[User-committee] OpenStack End User Working Group

Scheessele, Evan (Corvallis) evan.scheessele at hp.com
Fri Sep 5 20:48:55 UTC 2014


I vote for #1: "Apps on OpenStack Working Group"

Simplest tone. And besides, my wife in a biologist and she consistently reminds me that tech folks are being silly trying to adopt the word 'ecosystem' for our work. Something about missing the great depth and interdependent beauty of true natural ecosystems. One can aspire of course.., but I digress.
Evan Scheessele


From: Everett Toews [mailto:everett.toews at RACKSPACE.COM]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 8:37 AM
To: Tom Fifield
Cc: user-committee at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [User-committee] OpenStack End User Working Group

On Aug 24, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org<mailto:tom at openstack.org>> wrote:


Though, as you've highlighted above, there are several definitions for
'end user', so perhaps this working group should be called something
more in-line with the definition above... anyone want to take a stab? :)

At the end of the day we're talking about applications on OpenStack, whether people are developing, deploying, operating, maintaining, packaging, integrating, or whatever you want to call it.

Throwing out a few ideas for discussion.

1. Apps on OpenStack Working Group
2. User Apps on OpenStack Working Group
3. Apps Targeting OpenStack Working Group
4. Application Ecosystem Working Group

I'm partial to 4 because the connotations of an ecosystem promote broader thinking about the applications built for OpenStack clouds.

Thoughts?

Everett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20140905/a8f42cab/attachment.html>


More information about the User-committee mailing list