October 2020 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[kolla][ptg] Kolla Wallaby priorities
by Mark Goddard 23 Nov '20

23 Nov '20

Hi, Thanks to everyone who attended the Kolla PTG sessions, we covered a lot of ground. The Etherpad is available at [1]. I wrote an email [2] summarising the discussions. I have moved candidate work items across to a second Etherpad [2] for voting on. Now is the time to vote! Please add your name against a maximum of 12 items across the 3 deliverables (kolla, kolla-ansible, kayobe) in the priorities [2] Etherpad. Anyone in the community is welcome to vote. [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/kolla-wallaby-ptg [2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-October/018445.… [3] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/kolla-wallaby-priorities Thanks, Mark

1 3

[release] Meeting Time Poll
by Herve Beraud 19 Nov '20

19 Nov '20

Hello We have a few regular attendees of the Release Management meeting who have conflicts with the current meeting time. As a result, we would like to find a new time to hold the meeting. I've created a Doodle poll[1] for everyone to give their input on times. It's mostly limited to times that reasonably overlap the working day in the US and Europe since that's where most of our attendees are located. If you attend the Release Management meeting, please fill out the poll so we can hopefully find a time that works better for everyone. Thanks! [1] https://doodle.com/poll/7zgvfb8ne54bwhzw -- Hervé Beraud Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat irc: hberaud https://github.com/4383/ https://twitter.com/4383hberaud -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsFcBAABCAAQBQJb4AwCCRAHwXRBNkGNegAALSkQAHrotwCiL3VMwDR0vcja10Q+ Kf31yCutl5bAlS7tOKpPQ9XN4oC0ZSThyNNFVrg8ail0SczHXsC4rOrsPblgGRN+ RQLoCm2eO1AkB0ubCYLaq0XqSaO+Uk81QxAPkyPCEGT6SRxXr2lhADK0T86kBnMP F8RvGolu3EFjlqCVgeOZaR51PqwUlEhZXZuuNKrWZXg/oRiY4811GmnvzmUhgK5G 5+f8mUg74hfjDbR2VhjTeaLKp0PhskjOIKY3vqHXofLuaqFDD+WrAy/NgDGvN22g glGfj472T3xyHnUzM8ILgAGSghfzZF5Skj2qEeci9cB6K3Hm3osj+PbvfsXE/7Kw m/xtm+FjnaywZEv54uCmVIzQsRIm1qJscu20Qw6Q0UiPpDFqD7O6tWSRKdX11UTZ hwVQTMh9AKQDBEh2W9nnFi9kzSSNu4OQ1dRMcYHWfd9BEkccezxHwUM4Xyov5Fe0 qnbfzTB1tYkjU78loMWFaLa00ftSxP/DtQ//iYVyfVNfcCwfDszXLOqlkvGmY1/Y F1ON0ONekDZkGJsDoS6QdiUSn8RZ2mHArGEWMV00EV5DCIbCXRvywXV43ckx8Z+3 B8qUJhBqJ8RS2F+vTs3DTaXqcktgJ4UkhYC2c1gImcPRyGrK9VY0sCT+1iA+wp/O v6rDpkeNksZ9fFSyoY2o =ECSj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 1

[SDK][OSC] Meeting Times
by Kendall Nelson 16 Nov '20

16 Nov '20

Hello! In the PTG session today we talked about doing some sort of regular meetings to kind of jump start things after the more recent lack of activity. We discussed beginning with more frequent meetings (a couple across the next few weeks) and then shifting to a more relaxed monthly cadence. I propose 15:00 UTC on the third thursday of each month as our monthly meeting time? If people agree, I will propose a patch :) As for the more frequent ones to keep the momentum from discussion from this week/last week. We could use that time (15 UTC) and date (Thursdays) and maybe just do them on Nov 12 and 19th to keep us moving? That gives us next week to catch up/ take a breath from the last two weeks, but not waiting till after the US Thanksgiving holiday. Let me know what you think! -Kendall Nelson (diablo_rojo)

4 6

CloudKitty deployment on Train and/or Ussuri
by Thode Jocelyn 16 Nov '20

16 Nov '20

Hi, I was looking at the possibilities to have Rating-as-A-Service in our Openstack (currently train but planning to move to Ussuri) and I stumbled upon CloudKitty. I'm currently facing multiple issues with cloudkitty itself and with openstack-ansible. (We are using a containerized deployment with LXC) * I noticed that openstack-ansible has no playbook yet to install a service like CloudKitty even though starting from Ussuri it was added in the ansible-role-requirements.yml. I have created a small patch to be able to install CloudKitty via openstack-ansible and if this is of interest I could potentially submit a PR with this. * The os_cloudkitty role seems to kinda work and only with a relatively old version of CloudKitty. For example, here : https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cloudkitty/src/branch/st… since CloudKitty v8.0.0 the section should be named "[fetcher_keystone]", but I found no information as to which CloudKitty version should be used with this role. Does someone have any recommendation as to which version should be used and if there is any interest in improving the role to support more recent versions of CloudKitty? * Even when tweaking the configuration and installing v7.0.0 of Cloudkitty it only fixes cloudkitty-processor, I was never able to make cloudkitty-api work I always get an error like "Fatal Python error: Py_Initialize: Unable to get the locale encoding ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'encodings'". Any input on this would be greatly appreciated. Cheers Jocelyn

4 5

[neutron][stable]Proposing Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez as a stable branches core reviewer
by Slawek Kaplonski 06 Nov '20

06 Nov '20

Hi, I would like to propose Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez (ralonsoh) to be new member of the Neutron stable core team. Rodolfo works in Neutron since very long time. He is core reviewer in master branch already. During last few cycles he also proved his ability to help with stable branches. He is proposing many backports from master to our stable branches as well as doing reviews of other backports. He has knowledge about stable branches policies. I think that he will be great addition to our (not too big) stable core team. I will open this nomination open for a week to get feedback about it. -- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat

6 6

[openstack][ptg][InteropWG] : Conclusion of InteropWG session 10/26 - next one will be 10/30
by prakash RAMCHANDRAN 06 Nov '20

06 Nov '20

Hi all My apology on the delayed start and here is the items we went over on first session. Refer : https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/interop-wallaby-ptg (Monday 10/26 recorded the meeting for everyone to see, its cloud recording and will know from PTG hosts where they have that?) Summary:1. Plan to Complete Victoria guidelines specs for interop in 2-6 weeks depending on adding new [OpenStack Powered File System Branding as Add-on Program] - last Ussuri guidelines are at https://opendev.org/osf/interop/src/branch/master/2020.06.json New one will be 2020.10.json to be added - For existing integrated modules [ Core OpenStack services including identity, compute, networking, block storage, and object storage ] - for two existing add-ons [Orchestration (heat) , DNS (designate) "Not a core capability, add-on program is available" - This is for Manila Filesystem add-on https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/wallaby-ptg-manila-interop "Not a core capability, add-on program to be made available" We have one more opportunity on 10/30 slot at the end of PTG if BMaaS (Ironic) if Julia has any proposals, besides (Open Infra Kata + Docker) Container has additional proposal community is working on. Look forward to seeing you all on October 30 as what the Road-map will look like for 2020 and 2021 going forward. ThanksPrakash On Monday, October 26, 2020, 06:09:00 AM PDT, Goutham Pacha Ravi <gouthampravi(a)gmail.com> wrote: Hi Prakash, We're here: https://zoom.us/j/92649902134?pwd=a01aMXl6ZlNEZDlsMjJMTGNMVUp1UT09 On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 6:06 AM prakash RAMCHANDRAN <pramchan(a)yahoo.com> wrote: https://meetpad.opendev.org/Interop-WG-weekly-meeting

3 5

Editing libvirt xml file
by vladimir franciz blando 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

Hi, I edited the libvirt xml (virsh edit...) file of a running Windows server instance because I changed the video model type from cirrus to vmvga so it can support a higher resolution on a console (cirrus supports up to 1280 only). After editing, i "soft-rebooted" the instance and the new configuration sticks. That's awesome. But when you do a "hard-reboot" it will revert back to the original config. I also tried to do a "shut-down" then "start" again, but it still reads the original config. Not sure where it is reading the config from... Regards Vlad

3 5

[ptl] Victoria Release Community Meeting
by helena＠openstack.org 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

Hi Everyone, We are looking to do a community meeting following The Open Infrastructure Summit and PTG to discuss the Victoria Release. If you’re a PTL, please let me know if you’re interested in doing a prerecorded explanation of your project’s key features for the release. We will show a compilation of these recordings at the community meeting and follow it with a live Q&A session. Post community meeting we will have this recording live in the project navigator. Cheers, Helena

8 10

[tripleo][ci] Monday Nov 2
by Wesley Hayutin 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

Greetings, The tripleo ci team has identified a handful of patches that we'd like to land prior to Nov 2, the day docker.io goes away. We've hit some new bugs and have also tuned a few things to try and make sure we can get patches to merge. Our current focus is across master, victoria, ussuri and centos-8 train, and queens while reducing coverage in rocky and stein. A list of the prioritized gerrit reviews can be found here: https://hackmd.io/MlbZ_izSTEuZsCWTJvu_Kg?view The entire topic can be found here: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:new-ci-job Thanks all.

4 4

[placement][nova][cinder][neutron][blazar] Placement governance switch(back)
by Stephen Finucane 03 Nov '20

03 Nov '20

Placement has been a separate project with its own governance since Stein [1]. Since then, the main drivers behind the separation have moved onto pastures new and with Tetsuro sadly declaring his non- candidacy for the PTL position for Wallaby [2], we're left in the unenviable position of potentially not having a PTL for the Wallaby cycle. As such, it's probably time to discuss the future of Placement governance. Assuming no one steps forward for the Placement PTL role, it would appear to me that we have two options. Either we look at transitioning Placement to a PTL-less project, or we move it back under nova governance. To be honest, given how important placement is to nova and other projects now, I'm uncomfortable with the idea of not having a point person who is ultimately responsible for things like cutting a release (yes, delegation is encouraged but someone needs to herd the cats). At the same time, I do realize that placement is used by more that nova now so nova cores and what's left of the separate placement core team shouldn't be the only ones making this decision. So, assuming the worst happens and placement is left without a PTL for Victoria, what do we want to do? Stephen PS: Apologies if I missed other projects with an interest in placement. I did try to catch them all /o\ [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-February/002575… [2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-September/01749…

8 10