February 2020 - openstack-discuss

[Outreachy] Call for mentors, projects by Feb 25
by Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz 14 Feb '20

14 Feb '20

Hi all, TL;DR OpenStack is participating of Outreachy! Mentors, please submit project proposals by Feb 25. More info: https://www.outreachy.org/communities/cfp/openstack/ Outreachy's goal is to support people from groups underrepresented in the technology industry. The upcoming round runs from May to August 2020. Now that we are confirmed as a participating community, we welcome experienced community contributors to help out as mentors, who need to submit project proposals. Therefore, if you have an interesting project that meets the criteria, please submit it as soon as possible. You can find more information about the program, project criteria, mentor requirements, and submit your project at the Call for mentors page <https://www.outreachy.org/communities/cfp/openstack/> [1]. I have participated twice of Outreachy as a mentor and I can tell you it was a great opportunity to get someone onboard the community and, of course, to learn from them. Besides getting work done (which is great), we happen to make our community more diverse, while helping with its continuity. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Samuel [1] https://www.outreachy.org/communities/cfp/openstack/

1 0

[keystone] Keystone Team Update - Week of 10 February 2020
by Vishakha Agarwal 14 Feb '20

14 Feb '20

# Keystone Team Update - Week of 10 February 2020 ## News ### YVR PTG Keystone People can write down the topics in etherpad [1] to have a brief discussion with the team. [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/yvr-ptg-keystone ### User Support and Bug Duty Every week the duty is being rotated between the members. The person-in-charge for bug duty for current and upcoming week can be seen on the etherpad [2] [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-l1-duty ## Open Specs Ussuri specs: https://bit.ly/2XDdpkU Ongoing specs: https://bit.ly/2OyDLTh ## Recently Merged Changes Search query: https://bit.ly/2pquOwT We merged 10 changes this week. ## Changes that need Attention Search query: https://bit.ly/2tymTje There are 21 changes that are passing CI, not in merge conflict, have no negative reviews and aren't proposed by bots. ### Priority Reviews * Ussuri Roadmap Stories - Groups in keystone SAML assertion https://tree.taiga.io/project/keystone-ussuri-roadmap/us/33 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/588211/ Add openstack_groups to assertion - Add support for modifying resource options to CLI tool https://tree.taiga.io/project/keystone-ussuri-roadmap/us/53 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/697444/ Adding options to user cli ## Bugs This week we opened 3 new bugs and closed 2. Bugs opened (3) Bug #1862802 (keystone:Wishlist): Avoid the default domain usage when the Domain is not specified in the project creation - Opened by Raildo Mascena de Sousa Filho https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1862802 Bug #1862606 (keystone:Undecided): LDAP support broken if UTF8 characters in DN (python2) - Opened by Rafal Ramocki https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1862606 Bug #1863098 (keystone:Undecided): Install and configure in keystone - Opened by Assassins! https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1863098 Bugs closed (2) Bug #1808305 (python-keystoneclient:Won't Fix) https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-keystoneclient/+bug/1808305 Bug #1823258 (keystone:Undecided): RFE: Immutable Resources - Fixed by Colleen Murphy https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1823258 ## Milestone Outlook https://releases.openstack.org/ussuri/schedule.html This week marks the milestone 2 spec freeze. Feature proposal freeze is in week of March 9. This means code implementing approved specs needs to be in a reviewable, non-WIP state. ## Help with this newsletter Help contribute to this newsletter by editing the etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-team-newsletter ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1 0

Re: RHOSP-like installation
by Amy Marrich 14 Feb '20

14 Feb '20

Adding the discuss list back in On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 5:16 PM Amy Marrich <amy(a)demarco.com> wrote: > Volodymyr, > > I'm sure someone from the TripleO team will pipe in, but TripleO is closer > to RHOSP then RDO. When I was playing with it in the past I found Keith > Tenzer's blogs helpful. There might be more recent ones then this but > here's a link to one: > > > https://keithtenzer.com/2015/10/14/howto-openstack-deployment-using-tripleo… > > Thanks, > > Amy Marrich (spotz) > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 5:05 PM Volodymyr Litovka <doka.ua(a)gmx.com> wrote: > >> Dear colleagues, >> >> while having a good experience with Openstack on Ubuntu, we're facing a >> plenty of questions re RHOSP installation. >> >> The primary requirement for our team re RHOSP is to get a knowledge on >> RHOSP - how to install it and maintain. As far as I understand, RDO is >> the closest way to reach this target but which kind of installation it's >> better to use? - >> * plain RDO installation as described in generic Openstack guide at >> https://docs.openstack.org/install-guide/index.html (specifics in >> RHEL/CentOS sections) >> * or TripleO installation as described in http://tripleo.org/install/ >> * or, may be, it is possible to use RHOSP in kind of trial mode to get >> enough knowledge on this platform? >> >> Our lab consists of four servers (64G RAM, 16 cores@2GHz) which we're >> going to use in "ultraconverged" mode - as both controller and agent >> (compute/network/storage) nodes (controllers, though, can be in >> virsh-controlled VMs). In case of TripleO scenario, 4th server can be >> used for undercloud role. This installation is intended not for >> production use, but rather for learning purposes, so no special >> requirements for productivity. The only special requirement - to be >> functionally as much as close to canonical RHOSP platform. >> >> I will highly appreciate your suggestions on this issue. >> >> Thank you. >> >> -- >> Volodymyr Litovka >> "Vision without Execution is Hallucination." -- Thomas Edison >> >> >>

2 1

[all][PTL][tc] U Community Goal: Project PTL & Contrib Docs Update #2
by Kendall Nelson 14 Feb '20

14 Feb '20

Hello! First off I want to say thank you to the 4 projects that have already gotten started/completed the goal! Good work Glance, Neutron, Searchlight, and Watcher :) For the rest of the projects, thankfully we have more time to work on this goal than for the dropping py2 goal given that its documentation we aren't restricted to it being completed by feature freeze. That said, the sooner the better :) One thing I did want to draw attention to was the discussion around adding an include for CONTRIBUTING.rst to doc/source/contributor/contributing.rst[4] and the patch I have to add it to the template[5]. I also pushed a patch to clarify doc/source/contributor/contributing.rst vs CONTRIBUTING.rst -Kendall (diablo_rojo) [1] Goal: https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/selected/ussuri/project-ptl-and-c… [2] Docs Template: https://opendev.org/openstack/cookiecutter/src/branch/master/%7b%7bcookiecu… [3] Tracking: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2007236 [4] TC Discussion: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2020… [5] Patch to add include: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/707735/ [6] contributing.rst vs CONTRIBUTING.rst clarification patch: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/707736/

1 0

[tripleo] CI is RED py27 related
by Wesley Hayutin 14 Feb '20

14 Feb '20

Greetings, Most of the jobs went RED a few minutes ago. Again it's related to python27. Nothing is going to pass CI until this is fixed. See: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ruckroversprint21 We'll update the list when we have the required patches in. Thanks

2 5

[release] Release countdown for week R-13, February 10-14
by Sean McGinnis 13 Feb '20

13 Feb '20

Development Focus ----------------- The Ussuri-2 milestone is next week, on February 13! Ussuri-related specs should now be finalized so that teams can move to implementation ASAP. Some teams observe specific deadlines on the second milestone (mostly spec freezes): please refer to https://releases.openstack.org/ussuri/schedule.html for details. General Information ------------------- Libraries need to be released at least once per milestone period. Next week, the release team will propose releases for any library that has not been otherwise released since milestone 1. PTL's and release liaisons, please watch for these and give a +1 to acknowledge them. If there is some reason to hold off on a release, let us know that as well. A +1 would be appreciated, but if we do not hear anything at all by the end of the week, we will assume things are OK to proceed. Remember that non-library deliverables that follow the cycle-with-intermediary release model should have an intermediary release before milestone-2. Those who haven't will be proposed to switch to the cycle-with-rc model, which is more suited to deliverables that are released only once per cycle. Next week is also the deadline to freeze the contents of the final release. All new 'Ussuri' deliverables need to have a deliverable file (https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/deliverables/ussuri ) and need to have done a release by milestone-2. The following new deliverables have not had a release yet, and will not be included in Ussuri unless a release is requested for them in the coming week: - adjutant, adjutant-ui, python-adjutantclient (Adjutant) - barbican-ui (Barbican) - js-openstack-lib (OpenStackSDK) - ovn-octavia-provider (Neutron) - sushy-cli (Ironic) - tripleo-operator-ansible (TripleO) Changes proposing those deliverables for inclusion in Ussuri have been posted, please update them with an actual release request before the milestone-2 deadline if you plan on including that deliverable in Ussuri, or -1 if you need one more cycle to be ready. Upcoming Deadlines & Dates -------------------------- Ussuri-2 Milestone: February 13 (R-13 week)

1 1

[nova] API updates week 20-7
by Ghanshyam Mann 13 Feb '20

13 Feb '20

Hello Everyone, Please find the Nova API updates of this week. Please add if I missed any BPs/API related work. API Related BP : ============ COMPLETED: 1. Add image-precache-support spec: - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/image-precache-support Code Ready for Review: ------------------------------ 1. Nova API policy improvement - Topic: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bp/policy-defaults-refresh+(status:ope… - Weekly Progress: API till D is covered and ready for review. Fixed 5 bugs in policy while working on new defaults. - Review guide over ML - http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-August/008504.h… 2. Non-Admin user can filter their instance by availability zone: - Topic: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bp/non-admin-filter-instance-by-az+(st… - Weekly Progress: Code under review. efried needs to remove his -2 now as spec is merge 3. Boot from volume instance rescue - Topic: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bp/virt-bfv-instance-rescue+(status:op… - Weekly Progress: Code is in progress. Lee Yarwood has removed the WIP from patches so ready for review. 4. Add action event fault details -Topic: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bp/action-event-fault-details+(status:… - Weekly Progress: Spec is merged and code is ready for review. Specs are merged and code in-progress: ------------------------------ ------------------ - None Spec Ready for Review or Action from Author: --------------------------------------------------------- 1. Support specifying vnic_type to boot a server -Spec: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/672400/ - Weekly Progress: Stephen summarized the comment about not in scope of nova. I will remove it from this list from next report. 2. Allow specify user to reset password -Spec: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/682302/5 - Weekly Progress: One +2 on this but other are disagree on this idea. More discussion on review. 3. Support re-configure deleted_on_termination in server -Spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/580336/ - Weekly Progress: This is old spec and there is no consensus on this till now. Others: 1. None Bugs: ==== I started fixing policy bugs while working on policy-defaults-refresh BP. 5 bugs have been identified till now and fix up for review. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=policy-defaults-refresh NOTE- There might be some bug which is not tagged as 'api' or 'api-ref', those are not in the above list. Tag such bugs so that we can keep our eyes. -gmann

1 0

[neutron][metering] Dublicated Neutron Meter Rules in different projects kills metering
by merlin.blom＠bertelsmann.de 13 Feb '20

13 Feb '20

I want to use Neutron Meter with gnocchi to report the egress bandwidth used for public traffic. So I created neutron meter labels and neutron meter rules to include all ipv4 traffic: +-------------------+------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------+ | Field | Value | +-------------------+------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------+ | direction | egress | | id | f2c9b9a8-0af3-40a5-a718-6e841bad111d | | is_excluded | False | | location | cloud='', project.domain_id='default', project.domain_name=, | | | project.id='80120067cd7949908e44dce45aeb7712', project.name='billing', region_name='xxx', | | | zone= | | metering_label_id | d0068fc8-4a3e-4108-aa11-e3c171d4d1e1 | | name | None | | project_id | None | | remote_ip_prefix | 0.0.0.0/0 | +-------------------+------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------+ And excluded all private nets: +-------------------+------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------+ | Field | Value | +-------------------+------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------+ | direction | egress | | id | 838c9631-665b-42b6-b1e9-539983a38573 | | is_excluded | True | | location | cloud='', project.domain_id='default', project.domain_name=, | | | project.id='80120067cd7949908e44dce45aeb7712', project.name='billing', region_name='xxx', | | | zone= | | metering_label_id | 435652e6-e985-4351-a31a-954bace9eea0 | | name | None | | project_id | None | | remote_ip_prefix | 10.0.0.0/8 | +-------------------+------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------+ It works fine for just one project but if I apply it to all projects it fails and no measures are recorded in gnocchi. The neutron-metering-agent.log shows the following warning: Feb 13 09:14:18 xxx_host neutron-metering-agent: 2020-02-13 09:14:09.648 4732 WARNING neutron.agent.linux.iptables_manager [req-4c38f1f5-2db4-4d4a-9c1f-9585b1b50427 65c6d4bdcbc7469a910f6361b7f70f27 80120067cd7949908e44dce45aeb7712 - - -] Duplicate iptables rule detected. This may indicate a bug in the iptables rule generation code. Line: -A neutron-meter-r-28155d45-d16 -s 10.0.0.0/8 -o qg-c61bafef-ea -j RETURN I would expect that it is possible to have similar rules for different projects. What do you think? Is it part of the rule creation code? In the iptables_manager code the function is criticized: <https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/86e4f141159072421a19080455caba1b0 efef776/neutron/agent/linux/iptables_manager.py> https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/86e4f141159072421a19080455caba1b0e fef776/neutron/agent/linux/iptables_manager.py # TODO(kevinbenton): remove this function and the next one. They are # just oversized brooms to sweep bugs under the rug!!! We generate the # rules and we shouldn't be generating duplicates. def _weed_out_duplicates(line): if line in seen_lines: thing = 'chain' if line.startswith(':') else 'rule' LOG.warning("Duplicate iptables %(thing)s detected. This " "may indicate a bug in the iptables " "%(thing)s generation code. Line: %(line)s", {'thing': thing, 'line': line}) return False seen_lines.add(line) # Leave it alone return True <https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1863068> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1863068 Merlin Blom

1 0

[Watcher]IRC meeting at 8:00 UTC today
by licanwei 13 Feb '20

13 Feb '20

2 2

[openstack-dev][kuryr] Kubelet error in ARM64
by VeeraReddy 13 Feb '20

13 Feb '20

Hi I am getting following error in kubelet in arm64 platform Feb 13 07:16:32 node-2088 kubelet[16776]: E0213 07:16:32.493458 16776 machine.go:288] failed to get cache information for node 0: open /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cache/index0/size: no such file or directoryFeb 13 07:16:32 node-2088 kubelet[16776]: I0213 07:16:32.493600 16776 gce.go:44] Error while reading product_name: open /sys/class/dmi/id/product_name: no such file or directory Help me in fixing above issue. Regards, Veera.

2 1