February 2020 - openstack-discuss

[neutron][ironic][nova][routed_network] what's normal workflow when ironic host added to nova from neutron?
by 양유석 11 Feb '20

11 Feb '20

Hi stacker, I'm trying to use ironic routed network from stein. I do not sure how the normal workflow works in nova/neutron/ironic side for routed network, so I sent this mail to get more information. >From what I understand for ironic routed network, what I did - Enable segment plugin in Neutron - Add ironic 'node' - Add ironic port with physical network - network-baremetal plugin reports neutron from all ironic nodes. - It sent 'physical_network' and 'ironic node uuid' to Neutron - It make 'segmenthostmapping' entry with ('node uuid', 'segment_id') - Add segment for the subnet. At last step, I encountered the strange. In detail, - Neutron subnet update callback call nova inventory registration - Neutron ask placement to create resource provider for segment - Neutron ask nova to create aggregate for segment - Neutron request placement to associate nova aggregate to resource provider. - (Bug?) Neutron add hosts came from 'segmenthostmapping' to nova aggregate Since 'segmenthostmapping' has 'ironic node uuid' for host, nova deny to register the host to aggregate emitting the exception like below Returning 404 to user: Compute host 27004f76-2606-4e4a-980e-a385a01f04de could not be found. __call__ What's strange for me is why neutron ask 'ironic node uuid' for host when nova aggregate only look for host from HostMapping which came from 'host' in compute_nodes. I could not find the code related to how 'ironic node uuid' can be registered in nova aggregate. Please someone who knows what's going on shed light on me. Thanks.

2 4

[tripleo] rework of triple squads and the tripleo mtg.
by Wesley Hayutin 11 Feb '20

11 Feb '20

Greetings, As mentioned at the previous tripleo meeting [1], we're going to revisit the current tripleo squads and the expectations for those squads at the tripleo meeting. Currently we have the following squads.. 1. upgrades 2. edge 3. integration 4. validations 5. networking 6. transformation 7. ci A reasonable update could include the following.. 1. validations 2. transformation 3. mistral-to-ansible 4. CI 5. Ceph / Integration?? maybe just Ceph? 6. others?? The squads should reflect major current efforts by the TripleO team IMHO. For the meetings, I would propose we use this time and space to give context to current reviews in progress and solicit feedback. It's also a good time and space to discuss any upstream blockers for those reviews. Let's give this one week for comments etc.. Next week we'll update the etherpad list and squads. The etherpad list will be a decent way to communicate which reviews need attention. Thanks all!!! [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2020/tripleo.2020-01-07-14.…

7 7

[infra][neutron] Removing networking-calico from OpenStack governance
by Neil Jerram 11 Feb '20

11 Feb '20

Hi all, networking-calico is the code that integrates Project Calico [1] with Neutron. It has been an OpenStack project for several years, but we, i.e. its developers [2], would like now to remove it from OpenStack governance and instead manage it like the other Project Calico projects under https://github.com/projectcalico/. In case anyone has any concerns about this, please let me know very soon! Please could infra folk confirm that https://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/drivers.html#retiring-a-project is the correct procedure for winding up the OpenStack side of this transition? Many thanks, Neil [1] https://www.projectcalico.org/ [2] That means mostly me, with some help from my colleagues here at Tigera. We do have some other contributors but I will take care that they are also on board with this change.

3 6

UC Elections Reminder
by Amy Marrich 10 Feb '20

10 Feb '20

Hey All! Just a reminder that the nomination period for the upcoming User Committee elections is open. See the original email below! Thanks, Amy (spotz) The nomination period for the February User Committee elections is now open. Any individual member of the Foundation who is an Active User Contributor (AUC) can propose their candidacy (except the two sitting UC members elected in the previous election). Self-nomination is common; no third party nomination is required. Nominations can be made by sending an email to the user-committee(a)lists.openstack.org mailing-list[0], with the subject: “UC candidacy” by February 16, 23:59 UTC aa voting will begin on February 17. The email can include a description of the candidate platform. The candidacy is then confirmed by one of the election officials, after verification of the electorate status of the candidate. Criteria for AUC status can be found at https://superuser.openstack.org/articles/auc-community/. If you are still not sure of your status and would like to verify in advance please email myself(amy(a)demarco.com) and Rain Leander(rleander(a)redhat.com) as we are serving as the Election Officials. Thanks, Amy Marrich (spotz) 0 - Please make sure you are subscribed to this list before sending in your nomination.

1 0

Nominating Maysa De Macedo Souza for kuryr-kubernetes core
by mdulko＠redhat.com 10 Feb '20

10 Feb '20

Hi, I'd like to nominate Maysa to be core reviewer in Kuryr-Kubernetes project. Maysa shown numerous examples of diligent and valuable work in terms of code contribution (e.g. in network policy support), project maintenance and reviews [1]. Please express support or objections by replying to this email. Assuming that there will be no pushback, I'll proceed with granting Maysa core powers by the end of this week. Thanks, Michał [1] https://www.stackalytics.com/?module=kuryr-kubernetes&release=ussuri

3 3

[oslo] PTG Attendance
by Ben Nemec 10 Feb '20

10 Feb '20

Hi, As discussed in the meeting this morning, we need to decide if we want to request a room at the Vancouver PTG. Since I'm not expecting to be there this time someone else would need to organize it. I realize travel plans are not finalized for most people, but if you expect to be there and would like to have formal Oslo discussions please let me know ASAP. Thanks. -Ben

1 0

[neutron] Bug deputy report Feb 3-10
by Nate Johnston 10 Feb '20

10 Feb '20

Nate bug deputy notes - 2020-02-03 to 2020-02-10 ------------------------------------------------ It was a very quiet week - almost half of these were filed today, this report was looking very short as recently as yesterday. Thanks to amotoki for the next shift as bug deputy. Untriaged: - "Neutron try to register invalid host to nova aggregate for ironic routed network" * URL: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862611 * Version: stable/stein * lajoskatona responded to the bug but I was not able to reproduce it; I don't have an ironic setup to verify the bug report. Critical: - "Neutron incorrectly selects subnet" * URL: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862374 * Marked Incomplete by haleyb but there is still a significant chance there is a real issue here, it might just be in the SDK as opposed to neutron. Waiting for reported to respond. High: - "Fullstack tests failing due to "hang" neutron-server process" (slaweq) * URL: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862178 * Unassigned - "Fullstack tests failing due to problem with connection to the fake placement service" * URL: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862177 * Assigned: lajoskatona * Fix proposed: https://review.opendev.org/706500 - "Sometimes VMs can't get IP when spawned concurrently" * URL: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862315 * Version: stable/stein * Assigned: obondarev - "[OVN] Reduce the number of tables watched by MetadataProxyHandler" * URL: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862648 * Assigned: lucasgomes Medium: - "[OVN] functional test test_virtual_port_delete_parents is unstable" * URL: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862618 * Assigned: sapana45 Invalid: - "placement in neutron_lib could not process keystone exceptions" * URL: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862565 * Marked as duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1828543 (lajoskatona) RFE: - "Add RBAC for subnet pools" * URL: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862032 * Cross-project with the nova team, nova has a patch up for their part. Last week's report by tidwellr: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-February/012332…

1 0

Re: [Release-job-failures] release-post job for openstack/releases for ref refs/heads/master failed
by Sean McGinnis 10 Feb '20

10 Feb '20

On 2/10/20 9:08 AM, zuul(a)openstack.org wrote: > Build failed. > > - tag-releases https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/8796e6c046a84688b3dd9dc756f4a15d : FAILURE in 6m 13s > - publish-tox-docs-static https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/None : SKIPPED > > _______________________________________________ > Release-job-failures mailing list > Release-job-failures(a)lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-job-failures This failure was actually on the removal of a deliverable file for something that is no longer active. This can be safely ignored. Sean

1 0

[neutron] 11.02.2020 team meeting cancelled
by Slawek Kaplonski 10 Feb '20

10 Feb '20

Hi, I will not be able to chair our tomorrow’s team meeting. So lets cancel it and see You all on Monday 17.02.2020. — Slawek Kaplonski Senior software engineer Red Hat

1 0

[largescale-sig] Next meeting: Feb 12, 9utc
by Thierry Carrez 10 Feb '20

10 Feb '20

Hi everyone, The Large Scale SIG will have a meeting this week on Wednesday, Feb 12 at 9 UTC[1] in #openstack-meeting on IRC: [1] https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20200212T09 As always, the agenda for our meeting is available at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/large-scale-sig-meeting Feel free to add topics to it. We'll start with a show-and-tell by Stig (oneswig), followed by a status update on the various TODOs we had from last meeting, in particular: - Reviewing oslo.metrics draft at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/704733/ and comment so that we can iterate on it - Reading page on golden signals at https://landing.google.com/sre/sre-book/chapters/monitoring-distributed-sys… Talk to you all on Wednesday, -- Thierry Carrez

1 0