Open Stack

Dear Andreas, all,

I agree that some parts should be retired.

I however wonder how the outcome of the Product WG (i.e. the development proposals) could be conserved (https://github.com/openstack/development-proposals/tree/master/development-proposals/proposed).
Those proposals had been references e.g. by other groups and IMHO it would be good to keep the use cases and requirements contained within.

Best regards,
Gerald

-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com> 
Sent: Donnerstag, 30. August 2018 08:38
To: Rochelle Grober <rochelle.grober at huawei.com>; user-committee at lists.openstack.org; ItzShamail at gmail.com; arkady_kanevsky at dell.com
Subject: Re: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo openstack-infra/featuretracker ?

On 2018-08-29 22:41, Rochelle Grober wrote:
> sounds good to me.  The definitive voice for those repos, though, is 
> Shamail. He's the arbiter of those.

That whole topic let'S me wonder what todo with:
* IRC channel #openstack-product
* and repository openstack/development-proposals

Can both be retired as well? #openstack-product is really empty...

And you still get changes proposed, e.g.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/573756/ .

I can help with proposing the retirement changes if you want,

Andreas

> --Rocky
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> Rochelle Grober Rochelle Grober
> M: +1-6508889722 <tel:+1-6508889722>(preferred)
> E: rochelle.grober at huawei.com <mailto:rochelle.grober at huawei.com>
> 2012 <tel:2012>实验室-硅谷研究所技术规划及合作部
> 2012 <tel:2012> Laboratories-Silicon Valley Technology Planning & 
> Cooperation,Silicon Valley Research Center *From:*Andreas Jaeger 
> *To:*user-committee at lists.openstack.org,
> *Date:*2018-08-29 12:45:32
> *Subject:*Re: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo 
> openstack-infra/featuretracker ?
> 
> On 2018-08-29 07:11, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> Product WG,
>> 
>> are you still working on the featuretracker? I see that 
>> http://featuretracker.openstack.org/ is not up and the repo which is 
>> under OpenStack Infra ownership has no commits for a long time, see
>> 
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/featuretrack
>> er http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/featuretracker
>> 
>> I propose to retire featuretracker together with puppet-featuretracker:
>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/puppet-featuretracker
>> 
>> If you take this work on again, we can always un-retire.
>> 
>> Please advise how to move forward,
> 
> 
> I see that the product WG has been disbanded [1], so will retire these 
> two repositories now as well,
> 
> Andreas
> 
> [1]
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/2018-February/0025
> 99.html
> 
> --
>   Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi
>    SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>     GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
>         HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
>      GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 
> A126
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> User-committee mailing list
> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee


--
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
       HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126


_______________________________________________
User-committee mailing list
User-committee at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5508 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20180830/cbda5d19/attachment.bin>