December 2020 - openstack-discuss

[infra][tripleo] is it possible to control (tripleo) gate queue priority?
by Marios Andreou 22 Dec '20

22 Dec '20

Hello illustrious members of openstack infra tripleo-ci squad is wondering if it is possible for (some subset of) us to be able to set the priority of a particular patch/es in the tripleo queue. We've done this "manually" in the past, by abandoning all patches in the gate & then restoring in order and putting the priority patch at the top of the dependency queue. However abandoning all the things is completely disruptive for everyone else (sometimes that might be necessary if your queue is way too long but still...). So the question is, is there a better way to put a particular patch at the top of our queue when we need to do that? thanks for your thoughts, sorry if this has come up before I couldn't quickly find something in the list archives. regards, marios

4 5

[off-topic][tripleo] Merry Christmas!
by Carlos Camacho Gonzalez 22 Dec '20

22 Dec '20

Hi everyone! Its been a complex year for everyone, however, we managed to do amazing things, I hope we can get a boost of energy these holidays to do even better things next year, I wish you all the best and to stay healthy. https://imgur.com/a/5rSXMTe As usual, all the sources are in GH [1]. Merry Christmas! Carlos. [1]: https://github.com/ccamacho/tripleo-graphics/tree/master/x-mas/2020

1 0

[blazar] No IRC meetings during holiday season
by Pierre Riteau 22 Dec '20

22 Dec '20

Hello, I am on leave for the end of the year, so there will be no IRC meetings for the Blazar project until the week of January 4. I wish everyone a very happy holiday! Pierre Riteau (priteau)

1 0

[keystone] No weekly meeting Dec 22
by Nikolla, Kristi 22 Dec '20

22 Dec '20

Hi all, I won't be able to host the weekly IRC team meeting for keystone tomorrow. Best, Kristi Nikolla

1 0

Re: [placement] Train upgrade warning
by Seth Tunstall 21 Dec '20

21 Dec '20

Hello, As another person has mentioned (Chanu Romain), I am attempting an upgrade from Queens to Train. I have successfully upgraded Keystone and Glance, but while trying to separate Placement's databases out from Nova, I run into the the same issue with placement-status upgrade check: # placement-status upgrade check +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Upgrade Check Results | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Check: Missing Root Provider IDs | | Result: Success | | Details: None | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Check: Incomplete Consumers | | Result: Warning | | Details: There are -3511 incomplete consumers table records for | | existing allocations. Run the "placement-manage db | | online_data_migrations" command. | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ Likewise, running placement-manage db online_data_migrations does nothing. I am running this placement migration on a dev cluster which has had the databases from a Prod cluster restored to it. This has worked well for me previously as a way to run through upgrades without touching the live system. Thanks very much, Seth

3 10

[tc] weekly update
by Mohammed Naser 21 Dec '20

21 Dec '20

Hi everyone, Here's an update for what happened in the OpenStack TC this week. You can get more information by checking for changes in openstack/governance repository. # Patches ## Open Reviews - Add glance-tempest-plugin to Glance https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/767666 - Remove Karbor project team https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/767056 - Add Resolution of TC stance on the OpenStackClient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/759904 ## Project Updates - Deprecate openstack-ansible-galera_client role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/765784 ## General Changes - Improve check-review-status https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/766249 - Clarify impact on releases for SIGs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/752699 # Other Reminders - Due to the upcoming holidays we are skipping the next TC meetings on Dec 24th and Dec 31st. We will resume with our regular schedule on Thursday January 7th. Thanks for reading! Happy Holidays! Mohammed & Kendall -- Mohammed Naser VEXXHOST, Inc.

1 0

[all] Our next release name - OpenStack Xena!
by Sean McGinnis 21 Dec '20

21 Dec '20

Hello everyone! The naming poll is done [0], the legal vetting is complete, and we now have our X release name. All hail OpenStack Xena! Observant readers will note that Xena was not the 1st place name from the poll. After review for legal and copyright concerns, it was determined there would be conflicts with the top place Xanadu. Apologies to the Olivia Newton John fans out there. Xena was determined to be safe for our use, and was a close second. More details about the release naming process can be found on the governance page [1]. Please consider getting involved for the Y release naming. Thanks! Sean [0] https://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_7e6e96070af39fe7 [1] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/release-naming.html

1 0

New Openstack Deployment questions
by Thomas Wakefield 21 Dec '20

21 Dec '20

OpenStack deployment questions: If you were starting a new deployment of OpenStack today what OS would you use, and what tools would you use for deployment? We were thinking CentOS with Kayobe, but then CentOS changed their support plans, and I am hesitant to start a new project with CentOS. We do have access to RHEL licensing so that might be an option. We have also looked at OpenStack-Ansible for deployment. Thoughts? Thanks in advance. -Tom

9 13

OOO First half on 22 December
by Abhishek Kekane 21 Dec '20

21 Dec '20

Hi Team, I will be out in the first half tomorrow for personal reasons, and will resume work around 1400 UTC. Thanks & Best Regards, Abhishek Kekane

1 1

[tripleo][centosLinux8][podman-1.6] during undercloud deployment missing podman 1.6 cause we have podman 2.0
by Ruslanas Gžibovskis 21 Dec '20

21 Dec '20

Hi all. Somewhere there is a mismatch. When deploying fresh undercloud I get error ./builddir/install-undercloud.log:2020-12-21 11:07:02,763 p=30959 u=root n=ansible | 2020-12-21 11:07:02.762141 | 52540000-0011-172f-d7e6-000000000826 | FATAL | ensure podman and deps are installed | remote-u | error={"changed": false, "failures": ["podman-1.6.4 All matches were filtered out by modular filtering for argument: podman-1.6.4"], "msg": "Failed to install some of the specified packages", "rc": 1, "results": []} ./builddir/install-undercloud.log: "podman-1.6.4" ./builddir/install-undercloud.log: "podman-1.6.4 All matches were filtered out by modular filtering for argument: podman-1.6.4" ./builddir/install-undercloud.log: "podman-1.6.4" so I found a file and updated with version found in repos: [stack@remote-u ~]$ cat /usr/share/ansible/roles/tripleo_podman/vars/redhat.yml --- _tripleo_podman_packages: - podman-2.0.5 _tripleo_buildah_packages: - buildah-1.15.1 _tripleo_podman_purge_packages: - docker - docker-ce [stack@remote-u ~]$ -- Ruslanas Gžibovskis +370 6030 7030

2 3