[User-committee] Barcelona Tracks

Kruithof Jr, Pieter pieter.kruithof.jr at intel.com
Mon May 30 14:36:33 UTC 2016


One other quick thing.

I tend to push back a bit because moving OpenStack towards a more user-focused culture is important to me.  However, please don’t think I’m angry or trying to pick a fight!!!

Piet


From: Pieter Kruithof <pieter.kruithof.jr at intel.com<mailto:pieter.kruithof.jr at intel.com>>
Date: Monday, May 30, 2016 at 8:27 AM
To: Lauren Sell <lauren at openstack.org<mailto:lauren at openstack.org>>
Cc: Ju Lim <julim at redhat.com<mailto:julim at redhat.com>>, "user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>" <user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>>, David F Flanders <flanders at openstack.org<mailto:flanders at openstack.org>>, "openstack-tc-request at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-tc-request at lists.openstack.org>" <openstack-tc-request at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-tc-request at lists.openstack.org>>, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com<mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>>
Subject: Re: [User-committee] Barcelona Tracks

I would be a bit careful because Leong’s point was that user expereince spans the other tracks, but I could make the same argument for strategy and business.  Also, I think it makes sense to be explicit about user experience within largely engineering-centric cultures.

My hope was to begin to push the community towards really focusing on users and it seemed as though adding a track that would cause the project teams to really think deeply about how their features impact users.

However, the individual track isn’t a huge priority for me, but something worth considering.

My two cents.

Cheers,

Piet











From: Lauren Sell <lauren at openstack.org<mailto:lauren at openstack.org>>
Date: Monday, May 30, 2016 at 7:51 AM
To: Pieter Kruithof <pieter.kruithof.jr at intel.com<mailto:pieter.kruithof.jr at intel.com>>
Cc: "Sun, Yih Leong" <yih.leong.sun at intel.com<mailto:yih.leong.sun at intel.com>>, "user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>" <user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>>, "openstack-tc-request at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-tc-request at lists.openstack.org>" <openstack-tc-request at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-tc-request at lists.openstack.org>>, Heidi Joy Tretheway <heidijoy at openstack.org<mailto:heidijoy at openstack.org>>, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com<mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>>, David F Flanders <flanders at openstack.org<mailto:flanders at openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [User-committee] Barcelona Tracks

Hi Piet, Leong,

The Foundation staff organizes the conference tracks with input from the track chairs. We look at how many sessions were submitted across tracks at the previous summit, which were the most popular, etc., as well as new areas we want to bring focus, such as cloud app development or organizational culture.

For the Barcelona Summit, we’re planning to divide the conference tracks among three different categories: Business & Strategy, Architecture & Operations, and Developers. We will also continue to run OpenStack Academy, which is now home to all of the hands-on workshops, day-long training sessions and Certified OpenStack Administrator exams.

I agree with Leong that User Experience might not make sense as a track on its own, but UX is an official “tag,” which is apparent to attendees. I would make sure you select the tag for the sessions you’re describing so we get a sense for how many presentations are UX related and have a way to filter / promote them in the schedule (as well as the post Summit videos).

Thanks,
Lauren


On May 27, 2016, at 2:48 PM, Kruithof Jr, Pieter <pieter.kruithof.jr at intel.com<mailto:pieter.kruithof.jr at intel.com>> wrote:

Hi Leong,

You could make a similar argument for some of the other tracks.

My experience with engineering-driven communities is that work on improving user experience tend to be pushed aside for highly technical presentations.  Also, adding User Experience as a track communicates that users are important.

Piet






From: "Sun, Yih Leong" <yih.leong.sun at intel.com<mailto:yih.leong.sun at intel.com>>
Date: Friday, May 27, 2016 at 12:51 PM
To: Pieter Kruithof <pieter.kruithof.jr at intel.com<mailto:pieter.kruithof.jr at intel.com>>, "user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>" <user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>>, "openstack-tc-request at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-tc-request at lists.openstack.org>" <openstack-tc-request at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-tc-request at lists.openstack.org>>, Heidi Joy Tretheway <heidijoy at openstack.org<mailto:heidijoy at openstack.org>>, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com<mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>>, David F Flanders <flanders at openstack.org<mailto:flanders at openstack.org>>
Subject: RE: Barcelona Tracks

This is just my personal opinion and I have no strong oppose on it.
In my opinion, “user experience” is not a track itself but potentially cover many aspect in OpenStack, which will fall under different tracks depending on the “context”.

If the talk is related to user experience from App Developer perspective, that might fit under “Cloud App Development”.
For example, the Marcela’s cloud benchmarking was presented in this track at Austin.
If the talk is from Operator perspective, maybe “Operations” will be a good one.
If the talk is about new tools for user experience, that would probably fit under “Related OSS Projects” or “Products & Services” track.

My 2 cents.. :-)


From: Kruithof Jr, Pieter [mailto:pieter.kruithof.jr at intel.com]
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 10:46 AM
To: user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>; openstack-tc-request at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-tc-request at lists.openstack.org>; Heidi Joy Tretheway <heidijoy at openstack.org<mailto:heidijoy at openstack.org>>; Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com<mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>>; David F Flanders <flanders at openstack.org<mailto:flanders at openstack.org>>
Subject: [User-committee] Barcelona Tracks

Hi Folks,

I was hoping you could help me understand how the presentation tracks are identified for each summit.

https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/categories/track-list

I’m sure you know where I’m going with this…would like to propose that we include a “user experience” track or something more catchy like “Focus on customers" or “What have you done for me lately.”

The goal is to help generate a deeper discussion on how we serve our customers within the community.  Note that this isn’t intended to be a way to add more sessions from the OpenStack UX project.  In fact, I’m far more interested in hearing how the other projects are focusing on their customers.

For example, the Horizon project has done an interesting concepts that integrates searchlight more deeply into the user portal.  In addition, the Docs team will be looking at how information architecture can be changed to better inform our users.  Also, OpenStackClient has also done a few usability studies with both operators and end users that would be interesting for the community.

Lemme know what you think..

Piet

--
Piet Kruithof
Sr User Experience Architect, Intel OTC
PTL, OpenStack UX Project

Mobile: 512 576-2844
IRC: piet
_______________________________________________
User-committee mailing list
User-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20160530/5d308fbc/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the User-committee mailing list