Open Stack

Hi Chris,

I did not attend the meeting in Barcelona, but the name change and shift to a functional team makes sense to me. One potential small tweak to the wording could be App Dev Enablement?

Referencing your agenda from the Barcelona meeting, I’m excited about the efforts to improve developer.openstack.org and openstack.org/appdev. In terms of collaborating with other working groups, I’m anxious to hear how the enterprise WG book sprint about migrating / running apps on OpenStack went last week. Seems like a place your team might want to be involved, or at least consider how we leverage and promote the content.

I also saw notes about mapping the mix of events. I would love to get some feedback about our efforts to attract more app developers to Barcelona and the right strategy for the future, i.e. do we think we’ll ever attract a critical mass of app developers to an OpenStack Summit, or should we be focusing our efforts to educate and build this community outside of the Summits?

Thanks,
Lauren


> On Nov 1, 2016, at 11:11 AM, Bonell Manjarrez, Marcela <marcela.bonell.manjarrez at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> - App Developer Enabling +1
> 
> - Become a "functional team” +1
> 
> Marcela Bonell
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 11/1/16, 5:26 AM, "Christopher Aedo" <doc at aedo.net> wrote:
> 
>> During one of our work sessions in Barcelona (etherpad here[1]) we
>> discussed the name of our working group and agreed it was overly broad
>> and could use reconsideration.  Those in attendance agreed that our
>> purpose, scope and deliverables[2] made sense given goals planned for
>> the next cycle[3].
>> 
>> As far as names go, we briefly discussed the following before agreeing
>> to continue the conversation on the mailing list after the summit:
>> -App Developer Support
>> -App Developer Enabling
>> 
>> Any feedback on these?  Any others to think about?
>> 
>> I think it's also worth discussing whether or not we continue as a
>> working group or transition to a functional team.  Nobody currently
>> involved with the App Eco WG was there at it's creation.  Since then
>> we've broadened our scope to cover more than just creation of the
>> first-openstack-app guide and chasing improvements in external SDKs.
>> Given the definitions in the UC charter[4] I think we should be
>> operating as a "functional team" rather than a working group.  What do
>> you think?
>> 
>> -Christopher
>> 
>> [1]: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/AppEco_WG_BCN
>> [2]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Application_Ecosystem_Working_Group
>> [3]: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/app-eco-objectives
>> [4]: http://governance.openstack.org/uc/reference/charter.html
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> User-committee mailing list
>> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
> _______________________________________________
> User-committee mailing list
> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee