - knikolla (4) - njohnston (3) # MEETING SUMMARY 1. Rollcall (mnaser, 14:00:21) 2. Follow up on past action items (mnaser, 14:02:16) - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/744995/ (diablo_rojo, 14:03:14) - http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-August/016336.h… (gmann, 14:03:24) 3. OpenStack User-facing APIs and CLIs (belmoreira) (mnaser, 14:25:52) 4. W cycle goal selection start (mnaser, 14:34:39) 5. Completion of retirement cleanup (gmann) (mnaser, 14:40:48) - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-retirement-cleanup (mnaser, 14:41:02) - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/739291/1 (gmann, 14:42:17) - https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:cleanup-retirement+(status:open+OR+sta… (gmann, 14:42:51) # ACTION ITEMS - TC members to follow up and review "Resolution to define distributed leadership for projects" - mnaser schedule session with sig-arch and k8s steering committee - gmann continue to audit and clean-up tags - mnaser propose change to implement weekly meetings - njohnston and mugsie to work on getting goals groomed/proposed for W cycle - belmoreira start discussion around openstack user-facing apis & clis - gmann to merge changes to properly retire projects To read the full logs of the meeting, please refer to http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2020/tc.2020-08-06-14.00.log.html Thank you, Mohammed -- Mohammed Naser VEXXHOST, Inc.

1 0

Re: [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/python-glanceclient for ref refs/tags/3.1.2 failed
by Sean McGinnis 12 Aug '20

12 Aug '20

On 8/12/20 4:36 AM, zuul(a)openstack.org wrote: > Build failed. > > - openstack-upload-github-mirror https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/cba5dda29e8744059d637a97f358c59f : SUCCESS in 43s > - release-openstack-python https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/b9628cf4f28d4bea95844539295ff520 : SUCCESS in 2m 54s > - announce-release https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/9f9a5910815247049bf02ab612781620 : FAILURE in 24m 20s > - propose-update-constraints https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/44353ec832794af2965e7e2d05d63442 : SUCCESS in 3m 28s announce-release job appears to have failed due to a temporary network issue accessing PyPi packages. Since the release announcement is not critical, no further action is needed. Sean

1 0

[oslo.cache][keystonemiddleware] enable-sasl-protocol
by Brin Zhang(张百林) 12 Aug '20

12 Aug '20

Hi all, we would like to enable sasl protocol to oslo.cache and keystonemiddleware<https://review.opendev.org/#/projects/openstack/keystonemiddleware,dashboar…> project to improve the security of authority. SASL(Simple Authentication and Security Layer): is a memchanism used to extend the verification ability of C/S mode. SASL is only the authentication process, which integrates the application layer and the system authentication mechanism. Need to review patches: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:open++branch:master+topic:bp/enable-s… brinzhang

2 1

[horizon][dashboard] Disable admin and identity dashboard panel for user role
by Amjad Kotobi 11 Aug '20

11 Aug '20

Hi, I’m trying to customise view level of dashboard to users with “User” role in keystone, by that I meant to disable “admin” + “identity” panels for users, but when I’m adding “DISABLED = True” to admin panel, it will disable panel for admin and user roles. Is there any way to disable “admin” & “identity” panels only for user role? Installed openstack-dashboard openstack-dashboard-16.2.0-1.el7 Thanks Amjad

2 1

[keystone] Weekly meeting cancelled today
by Nikolla, Kristi 11 Aug '20

11 Aug '20

Hi all, There are no items in today's weekly meeting agenda, and I'm unavailable to host/attend it due to a scheduling conflict. Therefore we can go ahead and cancel today's meeting. Thank you, and sorry for any inconvenience Kristi Nikolla

1 0

[all] [dev&ops] Early warning about new "stable" ansible releases
by Radosław Piliszek 11 Aug '20

11 Aug '20

Hiya Folks, Ansible 2.8.14 and 2.9.12 change the default mode, that created files will get, from 0666 (with umask; which would usually produce 0644) to 0600. [1] Kolla-Ansible got hit by it, and Zuul relies on Ansible so might pick it up at some point, possibly causing some little havoc for all of us. [1] https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/71200 -yoctozepto

1 0

[sigs][vendors] Proposal to create Hardware Vendor SIG
by Sean McGinnis 11 Aug '20

11 Aug '20

Hey everyone, OpenStack is a community for creating open source software, but by the nature of infrastructure management, there is a strong intersection with hardware, and therefore hardware vendors. Nova, Cinder, Neutron, Ironic, and many others need to interact with hardware and support vendor specific drivers for this interaction. There is currently a spectrum where some of this hardware interaction is done as openly as possible, while others develop their integration "glue" behind closed doors. Part of this is the disconnect between the fully open development of OpenStack, and the traditionally proprietary development of many products. For those that do want to do their vendor-specific development as openly as possible - and hopefully attract the involvement of customers, partners, and others in the community - there hasn't been a great venue for this so far. Some vendors that have done open development have even had difficulty finding a place in the community and ended up deciding to just develop behind closed doors. I would like to try to change this, so I am proposing the creation of the Hardware Vendor SIG as a place where we can collaborate on vendor specific things, and encourage development to happen in the open. This would be a place for any vendors and interested parties to work together to fix bugs, implement features, and overall improve the quality of anything that helps provide that glue to bridge the gap between our open source services and vendor hardware. This would include servers, storage, networking, and really anything else that plays a role in being able to set up an OpenStack cloud. This is a call out to any others interested in participating. If you are interested in this effort, and if you have any existing code (whether hosted on OpenDev, hosted on GitHub, or hosted on your own platform) that you think would be a good fit for this, please add your contact information and any relevant details here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/HardwareVendorSIG Also, please feel free to show your support by voting on the proposal to create this SIG here: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/745185/ Thanks! Sean

3 2

[Ironic] User Survey question
by Julia Kreger 11 Aug '20

11 Aug '20

Greetings awesome Artificial Intelligences and fellow humanoid carbon units! This week I need to submit the question for the 2021 user survey. We discussed this some during our weekly IRC meeting today.[0] Presently, the question is: "Ironic: What would you find most useful if it was part of ironic?" I'd like to propose we collect more data in order to enable us to make informed decisions for features and maintenance work moving forward. While this is long term thinking, I'm wondering if operators would be interested in collecting and submitting some basic data or using a tool, to submit anonymous usage data so we can gain insight into hardware types in use, numbers of machines, which interfaces are used, etc. So I'm thinking something along the lines of: "Ironic: Would you be willing to submit anonymous usage statistics (Number of nodes, conductors, which drivers are in use, etc) if such a tool existed? Yes/No/Not Applicable" Thoughts? Feelings? Concerns? Other ideas? -Julia [0]: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2020/ironic.2020-08-10-15.00…

7 8