[User-committee] A bit more publicity for the points to review

Ryan Lane rlane at wikimedia.org
Tue Jan 8 23:19:44 UTC 2013


Also good with me.


On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:27 PM, JC Martin <jcmartin at ebaysf.com> wrote:

>  Good with me.
>
>  Tim, let us know if you need any help.
>
>  JC
>
>   From: Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch>
> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 18:07:48 +0000
> To: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org" <
> user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: [User-committee] A bit more publicity for the points to review
>
>   ** **
>
> Since things seemed to have quietened down on the editing of the points to
> review doc, I will send a mail to the openstack operations and general list
> also to see if there are further comments. It may be that there are those
> who would have input which are not following the foundation list.****
>
> ** **
>
> Once that is done, we’ll need to start a new round to include the various
> comments.****
>
> ** **
>
> Any objections ? If not, I’ll mail tomorrow.****
>
> ** **
>
> Tim****
>
> ** **
>   _______________________________________________ User-committee mailing
> list User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-committee mailing list
> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20130108/2c004024/attachment.html>


More information about the User-committee mailing list