October 2019 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[tripleo] TripleO CI Summary: Sprint 37
by Rafael Folco 14 Oct '19

14 Oct '19

Greetings, The TripleO CI team has just completed Sprint 37 / Unified Sprint 16 (Sep 19 thru Oct 09). The following is a summary of completed work during this sprint cycle: - Started Train release branching prep work and bootstrapped a centos8 nodepool node. - Designed and implemented tests for verifying changes in the promotion server. - Added multi-arch support w/ manifests to container push in the promoter code. - Designed a test strategy for building and running jobs in zuul on ceph-ansible and podman repositories against pull requests on Github. The planned work for the next sprint [1] are: - Complete the manifest implementation with a test strategy for not breaking promotion workflow. - Improve tests for verifying a full promotion workflow running on the staging environment. - Implement CI jobs in zuul to build and run tests against ceph-ansible and podman pull requests in github. - Close-out Train release branching preparation work. - Address required changes for building a CentOS8 node for upcoming distro release support across TripleO CI jobs. The Ruck and Rover for this sprint are Rafael Folco (rfolco) and Marios Andreou (marios). Please direct questions or queries to them regarding CI status or issues in #tripleo, ideally to whomever has the ‘|ruck’ suffix on their nick. Ruck/rover notes are being tracked in etherpad [2]. Thanks, rfolco [1] https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/taskboard/unified-sprint-17 [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ruckroversprint17

1 0

[neutron] Bug deputy report - week of October 7th
by Slawek Kaplonski 14 Oct '19

14 Oct '19

Hi, I was on bug deputy last week. It was really quiet week. Below is summary of new bugs reported: Critical test_update_firewall_calls_get_dvr_hosts_for_router failure on rocky - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1847019 - patch is already proposed https://review.opendev.org/#/c/687085/ Medium Loading neutron-lib internationalized file - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1847586 - fix proposed already https://review.opendev.org/687861 Low '--sql' option of neutron-db-manage does not work - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1847210 Undecided l3-agent stops processing router updates - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1847203 - I asked some additional questions there but would be also good if some L3 experts could take a look into that, Incomplete cannot reuse floating IP as port's fixed-ip - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1847763 - I think it’s for Calico project but lets wait until reporter clarify that RFEs [RFE] create option in neutron.conf to disable designate+neutron consistency - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1847068 Others [RPC] digging RPC timeout for client and server - https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+bug/1847747 - More oslo_messaging issue IMO, neutron added only as impacted project. — Slawek Kaplonski Senior software engineer Red Hat

1 0

[tc] Status update on naming our next releases
by Thierry Carrez 14 Oct '19

14 Oct '19

Hi, Following last week TC meeting, I took the action to summarize the situation and way forward of naming releases. Naming our U release was a bit of a painful process, mostly due to the subjectivity of the process, combined with a difficult combination of letter vs. naming criteria. It triggered proposals to change the naming process and/or criteria, as we expect similar difficulties with the rest of the alphabet. We did a first round of proposals that covered the V-Z part of the alphabet. A Condorcet poll was run to select the best options. The two best ones were then run in a new Condorcet poll against "keep things the same", and the result was a draw. It was a good indication that the TC membership found none of the proposals on the table was significantly better than keeping things the same, and therefore no change was effected. That said, it does not mean we should stop proposing new models, as the current system is flawed: its subjectivity combined with a popularity contest creates problems, and its criteria (strongly tied to event locations) will not work well in the future as we work to reduce the number of global events we run while increasing the number of local events. The way forward is as follows: proposals can still be made, but they should address "any foreseeable future". That means they need to explain how they will name the V-Z releases, but also how they will roll over past Z. TC members should rollcall-vote +1 on those proposals if they think they are better than keeping things the same. They can rollcall-vote -1 on the proposals for which they think keeping things the same would be better. If one proposal gets a majority of votes (seven +1s), then after the usual grace period of 3 calendar days, it should be approved (unless a competing proposals gathers *more* positive votes in the mean time). There is no deadline for proposing, even after one such proposal is approved. Those things can always be changed in the future. However I personally don't think we should change naming systems too often, because they are only fun if they become some sort of tradition. We currently have three proposals up: Cities with 100,000+ inhabitants, TC-only poll: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/677745/ Vancouver, then words present in movie quotes about "release": https://review.opendev.org/#/c/684688/ Vancouver, then cities with 100,000+ inhabitants, community poll: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/687764/ Cheers, -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)

1 0

[kolla] Support for removing previously enabled services..
by Laurent Dumont 14 Oct '19

14 Oct '19

Hey everyone, I'm pretty sure I know the answer but are there any support within Kolla itself to disable Services that we're previously enabled. For example, I was testing the Skydive Agent/Analyzer combo till I realized that it was using about 90-100% of the CPUs or computes and controllers. [image: image.png] Re-running Kolla with reconfigure but with Service set to "No" didn't remove the containers. I had to remove the containers after the reconfigure finished. This is Kolla 8.0.1 with a Stein install. Thanks!

4 4

[goals][IPv6-Only Deployments and Testing] Update
by Ghanshyam Mann 14 Oct '19

14 Oct '19

Hello Everyone, Below is the updated on IPv6 goal. All the projects have the ipv6 job patch proposed now. Next step is to review then as per mentioned guidelines below or help in debugging the failure. As stable/train is already cut for all the projects, we will keep merging the remaining projects listed below in Ussuri release. If your project is listed below, check the project patch and help in review/debug failure. Summary: The projects waiting for IPv6 job patch to merge: If patch is failing, help me to debug that otherwise review and merge. * Barbican * Tricircle * Vitrage * Zaqar * Glance * Monasca * Neutron stadium projects (added a more generic job for all. need debugging as few tests failing- https://review.opendev.org/#/c/686043/) * Qinling * Sahara * Searchlight * Senlin * Tacker * Ec2-Api * Freezer * Heat * Ironic * Karbor * kuryr-kubernetes (not yet ready for IPv6. as per IRC chat with dulek, IPv6 support is planned for ussuri cycle - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/682531/) * Magnum * Masakari * Mistral * Octavia (johnsom is working on this) Storyboard: ========= - https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2005477 IPv6 missing support found: ===================== 1. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/673397/ 2. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/673449/ 3. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/677524/ There are few more but need to be tracked. How you can help: ============== - Each project needs to look for and review the ipv6 job patch. - Verify it works fine on ipv6 and no ipv4 used in conf etc - Any other specific scenario needs to be added as part of project IPv6 verification. - Help on debugging and fix the bug in IPv6 job is failing. Everything related to this goal can be found under this topic: Topic: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:ipv6-only-deployment-and-testing+(stat… How to define and run new IPv6 Job on project side: ======================================= - I prepared a wiki page to describe this section - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Goal-IPv6-only-deployments-and-testing Review suggestion: ============== - Main goal of these jobs will be whether your service is able to listen on IPv6 and can communicate to any other services either OpenStack or DB or rabbitmq etc on IPv6 or not. So check your proposed job with that point of view. If anything missing, comment on patch. - One example was - I missed to configure novnc address to IPv6- https://review.opendev.org/#/c/672493/ - base script as part of 'devstack-tempest-ipv6' will do basic checks for endpoints on IPv6 and some devstack var setting. But if your project needs more specific verification then it can be added in project side job as post-run playbooks as described in wiki page[1]. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Goal-IPv6-only-deployments-and-testing

2 1

[image-encryption] No meeting today
by Josephine Seifert 14 Oct '19

14 Oct '19

Hi, unfortunately neither Markus (mhen) nor me can hold the meeting today. We will have our next meeting next monday. greetings Josephine (Luzi)

1 0

monitoring
by Ali Ebrahimpour 14 Oct '19

14 Oct '19

hi guys i want to install monitoring in my horizon Ui and i'm confused in setting up ceilometer or gnocchi or aodh or monasca in my project because all of them where deprecated. i setup openstack with ansible <https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/openstack-ansible/stein/>and i want to monitor the usage of cpu and ram and etc in my dashboard and i also want to know how much resources each customer used for one hour and day. Thanks in advance for your precise guidance.

1 0

[Trove] [Qinling] PTL on vacation
by Lingxian Kong 14 Oct '19

14 Oct '19

Hi all, I will be away from 15 Oct to 15 Nov. - Best regards, Lingxian Kong Catalyst Cloud

1 0

[Indian OpenStack User Group} Need Volunteer Mentors for Bangalore Friday Oct 18 10AM-4 PM
by prakash RAMCHANDRAN 13 Oct '19

13 Oct '19

Hi all, We have 150+ students and 3 classrooms & need technical mentors who can deliver following contentInformation about training OpenStack Docs: OpenStack Upstream Institute Training Content https://docs.openstack.org/upstream-training/upstream-training-content.html | | | | OpenStack Docs: OpenStack Upstream Institute | | | If you are in Bangalore (India) and your company allows you to fulfill your Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) or you are a motivated Professional ready to help Engineering Students please respond to highlighted link and RSVP so that Event Co-coordinators can reach you to seek your help. Alternate is you can contact madhuri.rai07 or ganesh.hiregaoudar or digambarpat all AT gamailDOTcom. Once again appreciate all the help from tech folks from Bangalore India, who have been instrumental in supporting OpenStack for last decade. ThanksPrakash RamchandranEvent Coordinator

1 0

[kolla][tacker][glance] Deployment of Tacker Train (VNF CSAR packages issues)
by Radosław Piliszek 12 Oct '19

12 Oct '19

Hello Tackers! Some time ago I reported a bug in Kolla-Ansible Tacker deployment [1] Eduardo (thanks!) did some debugging to discover that you started requiring internal Glance configuration for Tacker to make it use the local filesystem via the filestore backend (internally in Tacker, not via the deployed Glance) [2] This makes us, Koalas, wonder how to approach a proper production deployment of Tacker. Tacker docs have not been updated regarding this new feature and following them may result in broken Tacker deployment (as we have now). We are especially interested in how to deal with multinode Tacker deployment. Do these new paths require any synchronization? [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla-ansible/+bug/1845142 [2] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/684275/2/ansible/roles/tacker/templates/tack… Kind regards, Radek

2 2