On 05/13/2014 02:28 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Along the lines of what I laid out in below email from January, Richard and I completed a first draft of such a document last Friday:
One thing still not clear to me is how legal risks change when an individual signs the Individual CLA but the corporation the person is working for doesn't sign the corresponding Corporate CLA. As you may know, we automatically enforce that any committer signs the Individual CLA but at the moment we have no way to automatically enforce a Corporate CLA on top of that. The Corporate CLA is now completed based on 'best effort': the Foundation makes sure that any company approaching us personally is informed about the Corporate CLA, we have it documented and all. What is the current legal risk for iCLA signed without a CCLA (when it should be signed) and how would this situation "iCLA without CCLA" would change with DCO? /stef