December 2020 - openstack-discuss

[ironic] No Weekly Meeting - December 21st, 28th, and January 4th.
by Julia Kreger 08 Dec '20

08 Dec '20

Greetings fellow humans! As we have in years past, we are approaching the end of year holiday season where people begin to disappear to use time off, rest, and relax their brains. As such, we're cancelling[0] our December 21st, 28th, and January 4th weekly meetings. As in past years, contributors tend to remain connected to IRC, but expect people to be heads-down if they are working, so replies will be sporadic. This also means December 14th will be our last weekly meeting of 2020. In accordance with the prophecy of end of year time off, we'll be in auto-pilot of sorts during the weeks we do not meet. Contributors should feel free to update the review priorities section on the etherpad[1] and look to it for what is going on or what needs additional reviews/feedback. One bit of warning, CI breakages during this time of year are common. Single core approvals to fix CI issues are encouraged in this case. Have a wonderful remainder of the year everyone! -Julia [0]: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2020/ironic.2020-12-07-15.00… [1]: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/IronicWhiteBoard

1 0

[tripleo][ci] update - CI jobs failures on RDO and Software Factory Project
by Wesley Hayutin 08 Dec '20

08 Dec '20

forwarded from rdo.... Hi, The CI jobs that are running on Vexxhost should be fine now. Regards, Dan

1 0

[all][qa][kolla][ops][tc] CentOS Project shifts focus to CentOS Stream
by Radosław Piliszek 08 Dec '20

08 Dec '20

TL;DR After 2021 there will be no CentOS 8 point releases. The focus is on CentOS 8 Stream. For more information, please read [1]. As the QA team, we have Stream testing proposed already [2]. We actually had Victoria from Manila ask us about it quite a while ago. Ghanshyam promised to coordinate this topic with the TC. As the Kolla team, we made switch to CentOS 8 Stream a priority of Wallaby and we will likely discuss this option for stable branches which will outlive the 2021 deadline. PS: Don't kill me. I'm just passing the information on. :-) [1] https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2020-December/075451.html [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/759122 Kind regards, -yoctozepto

2 2

[tripleo][ci] CI jobs failures on RDO project
by Wesley Hayutin 08 Dec '20

08 Dec '20

FYI ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Daniel Pawlik <dpawlik(a)redhat.com> Date: Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 6:13 AM Subject: [rdo-users] CI jobs failures on RDO project To: <users(a)lists.rdoproject.org> Hello, We are facing an outage in our cloud providers. That's why from time to time you can have problems validating CI jobs in RDO project. We are doing our best to fix the issues as soon as possible. Kindly regards, Dan _______________________________________________ users mailing list users(a)lists.rdoproject.org http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users To unsubscribe: users-unsubscribe(a)lists.rdoproject.org

2 1

[tc] weekly update
by Mohammed Naser 08 Dec '20

08 Dec '20

Hi everyone, Here's an update for what happened in the OpenStack TC this week. You can get more information by checking for changes in openstack/governance repository. # Patches ## Open Reviews - Revive os_monasca https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/765800 - Deprecate openstack-ansible-galera_client role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/765784 - Clarify impact on releases for SIGs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/752699 - Remove Searchlight project team https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/764530 - Remove Qinling project team https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/764523 - Add Resolution of TC stance on the OpenStackClient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/759904 ## General Changes - Remove already done use-builtin-mock from goal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/764262 - Propose Kendall Nelson for vice chair https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/762014 - Add election schedule exceptions in charter https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/751941 - Generate the TC liaisons assignments https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/763810 - Update example and oslo code usage in JSON->YAML goal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/764261 - Clarify the requirements for supports-api-interoperability https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/760562 - Remove assert_supports-zero-downtime-upgrade tag https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/761975 - Add assert:supports-standalone https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/722399 ## Project Updates - Add Magpie charm to OpenStack charms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/762820 ## Other Reminders - [TC] Weekly meeting, December 10 at 1500 UTC. If you would like to add topics for discussion, please go to https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting and fill out your suggestions by Wednesday, December 09, at 2100 UTC. Thanks for reading! Mohammed & Kendall -- Mohammed Naser VEXXHOST, Inc.

1 0

[cinder] reminder: virtual mid-cycle wednesday 1400 utc
by Brian Rosmaita 08 Dec '20

08 Dec '20

The Cinder Wallaby R-18 virtual mid-cycle will be held: DATE: WEDNESDAY 9 DECEMBER 2020 TIME: 1400-1600 UTC LOCATION: https://bluejeans.com/3228528973 The meeting will be recorded. Please add topics to the mid-cycle etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-wallaby-mid-cycles cheers, brian

1 0

[development] Installation of Openstack for development using OVS
by Pavlos Basaras 08 Dec '20

08 Dec '20

Hello, I would like to install openstack for testing/development (not production) with OVS, with a controller node and multiple compute nodes, with the option to use ironic. I have followed the documentation https://docs.openstack.org/install-guide/ and i have a successful installation with linux bridges instead of OVS, with all the features working as mentioned in the tutorial. Any directions in how to have an openstack installation with OVS, e.g., a similar manual? Any advice welcome. all the best Pavlos.

1 0

[neutron] Team meeting - Tuesday 08.12.2020
by Slawek Kaplonski 08 Dec '20

08 Dec '20

Hi, It's just quick reminder that today at 1400 UTC on the #openstack-meeting-3 channel there will be neutron team meeting. Agenda is on [1]. If You have any topics which You would like to discuss, please add it to the "On demand section" in the agenda page. Just after that, at 1500 UTC in the same channel there will be also Neutron CI team meeting. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings -- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat

1 0

[ironic][masakari] Should masakari rely on Ironic to power fence failing hosts?
by Nicolas Parquet 08 Dec '20

08 Dec '20

Hello Ironic people! I am coming to you with a question from one of the points we discussed during Masakari's PTG [1]. When a host fails and Masakari gets notified, there are some cases in which we would like Masakari to power fence the host before evacuating its instances to other hosts. That way it is safe to start the instances from the failed host on another one. Given that Ironic has the responsability of managing hosts, we would be interested to know how Masakari should do that, in your view? We discussed implementing IPMI power on / off directly in masakari, but maybe an integration where Masakari calls some Ironic API would be better? Or maybe we should implement it relying on the pyghmi library, or any other library? A positive side of relying on Ironic would be that Masakari does not have to store IPMI information about hosts; however that would create a dependency between the 2 projects as some deployments might use masakari without managing their hosts through Ironic. Any insight is welcome! Regards, Nicolas [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/masakari-wallaby-vptg -- Nicolas Parquet Gandi nicolas.parquet(a)gandi.net

2 1

[TripleO] how to make that inspection IP is given only to known hosts
by Ruslanas Gžibovskis 08 Dec '20

08 Dec '20

Hi all, I have a situation, when in my network, I have loads of equipment, which I do not control. and Inspection range gets occupied quite fast. and in TCP dump I get such messages: DHCP-Message Option 53, length 1: NACK Server-ID Option 54, length 4: DHCPD-IP MSG Option 56, length 21: "address not available" I have disabled: enabled_node_discovery = false Anything else? maybe additional environment options for undercloud I could provide? Than kyou in advance, have a good $day_time -- Ruslanas Gžibovskis +370 6030 7030

3 3