- App Developer Enabling +1 - Become a "functional team” +1 Marcela Bonell On 11/1/16, 5:26 AM, "Christopher Aedo" <doc at aedo.net> wrote: >During one of our work sessions in Barcelona (etherpad here[1]) we >discussed the name of our working group and agreed it was overly broad >and could use reconsideration. Those in attendance agreed that our >purpose, scope and deliverables[2] made sense given goals planned for >the next cycle[3]. > >As far as names go, we briefly discussed the following before agreeing >to continue the conversation on the mailing list after the summit: >-App Developer Support >-App Developer Enabling > >Any feedback on these? Any others to think about? > >I think it's also worth discussing whether or not we continue as a >working group or transition to a functional team. Nobody currently >involved with the App Eco WG was there at it's creation. Since then >we've broadened our scope to cover more than just creation of the >first-openstack-app guide and chasing improvements in external SDKs. >Given the definitions in the UC charter[4] I think we should be >operating as a "functional team" rather than a working group. What do >you think? > >-Christopher > >[1]: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/AppEco_WG_BCN >[2]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Application_Ecosystem_Working_Group >[3]: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/app-eco-objectives >[4]: http://governance.openstack.org/uc/reference/charter.html > >_______________________________________________ >User-committee mailing list >User-committee at lists.openstack.org >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee