From mrhillsman at gmail.com Sat Mar 3 00:05:31 2018 From: mrhillsman at gmail.com (Melvin Hillsman) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 00:05:31 +0000 Subject: [User-committee] Rocky PTG Summaries Message-ID: Hi UC, I apologize for not being able to offer my complete focus during our last meeting and discussed with Matt if it made sense to try to write summaries to help reduce the time needed to clarify discussions. Please take time to read the summaries at the top of the etherpad[0] to be prepared for our meeting this coming Monday. Be sure to leave comments so everyone can again be prepared to primarily focus on actionable items and spend less time addressing concerns and/or explaining things. Really appreciate your commitment to the community and looking forward to doing great things with you all! [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/UC-Rocky-PTG -- Kind regards, Melvin Hillsman mrhillsman at gmail.com mobile: (832) 264-2646 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From zhipengh512 at gmail.com Sat Mar 3 10:39:08 2018 From: zhipengh512 at gmail.com (Zhipeng Huang) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 10:39:08 +0000 Subject: [User-committee] [tc][ltm]Long Term Maintenance mode discussion Message-ID: Hi operators, users and public cloud providers, I would like to draw your attention to a discussion[0] happening now on the Technical Committee side about introducing a resolution on how to better provide long term maintenance for stable branches. As I understand this is a widely desired feature so please help reviewing the patch with your insight. For public cloud providers , if you have any questions we could discuss on #openstack-publiccloud and then Tobias or me could relay any concerns you might have but find it difficult to directly comment on the patch. Thanks :) [0]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/548916/ -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhipeng at huawei.com Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen (Previous) Research Assistant Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 University of California, Irvine Email: zhipengh at uci.edu Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mrhillsman at gmail.com Mon Mar 5 14:29:52 2018 From: mrhillsman at gmail.com (Melvin Hillsman) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 08:29:52 -0600 Subject: [User-committee] Reminder: UC Meeting Today - 18:00 UTC #openstack-uc Message-ID: Hi everyone, Friendly reminder we have a UC meeting today in #openstack-uc on freenode at 18:00UTC Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/UserCommittee#Meeting_Agenda.2FPrevious_Meeting_Logs -- Kind regards, Melvin Hillsman mrhillsman at gmail.com mobile: (832) 264-2646 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mrhillsman at gmail.com Mon Mar 5 18:03:15 2018 From: mrhillsman at gmail.com (Melvin Hillsman) Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 18:03:15 +0000 Subject: [User-committee] Reminder: UC Meeting Today - 18:00 UTC #openstack-uc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mrhillsman at gmail.com Mon Mar 5 22:04:56 2018 From: mrhillsman at gmail.com (Melvin Hillsman) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 16:04:56 -0600 Subject: [User-committee] UC Meeting 2018-03-05 Message-ID: Hi everyone, We want to thank the community for voting in the recent election and here is a summary of the first meeting with all the members: We voted for chair and vice-chair: Melvin Hillsman (chair) Matt Van Winkle (vice-chair) User survey: We spent some time exploring - with Allison Price leading - the idea of moving the user survey to yearly versus semi-annually and will continue to do so over the next few weeks. We will continue to work through the PTG summaries: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/UC-Rocky-PTG Upcoming Meeting Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/UserCommittee#Meeting_Agenda.2FPrevious_Meeting_Logs Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/uc/2018/uc.2018-03-05-18.03.html Minutes (txt): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/uc/2018/uc.2018-03-05-18.03.txt Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/uc/2018/uc.2018-03-05-18.03.log.txt -- Kind regards, Melvin Hillsman mrhillsman at gmail.com mobile: (832) 264-2646 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimmy at openstack.org Mon Mar 5 22:31:31 2018 From: jimmy at openstack.org (Jimmy McArthur) Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 16:31:31 -0600 Subject: [User-committee] UC Meeting 2018-03-05 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5A9DC543.7000904@openstack.org> Thanks for doing this summary! > Melvin Hillsman > March 5, 2018 at 4:04 PM > Hi everyone, > > We want to thank the community for voting in the recent election and > here is a summary of the first meeting with all the members: > > We voted for chair and vice-chair: > Melvin Hillsman (chair) > Matt Van Winkle (vice-chair) > > User survey: > We spent some time exploring - with Allison Price leading - the idea > of moving the user survey to yearly versus semi-annually and will > continue to do so over the next few weeks. > > We will continue to work through the PTG summaries: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/UC-Rocky-PTG > > Upcoming Meeting Agenda: > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/UserCommittee#Meeting_Agenda.2FPrevious_Meeting_Logs > > Minutes: > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/uc/2018/uc.2018-03-05-18.03.html > Minutes (txt): > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/uc/2018/uc.2018-03-05-18.03.txt > Log: > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/uc/2018/uc.2018-03-05-18.03.log.txt > > -- > Kind regards, > > Melvin Hillsman > mrhillsman at gmail.com > mobile: (832) 264-2646 > _______________________________________________ > User-committee mailing list > User-committee at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mrhillsman at gmail.com Mon Mar 5 23:17:56 2018 From: mrhillsman at gmail.com (Melvin Hillsman) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 17:17:56 -0600 Subject: [User-committee] UC Meeting 2018-03-05 In-Reply-To: <5A9DC543.7000904@openstack.org> References: <5A9DC543.7000904@openstack.org> Message-ID: My pleasure! On Mar 5, 2018 4:31 PM, "Jimmy McArthur" wrote: > Thanks for doing this summary! > > Melvin Hillsman > March 5, 2018 at 4:04 PM > Hi everyone, > > We want to thank the community for voting in the recent election and here > is a summary of the first meeting with all the members: > > We voted for chair and vice-chair: > Melvin Hillsman (chair) > Matt Van Winkle (vice-chair) > > User survey: > We spent some time exploring - with Allison Price leading - the idea of > moving the user survey to yearly versus semi-annually and will continue to > do so over the next few weeks. > > We will continue to work through the PTG summaries: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/UC-Rocky-PTG > > Upcoming Meeting Agenda: > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/ > UserCommittee#Meeting_Agenda.2FPrevious_Meeting_Logs > > Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/uc/2018/uc.2018- > 03-05-18.03.html > Minutes (txt): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/uc/ > 2018/uc.2018-03-05-18.03.txt > Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/uc/ > 2018/uc.2018-03-05-18.03.log.txt > > -- > Kind regards, > > Melvin Hillsman > mrhillsman at gmail.com > mobile: (832) 264-2646 > _______________________________________________ > User-committee mailing list > User-committee at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mrhillsman at gmail.com Mon Mar 5 23:34:32 2018 From: mrhillsman at gmail.com (Melvin Hillsman) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 17:34:32 -0600 Subject: [User-committee] Forum Selection Committee Message-ID: Hi everyone, Apologies for not getting this out sooner but we need one UC member to volunteer to be on the Forum Selection Committee. I have volunteered to fill one spot; I can definitely yield to another member however if two members want to volunteer but one is needed. -- Kind regards, Melvin Hillsman mrhillsman at gmail.com mobile: (832) 264-2646 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimmy at openstack.org Mon Mar 5 23:44:42 2018 From: jimmy at openstack.org (Jimmy McArthur) Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 17:44:42 -0600 Subject: [User-committee] Forum Selection Committee In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5A9DD66A.3040905@openstack.org> This is a really good opportunity to help shape the content of the Forum! :) > Melvin Hillsman > March 5, 2018 at 5:34 PM > Hi everyone, > > Apologies for not getting this out sooner but we need one UC member to > volunteer to be on the Forum Selection Committee. I have volunteered > to fill one spot; I can definitely yield to another member however if > two members want to volunteer but one is needed. > > -- > Kind regards, > > Melvin Hillsman > mrhillsman at gmail.com > mobile: (832) 264-2646 > _______________________________________________ > User-committee mailing list > User-committee at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From amy at demarco.com Tue Mar 6 00:56:41 2018 From: amy at demarco.com (Amy Marrich) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 18:56:41 -0600 Subject: [User-committee] Forum Selection Committee In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I can do it, I used to like being a track chair. Amy (spotz) On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 5:34 PM, Melvin Hillsman wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Apologies for not getting this out sooner but we need one UC member to > volunteer to be on the Forum Selection Committee. I have volunteered to > fill one spot; I can definitely yield to another member however if two > members want to volunteer but one is needed. > > -- > Kind regards, > > Melvin Hillsman > mrhillsman at gmail.com > mobile: (832) 264-2646 > > _______________________________________________ > User-committee mailing list > User-committee at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mrhillsman at gmail.com Tue Mar 6 00:57:12 2018 From: mrhillsman at gmail.com (Melvin Hillsman) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 18:57:12 -0600 Subject: [User-committee] Forum Selection Committee In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Ok, thanks Amy, will pass your name along. On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Amy Marrich wrote: > I can do it, I used to like being a track chair. > > Amy (spotz) > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 5:34 PM, Melvin Hillsman > wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> Apologies for not getting this out sooner but we need one UC member to >> volunteer to be on the Forum Selection Committee. I have volunteered to >> fill one spot; I can definitely yield to another member however if two >> members want to volunteer but one is needed. >> >> -- >> Kind regards, >> >> Melvin Hillsman >> mrhillsman at gmail.com >> mobile: (832) 264-2646 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> User-committee mailing list >> User-committee at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee >> >> > -- Kind regards, Melvin Hillsman mrhillsman at gmail.com mobile: (832) 264-2646 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mrhillsman at gmail.com Tue Mar 6 12:53:29 2018 From: mrhillsman at gmail.com (Melvin Hillsman) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 06:53:29 -0600 Subject: [User-committee] Stable Branch EOL and "Extended Maintenance" Resolution Message-ID: Hi everyone, If you are interested in the items in the subject please be sure to take time to review and comment on the following patch - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/548916/ -- Kind regards, Melvin Hillsman mrhillsman at gmail.com mobile: (832) 264-2646 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mvanwink at rackspace.com Tue Mar 6 14:32:04 2018 From: mvanwink at rackspace.com (Matt Van Winkle) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 14:32:04 +0000 Subject: [User-committee] Forum Selection Committee In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks for jumping in, Amy! Just so the rest of the team is aware, I had already agreed to represent the UC on the travel assistance committee for Vancouver. Glad to see us jumping in to more things. VW From: Melvin Hillsman Date: Monday, March 5, 2018 at 6:58 PM To: Amy Marrich Cc: user-committee Subject: Re: [User-committee] Forum Selection Committee Ok, thanks Amy, will pass your name along. On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Amy Marrich > wrote: I can do it, I used to like being a track chair. Amy (spotz) On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 5:34 PM, Melvin Hillsman > wrote: Hi everyone, Apologies for not getting this out sooner but we need one UC member to volunteer to be on the Forum Selection Committee. I have volunteered to fill one spot; I can definitely yield to another member however if two members want to volunteer but one is needed. -- Kind regards, Melvin Hillsman mrhillsman at gmail.com mobile: (832) 264-2646 _______________________________________________ User-committee mailing list User-committee at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee -- Kind regards, Melvin Hillsman mrhillsman at gmail.com mobile: (832) 264-2646 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mrhillsman at gmail.com Tue Mar 6 15:53:54 2018 From: mrhillsman at gmail.com (Melvin Hillsman) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 09:53:54 -0600 Subject: [User-committee] Forum Selection Committee In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: +1000 Thanks for the update! On Mar 6, 2018 8:32 AM, "Matt Van Winkle" wrote: > Thanks for jumping in, Amy! Just so the rest of the team is aware, I had > already agreed to represent the UC on the travel assistance committee for > Vancouver. Glad to see us jumping in to more things. > > > > VW > > > > *From: *Melvin Hillsman > *Date: *Monday, March 5, 2018 at 6:58 PM > *To: *Amy Marrich > *Cc: *user-committee > *Subject: *Re: [User-committee] Forum Selection Committee > > > > Ok, thanks Amy, will pass your name along. > > > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Amy Marrich wrote: > > I can do it, I used to like being a track chair. > > > > Amy (spotz) > > > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 5:34 PM, Melvin Hillsman > wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Apologies for not getting this out sooner but we need one UC member to > volunteer to be on the Forum Selection Committee. I have volunteered to > fill one spot; I can definitely yield to another member however if two > members want to volunteer but one is needed. > > > > -- > > Kind regards, > > Melvin Hillsman > > mrhillsman at gmail.com > mobile: (832) 264-2646 > > > > _______________________________________________ > User-committee mailing list > User-committee at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee > > > > > > > > -- > > Kind regards, > > Melvin Hillsman > > mrhillsman at gmail.com > mobile: (832) 264-2646 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From amy at demarco.com Tue Mar 6 16:03:35 2018 From: amy at demarco.com (Amy Marrich) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 10:03:35 -0600 Subject: [User-committee] Forum Selection Committee In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: UC doing all the things! Amy (spotz) On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 8:32 AM, Matt Van Winkle wrote: > Thanks for jumping in, Amy! Just so the rest of the team is aware, I had > already agreed to represent the UC on the travel assistance committee for > Vancouver. Glad to see us jumping in to more things. > > > > VW > > > > *From: *Melvin Hillsman > *Date: *Monday, March 5, 2018 at 6:58 PM > *To: *Amy Marrich > *Cc: *user-committee > *Subject: *Re: [User-committee] Forum Selection Committee > > > > Ok, thanks Amy, will pass your name along. > > > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Amy Marrich wrote: > > I can do it, I used to like being a track chair. > > > > Amy (spotz) > > > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 5:34 PM, Melvin Hillsman > wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Apologies for not getting this out sooner but we need one UC member to > volunteer to be on the Forum Selection Committee. I have volunteered to > fill one spot; I can definitely yield to another member however if two > members want to volunteer but one is needed. > > > > -- > > Kind regards, > > Melvin Hillsman > > mrhillsman at gmail.com > mobile: (832) 264-2646 > > > > _______________________________________________ > User-committee mailing list > User-committee at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee > > > > > > > > -- > > Kind regards, > > Melvin Hillsman > > mrhillsman at gmail.com > mobile: (832) 264-2646 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From zhipengh512 at gmail.com Fri Mar 9 08:51:10 2018 From: zhipengh512 at gmail.com (Zhipeng Huang) Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 16:51:10 +0800 Subject: [User-committee] Financial Services Team In-Reply-To: References: <7618CCCFE1BE854195499C423CEEFA7801F18B1A@dggemm513-mbs.china.huawei.com> <2018022714584401189478@unionpay.com> Message-ID: Hi Lijun and Leong, What Bill mentioned is my blockchain proposal for the Public Cloud WG Passport Program, you can find the slide here : https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1RYRq1YdYEoZ5KNKwlDDtnunMdoYRAHPjPslnng3VqcI/edit?usp=sharing . If you have trouble accessing the google doc, i can send out the pdf :) On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 1:02 AM, Yih Leong, Sun. wrote: > Hi Bill, > > I would love to hear more from you about the reference architecture (RA) > and blockchain proposal. RA is also part of the plan/agenda in Financial > Services Team. Let me know if we should schedule a conf call to discuss. > > FYI. Jason Shi Hao (Jason.shi at huawei.com) is listed as the community > member from Huawei at the wiki [1]. You are more than welcome to join us. > > [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Financial_Team#Members > > Thanks! > Leong. > > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:58 PM, zulijun at unionpay.com < > zulijun at unionpay.com> wrote: > >> Hi William, >> >> Welcome you to jion us. >> >> If you can do that what you said , we are glad to see that you are the Huawei >> representative/focal. >> >> If you can, can you give me your plan about FS Team for 2018. >> >> If you agree, I will put your info on wiki. >> >> @Leo, do you agree with me? >> >> zulijun >> ------------------------------ >> zulijun at unionpay.com >> >> >> *From:* William Michael Genovese >> *Date:* 2018-02-27 14:41 >> *To:* Yih Leong, Sun. ; user-committee >> ; zulijun at unionpay.com >> *Subject:* RE: Financial Services Team >> >> Hi Leong! And also Zulijun! >> >> >> >> Yes it’s been some time. First question: does the Open Stack Foundation >> have a focal point established yet from Huawei for the FS Team? If not, >> that will and should be me. >> >> First objective is establishing a reference architecture blueprint for >> Open Stack for FSI based on Private, Public and Hybrid with required and >> recommended additional services. >> >> There’s also some cross industry blueprints/reference architectures I am >> working on that I think we be of keen interest as well. Finally, we also >> have a very unique Open Stack and Blockchain solution we’d like to share, >> collaborate on for further adoption and formalization too. >> >> >> >> So, if I can be the Huawei representative/focal, then let’s begin..I will >> start pulling other individuals in, and we can set up some meetings to >> discuss. >> >> >> >> Thank you, >> >> >> >> *William (Bill) M Genovese (**威廉* *（比**尔）* *迈克尔** · **吉**诺维**斯**)* >> >> *Vice President* >> >> *Corporate Strategy Planning | Banking, Financial Services and IT >> Services Solutions* >> >> *[image: huawei-logo.jpg]* >> >> *HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.* >> >> *Bantian, Longgang District* >> >> *Shenzhen 518129 P.R. China* >> >> *www.huawei.com * >> >> Mobile: +86 132-4373-0940 <+86%20132%204373%200940> (CN) +1 704-906-3558 >> <(704)%20906-3558> (US) >> >> Email: *william.michael.genovese at huawei.com >> * >> >> Wechat: Wechat: Bill277619782016 >> >> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/wgenovese >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Yih Leong, Sun. [mailto:yihleong at gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 27, 2018 2:30 AM >> *To:* William Michael Genovese; user-committee; zulijun at unionpay.com >> *Subject:* Financial Services Team >> >> >> >> (changing the subject header) >> >> >> >> Hi Bill, >> >> It has been a while since we last collaborated. :-) >> >> >> >> Zulijun from PRC China UnionPay is the chair of Financial Services Team >> (under User Committee governance). >> >> I am involved in setting up the team which was officially kick-off at >> Sydney Summit. >> >> >> >> Currently the participants are mainly contributed from PRC financial >> institutions, vendors and community members [1]. >> >> We look forward to having more participants across the globe :-) >> >> >> >> Please let me or Zulijun know if there is anything we can collaborate? >> >> >> >> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Financial_Team#Members >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> Leong. >> >> >> >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: >> Date: Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 1:31 AM >> Subject: User-committee Digest, Vol 61, Issue 11 >> To: user-committee at lists.openstack.org >> >> >> Send User-committee mailing list submissions to >> user-committee at lists.openstack.org >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-com >> mittee >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> user-committee-request at lists.openstack.org >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> user-committee-owner at lists.openstack.org >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of User-committee digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: User-committee Digest, Vol 61, Issue 10 (zulijun at unionpay.com) >> 2. Re: User Committee Election Results - February 2018 >> (Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:59:02 +0800 >> From: "zulijun at unionpay.com" >> To: user-committee >> Subject: Re: [User-committee] User-committee Digest, Vol 61, Issue 10 >> Message-ID: <2018022612590262504666 at unionpay.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> To William Genovese >> >> I am chairing the Financial Team. >> >> See detail on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Financial_Team >> >> Do you have anything for me to talk？ >> >> zulijun >> China Unionpay >> >> >> zulijun at unionpay.com >> >> From: user-committee-request >> Date: 2018-02-26 11:39 >> To: user-committee >> Subject: User-committee Digest, Vol 61, Issue 10 >> Send User-committee mailing list submissions to >> user-committee at lists.openstack.org >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> user-committee-request at lists.openstack.org >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> user-committee-owner at lists.openstack.org >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of User-committee digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. User Committee Election Results - February 2018 (Shilla Saebi) >> 2. Re: [openstack-community] User Committee Election Results - >> February 2018 (William Genovese) >> 3. Re: User Committee Election Results - February 2018 (Edgar Magana) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 18:52:16 -0500 >> From: Shilla Saebi >> To: user-committee , OpenStack >> Mailing List , OpenStack Operators >> , OpenStack Dev >> , community at lists.openstack.org >> Subject: [User-committee] User Committee Election Results - February >> 2018 >> Message-ID: >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Hello Everyone! >> >> Please join me in congratulating 3 newly elected members of the User >> Committee (UC)! The winners for the 3 seats are: >> >> Melvin Hillsman >> Amy Marrich >> Yih Leong Sun >> >> Full results can be found here: >> https://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_f7b17dc638013045 >> >> Election details can also be found here: >> https://governance.openstack.org/uc/reference/uc-election-feb2018.html >> >> Thank you to all of the candidates, and to all of you who voted and/or >> promoted the election! >> >> Shilla >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: > ents/20180225/e9e0dfbc/attachment-0001.html> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 01:30:33 +0000 (UTC) >> From: William Genovese >> To: user-committee , OpenStack >> Mailing List , OpenStack Operators >> , OpenStack Dev >> , community at lists.openstack.org, >> Shilla Saebi >> Subject: Re: [User-committee] [openstack-community] User Committee >> Election Results - February 2018 >> Message-ID: <1169833579.5810488.1519608633249 at mail.yahoo.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> >> >> >> Hi- >> >> Can you tell me who is chairing the Financial Services Industry OpenStack >> Cloud Committee? I thought there was one at one time? I'd like to (at a >> minimum) sign up and contribute to this. >> Thank you, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> William (Bill) M Genovese (威廉 （比尔） 迈克尔 · 吉诺维斯) >> >> Vice President >> >> Corporate Strategy Planning | Banking, Financial Services andIT Services >> Solutions >> >> >> >> >> HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. >> >> Bantian, Longgang District >> >> Shenzhen 518129 P.R. China >> >> www.huawei.com >> >> Mobile: +86 132-4373-0940 (CN) +1 704-906-3558 (US) >> >> Email: william.michael.genovese at huawei.com >> >> Wechat: Wechat: Bill277619782016 >> >> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/wgenovese >> >> >> >> On ‎Monday‎, ‎February‎ ‎26‎, ‎2018‎ ‎07‎:‎53‎:‎58‎ ‎AM, Shilla Saebi >> wrote: >> Hello Everyone! >> >> Please join me in congratulating 3 newly elected members of the User >> Committee (UC)! The winners for the 3 seats are: >> >> Melvin Hillsman >> Amy Marrich >> Yih Leong Sun >> >> Full results can be found here: https://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cg >> i-bin/results.pl?id=E_f7b17dc638013045 >> >> Election details can also be found here: https://governance.openstack.o >> rg/uc/reference/uc-election-feb2018.html >> >> Thank you to all of the candidates, and to all of you who voted and/or >> promoted the election! >> >> Shilla >> _______________________________________________ >> Community mailing list >> Community at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community >> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: > ents/20180226/ed6b9d9c/attachment-0001.html> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 03:38:54 +0000 >> From: Edgar Magana >> To: Shilla Saebi >> Cc: OpenStack Operators , >> OpenStack Mailing List , OpenStack Dev >> , user-committee >> , "community at lists.openstack.org" >> >> Subject: Re: [User-committee] User Committee Election Results - >> February 2018 >> Message-ID: <876B0B60-ADB0-4CE4-B1FC-5110622D08BE at workday.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Congratulations Folks! We have a great team to continue the growing of >> the UC. Your first action is to assign a chair for the UC and let the board >> of directors about your election. >> >> I wish you all the best! >> >> Edgar Magana >> >> >> On Feb 25, 2018, at 3:53 PM, Shilla Saebi > shilla.saebi at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hello Everyone! >> >> Please join me in congratulating 3 newly elected members of the User >> Committee (UC)! The winners for the 3 seats are: >> >> Melvin Hillsman >> Amy Marrich >> Yih Leong Sun >> >> Full results can be found here: https://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cg >> i-bin/results.pl?id=E_f7b17dc638013045> proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__civs.cs.cornell.edu_cgi- >> 2Dbin_results.pl-3Fid-3DE-5Ff7b17dc638013045&d=DwMFaQ&c=DS6P >> UFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpW >> yDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=uryEDva3eeLA17jjrm73DWw4CrzTezr7 >> HxiJNWpJAs0&s=JSlXF2Cz8d7IWVCAZQinqDxY3oHdqtJCPBPFaD0A_BA&e=> >> >> Election details can also be found here: https://governance.openstack.o >> rg/uc/reference/uc-election-feb2018.html> proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__governance.openstack.org_ >> uc_reference_uc-2Delection-2Dfeb2018.html&d=DwMFaQ&c= >> DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r= >> G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=uryEDva3eeLA17 >> jjrm73DWw4CrzTezr7HxiJNWpJAs0&s=nLOp6FdWRQJDjROxQPhN9SCbBK8e >> 75tivHZUcXwOWcI&e=> >> >> Thank you to all of the candidates, and to all of you who voted and/or >> promoted the election! >> >> Shilla >> _______________________________________________ >> User-committee mailing list >> User-committee at lists.openstack.org> lists.openstack.org> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.op >> enstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_user-2Dcommittee&d= >> DwIGaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r= >> G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=uryEDva3eeLA17 >> jjrm73DWw4CrzTezr7HxiJNWpJAs0&s=9y-_pHwzl3ADBVlN7GbhaF8HYVQG >> vTQjkEvEotC9jfw&e= >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: > ents/20180226/9f948197/attachment.html> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Subject: Digest Footer >> >> _______________________________________________ >> User-committee mailing list >> User-committee at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> End of User-committee Digest, Vol 61, Issue 10 >> ********************************************** >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: > ents/20180226/f55adb2c/attachment-0001.html> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 09:31:00 +0000 >> From: >> To: , , >> , >> , >> , < >> community at lists.openstack.org> >> Subject: Re: [User-committee] User Committee Election Results - >> February 2018 >> Message-ID: >> <0e96f3a69451488aabf5c9de9aaa2a1e at AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Congrats to new committee members. >> And thanks for great job for previous ones. >> >> From: Shilla Saebi [mailto:shilla.saebi at gmail.com] >> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2018 5:52 PM >> To: user-committee ; OpenStack >> Mailing List ; OpenStack Operators < >> openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>; OpenStack Dev < >> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>; community at lists.openstack.org >> Subject: [User-committee] User Committee Election Results - February 2018 >> >> Hello Everyone! >> >> Please join me in congratulating 3 newly elected members of the User >> Committee (UC)! The winners for the 3 seats are: >> >> Melvin Hillsman >> Amy Marrich >> Yih Leong Sun >> >> Full results can be found here: https://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cg >> i-bin/results.pl?id=E_f7b17dc638013045 >> >> Election details can also be found here: https://governance.openstack.o >> rg/uc/reference/uc-election-feb2018.html >> >> Thank you to all of the candidates, and to all of you who voted and/or >> promoted the election! >> >> Shilla >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: > ents/20180226/26567a00/attachment.html> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Subject: Digest Footer >> >> _______________________________________________ >> User-committee mailing list >> User-committee at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> End of User-committee Digest, Vol 61, Issue 11 >> ********************************************** >> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > User-committee mailing list > User-committee at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee > > -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhipeng at huawei.com Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen (Previous) Research Assistant Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 University of California, Irvine Email: zhipengh at uci.edu Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001(02-27-14-52-31).jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2938 bytes Desc: not available URL: From snow19642003 at yahoo.com Fri Mar 9 10:25:33 2018 From: snow19642003 at yahoo.com (William Genovese) Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 18:25:33 +0800 Subject: [User-committee] Financial Services Team In-Reply-To: References: <7618CCCFE1BE854195499C423CEEFA7801F18B1A@dggemm513-mbs.china.huawei.com> <2018022714584401189478@unionpay.com> Message-ID: <1EE47E2B-09AA-4019-A8F5-7EDC4A55F1BA@yahoo.com> Thank you, but we need to work on this a bit more based on our reference architecture core principles for Blockchain. It’s a good starting point and idea, but we will add more to it to bring it into the Financial Services Reference Architecture. Thanks very much Bill Genovese Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 9, 2018, at 4:51 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > > Hi Lijun and Leong, > > What Bill mentioned is my blockchain proposal for the Public Cloud WG Passport Program, you can find the slide here : https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1RYRq1YdYEoZ5KNKwlDDtnunMdoYRAHPjPslnng3VqcI/edit?usp=sharing. > > If you have trouble accessing the google doc, i can send out the pdf :) > >> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 1:02 AM, Yih Leong, Sun. wrote: >> Hi Bill, >> >> I would love to hear more from you about the reference architecture (RA) and blockchain proposal. RA is also part of the plan/agenda in Financial Services Team. Let me know if we should schedule a conf call to discuss. >> >> FYI. Jason Shi Hao (Jason.shi at huawei.com) is listed as the community member from Huawei at the wiki [1]. You are more than welcome to join us. >> >> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Financial_Team#Members >> >> Thanks! >> Leong. >> >> >>> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:58 PM, zulijun at unionpay.com wrote: >>> Hi William, >>> >>> Welcome you to jion us. >>> >>> If you can do that what you said , we are glad to see that you are the Huawei representative/focal. >>> >>> If you can, can you give me your plan about FS Team for 2018. >>> >>> If you agree, I will put your info on wiki. >>> >>> @Leo, do you agree with me? >>> >>> zulijun >>> zulijun at unionpay.com >>> >>> From: William Michael Genovese >>> Date: 2018-02-27 14:41 >>> To: Yih Leong, Sun.; user-committee; zulijun at unionpay.com >>> Subject: RE: Financial Services Team >>> Hi Leong! And also Zulijun! >>> >>> Yes it’s been some time. First question: does the Open Stack Foundation have a focal point established yet from Huawei for the FS Team? If not, that will and should be me. >>> First objective is establishing a reference architecture blueprint for Open Stack for FSI based on Private, Public and Hybrid with required and recommended additional services. >>> There’s also some cross industry blueprints/reference architectures I am working on that I think we be of keen interest as well. Finally, we also have a very unique Open Stack and Blockchain solution we’d like to share, collaborate on for further adoption and formalization too. >>> >>> So, if I can be the Huawei representative/focal, then let’s begin..I will start pulling other individuals in, and we can set up some meetings to discuss. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> William (Bill) M Genovese (威廉 （比尔） 迈克尔 · 吉诺维斯) >>> Vice President >>> Corporate Strategy Planning | Banking, Financial Services and IT Services Solutions >>> >>> HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. >>> Bantian, Longgang District >>> Shenzhen 518129 P.R. China >>> www.huawei.com >>> Mobile: +86 132-4373-0940 (CN) +1 704-906-3558 (US) >>> Email: william.michael.genovese at huawei.com >>> Wechat: Wechat: Bill277619782016 >>> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/wgenovese >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Yih Leong, Sun. [mailto:yihleong at gmail.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 2:30 AM >>> To: William Michael Genovese; user-committee; zulijun at unionpay.com >>> Subject: Financial Services Team >>> >>> (changing the subject header) >>> >>> Hi Bill, >>> It has been a while since we last collaborated. :-) >>> >>> Zulijun from PRC China UnionPay is the chair of Financial Services Team (under User Committee governance). >>> I am involved in setting up the team which was officially kick-off at Sydney Summit. >>> >>> Currently the participants are mainly contributed from PRC financial institutions, vendors and community members [1]. >>> We look forward to having more participants across the globe :-) >>> >>> Please let me or Zulijun know if there is anything we can collaborate? >>> >>> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Financial_Team#Members >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Leong. >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: >>> Date: Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 1:31 AM >>> Subject: User-committee Digest, Vol 61, Issue 11 >>> To: user-committee at lists.openstack.org >>> >>> >>> Send User-committee mailing list submissions to >>> user-committee at lists.openstack.org >>> >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee >>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>> user-committee-request at lists.openstack.org >>> >>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>> user-committee-owner at lists.openstack.org >>> >>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>> than "Re: Contents of User-committee digest..." >>> >>> >>> Today's Topics: >>> >>> 1. Re: User-committee Digest, Vol 61, Issue 10 (zulijun at unionpay.com) >>> 2. Re: User Committee Election Results - February 2018 >>> (Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com) >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Message: 1 >>> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:59:02 +0800 >>> From: "zulijun at unionpay.com" >>> To: user-committee >>> Subject: Re: [User-committee] User-committee Digest, Vol 61, Issue 10 >>> Message-ID: <2018022612590262504666 at unionpay.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>> >>> To William Genovese >>> >>> I am chairing the Financial Team. >>> >>> See detail on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Financial_Team >>> >>> Do you have anything for me to talk？ >>> >>> zulijun >>> China Unionpay >>> >>> >>> zulijun at unionpay.com >>> >>> From: user-committee-request >>> Date: 2018-02-26 11:39 >>> To: user-committee >>> Subject: User-committee Digest, Vol 61, Issue 10 >>> Send User-committee mailing list submissions to >>> user-committee at lists.openstack.org >>> >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee >>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>> user-committee-request at lists.openstack.org >>> >>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>> user-committee-owner at lists.openstack.org >>> >>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>> than "Re: Contents of User-committee digest..." >>> >>> >>> Today's Topics: >>> >>> 1. User Committee Election Results - February 2018 (Shilla Saebi) >>> 2. Re: [openstack-community] User Committee Election Results - >>> February 2018 (William Genovese) >>> 3. Re: User Committee Election Results - February 2018 (Edgar Magana) >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Message: 1 >>> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 18:52:16 -0500 >>> From: Shilla Saebi >>> To: user-committee , OpenStack >>> Mailing List , OpenStack Operators >>> , OpenStack Dev >>> , community at lists.openstack.org >>> Subject: [User-committee] User Committee Election Results - February >>> 2018 >>> Message-ID: >>> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>> >>> Hello Everyone! >>> >>> Please join me in congratulating 3 newly elected members of the User >>> Committee (UC)! The winners for the 3 seats are: >>> >>> Melvin Hillsman >>> Amy Marrich >>> Yih Leong Sun >>> >>> Full results can be found here: >>> https://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_f7b17dc638013045 >>> >>> Election details can also be found here: >>> https://governance.openstack.org/uc/reference/uc-election-feb2018.html >>> >>> Thank you to all of the candidates, and to all of you who voted and/or >>> promoted the election! >>> >>> Shilla >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 2 >>> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 01:30:33 +0000 (UTC) >>> From: William Genovese >>> To: user-committee , OpenStack >>> Mailing List , OpenStack Operators >>> , OpenStack Dev >>> , community at lists.openstack.org, >>> Shilla Saebi >>> Subject: Re: [User-committee] [openstack-community] User Committee >>> Election Results - February 2018 >>> Message-ID: <1169833579.5810488.1519608633249 at mail.yahoo.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi- >>> >>> Can you tell me who is chairing the Financial Services Industry OpenStack Cloud Committee? I thought there was one at one time? I'd like to (at a minimum) sign up and contribute to this. >>> Thank you, >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> William (Bill) M Genovese (威廉 （比尔） 迈克尔 · 吉诺维斯) >>> >>> Vice President >>> >>> Corporate Strategy Planning | Banking, Financial Services andIT Services Solutions >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. >>> >>> Bantian, Longgang District >>> >>> Shenzhen 518129 P.R. China >>> >>> www.huawei.com >>> >>> Mobile: +86 132-4373-0940 (CN) +1 704-906-3558 (US) >>> >>> Email: william.michael.genovese at huawei.com >>> >>> Wechat: Wechat: Bill277619782016 >>> >>> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/wgenovese >>> >>> >>> >>> On ‎Monday‎, ‎February‎ ‎26‎, ‎2018‎ ‎07‎:‎53‎:‎58‎ ‎AM, Shilla Saebi wrote: >>> Hello Everyone! >>> >>> Please join me in congratulating 3 newly elected members of the User Committee (UC)! The winners for the 3 seats are: >>> >>> Melvin Hillsman >>> Amy Marrich >>> Yih Leong Sun >>> >>> Full results can be found here: https://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_f7b17dc638013045 >>> >>> Election details can also be found here: https://governance.openstack.org/uc/reference/uc-election-feb2018.html >>> >>> Thank you to all of the candidates, and to all of you who voted and/or promoted the election! >>> >>> Shilla >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Community mailing list >>> Community at lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community >>> >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 3 >>> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 03:38:54 +0000 >>> From: Edgar Magana >>> To: Shilla Saebi >>> Cc: OpenStack Operators , >>> OpenStack Mailing List , OpenStack Dev >>> , user-committee >>> , "community at lists.openstack.org" >>> >>> Subject: Re: [User-committee] User Committee Election Results - >>> February 2018 >>> Message-ID: <876B0B60-ADB0-4CE4-B1FC-5110622D08BE at workday.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>> >>> Congratulations Folks! We have a great team to continue the growing of the UC. Your first action is to assign a chair for the UC and let the board of directors about your election. >>> >>> I wish you all the best! >>> >>> Edgar Magana >>> >>> >>> On Feb 25, 2018, at 3:53 PM, Shilla Saebi > wrote: >>> >>> Hello Everyone! >>> >>> Please join me in congratulating 3 newly elected members of the User Committee (UC)! The winners for the 3 seats are: >>> >>> Melvin Hillsman >>> Amy Marrich >>> Yih Leong Sun >>> >>> Full results can be found here: https://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_f7b17dc638013045 >>> >>> Election details can also be found here: https://governance.openstack.org/uc/reference/uc-election-feb2018.html >>> >>> Thank you to all of the candidates, and to all of you who voted and/or promoted the election! >>> >>> Shilla >>> _______________________________________________ >>> User-committee mailing list >>> User-committee at lists.openstack.org >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_user-2Dcommittee&d=DwIGaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=uryEDva3eeLA17jjrm73DWw4CrzTezr7HxiJNWpJAs0&s=9y-_pHwzl3ADBVlN7GbhaF8HYVQGvTQjkEvEotC9jfw&e= >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Subject: Digest Footer >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> User-committee mailing list >>> User-committee at lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> End of User-committee Digest, Vol 61, Issue 10 >>> ********************************************** >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 2 >>> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 09:31:00 +0000 >>> From: >>> To: , , >>> , >>> , >>> , >>> Subject: Re: [User-committee] User Committee Election Results - >>> February 2018 >>> Message-ID: >>> <0e96f3a69451488aabf5c9de9aaa2a1e at AUSX13MPS308.AMER.DELL.COM> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>> >>> Congrats to new committee members. >>> And thanks for great job for previous ones. >>> >>> From: Shilla Saebi [mailto:shilla.saebi at gmail.com] >>> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2018 5:52 PM >>> To: user-committee ; OpenStack Mailing List ; OpenStack Operators ; OpenStack Dev ; community at lists.openstack.org >>> Subject: [User-committee] User Committee Election Results - February 2018 >>> >>> Hello Everyone! >>> >>> Please join me in congratulating 3 newly elected members of the User Committee (UC)! The winners for the 3 seats are: >>> >>> Melvin Hillsman >>> Amy Marrich >>> Yih Leong Sun >>> >>> Full results can be found here: https://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_f7b17dc638013045 >>> >>> Election details can also be found here: https://governance.openstack.org/uc/reference/uc-election-feb2018.html >>> >>> Thank you to all of the candidates, and to all of you who voted and/or promoted the election! >>> >>> Shilla >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Subject: Digest Footer >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> User-committee mailing list >>> User-committee at lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> End of User-committee Digest, Vol 61, Issue 11 >>> ********************************************** >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> User-committee mailing list >> User-committee at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee >> > > > > -- > Zhipeng (Howard) Huang > > Standard Engineer > IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line > Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd > Email: huangzhipeng at huawei.com > Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen > > (Previous) > Research Assistant > Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 > University of California, Irvine > Email: zhipengh at uci.edu > Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 > > OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado > _______________________________________________ > User-committee mailing list > User-committee at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mrhillsman at gmail.com Mon Mar 12 13:12:30 2018 From: mrhillsman at gmail.com (Melvin Hillsman) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 08:12:30 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] Reminder: UC Meeting Today - 14:00 UTC #openstack-uc Message-ID: Hi everyone, Friendly reminder we have a UC meeting today in #openstack-uc on freenode at 14:00UTC Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/ UserCommittee#Meeting_Agenda.2FPrevious_Meeting_Logs -- Kind regards, Melvin Hillsman mrhillsman at gmail.com mobile: (832) 264-2646 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mvanwink at rackspace.com Mon Mar 12 14:17:57 2018 From: mvanwink at rackspace.com (Matt Van Winkle) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 14:17:57 +0000 Subject: [User-committee] Reminder: UC Meeting Today - 14:00 UTC #openstack-uc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hey folks, Traveling with family for the kids Spring Break. Trying to join but hotel WiFi not co-operating Get Outlook for iOS ________________________________ From: Melvin Hillsman Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 7:12:30 AM To: user-committee; OpenStack Operators Subject: [User-committee] Reminder: UC Meeting Today - 14:00 UTC #openstack-uc Hi everyone, Friendly reminder we have a UC meeting today in #openstack-uc on freenode at 14:00UTC Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/UserCommittee#Meeting_Agenda.2FPrevious_Meeting_Logs -- Kind regards, Melvin Hillsman mrhillsman at gmail.com mobile: (832) 264-2646 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tobias at citynetwork.se Tue Mar 13 12:25:52 2018 From: tobias at citynetwork.se (Tobias Rydberg) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 13:25:52 +0100 Subject: [User-committee] [publiccloud-wg] Poll new meeting time and bi-weekly meeting Message-ID: <4ccfe58f-4e22-90e9-83f8-24aa6398552e@citynetwork.se> Hi folks, We have under some time had requests of changing the current time for our bi-weekly meetings. Not very many suggestions of new time slots have ended up in my inbox, so have added a few suggestions my self. The plan is to have this set and do final voting at tomorrows meeting. Reply to this email if you have other suggestions and I can add those as well. Please mark the alternatives that works for you no later than tomorrow 1400UTC. Doodle link: https://doodle.com/poll/2kv4h79xypmathac Tomorrows meeting will be held as planned in #openstack-meeting-3 at 1400 UTC. Agenda can be found at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/publiccloud-wg S -- Tobias Rydberg Senior Developer Mobile: +46 733 312780 www.citynetwork.eu | www.citycloud.com INNOVATION THROUGH OPEN IT INFRASTRUCTURE ISO 9001, 14001, 27001, 27015 & 27018 CERTIFIED -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 3945 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From lbragstad at gmail.com Tue Mar 13 19:24:25 2018 From: lbragstad at gmail.com (Lance Bragstad) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:24:25 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] Unified limits and hierarchical project use cases Message-ID: Hey all, Unified limits and hierarchical quotas was a big topic during the Rocky PTG. With the ground work laid in Queens, most of the discussions for Rocky focused on different enforcement models. For those who haven't been keeping up with the unified limits discussions, an enforcement model is an opinionated way of how a quota, or limit, should behave with respect to other parent, sibling, or child projects. It's possible to think of multiple ways in which enforcement can be done, and it's not that there is one right way and the rest are wrong, just a difference in how quotas might need to behave for different deployments. During the discussions at the PTG, everyone in the room agreed that we don't really understand how people are using hierarchical projects. This makes it tough to design a quota or limit enforcement model without understanding how people expect it to work. Tim Bell has taken some time to write down how he expects a quota system to work for CERN's use case [0], which we'll be working into a specification for an enforcement model [1]. We'd like to see if the User Committee can help us collect more information from users and operators about how they expect enforcement to be done. Do your deployments use hierarchical projects? How do you manage quota today? Do you have expectations about how quotas and limits work across related projects (e.g. setting quota on a parent project affects the children in X ways)? Depending on responses, it'd be nice to aggregate the results, kind of like what Tim provided, so that we can write a specification for them. Is there a way we can leverage the UC to collect this information? Thanks, Lance [0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-February/111999.html [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/549766/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From Tim.Bell at cern.ch Tue Mar 13 19:35:25 2018 From: Tim.Bell at cern.ch (Tim Bell) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 19:35:25 +0000 Subject: [User-committee] [Scientific] Unified limits and hierarchical project use cases Message-ID: Lance, Thanks for reaching out. BTW, we're not set on how hierarchical quotas should work but we were trying to write down a possible scenario. There was also quite a lot of interest from other labs so I'm adding the Scientific SIG to the thread. We also expanded a little on the approach in http://openstack-in-production.blogspot.fr/2017/07/nested-quota-models.html based on some discussions with Sean where he was looking for more detail. Tim -----Original Message----- From: Lance Bragstad Date: Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 20:25 To: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org" Subject: [User-committee] Unified limits and hierarchical project use cases Hey all, Unified limits and hierarchical quotas was a big topic during the Rocky PTG. With the ground work laid in Queens, most of the discussions for Rocky focused on different enforcement models. For those who haven't been keeping up with the unified limits discussions, an enforcement model is an opinionated way of how a quota, or limit, should behave with respect to other parent, sibling, or child projects. It's possible to think of multiple ways in which enforcement can be done, and it's not that there is one right way and the rest are wrong, just a difference in how quotas might need to behave for different deployments. During the discussions at the PTG, everyone in the room agreed that we don't really understand how people are using hierarchical projects. This makes it tough to design a quota or limit enforcement model without understanding how people expect it to work. Tim Bell has taken some time to write down how he expects a quota system to work for CERN's use case [0], which we'll be working into a specification for an enforcement model [1]. We'd like to see if the User Committee can help us collect more information from users and operators about how they expect enforcement to be done. Do your deployments use hierarchical projects? How do you manage quota today? Do you have expectations about how quotas and limits work across related projects (e.g. setting quota on a parent project affects the children in X ways)? Depending on responses, it'd be nice to aggregate the results, kind of like what Tim provided, so that we can write a specification for them. Is there a way we can leverage the UC to collect this information? Thanks, Lance [0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-February/111999.html [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/549766/ From john at johngarbutt.com Tue Mar 13 21:07:23 2018 From: john at johngarbutt.com (John Garbutt) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 21:07:23 +0000 Subject: [User-committee] [Openstack-sigs] [Scientific] Unified limits and hierarchical project use cases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 at 19:36, Tim Bell wrote: > Lance, > > Thanks for reaching out. BTW, we're not set on how hierarchical quotas > should work but we were trying to write down a possible scenario. There was > also quite a lot of interest from other labs so I'm adding the Scientific > SIG to the thread. > > We also expanded a little on the approach in > http://openstack-in-production.blogspot.fr/2017/07/nested-quota-models.html > based on some discussions with Sean where he was looking for more detail. > I had forgotton about that blog, thanks for reminding me. My current proposal is really going for something as simple as possible that unblocks a bunch of use cases in a way that we can discover what might need building next: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/549766/ It limits the hierarchy to two levels for coding (and operational) simplicity. I was thinking of the community / virtual organisation model (VOMS/EGI AAI), where the community gets an amount of quota. That community is then allowed one level of sub projects that can also use some resources from the pool of quota given to the whole community. Given you must count how many resources are owned by all projects in the tree, there is a strong argument towards keeping the tree as small as possible. I am particularly interested in the use cases that are really blocked with only two levels of hierarchy. Thanks, John -----Original Message----- > From: Lance Bragstad > Date: Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 20:25 > To: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org" < > user-committee at lists.openstack.org> > Subject: [User-committee] Unified limits and hierarchical project use cases > > Hey all, > > Unified limits and hierarchical quotas was a big topic during the Rocky > PTG. With the ground work laid in Queens, most of the discussions for > Rocky focused on different enforcement models. > > For those who haven't been keeping up with the unified limits > discussions, an enforcement model is an opinionated way of how a quota, > or limit, should behave with respect to other parent, sibling, or child > projects. It's possible to think of multiple ways in which enforcement > can be done, and it's not that there is one right way and the rest are > wrong, just a difference in how quotas might need to behave for > different deployments. > > During the discussions at the PTG, everyone in the room agreed that we > don't really understand how people are using hierarchical projects. > This > makes it tough to design a quota or limit enforcement model without > understanding how people expect it to work. Tim Bell has taken some > time > to write down how he expects a quota system to work for CERN's use case > [0], which we'll be working into a specification for an enforcement > model [1]. > > We'd like to see if the User Committee can help us collect more > information from users and operators about how they expect enforcement > to be done. Do your deployments use hierarchical projects? How do you > manage quota today? Do you have expectations about how quotas and > limits > work across related projects (e.g. setting quota on a parent project > affects the children in X ways)? > > Depending on responses, it'd be nice to aggregate the results, kind of > like what Tim provided, so that we can write a specification for them. > > Is there a way we can leverage the UC to collect this information? > > Thanks, > > Lance > > [0] > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-February/111999.html > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/549766/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > openstack-sigs mailing list > openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Tim.Bell at cern.ch Tue Mar 13 21:22:00 2018 From: Tim.Bell at cern.ch (Tim Bell) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 21:22:00 +0000 Subject: [User-committee] [Openstack-sigs] [Scientific] Unified limits and hierarchical project use cases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <22661168-FA4C-4572-BF54-F704E65191C9@cern.ch> John, Two levels would certainly solve the vast majority of our use cases (i.e. delegation to a VO/Experiment within an envelope). The CERN blog included the expansion to 3 in that there had been some concerns from potential implementers raised over the algorithms when the nesting went beyond 2. Replacing the per user use case and moving resource ownership to the project would also simplify code in other areas. Tim From: John Garbutt Date: Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 22:08 To: "openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org" Cc: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org" Subject: Re: [User-committee] [Openstack-sigs] [Scientific] Unified limits and hierarchical project use cases On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 at 19:36, Tim Bell > wrote: Lance, Thanks for reaching out. BTW, we're not set on how hierarchical quotas should work but we were trying to write down a possible scenario. There was also quite a lot of interest from other labs so I'm adding the Scientific SIG to the thread. We also expanded a little on the approach in http://openstack-in-production.blogspot.fr/2017/07/nested-quota-models.html based on some discussions with Sean where he was looking for more detail. I had forgotton about that blog, thanks for reminding me. My current proposal is really going for something as simple as possible that unblocks a bunch of use cases in a way that we can discover what might need building next: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/549766/ It limits the hierarchy to two levels for coding (and operational) simplicity. I was thinking of the community / virtual organisation model (VOMS/EGI AAI), where the community gets an amount of quota. That community is then allowed one level of sub projects that can also use some resources from the pool of quota given to the whole community. Given you must count how many resources are owned by all projects in the tree, there is a strong argument towards keeping the tree as small as possible. I am particularly interested in the use cases that are really blocked with only two levels of hierarchy. Thanks, John -----Original Message----- From: Lance Bragstad > Date: Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 20:25 To: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org" > Subject: [User-committee] Unified limits and hierarchical project use cases Hey all, Unified limits and hierarchical quotas was a big topic during the Rocky PTG. With the ground work laid in Queens, most of the discussions for Rocky focused on different enforcement models. For those who haven't been keeping up with the unified limits discussions, an enforcement model is an opinionated way of how a quota, or limit, should behave with respect to other parent, sibling, or child projects. It's possible to think of multiple ways in which enforcement can be done, and it's not that there is one right way and the rest are wrong, just a difference in how quotas might need to behave for different deployments. During the discussions at the PTG, everyone in the room agreed that we don't really understand how people are using hierarchical projects. This makes it tough to design a quota or limit enforcement model without understanding how people expect it to work. Tim Bell has taken some time to write down how he expects a quota system to work for CERN's use case [0], which we'll be working into a specification for an enforcement model [1]. We'd like to see if the User Committee can help us collect more information from users and operators about how they expect enforcement to be done. Do your deployments use hierarchical projects? How do you manage quota today? Do you have expectations about how quotas and limits work across related projects (e.g. setting quota on a parent project affects the children in X ways)? Depending on responses, it'd be nice to aggregate the results, kind of like what Tim provided, so that we can write a specification for them. Is there a way we can leverage the UC to collect this information? Thanks, Lance [0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-February/111999.html [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/549766/ _______________________________________________ openstack-sigs mailing list openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mrhillsman at gmail.com Tue Mar 13 21:27:13 2018 From: mrhillsman at gmail.com (Melvin Hillsman) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:27:13 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] [Openstack-sigs] [Scientific] Unified limits and hierarchical project use cases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hey Lance, Thanks for putting this on our radar. Personally I need to read Tim's blog and understand a bit more about what this is exactly. I do remember a thread last year that got a lot of responses of which hierarchical quotas[0] [0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2017-January/012436.html On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:07 PM, John Garbutt wrote: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 at 19:36, Tim Bell wrote: > >> Lance, >> >> Thanks for reaching out. BTW, we're not set on how hierarchical quotas >> should work but we were trying to write down a possible scenario. There was >> also quite a lot of interest from other labs so I'm adding the Scientific >> SIG to the thread. >> >> We also expanded a little on the approach in http://openstack-in- >> production.blogspot.fr/2017/07/nested-quota-models.html based on some >> discussions with Sean where he was looking for more detail. >> > > I had forgotton about that blog, thanks for reminding me. > > My current proposal is really going for something as simple as possible > that unblocks a bunch of use cases in a way that we can discover what might > need building next: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/549766/ > > It limits the hierarchy to two levels for coding (and operational) > simplicity. I was thinking of the community / virtual organisation model > (VOMS/EGI AAI), where the community gets an amount of quota. That community > is then allowed one level of sub projects that can also use some resources > from the pool of quota given to the whole community. Given you must count > how many resources are owned by all projects in the tree, there is a strong > argument towards keeping the tree as small as possible. > > I am particularly interested in the use cases that are really blocked with > only two levels of hierarchy. > > Thanks, > John > > -----Original Message----- >> From: Lance Bragstad >> Date: Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 20:25 >> To: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org" > openstack.org> >> Subject: [User-committee] Unified limits and hierarchical project use >> cases >> >> Hey all, >> >> Unified limits and hierarchical quotas was a big topic during the >> Rocky >> PTG. With the ground work laid in Queens, most of the discussions for >> Rocky focused on different enforcement models. >> >> For those who haven't been keeping up with the unified limits >> discussions, an enforcement model is an opinionated way of how a >> quota, >> or limit, should behave with respect to other parent, sibling, or >> child >> projects. It's possible to think of multiple ways in which enforcement >> can be done, and it's not that there is one right way and the rest are >> wrong, just a difference in how quotas might need to behave for >> different deployments. >> >> During the discussions at the PTG, everyone in the room agreed that we >> don't really understand how people are using hierarchical projects. >> This >> makes it tough to design a quota or limit enforcement model without >> understanding how people expect it to work. Tim Bell has taken some >> time >> to write down how he expects a quota system to work for CERN's use >> case >> [0], which we'll be working into a specification for an enforcement >> model [1]. >> >> We'd like to see if the User Committee can help us collect more >> information from users and operators about how they expect enforcement >> to be done. Do your deployments use hierarchical projects? How do you >> manage quota today? Do you have expectations about how quotas and >> limits >> work across related projects (e.g. setting quota on a parent project >> affects the children in X ways)? >> >> Depending on responses, it'd be nice to aggregate the results, kind of >> like what Tim provided, so that we can write a specification for them. >> >> Is there a way we can leverage the UC to collect this information? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Lance >> >> [0] >> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017- >> February/111999.html >> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/549766/ >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openstack-sigs mailing list >> openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs >> > > _______________________________________________ > User-committee mailing list > User-committee at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee > > -- Kind regards, Melvin Hillsman mrhillsman at gmail.com mobile: (832) 264-2646 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mrhillsman at gmail.com Wed Mar 14 14:18:20 2018 From: mrhillsman at gmail.com (Melvin Hillsman) Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 09:18:20 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] [Openstack-operators] Stable Branch EOL and "Extended Maintenance" Resolution In-Reply-To: <5F54EB7C-EC87-415C-815B-3E4881092E6F@openstack.org> References: <5F54EB7C-EC87-415C-815B-3E4881092E6F@openstack.org> Message-ID: Hi everyone, I believe this resolution is getting close to being passed and so I highly suggest anyone interested provide any feedback they have good/bad/indifferent - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/548916/3/resolutions/20180301-stable-branch-eol.rst On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 7:42 AM, Anne Bertucio wrote: > Hi all, > > Given our conversations this morning at the Ops Midcycle about Extended > Maintenance, particularly how projects individually deciding stable > maintenance policies would affect operators, I wanted to pop this to the > top of your inbox again. The thread is actively moving, so it’d be good to > get your operator input in there: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/548916/ > > > Anne Bertucio > OpenStack Foundation > anne at openstack.org | irc: annabelleB > > > > > > On Mar 7, 2018, at 1:16 PM, Chris Morgan wrote: > > Thanks for pointing this one out! > > Chris > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:53 PM, Melvin Hillsman > wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> If you are interested in the items in the subject please be sure to take >> time to review and comment on the following patch - >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/548916/ >> >> -- >> Kind regards, >> >> Melvin Hillsman >> mrhillsman at gmail.com >> mobile: (832) 264-2646 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> >> > > > -- > Chris Morgan > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > > > -- Kind regards, Melvin Hillsman mrhillsman at gmail.com mobile: (832) 264-2646 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mrhillsman at gmail.com Wed Mar 14 19:15:31 2018 From: mrhillsman at gmail.com (Melvin Hillsman) Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:15:31 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] [forum] We want your session ideas for the Vancouver Forum! Message-ID: Hey everyone, Please take time to put ideas for sessions at the forum in the TC and/or UC catch-all etherpads or any of the others that are appropriate: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum/Vancouver2018 We really want to get as many session ideas as possible so that the committee has too many to choose from :) Here is an idea of the types of sessions to think about proposing: *Project-specific sessions* Where developers can ask users specific questions about their experience, users can provide feedback from the last release and cross-community collaboration on the priorities and 'blue sky' ideas for the next release can occur. *Strategic, whole-of-community discussions* To think about the big picture, including beyond just one release cycle and new technologies *Cross-project sessions* In a similar vein to what has happened at past design summits, but with increased emphasis on issues that are of relevant to all areas of the community If you have organized any events in the past year you probably have heard of or been in some sessions that are perfect for the Forum. -- Kind regards, Melvin Hillsman mrhillsman at gmail.com mobile: (832) 264-2646 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From james.page at ubuntu.com Fri Mar 16 10:10:23 2018 From: james.page at ubuntu.com (James Page) Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 10:10:23 +0000 Subject: [User-committee] [ptg][sig][upgrades] Upgrade SIG Message-ID: Hi All I finally got round to writing up my summary of the Upgrades session at the PTG in Dublin (see [0]). One outcome of that session was to form a new SIG centered on Upgrading OpenStack - I'm pleased to announce that the SIG has been formally accepted! The objective of the Upgrade SIG is to improve the overall upgrade process for OpenStack Clouds, covering both offline ‘fast-forward’ upgrades and online ‘rolling’ upgrades, by providing a forum for cross-project collaboration between operators and developers to document and codify best practice for upgrading OpenStack. If you are interested in participating in the SIG please add your details to the wiki page under 'Interested Parties': https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Upgrade_SIG I'll be working with the other SIG leads to setup regular IRC meetings in the next week or so - we expect to alternate between slots that are compatible with all time zones. Regards James [0] https://javacruft.wordpress.com/2018/03/16/winning-with-openstack-upgrades/ [1] https://governance.openstack.org/sigs/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tobias at citynetwork.se Mon Mar 19 09:59:45 2018 From: tobias at citynetwork.se (Tobias Rydberg) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:59:45 +0100 Subject: [User-committee] [publiccloud-wg] New meeting time and call to Forum brainstorming Message-ID: <0b04f6e6-7216-99aa-087b-723a14a04203@citynetwork.se> Hi folks, At last group meeting we decided upon a new meeting time for our bi-weekly meetings - new meeting time is: *Thursdays 1400 UTC odd weeks in IRC channel #openstack-publiccloud* Wiki and official calendar file are updated accordingly. During last meeting we touched on the subject "Forum sessions", got a few ideas. Now it's time to start brainstorming more officially. If you have a topic - please add it to the official list of topics for the Public Cloud WG [1] - and put your name as moderator. If you need or would like to have help moderating, please make a note about that and I'm pretty sure we can figure out a way to solve that as well. Next meeting will focus a bit on the Forum sessions - but it is encouraged to start discussions in #openstack-publiccloud before that. Deadline for proposal submission is April 2nd. More can be read at the Forum wiki page [2]. [1] - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-publiccloud-wg-brainstorming [2] - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum/Vancouver2018 Talk soon! Tobias -- Tobias Rydberg Senior Developer Mobile: +46 733 312780 www.citynetwork.eu | www.citycloud.com INNOVATION THROUGH OPEN IT INFRASTRUCTURE ISO 9001, 14001, 27001, 27015 & 27018 CERTIFIED -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 3945 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From mvanwink at rackspace.com Mon Mar 19 13:07:48 2018 From: mvanwink at rackspace.com (Matt Van Winkle) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:07:48 +0000 Subject: [User-committee] Reminder meeting today at 18:00 UTC Message-ID: <802B4B55-D973-488A-BFCD-4945B72C7465@rackspace.com> Hey folks, Just a quick reminder that our meeting is in #openstack-uc at 18:00 today. If you need to add anything to the agenda, please do so here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/UserCommittee Thanks! VW -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mrhillsman at gmail.com Wed Mar 21 15:45:39 2018 From: mrhillsman at gmail.com (Melvin Hillsman) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 10:45:39 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] [forum] We want your session ideas for the Vancouver Forum! Message-ID: Hey everyone, Please take time to put ideas for sessions at the forum in the TC and/or UC catch-all etherpads or any of the others that are appropriate: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum/Vancouver2018 We really want to get as many session ideas as possible so that the committee has too many to choose from :) Here is an idea of the types of sessions to think about proposing: *Project-specific sessions* Where developers can ask users specific questions about their experience, users can provide feedback from the last release and cross-community collaboration on the priorities and 'blue sky' ideas for the next release can occur. *Strategic, whole-of-community discussions* To think about the big picture, including beyond just one release cycle and new technologies *Cross-project sessions* In a similar vein to what has happened at past design summits, but with increased emphasis on issues that are of relevant to all areas of the community If you have organized any events in the past year you probably have heard of or been in some sessions that are perfect for the Forum. -- Kind regards, Melvin Hillsman mrhillsman at gmail.com mobile: (832) 264-2646 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mvanwink at rackspace.com Mon Mar 26 13:21:29 2018 From: mvanwink at rackspace.com (Matt Van Winkle) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 13:21:29 +0000 Subject: [User-committee] Meeting Reminder - Today at 14:00 UTC Message-ID: <870323E3-E915-438F-9203-6897A3A0916B@rackspace.com> Hey folks, Gentle reminder that the UC meeting is in about 40 minutes. I have roughed out a few things in the agenda, but please feel free to add more. Thanks! VW -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tobias at citynetwork.se Wed Mar 28 11:39:26 2018 From: tobias at citynetwork.se (Tobias Rydberg) Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:39:26 +0200 Subject: [User-committee] [publiccloud-wg] Reminder bi-weekly meeting Public Cloud WG Message-ID: Hi all, Time again for a meeting for the Public Cloud WG - at our new time and channel - tomorrow at 1400 UTC in #openstack-publiccloud Agenda and etherpad at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/publiccloud-wg Cheers, Tobias Rydberg -- Tobias Rydberg Senior Developer Mobile: +46 733 312780 www.citynetwork.eu | www.citycloud.com INNOVATION THROUGH OPEN IT INFRASTRUCTURE ISO 9001, 14001, 27001, 27015 & 27018 CERTIFIED -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 3945 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: