Open Stack

Ah, yes, we do. I've added that into the next-steps slide.


On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:34 PM, JC Martin <jcmartin at ebaysf.com> wrote:

>  Ryan, Tim,
>
>  This looks great.
> Do we want to mention anything short term that will be done during the
> next Summit, for example :
>  - Report on initial user poll
>  - Present the user committee structure and plan
>
>  Thanks,
>
>  JC
>
>   From: Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch>
> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:10:14 +0000
> To: Ryan Lane <rlane at wikimedia.org>
> Cc: JC Martin <jcmartin at eBaysf.com>, "user-committee at lists.openstack.org"
> <user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>
> Subject: RE: [User-committee] Board meeting 12th February
>
>   ** **
>
> Ryan,****
>
> ** **
>
> One extra thing, I think a slide with the initial scope would be useful to
> show the board. Currently, the points to review document has the following:
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> define the long term bylaws for the user committee****
>
> define the categories of different users that the user committee will
> represent****
>
> consolidate user needs and present them to the technical committee and
> management board with proposed action plans****
>
> keep track of users and their usage of OpenStack for the purpose of
> providing aggregate statistics to the foundation while maintaining
> confidentiality/anonymity as required****
>
> work with the OpenStack community managers to further expand the worldwide
> user group structures and keep them vibrant and informed****
>
> ** **
>
> Tim****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Tim Bell
> *Sent:* 10 February 2013 11:07
> *To:* 'Ryan Lane'
> *Cc:* JC Martin; user-committee at lists.openstack.org
> *Subject:* RE: [User-committee] Board meeting 12th February****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Do we need to be more explicit on where we could do with some help ?****
>
> ** **
>
> -          For the bylaws, I think we’re going to need some foundation
> help to get from the current ideas to something formal****
>
> -          Supporting the CRM configuration for our needs****
>
> ** **
>
> With only 15 minutes, it is tough to highlight the areas of debate such as
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> -          What is a user (from end user with the tools/CLI through
> ecosystem partner through to private cloud ‘runner’) ****
>
> -          What is a manageable size of committee ?****
>
> ** **
>
> Tim****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Ryan Lane [mailto:rlane at wikimedia.org <rlane at wikimedia.org>]
> *Sent:* 09 February 2013 23:49
> *To:* Tim Bell
> *Cc:* JC Martin; user-committee at lists.openstack.org
> *Subject:* Re: [User-committee] Board meeting 12th February****
>
> ** **
>
> I've created a presentation in google drive and shared it with both of you.
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:****
>
>   ****
>
> Thanks, that would be great to get a start and then we review together… **
> **
>
>  ****
>
> Tim****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* JC Martin [mailto:jcmartin at ebaysf.com]
> *Sent:* 05 February 2013 18:18
> *To:* Ryan Lane; Tim Bell
> *Cc:* user-committee at lists.openstack.org****
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [User-committee] Board meeting 12th February****
>
>  ****
>
> Ryan,****
>
>  ****
>
> Since the 12th is approaching, do you want to give a shot at the preso and
> we can help/review ?****
>
>  ****
>
> Thanks,****
>
>  ****
>
> JC****
>
>  ****
>
> *From: *Ryan Lane <rlane at wikimedia.org>
> *Date: *Sat, 2 Feb 2013 04:42:37 -0800
> *To: *Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch>
> *Cc: *"user-committee at lists.openstack.org" <
> user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [User-committee] Board meeting 12th February****
>
>  ****
>
> Sounds good.****
>
>  ****
>
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:****
>
>   ****
>
> Ryan/JC,****
>
>  ****
>
> Jonathan has given his OK for one of you to present in person at the next
> board meeting on 12th February.****
>
>  ****
>
> My default would be to propose Ryan since he’s in SF .. would this be OK ?
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> We need to work together to define the****
>
>  ****
>
> -          Current status****
>
> -          Strategic priorities for 2013****
>
> -          Next steps****
>
>  ****
>
> Tim****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* Tim Bell
> *Sent:* 01 February 2013 10:56
> *To:* 'JC Martin'; user-committee at lists.openstack.org
> *Subject:* RE: [User-committee] Board meeting 31st January****
>
>  ****
>
> Ryan/JC,****
>
>  ****
>
> Thanks for the replies.****
>
>  ****
>
> I’m checking back with the board to see if attendence for the user related
> part of the session is OK.****
>
>  ****
>
> Tim****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* JC Martin [mailto:jcmartin at ebaysf.com <jcmartin at ebaysf.com>]
> *Sent:* 01 February 2013 02:52
> *To:* Tim Bell; user-committee at lists.openstack.org
> *Subject:* Re: [User-committee] Board meeting 31st January****
>
>  ****
>
> I am not too far from SF, and could make it there in person of it's better.
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> JC****
>
>  ****
>
> *From: *Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch>
> *Date: *Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:37:37 +0000
> *To: *"user-committee at lists.openstack.org" <
> user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
> *Subject: *[User-committee] Board meeting 31st January****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> Ryan/JC,****
>
>  ****
>
> Although there was a scheduled agenda item on the foundation board for an
> update on the user committee, other items had overrun and the item was
> postponed to the February 12th meeting in San Francisco (Rackspace
> offices).****
>
>  ****
>
> Are either of you in San Francisco on the 12th ? I will be connected
> remotely but if the board would like a status update, I could see if
> physical presence would be preferred by one of the committee.****
>
>  ****
>
> Tim****
>
>  ****
>
> _______________________________________________ User-committee mailing
> list User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee ****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-committee mailing list
> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee****
>
>   ****
>
> _______________________________________________ User-committee mailing
> list User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee ****
>
>  ** **
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20130211/6f30a716/attachment-0001.html>