Richard -- The current situation is in flux, just a little. My understanding is that there is a letter for the board explaining the process for moving the docs to CC-By, but that it needs to be addressed at the board level, because that's where it lies in the charter. ---- Nick On 12/11/2013 2:15 AM, Richard Fontana wrote:
Hi,
Certain manuals available at docs.openstack.org contain this legal notice:
Copyright © 2013 OpenStack Foundation
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License.
followed immdiately by a box that says:
Except where otherwise noted, this document is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode
This github repository suggests at quickest glance that Apache License 2.0 is the license: https://github.com/openstack/openstack-manuals
Some docs writers at Red Hat were previously under the impression that CC BY was the license of OpenStack documentation, which I assume is incorrect except for material specifically on wiki.openstack.org.
Can anyone clarify? We'd like to adapt some portions of the upstream documentation in our product documentation and we want to make sure we get the licensing right.
Thanks!
Richard Fontana Legal Red Hat, Inc.
_______________________________________________ Openstack-docs mailing list Openstack-docs@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs