August 2019 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[nova][keystone][neutron][kuryr][requirements] breaking tests with new library versions
by Matthew Thode 11 Sep '19

11 Sep '19

NOVA: lxml===4.4.1 nova tests fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1838666 websockify===0.9.0 tempest test failing KEYSTONE: oauthlib===3.1.0 keystone https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1839393 NEUTRON: tenacity===5.1.1 https://2c976b5e9e9a7bed9985-82d79a041e998664bd1d0bc4b6e78332.ssl.cf2.rackc… this could be caused by pytest===5.1.0 as well KURYR: kubernetes===10.0.1 openshift PINS this, only kuryr-tempest-plugin deps on it https://review.opendev.org/665352 MISC: tornado===5.1.1 salt is cauing this, no eta on fix (same as the last year) stestr===2.5.0 needs merged https://github.com/mtreinish/stestr/pull/265 jsonschema===3.0.2 see https://review.opendev.org/649789 I'm trying to get this in place as we are getting closer to the requirements freeze (sept 9th-13th). Any help clearing up these bugs would be appreciated. -- Matthew Thode

7 18

[mistral] Publish field in workflow tasks
by Ali Abdelal 09 Sep '19

09 Sep '19

Hello, Currently, there are two "publish" fields, one in the task(regular "publish")-the scope is branch and not global, and another under "on-success", “on-error” or “on-complete”. In the current behavior, regular "publish" is ignored if there is "publish" under "on-success", “on-error” or “on-complete” [1]. For example:- (a) version: '2.0' wf1: tasks: t1: publish: res_x1: 1 on-success: publish: branch: res_x2: 2 (b) version: '2.0' wf2: tasks: t1: publish: res_x1: 1 "res_x1" won't be published in (a), but it will in (b). We can either:- 1) Invalidate such syntax. 2) Merge the two publishes together and if there are duplicate keys, there are two options:- a) What takes priority is what's in publish under "on-success" or “on-error” or “on-complete. b) Not allow having a duplicate. What is your opinion? And please tell us if you have other suggestions. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bug/1791449

2 1

[all][tc] PDF Community Goal Update
by Akihiro Motoki 06 Sep '19

06 Sep '19

Hi all, I would like to share the status of the PDF community goal. We made great progresses these two weeks. Highlights ---------- It is time for working on the PDF community goal in your project! - openstack-tox-docs job supports PDF build now. AJaeger and I worked on the job support of PDF doc build and publishing and have completed it. - We confirmed PDF build with the sphinx latex builder works for several major projects like nova, cinder and neutron. The approach with the latex builder should work for most projects. - First PDF doc is now published from the i18n project. How to get started ------------------ - "How to get started" section in the PDF goal etherpad [1] explains the minimum steps. You can find useful examples there too. - To build PDF docs locally, you need to install LaTex related packages. See "To test locally" in the etherpad [1]. - If you hit problems during PDF build, check the common problems etherpad [2]. We are collecting knowledges there. - If you have questions, feel free to ask #openstack-doc IRC channel. Also Please sign up your name to "Project volunteers" in [1]. Useful links ------------ [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/train-pdf-support-goal [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/pdf-goal-train-common-problems [3] Ongoing reviews: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:build-pdf-docs+(status:open+OR+status:… Thanks, Akihiro Motoki (amotoki)

9 15

[tripleo] Proposing Damien Ciabrini as core on TripleO/HA
by Michele Baldessari 06 Sep '19

06 Sep '19

Hi all, Damien (dciabrin on IRC) has always been very active in all HA things in TripleO and I think it is overdue for him to have core rights on this topic. So I'd like to propose to give him core permissions on any HA-related code in TripleO. Please vote here and in a week or two we can then act on this. Thanks, -- Michele Baldessari <michele(a)acksyn.org> C2A5 9DA3 9961 4FFB E01B D0BC DDD4 DCCB 7515 5C6D

16 15

[keystone][edge] Edge Hacking Days - August 16
by Ildiko Vancsa 04 Sep '19

04 Sep '19

Hi, It is a friendly reminder that we are having the second edge hacking days in August this Friday (August 16). The dial-in information is the same, you can find the details here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/osf-edge-hacking-days If you’re interested in joining please __add your name and the time period (with time zone) when you will be available__ on these dates. You can also add topics that you would be interested in working on. We will keep on working on two items: * Keystone to Keystone federation testing in DevStack * Building the centralized edge reference architecture on Packet HW using TripleO Please let me know if you have any questions. See you on Friday! :) Thanks, Ildikó

1 1

[Horizon] [stable] Adding Radomir Dopieralski to horizon-stable-maint
by Ivan Kolodyazhny 03 Sep '19

03 Sep '19

Hi team, I'd like to propose adding Radomir Dopieralski to the horizon-stable-maint team. He's doing good quality reviews for stable branches [1] on a regular basis and I think Radomir will be a good member of our small group. [1] https://review.opendev.org/#/q/reviewer:openstack%2540sheep.art.pl+NOT+bran… Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny, http://blog.e0ne.info/

2 2

[keystone] Weekly meeting for September 3rd 2019
by Morgan Fainberg 03 Sep '19

03 Sep '19

As of this time, we are planning to skip the keystone weekly meeting for 2019-09-03. This is to allow for work to continue with less interruption as well as US-based folks who have Labor Day (2019-09-02 this year) off to continue to make progress in light of the abbreviated week. As always, please feel free to join us on irc (freenode) in #openstack-keystone if you have any questions. I am also available (irc nic: kmalloc ). Cheers, --Morgan

1 1

[tc] Gradually reduce TC to 11 members over 2020
by Thierry Carrez 03 Sep '19

03 Sep '19

Hi everyone, The size of the TC is a trade-off between getting enough community representation and keeping enough members engaged and active. The current size (13 members) was defined by in 2013, as we moved from 5 directly-elected seats + all PTLs (which would have been 14 people) to a model that could better cope with our explosive growth. Since then, 13 has worked well, to ensure that new blood could come in at every cycle. I would argue that today, there are far less need to get wide representation in the TC (we are pretty aligned), and less difficulty to enter the TC (there is more turnover). In 2019 OpenStack, 13 members is a rather large group. It is becoming difficult to find 13 people able to commit to a significant amount of time over the coming year. And it is difficult to keep all those 13 members active and engaged. IMHO it is time to reduce the TC to 11 members, which sounds like a more reasonable and manageable size. We should encourage people to stop for a while and come back, rather than burn too many people at the same time. We should encourage more people to watch from the sidelines, rather than have a group so large that everyone that can be in it is in it. This would not be a big-bang change, just something we would gradually put in place over the next year. My strawman plan would be as follows: - Sept. 2019 election: no change, elect 6 seats as planned - Feb. 2020 election: elect 6 seats instead of 7 - Sept. 2020 election: elect 5 seats instead of 6 - Then elect 6 seats at every start-of-year and 5 at every end-of-year That would result in TC membership sizes: - U cycle (Q4 2019/Q1 2020): 13 members - V cycle (Q2/Q3 2020): 12 members - W cycle (Q4 2020/Q1 2021): 11 members - after that: 11 members FWIW, I intend to not run for reelection in the Feb 2020 election, so nobody else has to sacrifice their seat to that reform for that election :) Thoughts? -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)

13 18

[tc] not seeking reelection
by Lance Bragstad 02 Sep '19

02 Sep '19

Hi all, Now that the nomination period is open for TC candidates, I'd like to say that I won't be running for a second term on the TC. My time on the TC has enriched my understanding of open-source communities and I appreciate all the time people put into helping me get up-to-speed. I wish the best of luck to folks putting their hat in the ring this week! Thanks all, Lance

5 4

[tc][elections] Not seeking re-election to TC
by Julia Kreger 02 Sep '19

02 Sep '19

Greetings everyone, I wanted to officially let everyone know that I will not be running for re-election to the TC. I have enjoyed serving on the TC for the past two years. Due to some changes in my personal and professional lives, It will not be possible for me to serve during this next term. Thanks everyone! -Julia

8 7