April 2019 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[placement][ptg] Allocation Partitioning
by Chris Dent 17 Apr '19

17 Apr '19

>From the etherpad [1]: * do we need this? * what is it? * who is going to drive it? As as I recall, allocation partitioning (distinct from resource provider partitioning) is a way of declaring that a set of allocations below to a specific service. This is useful as a way, for example, of counting instances spawned via nova. Right now it is possible to count vcpus, ram and disk but if something besides nova is making allocations using those resource classes how do we distinguish? Of course it's important to also ask "should we distinguish?". If there's a concept of unified limits does it matter whether a VCPU is consume by _this_ nova or something else if they are consumed by the same user? This functionality is closely tied to resource provider partitioning. In a complex placement scenario, where placement is managing multiple instance spawning tools, in multiple cloud-like things, it seems like both would be needed. The ongoing work to implement quota counting in placement [2] has a workaround for instances not being counted in placement, but the "more than one nova per placement" limitation has to be documented. How urgent is this? Is there anyone available to do the work this cycle? How damaging is it to punt to U? What details are missing in the above description? [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/placement-ptg-train [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/count-quota-usage-from-placement -- Chris Dent ٩◔̯◔۶ https://anticdent.org/ freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent

7 26

[tripleo][openstack-ansible] collaboration on os_tempest role update XIX - Apr 16, 2019
by Chandan kumar 17 Apr '19

17 Apr '19

Hello, Here is the 19th update (Apr 10 to Apr 06, 2019) on collaboration on os_tempest[1] role between TripleO and OpenStack-Ansible projects. Highlights of the week: * os_tempest user guide is now published here: https://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/stein/user/index.ht… * os_tempest role now have debian support. * In tripleo side, all standalone and standalone scenario [1-4] periodics jobs are consuming os_tempest to run tempest in CI Thanks to mnaser for debian support, mkopec, noonedeadpunk for user guide & Arx for porting all standalone periodic jobs to os_tempest Things got merged: os_tempest: * os_tempest user guide: https://review.openstack.org/644570 * debian: add ci and update meta : https://review.openstack.org/652346 tripleo: * Port base standalone job to os_tempest - https://review.rdoproject.org/r/20061 * Port standalone scenario01 to os_tempest - https://review.rdoproject.org/r/19916 * Port scenario002-standalone-master to os_tempest - https://review.rdoproject.org/r/20059 * Port scenario003-standalone-master to os_tempest - https://review.rdoproject.org/r/20037 * Port scenario004-standalone-master to os_tempest - https://review.rdoproject.org/r/20140 * Port standalone full tempest job to os_tempest - https://review.rdoproject.org/r/20203 Things in Progress: os_tempest: * Make smoke tests as a default whitelist tests - https://review.openstack.org/652060 * Enable support for novajoin tempest plugin - https://review.openstack.org/652986 tripleo: * Enable os_tempest in baremetal-full-overcloud-validate playbook - https://review.openstack.org/652983 * Run novajoin tempest tests in all TLS job using os_tempest - https://review.openstack.org/639324 What's coming? Once we have tripleo master promotion, we will update the tripleo ci upstream job config to os_tempest We will be continue working on current os_tempest patches. Here is the 18th update [2]. Have queries, Feel free to ping us on #tripleo or #openstack-ansible channel. Links: [1.] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest [2.] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-April/004878.ht… Thanks, Chandan Kumar

1 1

[vitrage][ptg] Vitrage PTG etherpad
by Ifat Afek 17 Apr '19

17 Apr '19

Hi, I created an etherpad for discussion topics for the Vitrage PTG, which will be held on Friday morning, May 3rd. Feel free to comment or add other topics. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/vitrage-train-ptg Thanks, Ifat

1 0

Routed networks and FIP gateway assignments
by Syd Logan 17 Apr '19

17 Apr '19

I'm currently learning about routed networks and have a lab that is implementing a 3 tier leaf spine and have a question. I know that I can create a subnet from which FIP gateway IP addresses are consumed, e.g., openstack subnet create demo-floating-ip-agent-gateway-subnet \ --subnet-range 198.51.100.0/24 --no-dhcp \ --service-type 'network:floatingip_agent_gateway' \ --network demo-ext-net In videos from past OpenStack summits such as this https://youtu.be/XnXSwCSHc4U drawings show that the subnet is used within a single segment's compute nodes, and I can believe that would work. What isn't clear is whether the same subnet should be used across multiple segments, or the intent is for each segment defined in the routed network to have a unique subnet from which these FIP gateway IPs are assigned, e.g., some other segment would be using, say 198.52.100.0/24. In the non-routed network setup where I leanred about DVR it was pretty clear only one subnet was allowed, but what is the best practice/intent for routed nets? Thanks. syd

1 0

[Zun] Openstack Rocky Appcontainer start error
by Navdeep Uniyal 17 Apr '19

17 Apr '19

Dear All, I am getting following error while trying to start the ubuntu container Command: openstack appcontainer run --name containerA --net network=5guknet ubuntu ping 8.8.8.8 Error: status_reason | Docker internal error: 500 Server Error: Internal Server Error ("legacy plugin: Post http://127.0.0.1:23750/Plugin.Activate: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:23750: connect: connection refused"). Secondly, with Heat Template: heat_template_version: 2015-04-30 resources: the_resource: type: OS::Zun::Container properties: cpu: 4 image: ubuntu image_pull_policy: "ifnotpresent" interactive: true memory: 2048 name: "ubuntu16" command: "ping 8.8.8.8" networks: [{"network": 5guknet}] restart_policy: "no" The command I can see on the appcontainer show is : command | [u'p', u'i', u'n', u'g', u' ', u'8', u'.', u'8', u'.', u'8', u'.', u'8'] Please advise how to resolve the two issues. Kind Regards, Navdeep

2 1

[neutron] Cleaning in Neutron
by Slawomir Kaplonski 17 Apr '19

17 Apr '19

Hi, I just run abandon_old_reviews.sh [1] script again for neutron, neutron-lib and neutron-tempest-plugin repositories. So if You have Your patch abandoned but You want to continue to work on it, please simple restore it or if You can’t restore it by self, please ping me on irc (slaweq) and I will restore it for You. [1] https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/tools/abandon_old_reviews.… — Slawek Kaplonski Senior software engineer Red Hat

3 3

[stackalytics] Reported numbers seem inaccurate
by Sergey Nikitin 17 Apr '19

17 Apr '19

Hello everyone, As you mentioned there are some inaccuracies in stats on stackalytics.com. It happened because of outdated Prod env. At this moment we are in a process of migration to the new env. All data on this env is fresh and accurate. So the problem will be solved soon. -- Best Regards, Sergey Nikitin

2 1

[gentoo] Looking for members to help maintain OpenStack packages on Gentoo
by Matthew Thode 16 Apr '19

16 Apr '19

I'm considering disbanding the Gentoo OpenStack project and switching to sole maintainership of the project. So far I'm the only active maintianer in the project that I can see. I'm looking for others that are interested in helping maintain the openstack ebuilds. It's fairly easy as an ongoing thing with two major releases a year (which starts an update of 160 or so packages). It's python based and I've found maintaining the ebuilds to be very easy individually if that helps. There are other actions that'd be helpful as well. Some arm64 stage work (catalyst builds these) to then do some arm64 diskimage-builder work to work on building VM images for other arches (openstack or 'vanilla'). Please respond if you are intrested in joining. I've also emailed the Gentoo developer list separately with the same request. Thanks, -- Matthew Thode

1 0

[tripleo][ptg] Initial PTG schedule
by Alex Schultz 16 Apr '19

16 Apr '19

Hey folks, I've taken the topics from the previously announced etherpad[0] and put together a basic schedule for Thursday-Saturday. Please take a moment to review https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ptg-train and let me know if there are any issues with the timing. We have some extra time most days if we need to shift things around. Thanks, -Alex [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-train-topics

2 2

[placement][ptg] Keeping osc-placement healthy
by Chris Dent 16 Apr '19

16 Apr '19

>From the etherpad [1]: * It is behind (in microversions) and sometimes hard to remember * It's functional tests require a working devstack, which is a bit meh * Maybe something like https://vcrpy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ could help (reasonable given microversions) * (edleafe) It might be useful to have an osc-placement lead (czar? princess? mayor?) who can devote some of their time to this and help coordinate others. I might be able to rustle up some cycles. Not much to add to the above. What additional ideas to people have. Who (in addition to Ed) has some time to care about osc-placement? What do people think of vcrpy? What else? [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/placement-ptg-train -- Chris Dent ٩◔̯◔۶ https://anticdent.org/ freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent

3 8