Open Stack

Based on this thread, I'd be happy to organise and chair an initial IRC
meeting to discuss the potential scope. Might need a steer from Edgar on
some of the finer points of the IRC meeting system !

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> Yes, the process has changed. The most important thing is that we want any
> new (and existing) WG to create some momentum without the proper official
> “approval” from the User Committee. Once you have some work done and some
> activities delivered we could process the approval from UC.
>
> So, far nothing will stop you to have IRC meetings, create your milestones
> and deliver some goals.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Edgar
>
>
>
> *From: *David F Flanders <flanders at openstack.org>
> *Date: *Monday, November 7, 2016 at 4:12 PM
> *To: *Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com>, "user-committee at lists.
> openstack.org" <user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
> *Cc: *Bruno Morel <bmorel at internap.com>, Matt Jarvis <
> matt.jarvis at datacentred.co.uk>, Sean Handley <sean.handley at datacentred.co.
> uk>, Jean-Daniel Bonnetot <jean-daniel.bonnetot at corp.ovh.com>, Stefano
> Maffulli <stefano.maffulli at dreamhost.com>
>
> *Subject: *Re: [User-committee] Public Cloud Working Group
>
>
>
> +1 for this WG having significantly different scope and membership.
>
> I would also suggest that this would be an excellent potential candidate
> WG for minting one or more activities at the newly minted forum in Boston.
>
> One slight suggestion: in writing up the scope (and anti-scope) of the WG,
> consideration should be made for how the group will work with other related
> WGs (and potentially co-located in meeting times).
>
> For example:
>
> a.)  how the public clouds could be providing guidance for the use of
> Shade SDK for AppDev a la AppEco-WG, and
>
> b.) how the public clouds can continue to support the CloudAppHack-WG in
> providing cloud accounts for hackathon participants <- pretty plz 🙇
>
> Below is the template for submitting as WG:
>
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Procedure_for_Creating_a_New_Working_Group
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.openstack.org_wiki_Procedure-5Ffor-5FCreating-5Fa-5FNew-5FWorking-5FGroup&d=DgMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=S4ZW64zm80d8D0ByPliERwMLONl-aC5XQUhAmMh-koc&s=ZkBb41COfOkygMcVOfa-qHO1QQKeOhasqlWmpoyHp2A&e=>
>
> ^^@Edgar is this the latest version, re having 2x chairs and suggested
> times for timezone straddling betwen EU/USA/APAC?
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Flandersd
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Matt Jarvis <matt.jarvis at datacentred.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
>
> On 2 November 2016 at 23:18, Bruno Morel <bmorel at internap.com> wrote:
>
> So when ca we submit this to the User Committee ?... I think with have the
> critical mass :)
>
>
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
> *From: *Tobias Rydberg <tobias at citynetwork.se>
> *Date: *Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 5:55 PM
> *To: *"user-committee at lists.openstack.org" <user-committee at lists.
> openstack.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [User-committee] Public Cloud Working Group
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I think this is a great suggestion from Sean, and I agree with the words
> from Curtis as well.
>
> I work at a public cloud company and during our years with OpenStack we
> have seen a lot of things not suited for a public cloud. As Sean mentions,
> public cloud providers do their own fixes to get around this, and it would
> be much better with a joined force contributing this back to the community
> in a structured way.
>
> Regards,
> Tobias
>
> Den 2016-10-31 kl. 16:49, skrev Curtis:
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Sean Handley
>
> <sean.handley at datacentred.co.uk> <sean.handley at datacentred.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I’d like to propose a working group for public cloud operators to help
>
> deliver features across projects that support the needs of OpenStack public
>
> cloud operators:
>
>
>
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PublicCloudWorkingGroup <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.openstack.org_wiki_PublicCloudWorkingGroup&d=DgMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=S4ZW64zm80d8D0ByPliERwMLONl-aC5XQUhAmMh-koc&s=XdH5aU93mrRHkl1qUduwnQDyl1hxHr3nOoo-vkH1QfE&e=>
>
> I no longer work at a public cloud, but if I was I would think this
>
> group to be very important.
>
>
>
> I think there is a class of what I would call regional public clouds,
>
> all around the world the world, and I think these are important
>
> organizations worth supporting as much as possible. Speaking as
>
> someone who used to work at one, it is invaluable to have peers to
>
> discuss similar issues with. I would be very surprised if any of these
>
> regional clouds feel as through they are fully staffed, and in fact
>
> are often quite small. The ability to band together to solve common
>
> problems and implement common solutions is extremely powerful, and I
>
> think exactly what a working group would do.
>
>
>
> Further, I do believe there is enough difference in the requirements
>
> of a public cloud versus a private one to ensure that this working
>
> group will have sufficient work. Private clouds can often (not always,
>
> but often) solve problems by telling their users not to do something,
>
> "it's against company policy", or even not supporting the feature,
>
> whereas that is harder in a public cloud. Even the simple difference
>
> of the fact that their APIs are available on the Internet is a
>
> considerable change from a typical, IMHO, private cloud. Those are
>
> just a couple examples. Certainly some would disagree with me, but I
>
> feel there is fairly substantial difference between running a private
>
> cloud and a public one.
>
>
>
> My $0.02,
>
> Curtis.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sean Handley.
>
>
>
> DataCentred Limited registered in England and Wales no. 05611763
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> User-committee mailing list
>
> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_user-2Dcommittee&d=DgMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=S4ZW64zm80d8D0ByPliERwMLONl-aC5XQUhAmMh-koc&s=DZzj2aVh57qm2xEDAkuvPJ2SglhjIMrHgY5OuzeSvTE&e=>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
> *Tobias Rydberg*
> Senior Developer
>
> Mobile: +46 733 312780
> Support: +46 8 4000 9000
>
> tobias.rydberg at citynetwork.se
> www.citynetwork.se
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.citynetwork.se&d=DgMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=S4ZW64zm80d8D0ByPliERwMLONl-aC5XQUhAmMh-koc&s=pPRW_gWFtw-4BvPiUL_IP4gpkeZ8-MwfK2WOUstmQGc&e=>
>
> City Network Hosting AB
> Borgmästaregatan 18
> SE-371 34 Karlskrona
> Sweden
>
>
> Innovation through open IT Infrastructure
>
> * ISO 9001, 14001, 27001, 27015 & 27018 Certified *
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-committee mailing list
> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_user-2Dcommittee&d=DgMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=S4ZW64zm80d8D0ByPliERwMLONl-aC5XQUhAmMh-koc&s=DZzj2aVh57qm2xEDAkuvPJ2SglhjIMrHgY5OuzeSvTE&e=>
>
>
>
>
> DataCentred Limited registered in England and Wales no. 05611763
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-committee mailing list
> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_user-2Dcommittee&d=DgMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=S4ZW64zm80d8D0ByPliERwMLONl-aC5XQUhAmMh-koc&s=DZzj2aVh57qm2xEDAkuvPJ2SglhjIMrHgY5OuzeSvTE&e=>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Flanders | OpenStack Foundation | Community Manager (Cloud Application
> Communities)
> http://superuser.openstack.org/articles/meet-openstack-s-
> community-wrangler-david-flanders
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__superuser.openstack.org_articles_meet-2Dopenstack-2Ds-2Dcommunity-2Dwrangler-2Ddavid-2Dflanders&d=DgMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=S4ZW64zm80d8D0ByPliERwMLONl-aC5XQUhAmMh-koc&s=TONSxMBqm8ir12l_GMfxM6yyBZa_-A92Odd8YbmNjOg&e=>
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-committee mailing list
> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20161108/47647992/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5116 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20161108/47647992/attachment-0001.png>