From jimmy at openstack.org Thu Aug 2 22:50:55 2018 From: jimmy at openstack.org (Jimmy McArthur) Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 17:50:55 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] The UC at Stein PTG + Upcoming Elections Message-ID: <5B638ACF.4090902@openstack.org> Hi All - Just a quick note to let you know that the UC will be meeting at the PTG. Wednesday, Septemeber 12th looks like it will be the likely date. If you're interested in chiming in on User Committee matters or planning to run for the PTG, this would be a very good meeting to attend. Here's a look at the current proposed agenda [1]. If you have other items or want to weigh in on what's there, please do! Also, while I'm here, don't forget to nominate yourself or someone else for the User Committee. Elections will be next week. Here's a very rough primer on what it takes to be a UC Member [2]. More info can be found here [3]. Thanks and let me know if you have any questions. Cheers, Jimmy [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/uc-stein-ptg [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/UC-Election-Qualifications [3] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/UserCommittee From mvanwinkle at salesforce.com Fri Aug 3 14:30:13 2018 From: mvanwinkle at salesforce.com (Matt Van Winkle) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 09:30:13 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] UC Candidacy Message-ID: Greetings OpenStack Operators and Users, I’d like to take the opportunity to state my candidacy in the upcoming UC election. I have enjoyed the work we have been able to accomplish these last 12 months and I would like to serve another term to help continue the momentum. After 6 years in Operations and Engineering for Rackspace’s public cloud, I have recently joined Salesforce to help with their OpenStack efforts. At both companies, I’ve had the distinct pleasure of serving a number of talented engineers and teams as they have worked to scale and manage the infrastructure. During this time, I’ve also enjoyed sharing ideas with and learning from other Operators running large OpenStack clouds in order to find new and creative ways to solve challenges With respect to community involvement, my first summit was Portland and have made all but two since. I’ve also been very active in the Operators community since helping plan the very first meet-up in San Jose. I’ve given a few talks in the past and have served as track chair many times. After Paris, I began chairing the Large Deployments Team. This team, while inactive now, was a long running group of operators that shared many ideas on scaling OpenStack and has had some successes running feature requests to ground with dev teams. It’s been a distinct pleasure to work with such smart folks from around the community. Chairing LDT also led to an opportunity to join the Ops Meetup Team - working with others on planning Operator mid-cycles and Ops related Summit/Forum sessions. I was fortunate enough to be part of the group that helped the old UC craft the bylaw changes that have expanded the committee and made it the elected body it is today. After serving as an election official in the first election, I chose to run for an open spot a year ago. Regardless of the outcome of this election, it is really awesome to see the evolution of the UC and how it’s able to better coordinate Operator and User efforts in guiding the community and the development cycle. If re-elected, I hope to keep helping more Users and Operators understand how to take better advantage of the the various events and dev cycle to drive improvement and change in the software. The UC has a vision of seeing conversations at and Operators mid-cycle or from an OpenStack Days OPs session become specific topic submissions at the next summit. Conversely, we'd love this pattern to be regular enough that the Dev teams start proposing session ideas for certain feedback at upcoming OPs gatherings to complete the cycle. While there is still plenty of work to do to make these things a reality, the UC has been laying the ground work since the Dublin PTG. I'd like to serve another term so I can do my part to help keep making progress. Beyond that, I want to continue the great work of the UC members to date on being an advocate for the User with the Board, TC and community at large. I appreciate the time and the consideration. Thanks! VW -- Matt Van Winkle Senior Manager, Software Engineering | Salesforce Mobile: 210-445-4183 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From aspiers at suse.com Fri Aug 3 15:41:57 2018 From: aspiers at suse.com (Adam Spiers) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 16:41:57 +0100 Subject: [User-committee] [openstack-dev] [sig][upgrades][ansible][charms][tripleo][kolla][airship] reboot or poweroff? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20180803154157.7h33v5pxdbbcmdtx@pacific.linksys.moosehall> [Adding openstack-sigs list too; apologies for the extreme cross-posting, but I think in this case the discussion deserves wide visibility. Happy to be corrected if there's a better way to handle this.] Hi James, James Page wrote: >Hi All > >tl;dr we (the original founders) have not managed to invest the time to get >the Upgrades SIG booted - time to hit reboot or time to poweroff? TL;DR response: reboot, absolutely no question! My full response is below. >Since Vancouver, two of the original SIG chairs have stepped down leaving >me in the hot seat with minimal participation from either deployment >projects or operators in the IRC meetings. In addition I've only been able >to make every 3rd IRC meeting, so they have generally not being happening. > >I think the current timing is not good for a lot of folk so finding a >better slot is probably a must-have if the SIG is going to continue - and >maybe moving to a monthly or bi-weekly schedule rather than the weekly slot >we have now. > >In addition I need some willing folk to help with leadership in the SIG. >If you have an interest and would like to help please let me know! > >I'd also like to better engage with all deployment projects - upgrades is >something that deployment tools should be looking to encapsulate as >features, so it would be good to get deployment projects engaged in the SIG >with nominated representatives. > >Based on the attendance in upgrades sessions in Vancouver and >developer/operator appetite to discuss all things upgrade at said sessions >I'm assuming that there is still interest in having a SIG for Upgrades but >I may be wrong! > >Thoughts? As a SIG leader in a similar position (albeit with one other very helpful person on board), let me throw my £0.02 in ... With both upgrades and self-healing I think there is a big disparity between supply (developers with time to work on the functionality) and demand (operators who need the functionality). And perhaps also the high demand leads to a lot of developers being interested in the topic whilst not having much spare time to help out. That is probably why we both see high attendance at the summit / PTG events but relatively little activity in between. I also freely admit that the inevitable conflicts with downstream requirements mean that I have struggled to find time to be as proactive with driving momentum as I had wanted, although I'm hoping to pick this up again over the next weeks leading up to the PTG. It sounds like maybe you have encountered similar challenges. That said, I strongly believe that both of these SIGs offer a *lot* of value, and even if we aren't yet seeing the level of online activity that we would like, I think it's really important that they both continue. If for no other reasons, the offline sessions at the summits and PTGs are hugely useful for helping converge the community on common approaches, and the associated repositories / wikis serve as a great focal point too. Regarding online collaboration, yes, building momentum for IRC meetings is tough, especially with the timezone challenges. Maybe a monthly cadence is a reasonable starting point, or twice a month in alternating timezones - but maybe with both meetings within ~24 hours of each other, to reduce accidental creation of geographic silos. Another possibility would be to offer "open clinic" office hours, like the TC and other projects have done. If the TC or anyone else has established best practices in this space, it'd be great to hear them. Either way, I sincerely hope that you decide to continue with the SIG, and that other people step up to help out. These things don't develop overnight but it is a tremendously worthwhile initiative; after all, everyone needs to upgrade OpenStack. Keep the faith! ;-) Cheers, Adam From ed at leafe.com Fri Aug 3 18:42:43 2018 From: ed at leafe.com (Ed Leafe) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 13:42:43 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] UC Candidacy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <45CFCF9F-74A3-4AD8-8BB7-547FE69A997D@leafe.com> On Aug 3, 2018, at 9:30 AM, Matt Van Winkle wrote: > > I’d like to take the opportunity to state my candidacy in the upcoming UC election. I have enjoyed the work we have been able to accomplish these last 12 months and I would like to serve another term to help continue the momentum. The nomination period doesn't open until August 6, but I admire your enthusiasm! August 6 - August 17, 05:59 UTC: Open candidacy for UC positions August 20 - August 24, 11:59 UTC: UC elections (voting) -- Ed Leafe -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: From amy at demarco.com Sat Aug 4 01:15:30 2018 From: amy at demarco.com (Amy Marrich) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 20:15:30 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] New AUC Criteria Message-ID: *Are you an Active User Contributor (AUC)? Well you may be and not even know it! Historically, AUCs met the following criteria: - Organizers of Official OpenStack User Groups: from the Groups Portal- Active members and contributors to functional teams and/or working groups (currently also manually calculated for WGs not using IRC): from IRC logs- Moderators of any of the operators official meet-up sessions: Currently manually calculated.- Contributors to any repository under the UC governance: from Gerrit- Track chairs for OpenStack summits: from the Track Chair tool- Contributors to Superuser (articles, interviews, user stories, etc.): from the Superuser backend- Active moderators on ask.openstack.org : from Ask OpenStackIn July, the User Committee (UC) voted to add the following criteria to becoming an AUC in order to meet the needs of the evolving OpenStack Community. So in addition to the above ways, you can now earn AUC status by meeting the following: - User survey participants who completed a deployment survey- Ops midcycle session moderators- OpenStack Days organizers- SIG Members nominated by SIG leaders- Active Women of OpenStack participants- Active Diversity WG participantsWell that’s great you have met the requirements to become an AUC but what does that mean? AUCs can run for open UC positions and can vote in the elections. AUCs also receive a discounted $300 ticket for OpenStack Summit as well as having the coveted AUC insignia on your badge!* And remember nominations for the User Committee open on Monday, August 6 and end on August, 17 with voting August 20 to August 24. Amy Marrich (spotz) User Committee -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mrhillsman at gmail.com Mon Aug 6 05:14:02 2018 From: mrhillsman at gmail.com (Melvin Hillsman) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 00:14:02 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] Reminder: User Committee Meeting @ 1400UTC Message-ID: Hi everyone, Reminder about UC meeting in #openstack-uc; please add to agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/UserCommittee#Meeting_Agenda.2FPrevious_Meeting_Logs -- Kind regards, Melvin Hillsman mrhillsman at gmail.com mobile: (832) 264-2646 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ed at leafe.com Mon Aug 6 16:52:38 2018 From: ed at leafe.com (Ed Leafe) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 11:52:38 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] UC nomination period is now open! Message-ID: <277DC0C9-C34D-47D9-B14F-81E41F136909@leafe.com> As the subject says, the nomination period for the summer[0] User Committee elections is now open. Any individual member of the Foundation who is an Active User Contributor (AUC) can propose their candidacy (except the three sitting UC members elected in the previous election). Self-nomination is common; no third party nomination is required. Nominations are made by sending an email to the user-committee at lists.openstack.org mailing-list, with the subject: “UC candidacy” by August 17, 05:59 UTC. The email can include a description of the candidate platform. The candidacy is then confirmed by one of the election officials, after verification of the electorate status of the candidate. [0] Sorry, southern hemisphere people! -- Ed Leafe From mvanwinkle at salesforce.com Mon Aug 6 17:26:01 2018 From: mvanwinkle at salesforce.com (Matt Van Winkle) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 12:26:01 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] UC Candidacy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Resending this since I got my wires crossed on last week and jumped the gun. On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 9:30 AM Matt Van Winkle wrote: > Greetings OpenStack Operators and Users, > > I’d like to take the opportunity to state my candidacy in the upcoming UC election. I have enjoyed the work we have been able to accomplish these last 12 months and I would like to serve another term to help continue the momentum. > > After 6 years in Operations and Engineering for Rackspace’s public cloud, I have recently joined Salesforce to help with their OpenStack efforts. At both companies, I’ve had the distinct pleasure of serving a number of talented engineers and teams as they have worked to scale and manage the infrastructure. During this time, I’ve also enjoyed sharing ideas with and learning from other Operators running large OpenStack clouds in order to find new and creative ways to solve challenges > > With respect to community involvement, my first summit was Portland and have made all but two since. I’ve also been very active in the Operators community since helping plan the very first meet-up in San Jose. I’ve given a few talks in the past and have served as track chair many times. After Paris, I began chairing the Large Deployments Team. This team, while inactive now, was a long running group of operators that shared many ideas on scaling OpenStack and has had some successes running feature requests to ground with dev teams. It’s been a distinct pleasure to work with such smart folks from around the community. Chairing LDT also led to an opportunity to join the Ops Meetup Team - working with others on planning Operator mid-cycles and Ops related Summit/Forum sessions. > > I was fortunate enough to be part of the group that helped the old UC craft the bylaw changes that have expanded the committee and made it the elected body it is today. After serving as an election official in the first election, I chose to run for an open spot a year ago. Regardless of the outcome of this election, it is really awesome to see the evolution of the UC and how it’s able to better coordinate Operator and User efforts in guiding the community and the development cycle. > > If re-elected, I hope to keep helping more Users and Operators understand how to take better advantage of the the various events and dev cycle to drive improvement and change in the software. The UC has a vision of seeing conversations at and Operators mid-cycle or from an OpenStack Days OPs session become specific topic submissions at the next summit. Conversely, we'd love this pattern to be regular enough that the Dev teams start proposing session ideas for certain feedback at upcoming OPs gatherings to complete the cycle. While there is still plenty of work to do to make these things a reality, the UC has been laying the ground work since the Dublin PTG. I'd like to serve another term so I can do my part to help keep making progress. Beyond that, I want to continue the great work of the UC members to date on being an advocate for the User with the Board, TC and community at large. > > I appreciate the time and the consideration. > Thanks! > VW > > > > -- > Matt Van Winkle > Senior Manager, Software Engineering | Salesforce > Mobile: 210-445-4183 > -- Matt Van Winkle Senior Manager, Software Engineering | Salesforce Mobile: 210-445-4183 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ed at leafe.com Tue Aug 7 16:26:59 2018 From: ed at leafe.com (Ed Leafe) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 11:26:59 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] UC Candidacy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <59225C47-A58F-4466-A4A6-75DEF37B4F2A@leafe.com> On Aug 6, 2018, at 12:26 PM, Matt Van Winkle wrote: > > Resending this since I got my wires crossed on last week and jumped the gun. Thanks. Your candidacy is confirmed. -- Ed Leafe From amy at demarco.com Mon Aug 13 14:27:13 2018 From: amy at demarco.com (Amy Marrich) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 09:27:13 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] User Committee Election Nominations Reminder Message-ID: Just wanted to remind everyone that the nomination period for the User Committee elections are open until August 17, 05:59 UTC. If you are an AUC and thinking about running what's stopping you? If you know of someone who would make a great committee member nominate them! Help make a difference for Operators, Users and the Community! Thanks, Amy Marrich (spotz) User Committee -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From amy at demarco.com Mon Aug 13 23:10:33 2018 From: amy at demarco.com (Amy Marrich) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 18:10:33 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] =?utf-8?q?=28no_subject=29?= Message-ID: Hi everyone, If you’re running OpenStack, please participate in the User Survey to share more about the technology you are using and provide feedback for the community by *August 21 - hurry, it’s next week!!* By completing a deployment, you will qualify as an AUC and receive a $300 USD ticket to the two upcoming Summits. Please help us spread the word. a we're trying to gather as much real-world deployment data as possible to share back with both the operator and developer communities. We are only conducting one survey this year, and the report will be published at the Berlin Summit . II you would like OpenStack user data in the meantime, check out the analytics dashboard updates in real time, throughout the year. The information provided is confidential and will only be presented in aggregate unless you consent to make it public. The deadline to complete the survey and be part of the next report is next *Tuesday, August 21** at 23:59 UTC.* - You can login and complete the OpenStack User Survey here: http://www.openstack.org/user-survey - If you’re interested in joining the OpenStack User Survey Working Group to help with the survey analysis, please complete this form: https://openstackfoundation.formstack.com/forms/user_survey_working_group - Help us promote the User Survey: https://twitter.com/Op enStack/status/993589356312088577 Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Amy Amy Marrich (spotz) OpenStack User Committee -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From amy at demarco.com Wed Aug 15 20:00:34 2018 From: amy at demarco.com (Amy Marrich) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 15:00:34 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] OpenStack Diversity and Inclusion Survey Message-ID: The Diversity and Inclusion WG is asking for your assistance. We have revised the Diversity Survey that was originally distributed to the Community in the Fall of 2015 and are looking to update our view of the OpenStack community and it's diversity. We are pleased to be working with members of the CHAOSS project who have signed confidentiality agreements in order to assist us in the following ways: 1) Assistance in analyzing the results 2) And feeding the results into the CHAOSS software and metrics development work so that we can help other Open Source projects Please take the time to fill out the survey and share it with others in the community. The survey can be found at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/OpenStackDiversity Thank you for assisting us in this important task! Amy Marrich (spotz) Diversity and Inclusion Working Group Chair -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tobias.rydberg at citynetwork.eu Thu Aug 16 10:30:13 2018 From: tobias.rydberg at citynetwork.eu (Tobias Rydberg) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:30:13 +0200 Subject: [User-committee] [publiccloud-wg] Meeting this afternoon for Public Cloud WG Message-ID: <72285db1-6f3b-9370-1539-6030e84cfb4f@citynetwork.eu> Hi folks, Time for a new meeting for the Public Cloud WG. Agenda draft can be found at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/publiccloud-wg, feel free to add items to that list. See you all later this afternoon at IRC 1400 UTC in #openstack-publiccloud Cheers, Tobias -- Tobias Rydberg Senior Developer Twitter & IRC: tobberydberg www.citynetwork.eu | www.citycloud.com INNOVATION THROUGH OPEN IT INFRASTRUCTURE ISO 9001, 14001, 27001, 27015 & 27018 CERTIFIED From ed at leafe.com Thu Aug 16 17:21:11 2018 From: ed at leafe.com (Ed Leafe) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:21:11 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] User Committee Nominations Closing Soon! Message-ID: <699C3850-848C-438B-9AFB-FD6A1197EF1D@leafe.com> As I write this, there are just over 12 hours left to get in your nominations for the OpenStack User Committee. Nominations close at August 17, 05:59 UTC. If you are an AUC and thinking about running what's stopping you? If you know of someone who would make a great committee member nominate them (with their permission, of course)! Help make a difference for Operators, Users and the Community! -- Ed Leafe From joseph.r.sandoval at gmail.com Thu Aug 16 22:42:44 2018 From: joseph.r.sandoval at gmail.com (Joseph Sandoval) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 15:42:44 -0700 Subject: [User-committee] UC Candidacy Message-ID: Greetings, This email is to announce my candidacy for the upcoming OpenStack User Committee election (August 2018). I’ve spent the last year getting up to speed and participating with UC meetings and now would like to step up my role. I’ve been involved and active with Openstack since the Portland summit. My active operator experience includes leading 2 different teams running Openstack in production at large scale. My first team at Lithium were active contributors and very vocal in sharing what worked for us to help ease their journey in adopting the platform. My current team at Adobe AdCloud is notable for running 100k cores with a lean team and pragmatic approach. Personally, I’ve been organizing Open Infrastructure/Cloud Native meetups, speaking at summit events, providing feedback to help upstream devs, and working directly with other operators in the SF Bay area to promote the local community. If elected I would continue to suggest ways to help amplify operators voices and increase engagement across various events. I appreciate your consideration in my endeavor to be a part of the UC. I believe my experience and perspective will help the UC on their charter. Thanks, Joseph Sandoval irc: josephrsandoval -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From m2elsakha at gmail.com Fri Aug 17 00:18:03 2018 From: m2elsakha at gmail.com (Mohamed Elsakhawy) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 20:18:03 -0400 Subject: [User-committee] UC Candidacy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thank you. Your candidacy is confirmed On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 6:43 PM Joseph Sandoval wrote: > Greetings, > This email is to announce my candidacy for the upcoming OpenStack User > Committee election (August 2018). I’ve spent the last year getting up to > speed and participating with UC meetings and now would like to step up my > role. > > I’ve been involved and active with Openstack since the Portland summit. My > active operator experience includes leading 2 different teams running > Openstack in production at large scale. My first team at Lithium were > active contributors and very vocal in sharing what worked for us to help > ease their journey in adopting the platform. My current team at Adobe > AdCloud is notable for running 100k cores with a lean team and pragmatic > approach. > > Personally, I’ve been organizing Open Infrastructure/Cloud Native > meetups, speaking at summit events, providing feedback to help upstream > devs, and working directly with other operators in the SF Bay area to > promote the local community. > > If elected I would continue to suggest ways to help amplify operators > voices and increase engagement across various events. I appreciate your > consideration in my endeavor to be a part of the UC. I believe my > experience and perspective will help the UC on their charter. > > Thanks, > Joseph Sandoval > irc: josephrsandoval > _______________________________________________ > User-committee mailing list > User-committee at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mrhillsman at gmail.com Mon Aug 20 15:46:28 2018 From: mrhillsman at gmail.com (Melvin Hillsman) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 10:46:28 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] OpenStack PTG! Message-ID: Hi everyone, Friendly reminder that ticket prices will increase to USD $599 on August 22 at 11:59pm PT (August 23 at 6:59 UTC) for the PTG. So purchase your tickets before the price increases. Register here: https://denver2018ptg.eventbrite.com < https://denver2018ptg.eventbrite.com/> Also the discounted hotel block is filling up if it has not already and the last date to book in the hotel block is TODAY! so book now here: www.openstack.org/ptg PTG questions?, please email ptg at openstack.org -- Kind regards, Melvin Hillsman mrhillsman at gmail.com mobile: (832) 264-2646 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From amy at demarco.com Mon Aug 20 16:08:39 2018 From: amy at demarco.com (Amy Marrich) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:08:39 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] [openstack-community] OpenStack PTG! In-Reply-To: <78A9DBD7-5474-448A-8D46-C1DA974EF35D@cisco.com> References: <78A9DBD7-5474-448A-8D46-C1DA974EF35D@cisco.com> Message-ID: Gary, >From the description there that sounds like Summit vs PTG. Thanks, Amy (spotz) On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Gary Kevorkian (gkevorki) < gkevorki at cisco.com> wrote: > The Early Bird deadline was 21/22 August. But, according to the Eventbrite > site, Early Bird pricing has been extended to 28/29 August. > > > > > > > > *Can someone from the OpenStack Foundation confirm, please?* > > > > Thanks! > > GK > > > > > > > > [image: > ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/banners/standard/09_standard_graphic.png] > > > Gary Kevorkian > > EVENT MARKETING MANAGER > > gkevorki at cisco.com > > Tel: +3237912058 > > [image: > ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/twitter-16x16.png] > > > [image: > ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/webex.png] > [image: > ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/sparks.png] > [image: > ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/jabber.png] > > > Cisco Systems, Inc. > > United States > > Cisco.com > > [image: ttp://www.cisco.com/assets/swa/img/thinkbeforeyouprint.gif] > > Think before you print. > > This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole > use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or > authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by > reply email and delete all copies of this message. > > Please click here > for > Company Registration Information. > > > > > > *From: *Melvin Hillsman > *Date: *Monday, August 20, 2018 at 8:46 AM > *To: *OpenStack Operators , " > community at lists.openstack.org" , > user-committee > *Subject: *[openstack-community] OpenStack PTG! > > > > Hi everyone, > > Friendly reminder that ticket prices will increase to USD $599 on August > 22 at 11:59pm PT (August 23 at 6:59 UTC) for the PTG. So purchase your > tickets before the price increases. > > > > Register here: https://denver2018ptg.eventbrite.com < > https://denver2018ptg.eventbrite.com/> > > Also the discounted hotel block is filling up if it has not already and > the last date to book in the hotel block is TODAY! so book now here: > www.openstack.org/ptg > > PTG questions?, please email ptg at openstack.org openstack.org> > > > -- > Kind regards, > > Melvin Hillsman > mrhillsman at gmail.com > > mobile: (832) 264-2646 > > _______________________________________________ > Community mailing list > Community at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image006.png Type: image/png Size: 3506 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 25276 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.png Type: image/png Size: 3510 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.png Type: image/png Size: 3405 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 33012 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 521 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image007.gif Type: image/gif Size: 134 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mvanwinkle at salesforce.com Mon Aug 20 16:39:38 2018 From: mvanwinkle at salesforce.com (Matt Van Winkle) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:39:38 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] Reminder to take the User Survey Message-ID: Hi everyone, The deadline for the 2018 OpenStack User Survey deadline is *tomorrow, August 21 at 11:59pm UTC. *The User Survey is your annual opportunity to provide direct feedback to the OpenStack community, so we can better understand your environment and needs. We send all feedback directly to the project teams who work to improve how we provide value to you. By completing a deployment in the User Survey, you qualify as an Active User Contributor (AUC) and will receive a discount for the Berlin Summit - only $300 USD! The survey will take less than 20 minutes, and there’s not much time left! Please your User Survey by *tomorrow*, *Tuesday, August 21 at 11:59pm UTC.* Get started now: https://www.openstack.org/user-survey Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, VW -- Matt Van Winkle Senior Manager, Software Engineering | Salesforce -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kendall at openstack.org Mon Aug 20 17:17:45 2018 From: kendall at openstack.org (Kendall Waters) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 12:17:45 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] [openstack-community] OpenStack PTG! In-Reply-To: <78A9DBD7-5474-448A-8D46-C1DA974EF35D@cisco.com> References: <78A9DBD7-5474-448A-8D46-C1DA974EF35D@cisco.com> Message-ID: <52FD69B2-FA22-4FA7-B210-9AB629575E54@openstack.org> Hi Gary, Melvin was talking about the PTG registration. The Summit early bird deadline is August 28 at 11:59pm PT. Cheers, Kendall Kendall Waters OpenStack Marketing & Events kendall at openstack.org > On Aug 20, 2018, at 11:02 AM, Gary Kevorkian (gkevorki) wrote: > > The Early Bird deadline was 21/22 August. But, according to the Eventbrite site, Early Bird pricing has been extended to 28/29 August. > > > > > Can someone from the OpenStack Foundation confirm, please? > > Thanks! > GK > > > > > Gary Kevorkian > EVENT MARKETING MANAGER > gkevorki at cisco.com > Tel: +3237912058 > > > Cisco Systems, Inc. > United States > Cisco.com > > Think before you print. > This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. > Please click here for Company Registration Information. > > > From: Melvin Hillsman > > Date: Monday, August 20, 2018 at 8:46 AM > To: OpenStack Operators >, "community at lists.openstack.org " >, user-committee > > Subject: [openstack-community] OpenStack PTG! > > Hi everyone, > > Friendly reminder that ticket prices will increase to USD $599 on August 22 at 11:59pm PT (August 23 at 6:59 UTC) for the PTG. So purchase your tickets before the price increases. > > Register here: https://denver2018ptg.eventbrite.com > > > Also the discounted hotel block is filling up if it has not already and the last date to book in the hotel block is TODAY! so book now here: www.openstack.org/ptg > > > PTG questions?, please email ptg at openstack.org at openstack.org > > > -- > Kind regards, > > Melvin Hillsman > mrhillsman at gmail.com > mobile: (832) 264-2646 > _______________________________________________ > Community mailing list > Community at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ed at leafe.com Tue Aug 21 19:44:04 2018 From: ed at leafe.com (Ed Leafe) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 14:44:04 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] UC Elections will not be held Message-ID: <49D533BF-F818-4642-AD23-F93E1F6E8F05@leafe.com> As there were only 2 nominations for the 2 open seats, elections will not be needed. Congratulations to Matt Van Winkle and Joseph Sandoval! -- Ed Leafe From edgar.magana at workday.com Tue Aug 21 19:57:38 2018 From: edgar.magana at workday.com (Edgar Magana) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 19:57:38 +0000 Subject: [User-committee] UC Elections will not be held In-Reply-To: <49D533BF-F818-4642-AD23-F93E1F6E8F05@leafe.com> References: <49D533BF-F818-4642-AD23-F93E1F6E8F05@leafe.com> Message-ID: Congratulations Matt and Joseph! Our community is in good hands with your leadership, looking forward to seeing you in Berlin. Do not hesitate to ask for help at any time. Edgar On 8/21/18, 12:45 PM, "Ed Leafe" wrote: As there were only 2 nominations for the 2 open seats, elections will not be needed. Congratulations to Matt Van Winkle and Joseph Sandoval! -- Ed Leafe _______________________________________________ User-committee mailing list User-committee at lists.openstack.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_user-2Dcommittee&d=DwIGaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=zJVnmWwuk3H0ySNWzMvn_WFZHaXuHfYFrGXivVpZ4I8&s=b5cPci7YTmu4pkYg7k429mism5WKSUOkJpnub4U_Fp8&e= From amy at demarco.com Tue Aug 21 20:26:44 2018 From: amy at demarco.com (Amy Marrich) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 15:26:44 -0500 Subject: [User-committee] [Openstack-sigs] UC Elections will not be held In-Reply-To: <49D533BF-F818-4642-AD23-F93E1F6E8F05@leafe.com> References: <49D533BF-F818-4642-AD23-F93E1F6E8F05@leafe.com> Message-ID: Congrats to VW and Joseph. Thank you to Saverio for his hard work. And lastly thank you to Ed, Chandan, and Mohamed for serving as our election officials! Amy (spotz) User Committee On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > As there were only 2 nominations for the 2 open seats, elections will not > be needed. Congratulations to Matt Van Winkle and Joseph Sandoval! > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > openstack-sigs mailing list > openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From aj at suse.com Wed Aug 29 05:11:25 2018 From: aj at suse.com (Andreas Jaeger) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 07:11:25 +0200 Subject: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo openstack-infra/featuretracker ? Message-ID: <1f474b4b-b43f-32f1-c878-75e1f1bdf6bf@suse.com> Product WG, are you still working on the featuretracker? I see that http://featuretracker.openstack.org/ is not up and the repo which is under OpenStack Infra ownership has no commits for a long time, see https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/featuretracker http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/featuretracker I propose to retire featuretracker together with puppet-featuretracker: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/puppet-featuretracker If you take this work on again, we can always un-retire. Please advise how to move forward, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 From aj at suse.com Wed Aug 29 19:44:58 2018 From: aj at suse.com (Andreas Jaeger) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 21:44:58 +0200 Subject: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo openstack-infra/featuretracker ? In-Reply-To: <1f474b4b-b43f-32f1-c878-75e1f1bdf6bf@suse.com> References: <1f474b4b-b43f-32f1-c878-75e1f1bdf6bf@suse.com> Message-ID: On 2018-08-29 07:11, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > Product WG, > > are you still working on the featuretracker? I see that > http://featuretracker.openstack.org/ is not up and the repo which is > under OpenStack Infra ownership has no commits for a long time, see > > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/featuretracker > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/featuretracker > > I propose to retire featuretracker together with puppet-featuretracker: > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/puppet-featuretracker > > If you take this work on again, we can always un-retire. > > Please advise how to move forward, I see that the product WG has been disbanded [1], so will retire these two repositories now as well, Andreas [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/2018-February/002599.html -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 From rochelle.grober at huawei.com Wed Aug 29 20:41:39 2018 From: rochelle.grober at huawei.com (Rochelle Grober) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 20:41:39 +0000 Subject: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo openstack-infra/featuretracker ? In-Reply-To: References: <1f474b4b-b43f-32f1-c878-75e1f1bdf6bf@suse.com>, Message-ID: 92C66169-4C12-49DD-B67F-0442F7A686A4 sounds good to me. The definitive voice for those repos, though, is Shamail. He's the arbiter of those. --Rocky -------------------------------------------------- Rochelle Grober Rochelle Grober M: +1-6508889722(preferred) E: rochelle.grober at huawei.com 2012实验室-硅谷研究所技术规划及合作部 2012 Laboratories-Silicon Valley Technology Planning & Cooperation,Silicon Valley Research Center From:Andreas Jaeger To:user-committee at lists.openstack.org, Date:2018-08-29 12:45:32 Subject:Re: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo openstack-infra/featuretracker ? On 2018-08-29 07:11, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > Product WG, > > are you still working on the featuretracker? I see that > http://featuretracker.openstack.org/ is not up and the repo which is > under OpenStack Infra ownership has no commits for a long time, see > > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/featuretracker > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/featuretracker > > I propose to retire featuretracker together with puppet-featuretracker: > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/puppet-featuretracker > > If you take this work on again, we can always un-retire. > > Please advise how to move forward, I see that the product WG has been disbanded [1], so will retire these two repositories now as well, Andreas [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/2018-February/002599.html -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 _______________________________________________ User-committee mailing list User-committee at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From aj at suse.com Thu Aug 30 06:37:34 2018 From: aj at suse.com (Andreas Jaeger) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 08:37:34 +0200 Subject: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo openstack-infra/featuretracker ? In-Reply-To: <5B87050C0200005203F3C761@relay2.provo.novell.com> References: <1f474b4b-b43f-32f1-c878-75e1f1bdf6bf@suse.com> <5B87050C0200005203F3C761@relay2.provo.novell.com> Message-ID: On 2018-08-29 22:41, Rochelle Grober wrote: > sounds good to me.  The definitive voice for those repos, though, is > Shamail. He's the arbiter of those. That whole topic let'S me wonder what todo with: * IRC channel #openstack-product * and repository openstack/development-proposals Can both be retired as well? #openstack-product is really empty... And you still get changes proposed, e.g. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/573756/ . I can help with proposing the retirement changes if you want, Andreas > --Rocky > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > Rochelle Grober Rochelle Grober > M: +1-6508889722 (preferred) > E: rochelle.grober at huawei.com > 2012 实验室-硅谷研究所技术规划及合作部 > 2012 Laboratories-Silicon Valley Technology Planning & > Cooperation,Silicon Valley Research Center > *From:*Andreas Jaeger > *To:*user-committee at lists.openstack.org, > *Date:*2018-08-29 12:45:32 > *Subject:*Re: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo > openstack-infra/featuretracker ? > > On 2018-08-29 07:11, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >> Product WG, >> >> are you still working on the featuretracker? I see that >> http://featuretracker.openstack.org/ is not up and the repo which is >> under OpenStack Infra ownership has no commits for a long time, see >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/featuretracker >> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/featuretracker >> >> I propose to retire featuretracker together with puppet-featuretracker: >> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/puppet-featuretracker >> >> If you take this work on again, we can always un-retire. >> >> Please advise how to move forward, > > > I see that the product WG has been disbanded [1], so will retire these > two repositories now as well, > > Andreas > > [1] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/2018-February/002599.html > > -- >   Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi >    SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany >     GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, >         HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) >      GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 > > > _______________________________________________ > User-committee mailing list > User-committee at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 From kunzmann at docomolab-euro.com Thu Aug 30 07:21:05 2018 From: kunzmann at docomolab-euro.com (Kunzmann, Gerald) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 07:21:05 +0000 Subject: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo openstack-infra/featuretracker ? In-Reply-To: References: <1f474b4b-b43f-32f1-c878-75e1f1bdf6bf@suse.com> <5B87050C0200005203F3C761@relay2.provo.novell.com> Message-ID: <6cdef099e7cc4e23954c42886989f3d2@docomolab-euro.com> Dear Andreas, all, I agree that some parts should be retired. I however wonder how the outcome of the Product WG (i.e. the development proposals) could be conserved (https://github.com/openstack/development-proposals/tree/master/development-proposals/proposed). Those proposals had been references e.g. by other groups and IMHO it would be good to keep the use cases and requirements contained within. Best regards, Gerald -----Original Message----- From: Andreas Jaeger Sent: Donnerstag, 30. August 2018 08:38 To: Rochelle Grober ; user-committee at lists.openstack.org; ItzShamail at gmail.com; arkady_kanevsky at dell.com Subject: Re: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo openstack-infra/featuretracker ? On 2018-08-29 22:41, Rochelle Grober wrote: > sounds good to me. The definitive voice for those repos, though, is > Shamail. He's the arbiter of those. That whole topic let'S me wonder what todo with: * IRC channel #openstack-product * and repository openstack/development-proposals Can both be retired as well? #openstack-product is really empty... And you still get changes proposed, e.g. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/573756/ . I can help with proposing the retirement changes if you want, Andreas > --Rocky > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > Rochelle Grober Rochelle Grober > M: +1-6508889722 (preferred) > E: rochelle.grober at huawei.com > 2012 实验室-硅谷研究所技术规划及合作部 > 2012 Laboratories-Silicon Valley Technology Planning & > Cooperation,Silicon Valley Research Center *From:*Andreas Jaeger > *To:*user-committee at lists.openstack.org, > *Date:*2018-08-29 12:45:32 > *Subject:*Re: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo > openstack-infra/featuretracker ? > > On 2018-08-29 07:11, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >> Product WG, >> >> are you still working on the featuretracker? I see that >> http://featuretracker.openstack.org/ is not up and the repo which is >> under OpenStack Infra ownership has no commits for a long time, see >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/featuretrack >> er http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/featuretracker >> >> I propose to retire featuretracker together with puppet-featuretracker: >> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/puppet-featuretracker >> >> If you take this work on again, we can always un-retire. >> >> Please advise how to move forward, > > > I see that the product WG has been disbanded [1], so will retire these > two repositories now as well, > > Andreas > > [1] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/2018-February/0025 > 99.html > > -- > Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi > SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 > A126 > > > _______________________________________________ > User-committee mailing list > User-committee at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 _______________________________________________ User-committee mailing list User-committee at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5508 bytes Desc: not available URL: From aj at suse.com Thu Aug 30 07:27:19 2018 From: aj at suse.com (Andreas Jaeger) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 09:27:19 +0200 Subject: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo openstack-infra/featuretracker ? In-Reply-To: <6cdef099e7cc4e23954c42886989f3d2@docomolab-euro.com> References: <1f474b4b-b43f-32f1-c878-75e1f1bdf6bf@suse.com> <5B87050C0200005203F3C761@relay2.provo.novell.com> <6cdef099e7cc4e23954c42886989f3d2@docomolab-euro.com> Message-ID: <3df29bf0-7760-7f12-8d40-45e366d12e8a@suse.com> On 2018-08-30 09:21, Kunzmann, Gerald wrote: > Dear Andreas, all, > > I agree that some parts should be retired. > > I however wonder how the outcome of the Product WG (i.e. the development proposals) could be conserved (https://github.com/openstack/development-proposals/tree/master/development-proposals/proposed). > Those proposals had been references e.g. by other groups and IMHO it would be good to keep the use cases and requirements contained within. Retirement means the process documented at https://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/drivers.html#retiring-a-project . Basically: Making repo read-only, and pushing a change to delete everything. So, those use cases would be accessible (from old revision) but more difficult to find. Clark, is there a good way to half-retire it? Just block submissions? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 From rochelle.grober at huawei.com Thu Aug 30 17:54:39 2018 From: rochelle.grober at huawei.com (Rochelle Grober) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 17:54:39 +0000 Subject: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo openstack-infra/featuretracker ? In-Reply-To: <3df29bf0-7760-7f12-8d40-45e366d12e8a@suse.com> References: <1f474b4b-b43f-32f1-c878-75e1f1bdf6bf@suse.com> <5B87050C0200005203F3C761@relay2.provo.novell.com> <6cdef099e7cc4e23954c42886989f3d2@docomolab-euro.com>, <3df29bf0-7760-7f12-8d40-45e366d12e8a@suse.com> Message-ID: EAC5534B-B842-4B2D-B9AA-7E140655DFE0 the repos would be good to keep, but locked down. mail list and irc channel *should* go away. --Rocky -------------------------------------------------- Rochelle Grober Rochelle Grober M: +1-6508889722(preferred) E: rochelle.grober at huawei.com 2012实验室-硅谷研究所技术规划及合作部 2012 Laboratories-Silicon Valley Technology Planning & Cooperation,Silicon Valley Research Center From:Andreas Jaeger To:Kunzmann, Gerald,arkady_kanevsky at dell.com,ItzShamail at gmail.com,Rochelle Grober,user-committee at lists.openstack.org,Clark Boylan, Date:2018-08-30 00:27:35 Subject:Re: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo openstack-infra/featuretracker ? On 2018-08-30 09:21, Kunzmann, Gerald wrote: > Dear Andreas, all, > > I agree that some parts should be retired. > > I however wonder how the outcome of the Product WG (i.e. the development proposals) could be conserved (https://github.com/openstack/development-proposals/tree/master/development-proposals/proposed). > Those proposals had been references e.g. by other groups and IMHO it would be good to keep the use cases and requirements contained within. Retirement means the process documented at https://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/drivers.html#retiring-a-project . Basically: Making repo read-only, and pushing a change to delete everything. So, those use cases would be accessible (from old revision) but more difficult to find. Clark, is there a good way to half-retire it? Just block submissions? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From itzshamail at gmail.com Thu Aug 30 18:10:04 2018 From: itzshamail at gmail.com (Shamail Tahir) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 14:10:04 -0400 Subject: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo openstack-infra/featuretracker ? In-Reply-To: <5b87051a.1c69fb81.15607.f6eeSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> References: <1f474b4b-b43f-32f1-c878-75e1f1bdf6bf@suse.com> <5b87051a.1c69fb81.15607.f6eeSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> Message-ID: > On Aug 29, 2018, at 4:41 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote: > > sounds good to me. The definitive voice for those repos, though, is Shamail. He's the arbiter of those. +1, the group has disbanded and the projects in those repos have no contributors anymore and can be concerned as being abandoned. > > --Rocky > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > Rochelle Grober Rochelle Grober > M: +1-6508889722(preferred) > E: rochelle.grober at huawei.com > 2012实验室-硅谷研究所技术规划及合作部 > 2012 Laboratories-Silicon Valley Technology Planning & Cooperation,Silicon Valley Research Center > From:Andreas Jaeger > To:user-committee at lists.openstack.org, > Date:2018-08-29 12:45:32 > Subject:Re: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo openstack-infra/featuretracker ? > > On 2018-08-29 07:11, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > Product WG, > > > > are you still working on the featuretracker? I see that > > http://featuretracker.openstack.org/ is not up and the repo which is > > under OpenStack Infra ownership has no commits for a long time, see > > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/featuretracker > > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/featuretracker > > > > I propose to retire featuretracker together with puppet-featuretracker: > > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/puppet-featuretracker > > > > If you take this work on again, we can always un-retire. > > > > Please advise how to move forward, > > > I see that the product WG has been disbanded [1], so will retire these > two repositories now as well, > > Andreas > > [1] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/2018-February/002599.html > > -- > Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi > SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 > > > _______________________________________________ > User-committee mailing list > User-committee at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee > _______________________________________________ > User-committee mailing list > User-committee at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From itzshamail at gmail.com Thu Aug 30 18:11:00 2018 From: itzshamail at gmail.com (Shamail Tahir) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 14:11:00 -0400 Subject: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo openstack-infra/featuretracker ? In-Reply-To: References: <1f474b4b-b43f-32f1-c878-75e1f1bdf6bf@suse.com> <5B87050C0200005203F3C761@relay2.provo.novell.com> Message-ID: <561EEA8C-8262-4BE4-B441-5E564FB51DDC@gmail.com> > On Aug 30, 2018, at 2:37 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >> On 2018-08-29 22:41, Rochelle Grober wrote: >> sounds good to me. The definitive voice for those repos, though, is >> Shamail. He's the arbiter of those. > > That whole topic let'S me wonder what todo with: > * IRC channel #openstack-product > * and repository openstack/development-proposals > > Can both be retired as well? #openstack-product is really empty... > > And you still get changes proposed, e.g. > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/573756/ . > > I can help with proposing the retirement changes if you want, That would be most welcome. We tried to clean up upon wrapping up but would love the help (since we missed a few things). > > Andreas > >> --Rocky >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> Rochelle Grober Rochelle Grober >> M: +1-6508889722 (preferred) >> E: rochelle.grober at huawei.com >> 2012 实验室-硅谷研究所技术规划及合作部 >> 2012 Laboratories-Silicon Valley Technology Planning & >> Cooperation,Silicon Valley Research Center >> *From:*Andreas Jaeger >> *To:*user-committee at lists.openstack.org, >> *Date:*2018-08-29 12:45:32 >> *Subject:*Re: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo >> openstack-infra/featuretracker ? >> >>> On 2018-08-29 07:11, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >>> Product WG, >>> >>> are you still working on the featuretracker? I see that >>> http://featuretracker.openstack.org/ is not up and the repo which is >>> under OpenStack Infra ownership has no commits for a long time, see >>> >>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/featuretracker >>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/featuretracker >>> >>> I propose to retire featuretracker together with puppet-featuretracker: >>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/puppet-featuretracker >>> >>> If you take this work on again, we can always un-retire. >>> >>> Please advise how to move forward, >> >> >> I see that the product WG has been disbanded [1], so will retire these >> two repositories now as well, >> >> Andreas >> >> [1] >> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/2018-February/002599.html >> >> -- >> Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi >> SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany >> GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, >> HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) >> GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> User-committee mailing list >> User-committee at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee > > > -- > Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi > SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 > From aj at suse.com Fri Aug 31 07:47:41 2018 From: aj at suse.com (Andreas Jaeger) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:47:41 +0200 Subject: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo openstack-infra/featuretracker ? In-Reply-To: <561EEA8C-8262-4BE4-B441-5E564FB51DDC@gmail.com> References: <1f474b4b-b43f-32f1-c878-75e1f1bdf6bf@suse.com> <5B87050C0200005203F3C761@relay2.provo.novell.com> <561EEA8C-8262-4BE4-B441-5E564FB51DDC@gmail.com> Message-ID: <0d7851a9-a56c-c1f2-738a-ff64fb0cfd94@suse.com> On 2018-08-30 20:11, Shamail Tahir wrote: > > >> On Aug 30, 2018, at 2:37 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >> >>> On 2018-08-29 22:41, Rochelle Grober wrote: >>> sounds good to me. The definitive voice for those repos, though, is >>> Shamail. He's the arbiter of those. >> >> That whole topic let'S me wonder what todo with: >> * IRC channel #openstack-product >> * and repository openstack/development-proposals >> >> Can both be retired as well? #openstack-product is really empty... >> >> And you still get changes proposed, e.g. >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/573756/ . >> >> I can help with proposing the retirement changes if you want, > That would be most welcome. We tried to clean up upon wrapping up but would love the help (since we missed a few things). https://review.openstack.org/598477 removes #openstack-product channel. I'm looking at options for the repository, will get back to that later, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 From aj at suse.com Fri Aug 31 08:09:38 2018 From: aj at suse.com (Andreas Jaeger) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 10:09:38 +0200 Subject: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo openstack-infra/featuretracker ? In-Reply-To: <0d7851a9-a56c-c1f2-738a-ff64fb0cfd94@suse.com> References: <1f474b4b-b43f-32f1-c878-75e1f1bdf6bf@suse.com> <5B87050C0200005203F3C761@relay2.provo.novell.com> <561EEA8C-8262-4BE4-B441-5E564FB51DDC@gmail.com> <0d7851a9-a56c-c1f2-738a-ff64fb0cfd94@suse.com> Message-ID: <3f27e075-0eca-54e0-d026-7e3505b9b713@suse.com> On 2018-08-31 09:47, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2018-08-30 20:11, Shamail Tahir wrote: >> >> >>> On Aug 30, 2018, at 2:37 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >>> >>>> On 2018-08-29 22:41, Rochelle Grober wrote: >>>> sounds good to me.  The definitive voice for those repos, though, is >>>> Shamail. He's the arbiter of those. >>> >>> That whole topic let'S me wonder what todo with: >>> * IRC channel #openstack-product >>> * and repository openstack/development-proposals >>> >>> Can both be retired as well? #openstack-product is really empty... >>> >>> And you still get changes proposed, e.g. >>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/573756/ . >>> >>> I can help with proposing the retirement changes if you want, >> That would be most welcome. We tried to clean up upon wrapping up but >> would love the help (since we missed a few things). > > > https://review.openstack.org/598477 removes #openstack-product channel. > > I'm looking at options for the repository, will get back to that later, For the repository, I pushed https://review.openstack.org/598484 . I suggest to merge that, have it publish to specs.openstack.org/openstack/development-proposals as reference for the future - and then retire the repository following the process. Change https://review.openstack.org/598487 updates the index page on specs.openstack.org to list the repository. Shamail, I can propose all the remaining changes, just need a couple of reviews and approvals from you if we do it this way. but first I want to know whether the plan above is fine. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 From kunzmann at docomolab-euro.com Fri Aug 31 09:36:55 2018 From: kunzmann at docomolab-euro.com (Kunzmann, Gerald) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:36:55 +0000 Subject: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo openstack-infra/featuretracker ? In-Reply-To: <3f27e075-0eca-54e0-d026-7e3505b9b713@suse.com> References: <1f474b4b-b43f-32f1-c878-75e1f1bdf6bf@suse.com> <5B87050C0200005203F3C761@relay2.provo.novell.com> <561EEA8C-8262-4BE4-B441-5E564FB51DDC@gmail.com> <0d7851a9-a56c-c1f2-738a-ff64fb0cfd94@suse.com> <3f27e075-0eca-54e0-d026-7e3505b9b713@suse.com> Message-ID: <12de7278bb3644a783a6ed5e878fd87d@docomolab-euro.com> Hi Andreas, Looks good to me. Thanks for that solution proposal. Gerald =============================================== Dr. Gerald Kunzmann, Manager DOCOMO Communications Laboratories Europe GmbH Landsberger Strasse 312, 80687 Munich Tel: +49-89-56824-239 / Fax: +49-89-56824-300 Web: http://www.docomoeurolabs.de Managing Directors (Geschaeftsfuehrer): Takatoshi Okagawa, Hidetada Hayashi, Dr. Thomas Walter, Hiroyuki Oto, Kei Tonokura Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 132976 -----Original Message----- From: Andreas Jaeger Sent: Freitag, 31. August 2018 10:10 To: Shamail Tahir Cc: arkady_kanevsky at dell.com; user-committee at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [User-committee] [Product] retiring repo openstack-infra/featuretracker ? On 2018-08-31 09:47, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2018-08-30 20:11, Shamail Tahir wrote: >> >> >>> On Aug 30, 2018, at 2:37 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >>> >>>> On 2018-08-29 22:41, Rochelle Grober wrote: >>>> sounds good to me. The definitive voice for those repos, though, >>>> is Shamail. He's the arbiter of those. >>> >>> That whole topic let'S me wonder what todo with: >>> * IRC channel #openstack-product >>> * and repository openstack/development-proposals >>> >>> Can both be retired as well? #openstack-product is really empty... >>> >>> And you still get changes proposed, e.g. >>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/573756/ . >>> >>> I can help with proposing the retirement changes if you want, >> That would be most welcome. We tried to clean up upon wrapping up but >> would love the help (since we missed a few things). > > > https://review.openstack.org/598477 removes #openstack-product channel. > > I'm looking at options for the repository, will get back to that > later, For the repository, I pushed https://review.openstack.org/598484 . I suggest to merge that, have it publish to specs.openstack.org/openstack/development-proposals as reference for the future - and then retire the repository following the process. Change https://review.openstack.org/598487 updates the index page on specs.openstack.org to list the repository. Shamail, I can propose all the remaining changes, just need a couple of reviews and approvals from you if we do it this way. but first I want to know whether the plan above is fine. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 _______________________________________________ User-committee mailing list User-committee at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5508 bytes Desc: not available URL: