On 03/28/2015 03:43 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
I would hope that it's no surprise that I am a huge advocate of open and transparent dealings, so in general, I am a favor of both collecting feedback and publishing all of the things we can publish. However, that sounds like an accusation of misconduct in the guise of suggesting a process or policy be adopted. I can tell you from experience that the answer to such issues is not to invent process or policy, but rather to confront them in an open and honest manner. +1 on being open, transparent and timely in dealing with issues. In my experience, we will not get actionable information from 1...10 scale questions on a semi-annual survey that's already very long.
If we really want feedback then JUST ASK THE LIST(S) FOR IT. That would mean phrasing Board reports and agenda in a way that invites commentary and discussion. Or potentially, starting a thread about it. I'll show this with an example....