July 2019 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[nova-lxd] no one uses nova-lxd?
by Adrian Andreias 10 Aug '19

10 Aug '19

Hey, We were planing to migrate some thousand containers from OpenVZ 6 to Nova-LXD this fall and I know at least one company with the same plans. I read the message about current team retiring from the project. Unfortunately we don't have the manpower to invest heavily in the project development. We would however be able to allocate a few hours per month, at least for bug fixing. So I'm curios if there are organizations using or planning to use Nova-LXD in production and they have the know-how and time to contribute. It would be a pity if the the project dies. Cheers! - Adrian Andreias https://fleio.com

5 5

[ironic][ops] Taking ironic nodes out of production
by Arne Wiebalck 09 Aug '19

09 Aug '19

Dear all, One of the discussions at the PTG in Denver raised the need for a mechanism to take ironic nodes out of production (a task for which the currently available 'maintenance' flag does not seem appropriate [1]). The use case there is an unhealthy physical node in state 'active', i.e. associated with an instance. The request is then to enable an admin to mark such a node as 'faulty' or 'in quarantine' with the aim of not returning the node to the pool of available nodes once the hosted instance is deleted. A very similar use case which came up independently is node retirement: it should be possible to mark nodes ('active' or not) as being 'up for retirement' to prepare the eventual removal from ironic. As in the example above, ('active') nodes marked this way should not become eligible for instance scheduling again, but automatic cleaning, for instance, should still be possible. In an effort to cover these use cases by a more general "quarantine/retirement" feature: - are there additional use cases which could profit from such a "take a node out of service" mechanism? - would these use cases put additional constraints on how the feature should look like (e.g.: "should not prevent cleaning") - are there other characteristics such a feature should have (e.g.: "finding these nodes should be supported by the cli") Let me know if you have any thoughts on this. Cheers, Arne [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DEN-train-ironic-ptg, l. 360

5 7

[kolla][nova][cinder] Got Gateway-Timeout error on VM evacuation if it has volume attached.
by Eddie Yen 09 Aug '19

09 Aug '19

Hi everyone, I met an issue when try to evacuate host. The platform is stable/rocky and using kolla-ansible to deploy. And all storage backends are connected to Ceph. Before I try to evacuate host, the source host had about 24 VMs running. When I shutdown the node and execute evacuation, there're few VMs failed. The error code is 504. Strange is those VMs are all attach its own volume. Then I check nova-compute log, a detailed error has pasted at below link; https://pastebin.com/uaE7YrP1 Does anyone have any experience with this? I googled but no enough information about this. Thanks!

5 14

[tripleo] Proposing Kevin Carter (cloudnull) for tripleo-ansible core
by Alex Schultz 08 Aug '19

08 Aug '19

Hey folks, I'd like to propose Kevin as a core for the tripleo-ansible repo (e.g. tripleo-ansible-core). He has made excellent progress centralizing our ansible roles and improving the testing around them. Please reply with your approval/objections. If there are no objections, we'll add him to tripleo-ansible-core next Friday Aug 2, 2019. Thanks, -Alex

11 11

[neutron] OpenvSwitch firewall sctp getting dropped
by thuanlk＠viettel.com.vn 07 Aug '19

07 Aug '19

I have installed Openstack Queens on CentOs 7 with OvS and I recently used the native openvswitch firewall to implement SecusiryGroup. The native OvS firewall seems to work just fine with TCP/UDP traffic but it does not forward any SCTP traffic going to the VMs no matter how I change the security groups, But it run if i disable port security completely or use iptables_hybrid firewall driver. What do I have to do to allow SCTP packets to reach the VMs?

4 7

Slow instance launch times due to RabbitMQ
by Grant Morley 07 Aug '19

07 Aug '19

Hi all, We are randomly seeing slow instance launch / deletion times and it appears to be because of RabbitMQ. We are seeing a lot of these messages in the logs for Nova and Neutron: ERROR oslo.messaging._drivers.impl_rabbit [-] [f4ab3ca0-b837-4962-95ef-dfd7d60686b6] AMQP server on 10.6.2.212:5671 is unreachable: Too many heartbeats missed. Trying again in 1 seconds. Client port: 37098: ConnectionForced: Too many heartbeats missed The RabbitMQ cluster isn't under high load and I am not seeing any packets drop over the network when I do some tracing. We are only running 15 compute nodes currently and have >1000 instances so it isn't a large deployment. Are there any good configuration tweaks for RabbitMQ running on OpenStack Queens? Many Thanks, -- Grant Morley Cloud Lead, Civo Ltd www.civo.com <https://www.civo.com/>| Signup for an account! <https://www.civo.com/signup>

7 9

[edge][all] Edge Hacking Days
by Ildiko Vancsa 06 Aug '19

06 Aug '19

Hi, I’m reaching out with an attempt to organize hacking days to work on edge related tasks. The idea is to get together remotely on IRC/Zoom or any other platform that supports remote communication and work on items like building and testing our reference architectures or work on some project specific items like in Keystone or Ironic. Here are Doodle polls for the next three months: August: https://doodle.com/poll/ucfc9w7iewe6gdp4 September: https://doodle.com/poll/3cyqxzr9vd82pwtr October: https://doodle.com/poll/6nzziuihs65hwt7b Please mark any day when you have some availability to dedicate to hack even if it’s not a full day. Please let me know if you have any questions. As a reminder you can find the edge computing group’s resources and information about latest activities here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Edge_Computing_Group Thanks and Best Regards, Ildikó (IRC: ildikov)

1 1

[ironic] Moving to office hours as opposed to weekly meetings for the next month
by Julia Kreger 06 Aug '19

06 Aug '19

Greetings Everyone! This week, during the weekly meeting, we seemed to reach consensus that we would try taking a break from meetings[0] and moving to orienting around using the mailing list[1] and our etherpad "whiteboard" [2]. With this, we're going to want to re-evaluate in about a month. I suspect it would be a good time for us to have a "mid-cycle" style set of topical calls. I've gone ahead and created a poll to try and identify a couple days that might be ideal for contributors[3]. But in the mean time, we want to ensure that we have some times for office hours. The suggestion was also made during this week's meeting that we may want to make the office hours window a little larger to enable more discussion. So when will we have office hours? ---------------------------------- Ideally we'll start with two time windows. One to provide coverage to US and Europe friendly time zones, and another for APAC contributors. * I think 2-4 PM UTC on Mondays would be ideal. This translates to 7-9 AM US-Pacific or 10 AM to 12 PM US-Eastern. * We need to determine a time window that would be ideal for APAC contributors. I've created a poll to help facilitate discussion[4]. So what is Office Hours? ------------------------ Office hours are a time window when we expect some contributors to be on IRC and able to partake in higher bandwidth discussions. These times are not absolute. They can change and evolve, and that is the most important thing for us to keep in mind. -- If there are any questions, Please let me know! Otherwise I'll send a summary email out on next Monday. -Julia [0]: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2019/ironic.2019-07-01-15.00… [1]: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-June/007038.html [2]: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IronicWhiteBoard [3]: https://doodle.com/poll/652gzta6svsda343 [4]: https://doodle.com/poll/2ta5vbskytpntmgv

2 4

Re: [telemetry] Team meeting agenda for tomorrow
by Joseph Davis 05 Aug '19

05 Aug '19

On 5/8/19 7:12 AM, openstack-discuss-request(a)lists.openstack.org wrote: > Hello Trinh, > Where does the meeting happen? Will it be via IRC Telemetry channel? Or, in > the Etherpad (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/telemetry-meeting-agenda)? I > would like to discuss and understand a bit better the context behind > the Telemetry > events deprecation. Unfortunately, I have a conflict at that time and will not be able to attend. I do have a little bit of context on the Events deprecation to share. First, you will note the commit message from the commit [0] when Events were deprecated: " Deprecate event subsystem This subsystem has never been finished and is not maintained. Deprecate it for future removal. " I got the impression from jd at the time that there were a number of features in Telemetry, including Panko, that were not really "finished" and that the engineers who had worked on them had moved on to other things, so the features had become unsupported. In late 2018 there was an effort to clean up things that were not well maintained or didn't fit the direction of Telemetry. See also: https://julien.danjou.info/lessons-from-openstack-telemetry-deflation/ Events is one feature that often gets requested, but the use cases and demand for it are not expressed strongly or well understood by most people. If the Telemetry project has demand to de-deprecate Event handling (including Panko), I'd suggest a review of the requirements for event handling and possibly choosing a champion for maintaining the Panko service. Also note: over in Monasca we have a spec [1] for handling Events ingestion which I hope we will be completing in Train. Contributions and comments welcome. :) joseph [0] https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/commit/8a0245a5b3e1357d35ad6653be37… [1] https://github.com/openstack/monasca-specs/blob/master/specs/stein/approved… > > On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 12:19 AM Trinh Nguyen<dangtrinhnt(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi team, >> >> As planned, we will have a team meeting at 02:00 UTC, May 9th on >> #openstack-telemetry to discuss what we gonna do for the next milestone >> (Train-1) and continue what we left off from the last meeting. >> >> I put here [1] the agenda thinking that it should be fine for an hour >> meeting. If you have anything to talk about, please put it there too. >> >> [1]https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/telemetry-meeting-agenda >> >> >> Bests, >> >> -- >> *Trinh Nguyen* >> *www.edlab.xyz<https://www.edlab.xyz>* >> >>

14 25

stestr Python 2 Support
by Matthew Treinish 05 Aug '19

05 Aug '19

Hi Everyone, I just wanted to send a quick update about the state of python 2 support in stestr, since OpenStack is the largest user of the project. With the recent release of stestr 2.4.0 we've officially deprecated the python 2.7 support in stestr. It will emit a DeprecationWarning whenever it's run from the CLI with python 2.7 now. The plan (which is not set in stone) is that we will be pushing a 3.0.0 release that removes the python 2 support and compat code from stestr sometime in early 2020 (definitely after the Python 2.7 EoL on Jan. 1st). I don't believe this conflicts with the current Python version support plans in OpenStack [1] but just wanted to make sure people were aware so that there are no surprises when stestr stops working with Python 2 in 3.0.0. Thanks, -Matt Treinish [1] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20180529-python2-deprecatio…

3 3