Open Stack

Arkady,

That is a concern as well as the fact people will not be communicating in
the open, nor will those communications be easily searched for like you can
with the mail archives. Discarding the Open Source aspect, it does take
away from Open Community as well as Open Development.

Amy (spotz)

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:07 PM <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com> wrote:

> Amy, what are 4open with respect to user community?
>
> I always viewed users are one of 4 Os.
>
> Are you thinking that for open communication we must only use open sourced
> based communication?
>
> Thanks,
> Arkady
>
>
>
> *From:* Amy Marrich <amy at demarco.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 14, 2019 12:03 PM
> *To:* John Studarus
> *Cc:* user-committee
> *Subject:* Re: [User-committee] alternative contact details beyond IRC -
> Twitter
>
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> While I don't mind having my twitter handle on the page, are we discarding
> the Four Opens by encouraging the use of Twitter instead of maybe promoting
> the use of this list for async communications?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Amy (spotz)
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:34 AM John Studarus <john at jhlconsulting.com>
> wrote:
>
> Would there be any objections to adding Twitter handles to the user
> committee details in addition to IRC? I'm trying to open up the lines of
> communications beyond IRC and I've found Twitter to be a good async means
> for outreach.
>
>
>
> The handles would go on the following table:
>
>
>
> https://governance.openstack.org/uc/
>
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-committee mailing list
> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20190314/e0f58edc/attachment.html>