Yes not acceptable Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 9, 2016, at 11:53 AM, Ade Lee <alee@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
Just a quick question:
Is AGPLv3+ an acceptable license for a third party library that is a dependency for an Openstack project?
I read: (from http://governance.openstack.org/reference/licensing.html)
In order to be acceptable as dependencies of OpenStack projects, external libraries (produced and published by 3rd-party developers) must be licensed under an OSI-approved license that does not restrict distribution of the consuming project. The list of acceptable licenses includes ASLv2, BSD (both forms), MIT, PSF, LGPL, ISC, and MPL. Licenses considered incompatible with this requirement include GPLv2, GPLv3, and AGPL.
Is AGPL the same as AGPLv3 (and therefore not acceptable)?
Thanks, Ade Lee
_______________________________________________ legal-discuss mailing list legal-discuss@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-discuss Please consider the environment before printing this email.
The information contained in this email may be confidential and/or legally privileged. It has been sent for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender and destroy all copies of the message. To contact us directly, send to postmaster@dlapiper.com. Thank you.