November 2020 - openstack-discuss

[nova-compute] not reconnect to rabbitmq?
by Tony Liu 14 Nov '20

14 Nov '20

Hi, I'm having a deployment with Ussuri on CentOS 8. I noticed that, in case the connection from nova-compute to rabbitmq is broken, nova-compute doesn't reconnect. I checked nova-conductor who seems keeping trying reconnect to rabbitmq when connection is broken. But nova-compute doesn't seem doing the same. I've seen it a few times, after I fixed rabbitmq and bring it back, nova-conductor gets reconnected, but nova-compute doesn't, I have to manually restart it. Anyone else has the similar experiences? Anything I am missing? Thanks! Tony

2 1

[OpenStack][OpenInfra][InteropWG] Interop 2021 Brainstorming
by prakash RAMCHANDRAN 14 Nov '20

14 Nov '20

Hi all, Request you to consider putting down your ideas for Interop 2021 with Open Infrastructure Foundation (OIF) in your mind. https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/interop2021 If you can add inputs by mid-week next, that will be appreciated. Add your inputs and out-of-box thinking. ThanksPrakashFor Interop WG

1 0

Re: [Openstack][InteropWG] Victoria Interop Guidelines Patch and Future Directions
by prakash RAMCHANDRAN 13 Nov '20

13 Nov '20

Hi all, We are in-midst of transition from OSF to OIF and hence decided, not to add more add-ons for Victoria. Note the value and efforts involved in Refstack & Tempest process was in question and answer is we need to identify pointers in Marketplace to confirm the claims for current Marketpalce efforts. Here is the summary of Interop WG call today. 1. Interop Guidelines for 2020.10.json - 2020.10.json (https://opendev.org/osf/interop) - Arkady to try submit to osf/interop - escale to osf staff if needed ( refer https://review.opendev.org/#/c/762705/1/2020.11.json )- Need pointers to results in Markets 2. Interop add-on Guidelines for existing - https://opendev.org/osf/interop/src/branch/master/add-ons2.a DNS (Designate) - dns.2020.10.json - Need pointers to results 2.b Orchestration(Heat) -orchestration.2020.10.json - Need pointers results 3. Interop add-on guidelines for new proposals - https://www.openstack.org/marketplace/3.a FileSystem (Manila) - No plans for Victoria3.b Metal as a Service (Ironic) - No plans for Victoria 4. What's next for Interop 2021 with containers & Kubernetes/magnum ? - Need Volunteers with go skills for new conformance test proposals - Need Board level guidelines from Foundation Call for volunteers again to ensure we transit from OSF to OIF and please do reply your ideas by email for 1. un-linking orchestration from Heat to Mangnum or Kubernetes as baseline for containers2. Adding new program for BareMetal as a Service with Ironic , bifrost , metal3 etc.3. Putting Integrated OpenStack Integrated logo program on autopilot or terminate the same at Victoria. ThanksPrakashFor Interop WG OSF/OIF On Friday, November 13, 2020, 11:04:48 AM PST, openstack-discuss-request(a)lists.openstack.org <openstack-discuss-request(a)lists.openstack.org> wrote: Send openstack-discuss mailing list submissions to openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to openstack-discuss-request(a)lists.openstack.org You can reach the person managing the list at openstack-discuss-owner(a)lists.openstack.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of openstack-discuss digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: [release][infra] Discrepancy between release jobs and the "normal" jobs CI in terms of distro (Jeremy Stanley) 2. [OpenStack][InteropWG] Weekly Interop meeting Agenda for Victoria Interop Guidelines in next hr (prakash RAMCHANDRAN) 3. Re: [release][infra] Discrepancy between release jobs and the "normal" jobs CI in terms of distro (Jeremy Stanley) 4. Re: [nova][tripleo][rpm-packaging][kolla][puppet][debian][osa] Nova enforces that no DB credentials are allowed for the nova-compute service (Oliver Walsh) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 17:20:44 +0000 From: Jeremy Stanley <fungi(a)yuggoth.org> To: openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [release][infra] Discrepancy between release jobs and the "normal" jobs CI in terms of distro Message-ID: <20201113172044.c6cgt7rdy6m6mkeu(a)yuggoth.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On 2020-11-13 13:58:18 +0100 (+0100), Radosław Piliszek wrote: [...] > I believe it would be a rare situation but surely testing something on > Bionic and trying to release on Focal might have its quirks. Honestly, I think the real problem here is that we have a bunch of unnecessary cruft in the release-openstack-python job held over from when we used to use tox to create release artifacts. If you look through the log of a successful build you'll see that we're not actually running tox or installing the projects being released, but we're using the ensure-tox and bindep roles anyway. We may not even need ensure-pip in there. The important bits of the job are that it checks out the correct state of the repository and then runs `python3 setup.py sdist bdist_wheel` and then pulls the resulting files back to the executor to be published. That should be fairly consistent no matter what project is being built and no matter what distro it's being built on. -- Jeremy Stanley

1 0

[OpenStack][InteropWG] Weekly Interop meeting Agenda for Victoria Interop Guidelines in next hr
by prakash RAMCHANDRAN 13 Nov '20

13 Nov '20

Hi all, Please join me in next hour weekly Interop WG meetingInterop Working Group - Weekly Friday 10-11 AM PST Link: https://meetpad.opendev.org/Interop-WG-weekly-meetin Agenda: 1. Interop Guidelines for 2020.10.json 2. Interop add-on Guidelines for existing2.a DNS (Designate) 2.b Orchestration(Heat)3. Interop add-on guidelines for new proposals3.a FileSystem (Manila)3.b Metal as a Service (Ironic)4. What's next for Interop 2021 with containers & Kubernetes/magnum ? - Need Volunteers with go skills for new conformance test proposals ThanksPrakashFor Interop WGOpenDev Etherpad | | | | OpenDev Etherpad | | |

1 0

[tripleo] TripleO CI Summary: Unified Sprint 35
by Rafael Folco 13 Nov '20

13 Nov '20

Greetings, The TripleO CI team has just completed **Unified Sprint 35** (Oct 23 thru Nov 12). The following is a summary of completed work during this sprint cycle: In the last sprint we had two major goals: #1 OpenStack Victoria release branching (upstream jobs) and #2 Docker.io removal from upstream CI #1 OpenStack Victoria release branching (upstream jobs) Upstream jobs have been branched for stable/victoria release. Jobs from stable/rocky and stable/stein branches have been deprecated. #2 Docker.io removal from upstream CI Stable branch and CentOS7 jobs have also been converted to content providers. Content provider jobs have been wired-up in more repositories such as puppet-* projects. There are still changes in-flight to be merged, which are expected to happen in the next couple weeks. Content provider changes (160+): https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:new-ci-job Upstream promotions [1] Ruck/Rover recorded notes [2]. NEXT SPRINT =========== The planned work for the next sprint is to close-out the content provider work started in the previous sprint, and work on unfinished items for CI related on-going projects: - Elastic recheck / openstack health - Dependency pipeline design and PoC - Job footprint reduction - Cockpit improvements - Quay registry experimentation - Tempest improvements - RPM diff tooling - Reproducer enhancements - Documentation - TripleO core projects - Ansible-role-collect-logs - Upgrade/component pipeline standalone job - Improve container builds The Ruck and Rover shifts for the upcoming weeks are scheduled as follows: Nov 16: Marios Andreou (marios), Ronelle Landy (rlandy) Nov 23: Rafael Folco (rfolco), Arx Cruz (arxcruz) Nov 30: Wesley Hayutin (weshay), Pooja Jadhav (pojadhav) Dec 7: Sorin Sbarnea (zbr), Marios Andreou (marios) Dec 14: Chandan Kumar (chandankumar), Amol Kahat (akahat) Dec 21: Bhagyashri Shewale (bhagyashris), Soniya Vyas (soniya29) Dec 28: Sandeep Yadav (ysandeep), Sagi Shnaidman (sshnaidm) Jan 4: Wesley Hayutin (weshay), Poja Jadhav (pojadhav) Please direct questions or queries to them regarding CI status or issues in #tripleo, ideally to whomever has the ‘|ruck’ suffix on their nick. Ruck/rover notes to be tracked in hackmd [3]. Thanks, --rfolco [1] http://dashboard-ci.tripleo.org/d/HkOLImOMk/upstream-and-rdo-promotions?org… [2] https://hackmd.io/a_PhAlijTr-KTWHzGuf3qQ [3] https://hackmd.io/R0kCgz_7SHSix_cNgoC9pg

1 0

Re: Ironic use shellinabox doesn't work
by Kaifeng Wang 13 Nov '20

13 Nov '20

There is nothing wrong with the openstack side according to your context, but you need to double check the BMC configuration and kernel parameters before you can make it work in the dashboard or shellinabox web service. You should have something like "console=ttyS0,115200n8" in the kernel parameters, and the parameters should match what's configured in the BIOS. I'd suggest you to start diagnosing with ipmitool because it's the underlying tool used by ironic, try ipmitool <address, port arguments> sol activate, if you can't do anything there, you definity can't do anything from socat/shellinabox. On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 4:17 PM Ankele zhang <ankelezhang(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello~ Wang > > Thanks for your email very much, you show me hope. > There are some problems that need your help. > > My Ironic baremetal node's BIOS has enabled the SOL, and I have configure > the baremetal node correctly guided by 'https://docs.openstack.org/rocky' > and the result of the command line 'openstack baremetal node console' is > ok, but the SOL page is still frozen. After that, I changed my > enabled_console_interfaces from ipmitool-shellinabox to ipmitool-socat, and > recreate my baremetal node and recreate my nova server, everything is the > same as before, I got a frozen SOL page in dashboard. > > I don't know why the docs of openstack.org is incomplete, or socat or > shellinabox. Maybe you can give me some advice. > Looking forward to your reply again! > > > Ankele > > Kaifeng Wang <kaifeng.w(a)gmail.com> 于2020年11月13日周五上午12:04写道： > >> Hi, >> >> "SOL Session operational" is a BMC prompt, actually you have successfully >> connected to it, before you can interact with the terminal, the Serial >> Redirection (or something called that) needs to be enabled in the BIOS, >> also make sure you have matching baud rate set to the bootloader for the >> tty. >> >> P.S. SOL does not work for Windows systems. >> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:05 PM Ankele zhang <ankelezhang(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello~ >>> >>> I have a OpenStack platform( Rocky ) on CentOS7.6, and I installed >>> Ironic components on it. I can manage bare metal node with Ironic and I >>> plan to use shellinabox to manage the bare metal node remotely. >>> I had config conductor ironic.conf: >>> [DEFAULT] >>> ... >>> enabled_console_interfaces = ipmitool-shellinabox,no-console >>> I had config shellinabox: >>> USER=shellinabox >>> GROUP=shellinabox >>> CERTDIR=/var/lib/shellinabox >>> PORT=4200 >>> OPTS="--disable-ssl-menu -s /:LOGIN" >>> My 'openstack baremetal node console show BM01': >>> console_enabled: True and console_info.url: http://192.168.3.84:8023 >>> [image: image.png] >>> Now, I can access https://192.168.3.84:4200 is OK, and I can log >>> in and manage it. >>> But, when I access http://192.168.3.84:8023: >>> [image: image.png] >>> can not type anything into it. >>> >>> Look forward to hearing from you! >>> >>> >>> Ankele >>> >>> >>>

1 0

[cinder][ops] restricting the Ceph version used with Cinder
by Brian Rosmaita 13 Nov '20

13 Nov '20

The Cinder project plans to take advantage of recent developments in Ceph to make some improvements to the RBD driver. To do that, we propose restricting the Cinder-supported releases of Ceph to the active stable releases plus the two prior releases. This will make Mimic the minimum supported version of Ceph for the Wallaby and X releases of Cinder. This is explained in a bit more detail in a patch to the RBD driver documentation: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/762592/ If you have concerns about this proposal, please leave comments on the review. Thank you, brian

3 2

[neutron] BaGPipe experiences
by Michael Richardson 13 Nov '20

13 Nov '20

Hi all, Is anyone using the BaGPipe driver[0] in production? Any comments, experiences, config. recommendations, war stories, tales of caution you would like to share? Cheers, Michael [0] https://docs.openstack.org/networking-bagpipe/latest/ -- Michael Richardson Catalyst Cloud || Catalyst IT Limited https://catalystcloud.nz/ GPG: 0530 4686 F996 4E2C 5DC7 6327 5C98 5EED A30

3 2

Re: Cannot deploly an instance at a specific host --(no such host found) [nova]
by Pavlos Basaras 13 Nov '20

13 Nov '20

Hello, thanks very much for your prompt reply. regarding the first command "nova-manage cell_v2 list_hosts" the output is the following (openstack is the host of the controller). I dont see any other node here, even when i execute the discover_hosts command +-----------+--------------------------------------+-----------+ | Cell Name | Cell UUID | Hostname | +-----------+--------------------------------------+-----------+ | cell1 | 1522c22f-64d4-4882-8ae8-ed0f9407407c | openstack | +-----------+--------------------------------------+-----------+ Also this is the output from my controller when i use the command: sudo -s /bin/sh -c "nova-manage cell_v2 discover_hosts --verbose" nova (not sure if this helps) Found 2 cell mappings. Skipping cell0 since it does not contain hosts. Getting computes from cell 'cell1': 1522c22f-64d4-4882-8ae8-ed0f9407407c Found 0 unmapped computes in cell: 1522c22f-64d4-4882-8ae8-ed0f9407407c any thoughts? best, Pavlos.

2 7

[neutron] Drivers meeting agenda
by Slawek Kaplonski 13 Nov '20

13 Nov '20

Hi, For tomorrow's drivers meeting we have one item in the "On Demand" section. It's added by Oleg and is related to the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ neutron/+bug/1887523/ So lets meet tomorrow and discuss about that. See You on the meeting :) -- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat

1 0