While I don't mind having my twitter handle on the page, are we discarding the Four Opens by encouraging the use of Twitter instead of maybe promoting the use of this list for async communications? Thanks, Amy (spotz) On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:34 AM John Studarus <john at jhlconsulting.com> wrote: > Would there be any objections to adding Twitter handles to the user > committee details in addition to IRC? I'm trying to open up the lines of > communications beyond IRC and I've found Twitter to be a good async means > for outreach. > > The handles would go on the following table: > > https://governance.openstack.org/uc/ > > Thoughts? > > John > _______________________________________________ > User-committee mailing list > User-committee at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20190314/9a9e8746/attachment.html>