[User-committee] Seeking feedback: Active User Contributor (AUC) eligibility requirements

Shamail Tahir itzshamail at gmail.com
Thu Jun 30 19:20:51 UTC 2016


On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Jonathan D. Proulx <jon at csail.mit.edu>
wrote:

>
> I'm surprised this hasn't generated more feed back, though I'd
> generally take that as positive.
>
> List seems good to me.
>
> The self nomintaion + confirm by UC is a good catch all especially in
> the beginning where we're unlikely to have though of everything.  We
> can always expand criterial later if the 'misc' of UC confirmantion
> gets too big and we idnetify patterns.
>
+1

That is the intention.. it will help us make sure that we didn't miss
anything and if we get a lot of requests for a certain activity then we can
expand the role definitions to include it.


>
> Thanks all!
> -Jon
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:52:00PM -0400, Shamail Tahir wrote:
> :Hi everyone,
> :
> :The AUC Recognition WG has been hard at work on milestone-4 of our plan
> :which is to identify the eligibility criteria for each community
> :contributor role that is covered by AUC.  We had a great mix of community
> :people involved in defining these thresholds but we wanted to also open
> :this up for broader community feedback before we propose them to the user
> :committee.  AUC is a new concept and we hope to make iterative
> improvements
> :going forward... you can consider the guidelines below as "version 1" and
> I
> :am certain they will evolve as lessons are learned.  Thank you in advance
> :for your feedback!
> :
> :·      Official User Group organizers
> :
> :o   Listed as an organizer or coordinator for an official OpenStack user
> :group
> :
> :·      Active members of official UC Working Groups
> :
> :o   Attend 25% of the IRC meetings and have spoken more than 25 times OR
> :have spoken more than 100 times regardless of attendance count over the
> :last six months
> :
> :o   WG that do not use IRC for their meetings will depend on the meeting
> :chair(s) to identify active participation from attendees
> :
> :·      Ops meetup moderators
> :
> :o   Moderate a session at the operators meetup over the last six
> :months AND/OR
> :
> :o   Host the operators meetup (limit 2 people from the hosting
> :organization) over the last six months
> :
> :·      Contributions to any repository under UC governance (ops
> :repositories, user stories repository, etc.)
> :
> :o   Submitted two or more patches to a UC governed repository over the
> last
> :six months
> :
> :·      Track chairs for OpenStack Summits
> :
> :o   Identified track chair for the upcoming OpenStack Summit (based on
> when
> :data is gathered) [this is a forward-facing metric]
> :
> :·      Contributors to Superuser (articles, interviews, user stories,
> etc.)
> :
> :o   Listed as author in at least one publication at
> superuser.openstack.org
> :over the last six months
> :
> :·      Submission for eligibility to AUC review panel
> :
> :o   No formal criteria, anyone can self-nominate, and nominations will be
> :reviewed per guidance established in milestone-5
> :
> :·      Active moderators on ask.openstack
> :
> :o   Listed as moderator on Ask OpenStack and have over 500 karma
> :
> :There is additional information available in the etherpad[1] the AUC
> :recognition WG has been using for this task which includes Q&A (question
> :and answers) between team members.
> :
> :[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/uc-recog-metrics
> :
> :--
> :Thanks,
> :Shamail Tahir
> :t: @ShamailXD
> :tz: Eastern Time
>
> :_______________________________________________
> :User-committee mailing list
> :User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> :http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>
>
> --
>



-- 
Thanks,
Shamail Tahir
t: @ShamailXD
tz: Eastern Time
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20160630/f2e8bdd2/attachment.html>


More information about the User-committee mailing list