Re: [legal-discuss] [openstack-dev] [javascript] [fuel-ui] Is ReactJS OSI Compliant?
Hey legal discuss folks ... On 09/07/2016 07:06 AM, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
Preface: IANAL (I-am-not-a-lawyer).
ReactJS claims to be BSD licensed. However, it has a non-BSD patent rider with a very aggressive "Strong Retaliation Clause", meaning that if there's ever a patent dispute between [React Project] and Facebook, the patents are revoked.
This might be fine. It might not. If possible, I'd like one of the foundation lawyers to weigh in on this, as one of our projects (Fuel-UI) is using it.
Some discussion on the matter: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12108158
Our own guidelines. http://governance.openstack.org/reference/licensing.html
Historically, OpenStack has avoided projects that make custom modifications to a license (see the do-no-evil license on JSLint/JSHint).
Michael
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
I agree that we should not use code under this license. The "Patent Grant" has one of the broadest "patent peace" provisions I have ever seen. I think that most corporate contributors would be very reluctant to agree to it. -----Original Message----- From: Monty Taylor [mailto:mordred@inaugust.com] Sent: Friday, September 09, 2016 1:49 PM To: legal-discuss@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [legal-discuss] [openstack-dev] [javascript] [fuel-ui] Is ReactJS OSI Compliant? Hey legal discuss folks ... On 09/07/2016 07:06 AM, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
Preface: IANAL (I-am-not-a-lawyer).
ReactJS claims to be BSD licensed. However, it has a non-BSD patent rider with a very aggressive "Strong Retaliation Clause", meaning that if there's ever a patent dispute between [React Project] and Facebook, the patents are revoked.
This might be fine. It might not. If possible, I'd like one of the foundation lawyers to weigh in on this, as one of our projects (Fuel-UI) is using it.
Some discussion on the matter: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12108158
Our own guidelines. http://governance.openstack.org/reference/licensing.html
Historically, OpenStack has avoided projects that make custom modifications to a license (see the do-no-evil license on JSLint/JSHint).
Michael
______________________________________________________________________ ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________ legal-discuss mailing list legal-discuss@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-discuss Please consider the environment before printing this email. The information contained in this email may be confidential and/or legally privileged. It has been sent for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender and destroy all copies of the message. To contact us directly, send to postmaster@dlapiper.com. Thank you.
Radcliffe, Mark wrote:
I agree that we should not use code under this license. The "Patent Grant" has one of the broadest "patent peace" provisions I have ever seen. I think that most corporate contributors would be very reluctant to agree to it.
I agree it's pretty clear we (OpenStack) should not code under this license... I suspect the question is whether we can accept this license in one of our third-party dependencies ? -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)
participants (3)
-
Monty Taylor
-
Radcliffe, Mark
-
Thierry Carrez