Open Stack

Aaaaggghhhh!  The logging what is still around, but moribund. BUT, there are new members that I am hoping/ expecting to drive some progress. If nothing else, we monitor and report back progress, along with ensuring that any work in the area takes operator needs into account and that across projects, consistency is considered.

I was thinking we could use one working session to get everyone synced on focus and dev work for Ocata

Sorry I'm so late with this. My paying job is sucking lots of time.

Oh, and we will likely have some chair changes determined during the summit.

--Rocky


Sent from HUAWEI AnyOffice
From: Edgar Magana
To: Matt Van Winkle; user-committee at lists.openstack.org;
Subject: Re: [User-committee] ACTION Needed - All WGs Chairs
Time: 2016-08-05 08:13:27


Hi,

Yes, it is completed. Take a look to:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/UserCommittee

We have included a table with contact information of the co-chairs.

Edgar

From: Matt Van Winkle <mvanwink at rackspace.com>
Date: Friday, August 5, 2016 at 7:59 AM
To: Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com>, "user-committee at lists.openstack.org" <user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [User-committee] ACTION Needed - All WGs Chairs

Hello, UC!

Has the list been updated/finalized of the still active Working Groups and Teams?  I need to reach out to all those looking after them as part of an action item I have form the Ops planning session.  I’ve been holding off to wait for this audit to finish.  Let me know.

Thanks!
VW

From: Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com<mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>>
Date: Monday, July 11, 2016 at 10:34 AM
To: Matt Van Winkle <mvanwink at rackspace.com<mailto:mvanwink at rackspace.com>>, "user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>" <user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>>, "openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>" <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [User-committee] ACTION Needed - All WGs Chairs

Roger That Matt VW!

I will update our charter document. I may contact you directly to gather more information if needed.

Thanks,

Edgar

From: Matt Van Winkle <mvanwink at rackspace.com<mailto:mvanwink at rackspace.com>>
Date: Saturday, July 9, 2016 at 8:47 PM
To: Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com<mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>>, "user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>" <user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>>, "openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>" <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [User-committee] ACTION Needed - All WGs Chairs

Hello Edgar,
The Large Deployment Team is still very active.  We have been meeting monthly since Paris.  Or current areas of focus are:

1.  Continuing to work with Neutron devs on features to allow a network to be broken up/segmented for IP assignment
2.  Determine any areas where we can help the Nova team on cells V2
3.  Currently engaging with the Glance developers on a few issues that large deployers face

We are continuing to refine the method for driving work out of the mid-cycles and summits.  In Barcelona, we are looking to organize our time with a planning session early on – where as a team, we’ll decide which Developer and Ops sessions we really want LDT folks in.  Then, much later in the week, we hope to take the output of those to drive any other items that need to go on the list above.

I’ll be out of pocket for a few days, but let us know if you have any other questions about the team.  Other members can chime in as they are active on the Mls.

Thanks!
VW

From: Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com<mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>>
Date: Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 9:13 PM
To: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>" <user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>>, "openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>" <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: [User-committee] ACTION Needed - All WGs Chairs

Dear Working Groups Chairs,

As you know WGs present an opportunity to consolidate and increase the Community around OpenStack from the User and Operator perspective. One of the goals of the User Committee is to help WGs to have the resources needed to achieve their specific goals and exactly as the TC validates and accepts development projects the UC needs to validate and accept WGs before they be granted with resources and support from UC and the OpenStack Foundation. (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Procedure_for_Creating_a_New_Working_Group)<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.openstack.org_wiki_Procedure-5Ffor-5FCreating-5Fa-5FNew-5FWorking-5FGroup-29&d=CwMGaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=wlwoYW1atSazljcbOFRbJQtJ988OqZtA0Pl1J7nh-c8&s=E0j-GMXWzDMrLCKx5KRpiZKKVq7CQV_ck8yDVThCFZA&e=>

In order to validate the current work and progress of the existing WGs under: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/UserCommittee#Working_Groups<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.openstack.org_wiki_Governance_Foundation_UserCommittee-23Working-5FGroups&d=CwMGaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=wlwoYW1atSazljcbOFRbJQtJ988OqZtA0Pl1J7nh-c8&s=Twmjo9ggFkjIydk2YiL9PuZqDzNT_NI3HC1wqMX9JjQ&e=>
The UC would like to have all chairs to reply to this thread with the status of the WG and their plans for the Barcelona summit. This is also an opportunity to have a space allocated to get together and discuss about work and activities. This is only for existing WGs not for new ones. If we do not hear from WG Chairs, we will assume that those WGs are no longer active and therefore they will be removed from UC documentation.

Please, reach out to us with a short report of the activities (wikis, etherpads, repos, etc).

Thanks,

Edgar, Shilla and Jon
UC Members.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20160805/fc6a85f6/attachment.html>